Zzyzx11

''Welcome to my talk page. Please sign and date your entries by inserting --~~~~ at the end.
[{{localurl::|action=edit§ion=new}} Start a new talk topic.]''

== Templates. == Zzyzx11, Your recent edits to Template:Cities of Orange County, California and Template:Cities of San Diego County, California were excellent. However, they are incompatable with Internet Explorer. I'm assuming you are a Firefox user as I am? Unfortunatly, one of the drawbacks of editing on Wikipedia with Firefox is that you usually have to check if it displays correctly in IE, which, quite often, messes everything up completely. Also, in regards to your edit to Template:Infobox Community, I do not like the way the new version looks as much, although I do feel that standardization is important and do I agree with your edit. Thus, I proposed a new version for Template:Infobox City at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Cities. Comments? Sincerely, Short_Verses">User:Short Verses User talk:Short Verses 22:12, Jun 16, 2005 (UTC) *Everything seems to be in order, except there is a now a white background behind content text in Template:Cities of Orange County, California. I'll give fixing that a try, I don't know how good I am at Wiki markup, though. Thanks for your help. Regards, Short_Verses">User:Short Verses User talk:Short Verses 22:52, Jun 16, 2005 (UTC) *Okay, one last question. Should we place the county seats into the population classes as well? Sincerely, Short_Verses">User:Short Verses User talk:Short Verses 23:25, Jun 16, 2005 (UTC) *I'll leave the templates alone. For now, I'll work on replacing all of my :Image:MissionViejoCALM.GIF. Sincerely, Short_Verses">User:Short Verses User talk:Short Verses 04:37, Jun 17, 2005 (UTC) == Barnstar == [[Image:Barnstar.png|frame|left|For your significant contributions to articles on places in California. Awarded by User:Willmcw on 06:00, Jun 17, 2005 (UTC).]]
== Is This an Article That Should be Deleted? == U.S. presidential election, 2002 (fictional). I just don't see the point of putting fictional plots from TV show and movies. Do you know how many fictional elections there have been over the last 70 years in movies and TV? In fact I am having a hard time wrapping my support around much of anything [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Special:Contributions&target=203.9.200.3 203.9.200.3] has contributed. But, maybe it is something I just don't see. Advice? User:WikiDon 07:49, 17 Jun 2005 (UTC) == My RFA: Thanks == Hi Zzyzx11! Thanks for your support on my adminship nomination! User:Sjakkalle User talk:Sjakkalle 13:12, 17 Jun 2005 (UTC) == My Rfa == Thank you for supporting me! --User:Kbdank71 13:21, 17 Jun 2005 (UTC) ==Hi there== When you revert a change because it should be discussed first, like you did with Snowspinner's edits to Wikipedia:Deletion process, please start the relevant discussion on the talk page. I went to weigh in, and there wasn't any mention of Snowspinner's edit on the talk page at all. In a case like that there's a danger of a constructive edit being forgotten. Actually there's no reason to revert unless you personally disagree with an edit. If you believe there should be discussion, start it, but I don't think it's necessary to revert changes until there are objections to them beyond the procedural. Thanks, User:Isomorphic 05:32, 18 Jun 2005 (UTC) *Hmm... I thought I started a discussion on that page already... must have been a bad connection or database error. User:Zzyzx11 User talk:Zzyzx11 05:38, 18 Jun 2005 (UTC) **Yeah, that happens. No worries. I started one, so feel free to chime in there if you have an opinion. User:Isomorphic 05:41, 18 Jun 2005 (UTC) == Jack W. Smith == How is this Wikipedia:Votes for deletion/Jack W. Smith a no consensus? 4 deletes against one keep (not even counting the nominator) seems like pretty good consensus to delete. Grue ">User:Grue 20:03, 18 Jun 2005 (UTC) *Oops, I miscounted. There were 6 similar articles in a row like that, most of them with no consensus. Sorry about that. Thanks for catching my mistake. User:Zzyzx11 User talk:Zzyzx11 22:22, 18 Jun 2005 (UTC) == Thanks! == Thanks for supporting me on my RfA. It's always nice to get some positive feedback. I hope I can put my new abilities to some good use. -- User:Grm_wnr Esc">User_talk:Grm_wnr 17:39, 19 Jun 2005 (UTC) ==Wikipedia:Votes for deletion/LaRouche-Riemann Method== Hi Zzyzx, you wrote that the consensus was to keep (or rather, there was no consensus), and I'm wondering whether this is correct. There were 27 votes. Of these, 15 votes to delete entirely; seven to delete the article and merge contents with another LaRouche article; and five to keep (four to keep, plus one to rewrite). This gives you 22 votes to delete or to merge with another article out of 27 votes altogether. Isn't that a consensus not to keep it? User:SlimVirgin ^{User_talk:SlimVirgin} 02:44, Jun 20, 2005 (UTC) *Hmm. It looks like the sentence was cut off. It should have said: "No consensus to delete. The article should be merged." User:Zzyzx11 User talk:Zzyzx11 03:04, 20 Jun 2005 (UTC) :Okay, thanks. What is the cut-off point for a consensus? Sorry, I should know that, but don't. Also, regarding the procedure now - is it okay if I take the contents and place them in another LaRouche article? Then the text can be edited in there, as needed. User:SlimVirgin ^{User_talk:SlimVirgin} 03:07, Jun 20, 2005 (UTC) ::There were 15 votes out of 27 to delete, which is a majority, and only seven votes to merge. Of these seven, I'd say most wanted the article to be deleted, but anything salveable to be moved to one of the LaRouche pages. Perhaps the vote should be kept opened a little longer if you feel there's a lack of clarity? User:SlimVirgin ^{User_talk:SlimVirgin} 03:27, Jun 20, 2005 (UTC) :::Okay, I'll merge them into the other LaRouche articles, probably Political views of Lyndon LaRouche. I'll put them in their own section, and we can edit them from there to try to make them NPOV. I think the problem with the way that vote ended up being framed is that those voting to merge didn't realize they weren't voting to delete, if you see what I mean. It's a common problem with VfD. Twice as many wanted to delete than merge, and yet we're merging. User:SlimVirgin ^{User_talk:SlimVirgin} 04:06, Jun 20, 2005 (UTC) All I have to say is this -- Werid. Absolute, 100% WEIRD! -- User:Robeykr 15:14, 20 Jun 2005 (UTC) *Robeykr, all I have to say is that I hope your new signature doesn't get you confused by a user who also has a similar user name: User:Palpatine. But maybe not having a user page helps. User:Zzyzx11 User talk:Zzyzx11 16:09, 20 Jun 2005 (UTC) == RfA thanks == Thank you for your support for my adminship, and for your kind words. Cheers, -User:Willmcw 21:12, Jun 20, 2005 (UTC) == My RFA == Thank you for supporting my RFA. User:Guettarda 00:25, 21 Jun 2005 (UTC) == California county templates, revisited == That sounds like a good idea. Just mention the county seat twice, once in the county seat section and another in it's respective population class (which I see you've already done). Nice work on the new county templates you made. Sincerely, Short_Verses">User:Short Verses User talk:Short Verses 01:51, Jun 21, 2005 (UTC) == Time to unprotect User:Lulu_of_the_Lotus-Eaters == Our old Nehru-Stalin vandal seems to have gone quiet(er). So my user page is ready for unprotection, after your kindly protection a week or two back. User:Lulu of the Lotus-Eaters 16:25, 2005 Jun 21 (UTC)

See other meanings of words starting from letter:

Z

ZA | ZB | ZC | ZD | ZE | ZF | ZG | ZH | ZI | ZJ | ZK | ZL | ZM | ZN | ZO | ZP | ZR | ZS | ZT | ZU | ZW | ZX | ZY |

Words begining with Zzyzx11:

Zzyzx11
Zzyzx11
Zzyzx11/Archive1
Zzyzx11/Archive1
Zzyzx11/Archive2
Zzyzx11/Archive2
Zzyzx11/AT
Zzyzx11/monobook.css
Zzyzx11/myskin.css
Zzyzx11/RFA_nomination_records
Zzyzx11/RFA_nomination_records
Zzyzx11/Sandbox
Zzyzx11/Sandbox/A
Zzyzx11/Sandbox/N
Zzyzx11/TalkNav
Zzyzx11/Zzyzx11