In general, zoning is the division of an area into sub-areas, called zones. ==Land use== Zoning is a system of land use regulation which designates the permitted uses of land based on mapped zones, which separate one part of the community from another. Theoretically, its primary purpose is to segregate uses that are thought to be incompatible. In practice, zoning is used as a permitting system to prevent new development from harming existing residents or businesses. Zoning commonly includes regulation of the kinds of activities which will be acceptable on particular lots (such as open space, residential, agricultural, commerce or Industry), the densities at which those activities can be performed (low density housing such as single family homes to high density such as apartment buildings), the height of buildings, the amount of space structures may occupy by limiting how close a building may be from the edge of the lot, the proportions of the types of space on a lot (for example, how much landscaped space and how much pavement (roads) space), and how much parking lot must be provided. Most zoning systems have a procedure for granting Variance (land use)s - exceptions to the zoning rules, usually because of some perceived hardship due to the particular nature of the property in question. ==Origins and History of Zoning== New York City adopted the first zoning regulations to apply city-wide in 1916 as a reaction to construction of The Equitable Building (Manhattan) (which still stands at 120 Broadway). The building towered over the neighboring residences and cast long shadows that diminished the quality of life for the people in the affected area. These laws written by a commission headed by Edward Basset and signed by Mayor John Purroy Mitchel became the blueprint for the rest of the country (partly because Edward Basset headed the group of planning laws that wrote The Standard State Zoning Enabling Act, which was accepted almost without change by most states) and by the late 1920s most of the nation would have developed a set of zoning regulations that met the needs of the locality. New York went on to develop ever more complex set of zoning regulations, including floor area ratio regulations, air rights and others according to the density-specific needs of the neighborhoods. Among large cities in the United States, Houston, Texas is unique in having no zoning ordinance. Houston voters have rejected efforts to implement zoning in 1948, 1962 and 1993. ==Constitutional Challenges== There have been notable legal challenges to zoning regulations. In 1926 the Supreme Court upheld zoning as a right of U.S. states (typically via their cities and counties) to impose on landowners. The case was Village of ''Euclid, Ohio v. Ambler Realty Co.'' (often shortened to ''Euclid v. Ambler''), Court citation (1926). The village had zoned an area of land held by Ambler Realty as a residential neighborhood. Ambler argued that it would lose money because if the land could be leased to industrial users it would have netted a great deal more money than as a residential area. Euclid won, and a precedent was set favorable to local enforcement of zoning laws. The Euclid case was a facial challenge, meaning that the entire scheme of regulation was argued to be unconstitutional under any set of circumstances. The U.S Supreme Court justified the ordinance saying that a community may enact reasonable laws to keep the pig out of the parlor, even if pigs may not be prohibited from the entire community. Since the Euclid case, there have been no more facial challenges to the general scheme. Beginning in 1987, several U.S. Supreme Court cases ruled against land use regulations as being a regulatory requiring just compensation pursuant to the United States Constitution/Amendment Five. ''First English Evangelical Lutheran Church v. Los Angeles County'' ruled that even a temporary taking may require compensation. ''Nollan v. California Coastal Commission'' ruled that permit conditions that fail to substantially advance the agency's authorized purposes require compensation. ''Lucas v. South Carolina Coastal Council'' ruled that numerous environmental concerns were not sufficient to deny all development without compensation. ''Dolan v. City of Tigard'' ruled that conditions of a permit must be roughly proportional to the impacts of the the proposed new development. ''Palazzolo v. Rhode Island'' ruled property rights are not diminished by unconstitutional laws that exist without challenge at the time the complaining property owner acquired title. However, the landowner victories have been mostly limited to the U.S. Supreme Court despite that Court's purported overriding authority. Each decision in favor of the landowner is based on the facts of the particular case, so that regulatory takings rulings in favor of landowners are little more than a landowners' mirage. Even the trend of the U.S. Supreme Court may now have reversed with the 2004 ruling in the Tahoe case. Justice Sandra Day O'Connor, who had previously ruled with a 5-4 majority in favor of the landowner, switched sides to favor the government that had delayed development for more than 20 years because of the government's own indecision about alleged concerns to the water quality of Lake Tahoe. Specific zoning laws have been overturned in some other U.S. cases where the laws were not applied evenly (violating equal protection) or were considered to violate free speech. In the Atlanta suburb of Roswell, Georgia, an ordinance banning billboard (advertising)s was overturned in court on such grounds. It has been deemed that a municipality's sign ordinance must be content neutral with regard to the regulation of signage. The City of Roswell, Georgia has now institued a sign ordinance that regulates signage based strictly on dimensional and aesthetic codes, rather than an interpretation of a sign's content (i.e. use of colors, lettering, etc.). On other occasions, religious institutions sought to circumvent zoning laws, citing the Religious Freedom Restoration Act of 1993 (RFRA). The Supreme Court eventually overturned RFRA in just such a case, ''City of Boerne v. Flores'' Court citation (1997). However, Congress enacted the Religious Land Use and Institutionalized Persons Act (RLUIPA) in 2000 in an effort to correct the constitutionally objectionable problems of the RFRA. In the 2005 case of Cutter v. Wilkinson, the United States Supreme Court held RLUIPA to be constitutional. ==Some limitiations of zoning== Land use zoning is widely considered an important tool in the treatment of certain social ills, a part of the larger concept of social engineering (political science). Some jurisdictions attempting to growth management have turned to comprehensive planning to coordinate the growth of housing, industry, commercial with the impacts growth has on issues such as transport, utilities, recreation, schools, fire protection and police protection. Existing development in a community is generally not affected by the new zoning laws because it is "grandfathered", meaning the prior development is exempt from compliance. Consequently, zoning can only affect new development in a growing community. In addition, if undeveloped land is zoned to allow development, that land becomes relatively expensive, causing developers to seek land that is not zoned for development, and then seek rezoning of that land themselves. Communities generally react by not zoning undeveloped land to allow development until a developer requests rezoning and presents a suitable plan. Development under this practice appears to be piecemeal and uncoordinated. Communities try to influence the timing of development by government expenditures for new streets, sewers and utilities usually desired for modern developments. However, the development of interstate freeways for purposes unrelated to planned community growth, creates an inexorable rush to develop the relatively cheap land near interchanges. In more recent times, zoning has been criticized by urban planners as a source of new social ills, including the separation of homes from employmenting places and the rise of the automobile culture. Some communities have begun to encourage development of denser, mixed use neighborhoods that promote walking and biking to jobs and shopping. However, a single-family home and car are major parts of the American Dream for traditional families with children. Lot-size zoning has given rise to the rapid escalation of home values in many suburban communities. Massachusetts responded to this in 1969 with Chapter 40B, a so-called anti-snob zoning statute. Under this law, developers may circumvent local zoning boards in municipalities with less than 10% affordable housing. Similar laws are in place in other parts of the United States. ==Other uses of the concept of zoning== ===Pricing=== In many cities, fares for public transport depend on the number of zones in which a rider travels. London has recently zoned the central city for a high toll called the London Congestion Charge (£5 Pound Sterling) to reduce traffic. Telephone service may be zoned so that calls to the immediate area are free, calls to adjoining zones incur a small toll and calls to the other side of the metro area incur a somewhat higher toll even though they may all be considered a "local" (non-long-distance) call. See Zone pricing. ===Environmental controls=== Zoning may be implemented in air conditioning systems so that heating and cooling go where they are needed. For example, a house may be fitted with two thermostats,one for upstairs and one for downstairs. Residential HVAC zoning is most often used in radiant heating systems in the floor or ceiling, or with regular radiators. Irrigation sprinklers are almost always zoned, so that water pressure does not drop when the entire system is turned on at once. It is also extremely useful for controlling flow rates to areas with plants that need more or less water, or frequency of watering. ===Permaculture / agricultural design=== Here Zones (Permaculture) on a scale of 0 to 5 indicates the amount of effort put into getting a yield (harvest). Zone 0 is commonly just the house (sleeping and living done here). Zone 1 may be the immediate backyard, and the front drive. Zone 2 may be the lawn and herb garden which you visit every day, to play or to gather herbs for cooking. Zone 3 can contain the vegetable plot where you spend a couple of afternoons a week working. Zone 4 is an area that only requires input occasionally, maybe it is a 'wild patch' which you harvest for mulch, or a quiet space at the back of your garden where 'wild' berries are harvested. Zone 5 is commonly regarded as 'wilderness' where neither input or yield is sought, it is left entirely to nature. ===Informational=== Burglar alarm systems are often zoned as well, expecially in the case where different people will have different access levels to different rooms. Fire alarms are also sometimes done in this manner, though only in particular situations where fire cannot spread beyond a firewall (construction) or other method of containment. Railroad lines are zoned into blocks with block signals, with only one train allowed in a block at a time. Such traffic control is done in a similar way to air traffic control. In computing, Fibre Channel storage area networks are zoned similarly, with certain servers allowed access to only certain disk array. See fibre channel zoning. In the Sonic the Hedgehog Video Games, Zones are the names of stages in a certain group. For example, the Winter Levels are part of Ice Cap zone. ==See also== * Police power * plan#planning * variance (land use) ==External links== * [http://www.ci.nyc.ny.us/html/dcp/html/zone/zonehis.html New York City Department of City Planning - Zoning History] Urban studies and planning Real estate Real property law
I just pulled the discussion of "grandfathering" in the Atlanta billboard case. While grandfathering has some tangential relevance here, it is a general topic well covered in other discussions of the law. The text came across as a distraction in this discussion of zoning. (Of course, it didn't help that the example used language such as "eyesore" - pretty clear that this would be very hard example to use and still stick to our NPOV policy. User:Rossami 15:35, 6 Nov 2003 (UTC) ---------------- Zoning is patricuarly susceptable to corruption. Plus most laws require a person to be on another's property, public property, or interfering with another person to be invoked. Thus enforcement of z laws should be approached with great discretion to avoid violation of the sanctity of home. But z enforcers are often the lowest of the low, who would want to be a z enforcer, entering upon citizens proprety if they had another choice? yet they have police powers! There are laws limiting the height of hedges to 4.5 feet where thousands of properties have 12 footers, yet z enforcers have no problem giving first "offense" tickets for $250, subsequently they go to $500/day! Trees with limbs less than 7feet are illegal ( even in one's backyard ) yet palms grow through a phase where this is impossible. I have had tickets for too tall grass ( I HAVE VITUALLY NONE ), for parking a commercial vehicle ( a moving van, it's illegal to have lunch while loading, unless lunch last less than 30minutes! $500 fine ) and "storing" the car I drive ( new, ten day old tag, $500 ), charged for violations which the DCA had previously overturned ( eventually $12,000 in fines), and denied first time extensions of "administrative hearing" for " urgent health care" etc & etc! The laws are neither criminal nor civil, sort of a twilight zoning, and the game is rigged. It is easy for enforcers acting under color of law to step over it and become criminal organizations, especially when there is pressure to raise revenue, but how can one prevent them from engaging in this destruction civilization ?. Incidently, I live in Miami, where most civil "servants" are not born American, perhaps things are different elsewhere, but here the tempation to abuse law is too great for the minions of the city to resist. And if they force the old and infirm out, they can raise the tax base on the housing based on the selling price. If you would care to discuss issues relating to this topic please click my link. ta WblakesxUser:Wblakesx 00:04, 12 Aug 2004 (UTC) I live in NY City and as you can imagine these z-enforcers are not working the headge patrol. There are a number of instutions that enforce a varity of zoning related issues, from land managment to air rights revocation. HUD makes shure that buildings zoned industrial do not rise in res. areas, enforce low income responsibilities on landlords forces develupers to comply with safty codes, etc. The fire department enforces fire safty building codes, and inspects to make shure the sprinklers and such work. There are elevator inspectors, health code inspectors, and innumerable other public goods provided by people in agencys that work to prevent disaster or just llousy living/working enviorments from taking root. There is even a department that makes certin that no historic buildings are demolished and in fact helps inshure they are properly maintatined. Miami aside NY would be sunk with out most of our Zoning laws, no need to impune the people doning mostly good work in most places because of some overzelous enforcement of silly local legislation. If the Zoning laws in your area are excedingly bad, you have leagal and civic recourse; if the court fails you go to your ellected official, they love that sort of thing, or run for local office.
See other meanings of words starting from letter:
Words begining with Zoning:
Zoning
Zoning
Zoning_law
Zoning_laws
Zoning_ordinance
Zoning
In general, zoning is the division of an area into sub-areas, called zones. ==Land use== Zoning is a system of land use regulation which designates the permitted uses of land based on mapped zones, which separate one part of the community from another. Theoretically, its primary purpose is to segregate uses that are thought to be incompatible. In practice, zoning is used as a permitting system to prevent new development from harming existing residents or businesses. Zoning commonly includes regulation of the kinds of activities which will be acceptable on particular lots (such as open space, residential, agricultural, commerce or Industry), the densities at which those activities can be performed (low density housing such as single family homes to high density such as apartment buildings), the height of buildings, the amount of space structures may occupy by limiting how close a building may be from the edge of the lot, the proportions of the types of space on a lot (for example, how much landscaped space and how much pavement (roads) space), and how much parking lot must be provided. Most zoning systems have a procedure for granting Variance (land use)s - exceptions to the zoning rules, usually because of some perceived hardship due to the particular nature of the property in question. ==Origins and History of Zoning== New York City adopted the first zoning regulations to apply city-wide in 1916 as a reaction to construction of The Equitable Building (Manhattan) (which still stands at 120 Broadway). The building towered over the neighboring residences and cast long shadows that diminished the quality of life for the people in the affected area. These laws written by a commission headed by Edward Basset and signed by Mayor John Purroy Mitchel became the blueprint for the rest of the country (partly because Edward Basset headed the group of planning laws that wrote The Standard State Zoning Enabling Act, which was accepted almost without change by most states) and by the late 1920s most of the nation would have developed a set of zoning regulations that met the needs of the locality. New York went on to develop ever more complex set of zoning regulations, including floor area ratio regulations, air rights and others according to the density-specific needs of the neighborhoods. Among large cities in the United States, Houston, Texas is unique in having no zoning ordinance. Houston voters have rejected efforts to implement zoning in 1948, 1962 and 1993. ==Constitutional Challenges== There have been notable legal challenges to zoning regulations. In 1926 the Supreme Court upheld zoning as a right of U.S. states (typically via their cities and counties) to impose on landowners. The case was Village of ''Euclid, Ohio v. Ambler Realty Co.'' (often shortened to ''Euclid v. Ambler''), Court citation (1926). The village had zoned an area of land held by Ambler Realty as a residential neighborhood. Ambler argued that it would lose money because if the land could be leased to industrial users it would have netted a great deal more money than as a residential area. Euclid won, and a precedent was set favorable to local enforcement of zoning laws. The Euclid case was a facial challenge, meaning that the entire scheme of regulation was argued to be unconstitutional under any set of circumstances. The U.S Supreme Court justified the ordinance saying that a community may enact reasonable laws to keep the pig out of the parlor, even if pigs may not be prohibited from the entire community. Since the Euclid case, there have been no more facial challenges to the general scheme. Beginning in 1987, several U.S. Supreme Court cases ruled against land use regulations as being a regulatory requiring just compensation pursuant to the United States Constitution/Amendment Five. ''First English Evangelical Lutheran Church v. Los Angeles County'' ruled that even a temporary taking may require compensation. ''Nollan v. California Coastal Commission'' ruled that permit conditions that fail to substantially advance the agency's authorized purposes require compensation. ''Lucas v. South Carolina Coastal Council'' ruled that numerous environmental concerns were not sufficient to deny all development without compensation. ''Dolan v. City of Tigard'' ruled that conditions of a permit must be roughly proportional to the impacts of the the proposed new development. ''Palazzolo v. Rhode Island'' ruled property rights are not diminished by unconstitutional laws that exist without challenge at the time the complaining property owner acquired title. However, the landowner victories have been mostly limited to the U.S. Supreme Court despite that Court's purported overriding authority. Each decision in favor of the landowner is based on the facts of the particular case, so that regulatory takings rulings in favor of landowners are little more than a landowners' mirage. Even the trend of the U.S. Supreme Court may now have reversed with the 2004 ruling in the Tahoe case. Justice Sandra Day O'Connor, who had previously ruled with a 5-4 majority in favor of the landowner, switched sides to favor the government that had delayed development for more than 20 years because of the government's own indecision about alleged concerns to the water quality of Lake Tahoe. Specific zoning laws have been overturned in some other U.S. cases where the laws were not applied evenly (violating equal protection) or were considered to violate free speech. In the Atlanta suburb of Roswell, Georgia, an ordinance banning billboard (advertising)s was overturned in court on such grounds. It has been deemed that a municipality's sign ordinance must be content neutral with regard to the regulation of signage. The City of Roswell, Georgia has now institued a sign ordinance that regulates signage based strictly on dimensional and aesthetic codes, rather than an interpretation of a sign's content (i.e. use of colors, lettering, etc.). On other occasions, religious institutions sought to circumvent zoning laws, citing the Religious Freedom Restoration Act of 1993 (RFRA). The Supreme Court eventually overturned RFRA in just such a case, ''City of Boerne v. Flores'' Court citation (1997). However, Congress enacted the Religious Land Use and Institutionalized Persons Act (RLUIPA) in 2000 in an effort to correct the constitutionally objectionable problems of the RFRA. In the 2005 case of Cutter v. Wilkinson, the United States Supreme Court held RLUIPA to be constitutional. ==Some limitiations of zoning== Land use zoning is widely considered an important tool in the treatment of certain social ills, a part of the larger concept of social engineering (political science). Some jurisdictions attempting to growth management have turned to comprehensive planning to coordinate the growth of housing, industry, commercial with the impacts growth has on issues such as transport, utilities, recreation, schools, fire protection and police protection. Existing development in a community is generally not affected by the new zoning laws because it is "grandfathered", meaning the prior development is exempt from compliance. Consequently, zoning can only affect new development in a growing community. In addition, if undeveloped land is zoned to allow development, that land becomes relatively expensive, causing developers to seek land that is not zoned for development, and then seek rezoning of that land themselves. Communities generally react by not zoning undeveloped land to allow development until a developer requests rezoning and presents a suitable plan. Development under this practice appears to be piecemeal and uncoordinated. Communities try to influence the timing of development by government expenditures for new streets, sewers and utilities usually desired for modern developments. However, the development of interstate freeways for purposes unrelated to planned community growth, creates an inexorable rush to develop the relatively cheap land near interchanges. In more recent times, zoning has been criticized by urban planners as a source of new social ills, including the separation of homes from employmenting places and the rise of the automobile culture. Some communities have begun to encourage development of denser, mixed use neighborhoods that promote walking and biking to jobs and shopping. However, a single-family home and car are major parts of the American Dream for traditional families with children. Lot-size zoning has given rise to the rapid escalation of home values in many suburban communities. Massachusetts responded to this in 1969 with Chapter 40B, a so-called anti-snob zoning statute. Under this law, developers may circumvent local zoning boards in municipalities with less than 10% affordable housing. Similar laws are in place in other parts of the United States. ==Other uses of the concept of zoning== ===Pricing=== In many cities, fares for public transport depend on the number of zones in which a rider travels. London has recently zoned the central city for a high toll called the London Congestion Charge (£5 Pound Sterling) to reduce traffic. Telephone service may be zoned so that calls to the immediate area are free, calls to adjoining zones incur a small toll and calls to the other side of the metro area incur a somewhat higher toll even though they may all be considered a "local" (non-long-distance) call. See Zone pricing. ===Environmental controls=== Zoning may be implemented in air conditioning systems so that heating and cooling go where they are needed. For example, a house may be fitted with two thermostats,one for upstairs and one for downstairs. Residential HVAC zoning is most often used in radiant heating systems in the floor or ceiling, or with regular radiators. Irrigation sprinklers are almost always zoned, so that water pressure does not drop when the entire system is turned on at once. It is also extremely useful for controlling flow rates to areas with plants that need more or less water, or frequency of watering. ===Permaculture / agricultural design=== Here Zones (Permaculture) on a scale of 0 to 5 indicates the amount of effort put into getting a yield (harvest). Zone 0 is commonly just the house (sleeping and living done here). Zone 1 may be the immediate backyard, and the front drive. Zone 2 may be the lawn and herb garden which you visit every day, to play or to gather herbs for cooking. Zone 3 can contain the vegetable plot where you spend a couple of afternoons a week working. Zone 4 is an area that only requires input occasionally, maybe it is a 'wild patch' which you harvest for mulch, or a quiet space at the back of your garden where 'wild' berries are harvested. Zone 5 is commonly regarded as 'wilderness' where neither input or yield is sought, it is left entirely to nature. ===Informational=== Burglar alarm systems are often zoned as well, expecially in the case where different people will have different access levels to different rooms. Fire alarms are also sometimes done in this manner, though only in particular situations where fire cannot spread beyond a firewall (construction) or other method of containment. Railroad lines are zoned into blocks with block signals, with only one train allowed in a block at a time. Such traffic control is done in a similar way to air traffic control. In computing, Fibre Channel storage area networks are zoned similarly, with certain servers allowed access to only certain disk array. See fibre channel zoning. In the Sonic the Hedgehog Video Games, Zones are the names of stages in a certain group. For example, the Winter Levels are part of Ice Cap zone. ==See also== * Police power * plan#planning * variance (land use) ==External links== * [http://www.ci.nyc.ny.us/html/dcp/html/zone/zonehis.html New York City Department of City Planning - Zoning History] Urban studies and planning Real estate Real property law
Zoning
I just pulled the discussion of "grandfathering" in the Atlanta billboard case. While grandfathering has some tangential relevance here, it is a general topic well covered in other discussions of the law. The text came across as a distraction in this discussion of zoning. (Of course, it didn't help that the example used language such as "eyesore" - pretty clear that this would be very hard example to use and still stick to our NPOV policy. User:Rossami 15:35, 6 Nov 2003 (UTC) ---------------- Zoning is patricuarly susceptable to corruption. Plus most laws require a person to be on another's property, public property, or interfering with another person to be invoked. Thus enforcement of z laws should be approached with great discretion to avoid violation of the sanctity of home. But z enforcers are often the lowest of the low, who would want to be a z enforcer, entering upon citizens proprety if they had another choice? yet they have police powers! There are laws limiting the height of hedges to 4.5 feet where thousands of properties have 12 footers, yet z enforcers have no problem giving first "offense" tickets for $250, subsequently they go to $500/day! Trees with limbs less than 7feet are illegal ( even in one's backyard ) yet palms grow through a phase where this is impossible. I have had tickets for too tall grass ( I HAVE VITUALLY NONE ), for parking a commercial vehicle ( a moving van, it's illegal to have lunch while loading, unless lunch last less than 30minutes! $500 fine ) and "storing" the car I drive ( new, ten day old tag, $500 ), charged for violations which the DCA had previously overturned ( eventually $12,000 in fines), and denied first time extensions of "administrative hearing" for " urgent health care" etc & etc! The laws are neither criminal nor civil, sort of a twilight zoning, and the game is rigged. It is easy for enforcers acting under color of law to step over it and become criminal organizations, especially when there is pressure to raise revenue, but how can one prevent them from engaging in this destruction civilization ?. Incidently, I live in Miami, where most civil "servants" are not born American, perhaps things are different elsewhere, but here the tempation to abuse law is too great for the minions of the city to resist. And if they force the old and infirm out, they can raise the tax base on the housing based on the selling price. If you would care to discuss issues relating to this topic please click my link. ta WblakesxUser:Wblakesx 00:04, 12 Aug 2004 (UTC) I live in NY City and as you can imagine these z-enforcers are not working the headge patrol. There are a number of instutions that enforce a varity of zoning related issues, from land managment to air rights revocation. HUD makes shure that buildings zoned industrial do not rise in res. areas, enforce low income responsibilities on landlords forces develupers to comply with safty codes, etc. The fire department enforces fire safty building codes, and inspects to make shure the sprinklers and such work. There are elevator inspectors, health code inspectors, and innumerable other public goods provided by people in agencys that work to prevent disaster or just llousy living/working enviorments from taking root. There is even a department that makes certin that no historic buildings are demolished and in fact helps inshure they are properly maintatined. Miami aside NY would be sunk with out most of our Zoning laws, no need to impune the people doning mostly good work in most places because of some overzelous enforcement of silly local legislation. If the Zoning laws in your area are excedingly bad, you have leagal and civic recourse; if the court fails you go to your ellected official, they love that sort of thing, or run for local office.
See other meanings of words starting from letter:
Z
ZA | ZB | ZC | ZD | ZE | ZF | ZG | ZH | ZI | ZJ | ZK | ZL | ZM | ZN | ZO | ZP | ZR | ZS | ZT | ZU | ZW | ZX | ZY |Words begining with Zoning:
Zoning
Zoning
Zoning_law
Zoning_laws
Zoning_ordinance
These materials are based on Wikipedia and licensed under the GNU FDL
YouTube.com videos better site than Turbo Tax 2007
