Yuber

Hello and Wikipedia:Welcome, newcomers to Wikipedia! Hope you like it here, and stick around. Here are some tips to help you get started: *To sign your posts (on Wikipedia:Tutorial (Talk pages), for example) use the '~' symbol. To insert just your name, type ~~~ (3 tildes), or, to insert your name and timestamp, use ~~~~ (4 tildes). * Try the Wikipedia:Tutorial, and feel free to experiment in the Wikipedia:Test area. * If you need Wikipedia:Help, post a question at the Wikipedia:Help desk * Eventually, you might want to read the Wikipedia:Manual of Style and Wikipedia:Policies and guidelines. *Remember Wikipedia:Neutral point of view * Explore, Wikipedia:Be bold in updating pages, and, most importantly, have fun! Good luck! User:Meelar User talk:Meelar 08:07, Mar 28, 2005 (UTC) Hi Yuber. I think you may be being be bold in adding :Category:Arab history to the pages of the Arab countries. There is already a :Category:History of the Middle East which links specifically historical articles about Arabs and others in the region.--User:Pharos 05:40, 29 Mar 2005 (UTC) :True, i guess with the Arab League category it is kind of redundant.--Yuber ::Then do you mind if I delete this category?--User:Pharos 04:15, 30 Mar 2005 (UTC) :::No problemUser:Yuber 04:17, 30 Mar 2005 (UTC) Hi! Good to see someone editing more Arab-related topics. Have you checked out :ar: yet? - User:Mustafaa 03:48, 30 Mar 2005 (UTC) :Hey, although i speak arabic fluently, i'm not that good at writing or reading. I mean , i know how to work out words phonetically and i know all the letters but i am not proficient enough for something like an encyclopedia :(. Anyways, thanks for your encouragement, i'll continue editing arab-related topic here on the english site :).User:Yuber 03:58, 30 Mar 2005 (UTC) I think you have a problem with the article I created called Islamic fascism. If you do perhaps you could discuss it with me. User:Walkingeagles 06:07, 24 Apr 2005 (UTC) == Discussion forum for Souria.com == Hello Yuber. You mentioned in talk:Syria that their is a heated discussion in the English forums of Souria.com. I tried to find the link, but couldn't. Do you happen to know the address for this exact link? Regards, --User:Gramaic 02:36, 25 Apr 2005 (UTC) :Hey, here is the link to the discussion forums in English http://www.souria.com/club/sb_forum.asp?forumid=3 Many of the topics got deleted, they were posted by Lebanese people trying to stir up trouble. Register if you want, we need more people on the forum :).User:Yuber 02:40, 25 Apr 2005 (UTC) ::Thanks Yuber, I really appreciate it.--User:Gramaic 03:37, 25 Apr 2005 (UTC) == False flag revisions == It's debatable whether Irgun was a terrorist organization; I might even be convinced that it was. But the next time you make a change like that and flag it as "minor," I'll report you for vandalism. --User:Leifern 14:04, May 4, 2005 (UTC) Categorization is almost always flagged a minor edit, and I think the Deir Yassin massacre proves they were a terrorist organization. The Zionist Terror Organizations category was finally made after a long debate, it's time to start putting it to use in a fair way.User:Yuber 15:07, 4 May 2005 (UTC) :Yuber, this is not the point. The point is that you've made multiple edits, flagged as minor with no description, which actually impact serious issues. I can only conclude that you're doing this to sneak around. Do it again, and I'll be the first to support Leifern's charge of vandalism. User:Mikeage 23:25, 4 May 2005 (UTC) ::Once again, I am fairly new to this and I didn't know that a categorization of a group regarded terrorist by almost everyone is not a minor edit.User:Yuber 04:40, 6 May 2005 (UTC) :::Yuber, I think you're much smarter than that. I could argue that "almost anyone" thinks that Yasser Arafat was a corrupt, degenerate imposter, but that doesn't give me the right to flag such a categorization (if it existed) as "minor." --User:Leifern 13:36, May 6, 2005 (UTC) == Islamofascism == Hello. You always keep on asking on the Islamist Terroism page on why this word has anything to do with Islamist Terrorism. I wish for you to read this posting that I wrote on the talk page: "Islamofacism The word has been used in the article before, not as a direct reference to Islamist Terrorism, but as an article of interest of those who want to read up on the entire issues of terrorism. What happened this morning is that a user by the name of Spastika took the word out, called it a POV. I reverted it, since nearly everything he did was reverted because of his possible pro-Arab pov pushing. I am not sure when the word was added to the article, but all I wanted to do is bring it back to a previous version. Zscout370 (talk) 23:13, 4 May 2005 (UTC)" Basically, all the link there was place there is just for those who are reading the article on Islamist Terrorism might be interested in the debate about Islamofacism. I agree with people that it is a word recently made up and made popular by "right wing nuts" like Bill O'Reilly and Rush Limbaugh, but I believe it is a valid link to be put at the end of the article. Plus, as I mentioned before, I was reverting vandalism by a user who was vandalising many pages. User:Zscout370 User_talk:Zscout370 23:31, 5 May 2005 (UTC) ::Oh ok, that's fine.User:Yuber 04:39, 6 May 2005 (UTC) :::Plus, I know the word is a slur and made up, but I was wondering if you, myself and others can agree to add the link to the article page. Dispite of what I told you and what I said on the talk page, it feels like I might have started an edit war over that word. What can we do to stop this editing war? User:Zscout370 User_talk:Zscout370 13:44, 6 May 2005 (UTC) Another question: do you think the comments by User:KaintheScion seen to be odd? Though this person has an account since (probably) this weekend, it feels like this person has been here before. The person's first comments were to defame (or attack, depending if the accusations are true or not) User:GraceNote. I do not know if this is getting bad, but if it does, I can have you talk to a few folks. User:Zscout370 User_talk:Zscout370 16:41, 7 May 2005 (UTC) ::It doesn't seem that bad so far, just strange... For a user that just registered yesterday to have all the knowledge of the events of the past few weeks is fishy. He claims he's just a "lurker" that decided to register and get in on things. I don't think anything needs to be done now as he just is trying to argue his POV in the talk page.User:Yuber 17:02, 7 May 2005 (UTC) :::I agree, it is strange. I still think it will be valid to at least mention when the term was coined, the person who coined it, where it was first used, where it is used now and the objections of Muslims. If an article about Judeofascism comes up, I will have no problems with it. User:Zscout370 User_talk:Zscout370 17:09, 7 May 2005 (UTC) == Syria Ribbon == Question, I am wondering why you put that on your user page. I have no problems with it, but I just want to know why you did it. User:Zscout370 User_talk:Zscout370 18:40, 6 May 2005 (UTC) :Just to make my bland user page a bit more aesthetic.User:Yuber 21:04, 6 May 2005 (UTC) :: Thats more of a Pan Arab ribbon though, no? same colours as Egypt and iraq, and maybe others (I was always bad at flags!) --User:Irishpunktom\^{User_talk:Irishpunktom} 20:47, Jun 3, 2005 (UTC) :::Well, the two green stars represent the Syrian version of the Pan-Arab colors. But yes, almost all Arab countries (except for maybe Tunisia and a few other North African ones) share the Pan-Arab colors. Many of them also use Saladin's eagle as their state symbol (Egypt, Iraq, and Syria).User:Yuber^{User_talk:Yuber} 21:46, 3 Jun 2005 (UTC) == Re ChantingFox's reversions == As I gather from his talk page, ChantingFox is fairly new to Wikipedia, and was immediately praised for his work in reverting articles that had been vandalized. He's decided that what you and I see as vandalism is a serious edit and that you and I are the vandals, so he's determined to revert. I've left messages on his talk page. I dunno if I got through to him. User:Zora 20:58, 6 May 2005 (UTC) : Nope, I was wrong. There's another message from ChantingFox on the vandalism alert page, saying that someone is spoofing him, and asking to have this IP blocked. So my initial guess (recorded on his userpage) that there was some skullduggery going on, was proved right after all. User:Zora 21:01, 6 May 2005 (UTC) ::I had a feeling something was strange when his contributions section showed that he only created his account today and already acquired a barnstar after editing a few Islamic related articles..User:Yuber 21:04, 6 May 2005 (UTC) ::From checking the Page History, ChantingFox himself redirected Yuber's user page to douche, then switched it back. I do agree that there have been people who have been impersonating users on Wikipedia, but this edit was not by an imposter. User:Zscout370 User_talk:Zscout370 21:06, 6 May 2005 (UTC) Please note the difference between my username and his. This user copied my userpage AND talkpage completely, and redirected my userpage to the same one. --User:Chanting Fox 21:08, 6 May 2005 (UTC) :Oh man, please accept my apologizes about that one Chanting. I realized now the same vandal has done the same thing to ClockworkSoul, copying the user page and all. If his IP was blocked, then the vandal must have been using a proxy, which is hard to block. However, a notice on Long Term Alerts on the Vandalism in Progress page should be warrented, since this vandal is causing many problems. User:Zscout370 User_talk:Zscout370 21:14, 6 May 2005 (UTC) ==Jizyah== Very nice work on this -- and no small amount of diplomatic skill, I notice. I have made some minor style edits, hope they are helpful, let me know what you think. User:BrandonYusufToropov 03:03, 7 May 2005 (UTC) ::Thanks, Klonimus and Jayjg were going off interpretations by Ibn Warraq and Bat Ye'or. After their changes, the article basically read like one of those two's books. Thanks for your edits, but Klonimus and Jayjg will probably be back trying to push POVs again.User:Yuber 03:09, 7 May 2005 (UTC) :I think I recall reading somewhere that there was a community that petitioned the Caliph (or somebody) for the ''right'' to pay jizyah -- they wanted protection, in other words. Of course, I don't have the source now. Ring any bells? User:BrandonYusufToropov 14:59, 8 May 2005 (UTC) ::I think it's already in the article, the Christian Arabs that wanted to pay twice the amount of jizyah to express their gratitude. It might have to be made clearer. It seems that Klonimus and Jayjg's editing style is to remove all quotes and examples that might shed a positive light on the actual history to the bottom and put the interpretations from Ibn Warraq and Bat Ye'or to the top.User:Yuber^{User_talk:Yuber} 22:30, 8 May 2005 (UTC) == Saudi Arabia == Is there any reason to delete the text in Saudi Arabia, for example I don't find this paragraph POV: "Highlights of mutaween activities in the news include instances where they prevented women from leaving burning buildings because they did not have proper Islamic headgear on, and numerous instances of religious persecution of non-Muslims for the "crime" of not being Muslim in Saudi Arabia." since all of it is based on facts. -- User:Eagleamn 16:36, May 7, 2005 (UTC) ::I hate the mutaween just as much as you do (have family living near dammam), but that paragraph was highly pov. For example, it claimed that the mutaween were found in most muslim countries (the only ones I can think of are Saudi and Iran). It also claimed that the burning building incident was a "highlight", a highlight is usually a good thing. If that paragraph was re-written in more NPOV language, I would see it as useful to the article.User:Yuber 16:50, 7 May 2005 (UTC) :::Thanks, now it's clear. Though I still believe it would be better if it was rewritten instead of having it deleted. -- User:Eagleamn 16:50, May 8, 2005 (UTC) ==Vandalizing user pages== Vandalizing the user page of an admin will get you blocked. If you do it again, I will block you. User:RDsmith4 00:19, 8 May 2005 (UTC) :Who are you trying to kid? It's obvious you are an impersonator.User:Yuber^{User_talk:Yuber} 00:20, 8 May 2005 (UTC) == Impersonation == Thanks! Any idea whose sockpuppet it might have been? 01:15, 8 May 2005 (UTC) :Go http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Vandalism_in_progress/Long_term_alerts#.22Impersonator_Vandal.22 here for the latest info on the "impersonator vandal" aka the "doppelganger" User:Yuber^{User_talk:Yuber} 01:40, 8 May 2005 (UTC) ==User:KaintheScion== This user has been engaging in POV-pushing on several articles, and upon overviewing his contributions I've noticed that he has also engaged in personal insults against you on several occasions. If you want to file a WP:RFC against him, I would be willing to co-sign it. User:Firebug 00:22, 9 May 2005 (UTC) :Yuber, KaintheScion is entitled to remove messages from his own talk page. Please don't revert him again. Many thanks, User:SlimVirgin ^{User_talk:SlimVirgin} 00:23, May 9, 2005 (UTC) ::Yuber, you're the POV pusher, and stalking my contrib page to revert me is getting really old. Knock it off.User:KaintheScion :::I actually didn't stalk your contrib page, but two of your edits came up on my watchlist. When I went to leave you a message, I saw that your talk page was cleared. So I reverted to the last version (and there is no rule against this).User:Yuber^{User_talk:Yuber} 00:28, 9 May 2005 (UTC) ==YOU POV PUSHING REVERT MONKEY== Stop reverting things when you could make edits, you stupid POV-pushing revert monkey.User:KaintheScion :Kain, stop the personal attacks. That is getting nobody nowhere. User:Zscout370 User_talk:Zscout370 03:17, 9 May 2005 (UTC) ::ZScout, so far I've seen plenty of bad-faith revert pushing and POV pushing - not to mention screaming for references on every single syllable of the edits he's trying to push a POV into - out of Yuber. I've put a notice in the Dhimmi talk but I'm letting him know as well here, if he throws around another revert like that without bothering to explain why in the talk, I'm reporting him for vandalism. User:ElKabong :::That is your call, however, you could have said to please stop the inserting of x,y and z, because we believe this is against NPOV. With the statement by Kain, I just think that was a bit over the top and uncalled for. POV pushing can be handled in several other ways. User:Zscout370 User_talk:Zscout370 20:03, 10 May 2005 (UTC) ::::I just want to point out that ElKabong and KaintheScion are the same person, this has been proven by admin jpgordon. I will not respond to either one of them from now on because they are sockpuppets of each other.User:Yuber^{User_talk:Yuber} 14:07, 11 May 2005 (UTC) :::::Ok, Yuber. Is there a discussion of this by jpgordon and others that I can view? User:Zscout370 User_talk:Zscout370 14:12, 11 May 2005 (UTC) ::::::Right [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Administrators%27_noticeboard/Incidents#ElKabong here]User:Yuber^{User_talk:Yuber} 14:26, 11 May 2005 (UTC) :::::::Other than that one thing, I do not see anything much for sockpuppetry. However, give me some time and I could see what I can find. User:Zscout370 User_talk:Zscout370 14:35, 11 May 2005 (UTC) ==RFC against User:KaintheScion== I have opened a Wikipedia:Requests for comment/KaintheScion against KaintheScion due to his repeated use of personal attacks and false accusations of vandalism. You are free to endorse it if you so choose. User:Firebug 05:27, 12 May 2005 (UTC) :Yeah I just endorsed it, haven't been here the past two days, thanks.User:Yuber^{User_talk:Yuber} 21:19, 13 May 2005 (UTC) == Credible sources == Thanks for providing sources for the quotes you insert, but please use more credible source than whatreallyhappened.com. User:Humus sapiens←User:Humus sapiens←User talk:Humus_sapiens 07:30, 15 May 2005 (UTC) :Most of those sources were Israeli/American and were well-cited, they were not from a "hate-site". You should try to accept the fact that secular/leftist Israelis are quite good sources for revealing what the heroes of Zionism have said over the years. Although those sources might have been from what you consider a "hate site", they were all well-cited in Israeli/American books.User:Yuber^{User_talk:Yuber} 13:26, 15 May 2005 (UTC) ==3RR== Yuber, you were reported for 3RR at Golan Heights and, because you've been warned many times about 3RR, I've blocked you for 24 hours. If you feel this is unfair, please feel free to contact me using the "e-mail this user" function on my user page and I'll get straight back to you. User:SlimVirgin ^{User_talk:SlimVirgin} 10:38, May 16, 2005 (UTC) :Yuber, I see you've started editing-by-revert again. We don't have a right to revert each article three times in 24 hours: it's an upper ceiling, but we're not meant to take advantage of it. This post to Jay is the wrong attitude: "Um, please look at the edit history. I made an edit today, then you reverted. Then I reverted, then you reverted. Then I reverted again, then you reverted. You're on three reverts, I'm on two." All that's going to happen is that someone will do an Wikipedia:Requests for comment on you, then it could go to the arbcom, where you could be placed on revert parole, blocked from editing certain articles, or blocked entirely for a period. If your edits matter to you, then ''make them stick'' by following our policies and making sure you have good sources. And if they don't matter to you, why bother making them in the first place? User:SlimVirgin ^{User_talk:SlimVirgin} 23:33, May 17, 2005 (UTC) ::Jay reverted my edits within 3 minutes of when I had made them, perhaps he is the one editing "revert by revert". His claim that I have made 4 reverts and that he has only made 3 is a very shaky one. If you would check the edits you would see the first sentence is sourced.User:Yuber^{User_talk:Yuber} 23:40, 17 May 2005 (UTC) :::You were reported for a 3RR violation at Jizyah and have been blocked again for 24 hours. The first edit you made was a revert to a previous version, so it counts as your first revert, not your first edit. Regarding the content and the fact that you supplied a source: violating 3RR gets you blocked even if you're right, and to be honest, I haven't even checked out the content closely, because we're not supposed to take content into account when blocking for 3RR. If in future, you feel your edits are being unfairly deleted (because, for example, they're properly sourced), there are other steps you can take, and I'd be happy to discuss those with you, but you mustn't keep reverting. In addition to the above, you were offered the chance to self-revert. As before, if you feel this block is unfair, please feel free to e-mail me. User:SlimVirgin ^{User_talk:SlimVirgin} 02:11, May 18, 2005 (UTC) ==Arab scientists== I have an un-edited list of Arab scientists with a paragraph of biographical description for each. These are neither Persian nor Persian related. And Wikipedia doesnt have these folks listed. I cant find the time to write an entry for each and put together the list. Im still working on the Persian list. And I have 60 other projects to finish and tend to. Where do you want me to send this list to? (Or perhaps paste it somewhere?)--User:Zereshk 21:49, 20 May 2005 (UTC) ==Resafa== Hello Yaber. Thank you for your message and for letting me know that you have used one of my picture. I went back to Resafa this spring and [http://www.zeledi.com/gallery/thumbnails.php?album=30 under this link] on my web site you will find frameless pictures of that trip. The one you've selected comes out best on a black background. --User:Zeledi 18:42, 2005 May 23 (UTC) ==[http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Category:Presidents_of_Syria Category:Presidents of Syria]== Hello Yuber. Since you work a lot with Syrian related articles, I thought you may have some pretty good ideas in how to expand this [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Category:Presidents_of_Syria category]. As you can see, the only presidents that are listed are Hafez and Bashar al-Assad. Other Syrian presidents that could be listed, I don't know, maybe Amin al-Hafez, Nur al Din al-Atassi, Nazem al-Qodsi, etc. So, what do think? Regards, --User:Gramaic 07:44, 24 May 2005 (UTC) *Note: Yuber, I'm having this category listed as an external link because there seems to be a small technical difficulty when I'm listing it as an internal link. --User:Gramaic 07:52, 24 May 2005 (UTC) :I'll see what I can do, there are plenty of articles about Syrian past presidents that should go in that cat.User:Yuber^{User_talk:Yuber} 02:51, 25 May 2005 (UTC) ==سفيرق== Never heard of such a surname... Aramaic, maybe? Greek "Spheric"? - User:Mustafaa 18:06, 25 May 2005 (UTC) Weird... what's the context? - User:Mustafaa 00:24, 26 May 2005 (UTC) So it's pronounced Suqayriq? I don't know... maybe Turkish? I'll ask around. - User:Mustafaa 00:46, 26 May 2005 (UTC) ==3RR== You've been blocked for violating the 3RR. --User:Petaholmes 02:46, 26 May 2005 (UTC) ==Vandalizing others' user pages== If you vandalize my user page again, I will report you for it. I have given Mel Etitis the same warning. User:Enviroknot 04:00, 28 May 2005 (UTC) :You have been identified as a sockpuppet by many admins and other respected users.User:Yuber^{User_talk:Yuber} 04:00, 28 May 2005 (UTC) ::No, YOU have accused me and your fellow conspirators have followed your lead. You have posted no proof, only vague accusations. That is slander and vandalism.User:Enviroknot 04:02, 28 May 2005 (UTC) ::: Actually I have seen Yuber accused of sock puppetry.--User:AI 01:06, 14 Jun 2005 (UTC) == Did you know? ==

:Template:Did you know has been updated and a fact from the article Tell Halaf, which you recently created, has been featured in that section on the Main Page. If you have another interesting fact to submit, then please suggest it at :Template talk:Did you know.

== Islam and other religions == Thanks Yuber for the message. I'll appreciate that. Cheers -- User:FayssalF 12:36, May 30, 2005 (UTC) ^{user talk:FayssalF} == It's good to know == Just making sure you are aware of disussions Concerning you. User:Guy Montag, User:Humus sapiens and User:Jayjg (of course) seem to have let you get under their skin. Be aware they intend on reverting everything you do that they disapprove of. See [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User_talk:Jayjg#Yuber.27s_edit here for details.].. and [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User_talk:Guy_Montag#Sea_of_Galilee here too]! --User:Irishpunktom\^{User_talk:Irishpunktom} 15:02, May 30, 2005 (UTC) :They are also reverting me on articles that have nothing to do with the conflict and that they have no knowledge of. It is getting quite ridiculous and they are making themselves look stupid. Anyways, thanks for pointing those discussions out for me.User:Yuber^{User_talk:Yuber} 15:07, 30 May 2005 (UTC) == User:Enviroknot == I'm out of reverts, so the sockpuppet template will remain deleted unless someone else joins in. User:Mel Etitis (Μελ_Ετητης)">User talk:Mel Etitis 17:28, 30 May 2005 (UTC) :Does the 3RR rule apply to him on his own userpage as well? At least 3 different editors have kept putting that template back in.User:Yuber^{User_talk:Yuber} 17:37, 30 May 2005 (UTC) ::I have reported your vandalism.User:Enviroknot 20:42, 30 May 2005 (UTC) ==Khirbat== The word comes from the root خرب, and means "ruin". The Lisan al-Arab defines "kharab" as ضِدُّ العُمْرانِ, the opposite of civilization; in Algerian dialect, خرّب means to make a mess, or destroy. I believe it has a Hebrew cognate "Horvat"; probably Aramaic as well, but I'm not certain offhand. - User:Mustafaa 17:40, 30 May 2005 (UTC) : According to a book I've been reading, it refers specifically to an extension of a village, built beyond the edge of town. - User:Mustafaa 16:44, 3 Jun 2005 (UTC) ==3RR== User:Enviroknot has reported you on the mailing list for 3RR at Dhimmi, claiming that you're also editing as User:199.181.178.37. I know of no evidence linking you to this IP address, and so there appears to be no violation. However, I ask you once again to stop reverting so often on so many articles. I protected three pages yesterday as a result of revert wars apparently triggered by you, and if it continues, it's likely that you'll eventually be placed on revert parole or even banned from editing certain articles. I urge you to reconsider your approach. User:SlimVirgin ^{User_talk:SlimVirgin} 23:33, May 30, 2005 (UTC) == Arbitration Committee case opening == Wikipedia:Requests for arbitration/KaintheScion et al. has been accepted and is now open. Please bring evidence to Wikipedia:Requests for arbitration/KaintheScion et al./Evidence. Thank you. -- User:Sannse User talk:Sannse 18:41, 31 May 2005 (UTC) ==Banu Qurayza== Hey, I'd like your input on the Banu Qurayza article. As it stands I believe it to be inherently POV, and containing Factual errors caused by this bias. I have detailed this on the talk page, however, I could easily be missing something, and as you were the one who put up the , I'd like you to point out any errors you also see. Cheers man. --User:Irishpunktom\^{User_talk:Irishpunktom} 14:58, Jun 2, 2005 (UTC) :I did some editing and I pointed out some errors/inconsistencies. I will do more when I have the time.User:Yuber^{User_talk:Yuber} 00:11, 3 Jun 2005 (UTC) == Gaza Strip == I take it that you've read the talk page on Gaza Strip and come to a contray decision to everyone else regarding the relevance of the photos you keep reverting in? User:Josh Parris User_talk:Josh Parris 03:09, 3 Jun 2005 (UTC) ==Copyright tag== Could you please add source and licensing information (as well as a copyright tag) to :Image:New community on the Golan .jpg User:Raul654 08:33, Jun 3, 2005 (UTC) == Category:Airports of Palestine == I created this category, and placed the note at the top of the page to inform people of the status of Palestine (not currently a country) as all the other first level categories are countries. Please don't remove it. If you wish to discuss a better note, do that at the top of the talk page. Cheers. User:Burgundavia (User talk:Burgundavia) 09:11, Jun 4, 2005 (UTC) ::Again, please don't unilateral changes to the note. The Gaza Strip and the West Bank are contested, and it is good to mention that. And the link to the airports of Israel is useful due to the above controversy. User:Burgundavia (User talk:Burgundavia) 17:28, Jun 6, 2005 (UTC) == SomeThing personal??!!! == what do u got against the name Intifada of independence? anything personal? coz i beleive u r nt acting reasonably by removing it every time from the lebanon page; even u dont want it side by side to the name u reclaim to be the best, say "cedar revolution" that is. =="Trafficking in Persons Report 2005"== NPOV would consist of well-referenced information that trafficking in persons is not permitted in Saudi Arabia, that those who engage in trafficking are prosecuted, that victims of trafficking are protected, and that concrete and effective steps are being taken to prevent trafficking. User:Fred Bauder 15:38, Jun 5, 2005 (UTC) == Template:Mediterranean == Hi Yuber. I've created polls on Template talk:Mediterranean, so people can vote whether Armenia, and the West Bank can be classified as "Mediterranean." So, I invite you to check out these polls and cast your votes. Thanks, --User:Gramaic 03:27, 8 Jun 2005 (UTC) ==Protection== Yuber, I've just unlocked Jizya, Sea of Galilee, and Dhimmi, which were protected because of revert wars. I'd appreciate it if you could make sure the reverting doesn't start up again, otherwise I'll have to re-protect. Many thanks, User:SlimVirgin ^{User_talk:SlimVirgin} 22:58, Jun 9, 2005 (UTC) ==Hey there -- please check out latest edits on Terrorism== I fixed the balanced-example problem people claimed to be concerned about, but POV editors are massing the troops. Could I ask you to take a look and add your thoughts to the discussion? User:BrandonYusufToropov 01:42, 11 Jun 2005 (UTC) == Similar (but much more longwinded) assaults at Jihad... == ... which took several weeks of work to get to an NPOV state. Can you please take a look when you get the chance? User:BrandonYusufToropov 17:45, 11 Jun 2005 (UTC) == That seemingly irrational trashing of the redirect on Islamofascism... == ... is, I think, our friend KainEnviroScion pulling a Citizen Kane. (Remember the scene where everything gets tossed out the window?) User:BrandonYusufToropov 19:07, 13 Jun 2005 (UTC) ==3RR== Hi Yuber, you've been reported again for 3RR violations, as you saw on my talk page. I haven't looked at them carefully yet, but I've glanced at Talk:Jihad. The other user has no right to remove the claim that Enviroknot etc are sockpuppets, but similarly you have no right to remove the claim that someone is an Islamist, which is not itself a personal attack, though I can see why it's taken that way. As for the other material you moved, you should probably just leave it. You're attracting extremist responses because you're acting in an extreme way yourself. Then you over-react because you're being attacked by sockpuppets, and I completely understand that response, but it's making your situation worse. Please see that this is a dynamic that has to be broken, because it's going to escalate, and if you don't sort out your own role in it, the arbitration committee may do it for you by imposing editing restrictions on you. Can I suggest you stop editing controversial articles for a period? Your presence around some articles is feeding the sockpuppets and anon IPs. You say on your user page that you have an interest in Syria, and some of the Syria pages could really use some good editing, so maybe you could do that? If you do make a controversial edit, make sure you have a good source, and stick closely to what that source says. Don't insert any of your own opinions. Read Wikipedia:No original research. Also, don't be so bothered by small details. For example, Operation Litani: you say Israel invaded Lebanon; Guy says attacked. Does the word "invaded" matter so much you have to keep reverting? You could say "Israeli troops attacked and entered Lebanon." Don't get so hung up on certain words. Above all, stop editing-by-revert. You might try imposing a revert parole on yourself: one revert per page per day or something, and see whether it makes a difference to people's responses to you. If you do all this, and are using good sources, and ''still'' find yourself being reverted, ask people for help. I'd probably support you if you were doing all of the above, as would others. I hope you'll give these suggestions some consideration. I don't want to keep on blocking you. Cheers, User:SlimVirgin ^{User_talk:SlimVirgin} 22:55, Jun 13, 2005 (UTC) :Also, I want to add that I ''know'' it can be very upsetting when you're being undermined about edits you care about. I don't want to give the impression that I think this is an easy thing for you to walk away from. User:SlimVirgin ^{User_talk:SlimVirgin} 23:00, Jun 13, 2005 (UTC) == Enviroknot == You know, the revert war on Enviroknot's userpage has been going on for a few score edits now. Is this really the best way to deal with him? Surely, given some of the horrendous behaviour we've seen from him, there could be an arbcom case filed, or something like that? User:Ingoolemo User_talk:Ingoolemo 06:11, 2005 Jun 14 (UTC) By the way, if your userpage keeps getting vandalised, I'd be happy to protect it for a few days. User:Ingoolemo User_talk:Ingoolemo 06:11, 2005 Jun 14 (UTC) :I've protected it. Yuber, let me know when you'd like it to be unlocked. User:SlimVirgin ^{User_talk:SlimVirgin} 08:32, Jun 14, 2005 (UTC) ==Wikipedia:Wikiportal/Palestine== Wikipedia:Wikiportal/Palestine is not being used much. Would you be interested in updating/using it? - User:Mustafaa 00:06, 15 Jun 2005 (UTC) ==Suicide Bombing== Ther has been no "Consensus", User:Will Lakeman has pointed out that the entire article is in dire need of an overhaul, so right now I'm not particularly concerned about that small piece. I myself want to bring about a hefty amount of changes, and remove a large amount of unsourced or flatly incorrect statements. I'm going tomorrow, away for a weeks, so i'll see what it's like when i come back, but if it's still the same I will need to serious changes. As it stands there are many paragraphs about Israel, a few words about the Tamil Tigers and almost nothing on the Suicide Bombing in Iraq. There is no mention of the Salafi's role in this, of the wahabbist movements attacks on the four main Sunni Maddhabs, that more Muslims have died as a result of Suicide Bombings than of other religions... oh I could go on. I'm leaving it for a little bit, but removing blatent.. "non-facts" (shall we say). --User:Irishpunktom\^{User_talk:Irishpunktom} 20:46, Jun 16, 2005 (UTC) == Edit comment on Richard Durbin article == One word for you in regard to that editor: sockpuppet. :What's the protocol for getting guys like that blocked, anyhow? User:Shem Daimwood^{User talk:Shem Daimwood} 21:18, 16 Jun 2005 (UTC) == Hello == Hm, you recently edited Soqotri language with an intent to move all that text elsewhere - it shouldn't be on Wikipedia, as it is directly copied from [http://www.soqotra.info/new_history.html]. Generally, if an anonymous user (or any user, for that matter) inserts a long-winded block of text, and it looks mildly suspicious, run about a sentence into google - often, it's a copyvio and/or plagiarized material. Cheers, – User:Ugen64 00:46, 17 Jun 2005 (UTC) :Ah, never mind then. I'll delete it from the page I moved it to.User:Yuber^{User_talk:Yuber} 00:47, 17 Jun 2005 (UTC) == List of Muslims == You removed Bin Laden and Zarqawi from this list... please don't. They are self-proclaimed Muslims and even if they do not fit into the category under your estimation they do by in people's. We had problems with a "Terrorist" section for that list and a "Militants" section as well... and ever since List of Christian militants was deleted so has the militant section on the Muslims list... therefore they have to go into the others section... User:Grenavitar 05:45, 17 Jun 2005 (UTC) ==personal attacks on suicide bombing talk page== If I were you, I'd just leave them up there. This represents an obvious case of trolling, and I for one am not going to bother to respond to any of Enviroknot's comments if they aren't intended to work towards any version of the article. He just seems to get off on making people angry, and being made aangry himself, so maybe if we try and stop responding, he will calm down a bit. Perhaps my optimism will be ill-founded, hopefully notUser:Will Lakeman 17:17, 17 Jun 2005 (UTC) :Yeah, I'll just stop responding from now on. But you are being overly optimistic, it's been over 3 months and he hasn't "calmed down".User:Yuber^{User_talk:Yuber} 18:43, 17 Jun 2005 (UTC) ::That long? He's really got some issues then. It's a shame that he vents them here, as it must be more frustrating for him than anybody else (which is saying something). Well, I am at least encouraged that a consensus of sorts was reached between you, Jay, Myself, Tom and Noitall - I get the impression that we are all coming at the issue from very different angles.User:Will Lakeman 18:49, 17 Jun 2005 (UTC) ==Proper Editing== I hold no grudges for your role in blocking me or in your past as a serial reverter. I have been encouraged the past couple days that you have refrained from these activities and even made an acceptable edit or two. But I will get very very upset when you do these things: 1. go back to your serial reverting ways, 2. deceptively edit out my edit and call it "minor", 3. entirely edit out my edit without discussing on the talk page first, 4. go onto controversial pages and make wholesale changes, especially when those pages are far outside of your expertise as in christianity. Please honor this reasonable request and we will get along fine. --User:Noitall 20:56, Jun 17, 2005 (UTC) == Ishmael in Christianity == Hey Yuber, Noitall is correct. Ishmael is not regarded as "the ancestor" of "the Arabs" for a number of reasons that should be pretty obvious. First off, "Arabs" is far more of a linguistic identification than an indicator of common descent. Beyond that, the only claims of descent from Ishmael come from Arab muslim sources, and even those claims deal primarily with the lineage of Islam's prophet Muhammad. These sources are not viewed as authoritative (or even ''accurate'') by most Christian scholars, and therefore form no part of Christian religious philosophy wrt the r�le of Ishmael in the lineage of "the Arabs". While it is probably true that many Christians, especially in Europe, primarily as a result of the 19th century romanticism of various French writers, believe that Ishmael is the patriarch of "the Arabs" analogous to Yitzchaq being a Jewish patriarch, this belief is not, nor has it ever been, any part of Christianity. User:TShilo12 ^{User talk:TShilo12} 00:56, Jun 18, 2005 (UTC) == Toxicity parody == I don't know that it ''has'' a name - it's done as sort of a joke cover. I downloaded it off Kazaa myself, from a general search on Tenacious D. -- BDAbramson">User:BDAbramson User talk:BDAbramson 02:59, 2005 Jun 18 (UTC) *Oops - my mistake! Tenacious D parodied Chop Suey! -- BDAbramson">User:BDAbramson User talk:BDAbramson 19:01, 2005 Jun 22 (UTC) ==3RR== You've been reported for a 3RR violation at Abraham and have been blocked from editing for 24 hours. If you feel this block is unfair, feel free to e-mail me using the link on my user page. User:SlimVirgin ^{User_talk:SlimVirgin} 10:42, Jun 18, 2005 (UTC) :The diffs are here Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/3RR#User:Yuber if you want to check them. User:SlimVirgin ^{User_talk:SlimVirgin} 11:02, Jun 18, 2005 (UTC) == Unwarranted reverts == You did remove my source additions to Ma Malakat Amaynukum without stating reasons at e.g. the Talk Page. --User:Germen 12:13, 19 Jun 2005 (UTC) ==Qana== Yuber, I've left a query for you on Talk:Qana. User:SlimVirgin ^{User_talk:SlimVirgin} 03:31, Jun 20, 2005 (UTC) == Thanks. == Thanks for helping revert vandalism on my user page by enviroknot (aka Kain, Kabong whatever). --User:Anonymous editor 01:58, Jun 21, 2005 (UTC) == User:Enviroknot == User:Enviroknot can edit his own user page if he wants. If you have a problem with him editing his own user page, take it to RfC. User:JYolkowski // User talk:JYolkowski 01:59, 21 Jun 2005 (UTC) :I'd really rather that they didn't, but they'll continue regardless of what I want. Note that there are some others who are removing the template as well. This dispute would probably be helped by an RfC; if no-one opens one before tomorrow, I think I will. User:JYolkowski // User talk:JYolkowski 02:06, 21 Jun 2005 (UTC) == Misunderstood? == Man, you are probably one of the most picked on people in many articles. Why is that? I am strongly against this arbitration thing that some are doing against you, where any defense for you is removed and vandalized by other "anti-Yuber" editors. So far from what I have seen in articles that you edited is that you have a consistent POV (good thing) and you cite your sources. Since I am a high advocate of NPOV, I don't like the antagonization/harassment of specific editors. If you need any help for mediation/support at all in any of the articles, just ask. Hope that helps. --User:Anonymous editor 03:55, Jun 21, 2005 (UTC) :You're welcome. Anytime you need help on Islam-related articles especially, I'll mediate/support. --User:Anonymous editor 04:12, Jun 21, 2005 (UTC) == Ed Poor has been kind enough to nominate me for an adminship == ...which I think will go a long way toward resolving unproductive disputes on pages he and I both edit. Anyone who is interested in voting one way or the other is invited to the discussion [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Requests_for_adminship/BrandonYusufToropov#.5B.5BUser:BrandonYusufToropov.5D.5D here]. User:BrandonYusufToropov 17:08, 21 Jun 2005 (UTC) ==Protected== Islamo-fascism is now protected, as is Islamofascism. User:SlimVirgin ^{User_talk:SlimVirgin} 22:50, Jun 21, 2005 (UTC) == Lebanese == I thought using the word "variety" was more NPOV as you had said before in another article, so that's why I changed dialect to variety.User:Yuber^{User_talk:Yuber} 00:42, 22 Jun 2005 (UTC) : In general I agree, but when there's a relatively high-profile debate as here, I think it's better to mention both sides. - User:Mustafaa 00:43, 22 Jun 2005 (UTC) == Bosra == hi Yuber I think you are mixing between biblical Bozrah in Jordan and Bosra in Syria the capital of Edom is Bozrah in Jordan, as you can read in many other sites: Bozrah: The modern city of Buseirah preserves the name and location of ancient Bozrah. Bozrah was the ancient capital of the Edomites. The earliest significant remains at Buseireh are from 800 B.C. Bozrah has the largest Iron Age buildings from Transjordan, and it may have been the king�s palace. The city is mentioned in several passages from the prophets Isaiah and Jeremiah (Isa 34:6; 63:1; Jer 49:13,22). the great Nabatean capital of Petra in all of its rose-red splendor, and Bozrah (modern Buseira), capital of the ancient kingdom of Edom. Both were excellent locations for capital cities, securely protected by natural topographical features and well-situated to control the flow of commerce in the region. Jerusalem University College Current News Update --User:Urij 08:58, 22 Jun 2005 (UTC) Ancient capital city of Edom 26 miles SSE of the Dead Sea near Petra. An important Edomite strong hold from 1200 to 600 BC, it was the home of Jobab the second known king of Edom. According to the Old Tedstament its destruction was prophesied by Amos and Isaiah ..... (AHSFC) Bozrah is thought to be a very ancient town, being mentioned in tablets by Thumose the Third and Akhnaten in the 14th century BC. It was one of the first Nabatean cities in the second century BC and in the Hellenistic period it bore the name Bostra. Then the Romans arrived and the King Trajan made it a capital of the state of the Djezire under the name of Nova Trajana Bostra http://ancientneareast.tripod.com/Bostra_Bozrah_Busra.html --User:Urij 09:02, 22 Jun 2005 (UTC) by the way, my mother's birth town called Bosra... --User:Urij 09:02, 22 Jun 2005 (UTC) --User:Urij 08:26, 22 Jun 2005 (UTC) I put my answer in my talk page --User:Urij 22:00, 22 Jun 2005 (UTC) ==Injunction== Yuber, the arbitration committee has issued a temporary injunction against you, so I'm not sure whether you're supposed to be editing. See Wikipedia:Requests_for_arbitration/Yuber/Proposed_decision#Temporary_injunction. I've put a query on Wikipedia talk:Requests for arbitration/Yuber/Proposed decision to ask when it starts. User:SlimVirgin ^{User_talk:SlimVirgin} 00:39, Jun 23, 2005 (UTC) :The arbcom has confirmed that the injunction has started. Not only are you still editing, but you're still reverting. Please read the injunction: link above. User:SlimVirgin ^{User_talk:SlimVirgin} 01:33, Jun 23, 2005 (UTC) ::Please stop. Otherwise you may end up getting temporarily blocked. Thanks, User:JYolkowski // User talk:JYolkowski 02:08, 23 Jun 2005 (UTC)

Yuber

[http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Yuber&action=edit Click here to leave a message on my Talk page.]

Wikipedia:Babel

Mainly concerned with Syrian, Levantine, and pre-Islamic Arab history. I find these 3 categories of history to be the most interesting that i have ever studied, basically because they are so disrespected and marginalized in today's arab countries. User:Anonymous_editor_to_Yuber_for_a_great_amount_of_work_on_Mideast-related_articles.">image:Barnstar.png|thumb|right|100px|Barnstar, awarded by User:Anonymous editor to Yuber for a great amount of work on Mideast-related articles. ==Articles that I have contributed to== *Masyaf *Mari, Syria (expanded from stub) *Ma`loula (created) *Hauran (created) *Shahba (created) *Safita (created) *Resafa (created) *Battle of Maysalun (created) *Arabization (rewrote,made more NPOV) *Palmyra (added much more info, reorganized) *Ghassanids (added alot more info) ==Navigation== | /todo ==Useful links== *Wikipedia:Wikiportal/Palestine *Wikipedia:Wikiportal/Archaeology *Help:Contents *Wikipedia:Mailing_lists "Chaos would suit me just fine." -Yuber, Suikoden

See other meanings of words starting from letter:

Y

Words begining with Yuber:

Yuber
Yuber
Yuber/Categories
Yuber/Sandbox
Yuber/Template:Syria
Yuber/todo