==Categorization== Hello, and thanks for your contributions! It would be great if you could make your categorizing of bridges more specific so that the bottom-level :Category:Bridges doesn't just become a meaningless list of thousands of bridges all over the world. Each state category (i.e., :Category:New York) should have its own "Bridges of..." category, which could get even more particular if there are a lot of bridges in a particular locality (such as NYC). This not only solves the problem of keeping the categories organized, but it also makes for easy cross-referencing to the localities where the bridges are located, rather than just tacking on another general category header onto the article. I noticed that most of those you were categorizing connect separate states, however, but there is also a :Category:Bridges in the United States that may be the best we can do with those. Thanks! User:Postdlf 19:35 23 June 2004 (UTC) I went ahead and swapped the NJ-PA bridges to Bidges in the US, like you suggested. There's no NJ bridges category yet, so I just wiped the Riverside-Delanco's categorization for now, until there's enough NJ bridges on Wiki to make a category for it worthwhile. Hope that's better. --User:Xanzzibar 22:28, 23 Jun 2004 (UTC) == yo == you did the most arbitrary shit possible to wawa. why? They weren't arbitrary. The article's subject is only put in bold for its first occurance in the article. "It's" to "its" was a necessary fix from a contraction to the possessive, and I don't think Super Wawas deserve their own article. What can be said about them to make it deserve its own article, instead of a subsection on the primary? ==The Humungous Image Tagging Project== Hi. You've helped with the Wikipedia:WikiProject Wiki Syntax, so I thought it worth alerting you to the latest and greatest of Wikipedia fixing project, User:Yann/Untagged Images, which is seeking to put copyright tags on all of the untagged images. There are probably, oh, thirty thousand or so to do (he said, reaching into the air for a large figure). But hey: they're images ... you'll get to see lots of random pretty pictures. That must be better than looking for ''at at'' and ''the the'', non? You know you'll love it. best wishes --User:Tagishsimon User_talk:Tagishsimon == Article Licensing == Hi, I've User:rambot#Free the Rambot Articles project to get users to Wikipedia:Multi-licensing all of their contributions that they've made to either (1) all U.S. state, county, and city articles or (2) all articles, using the Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike (''CC-by-sa'') v1.0 and v2.0 Creative Commons Licenses or into the public domain if they prefer. The ''CC-by-sa'' license is a true free documentation license that is similar to Wikipedia's license, the GFDL, but it allows other projects, such as WikiTravel, to use our articles. Since you are among the Wikipedia:List_of_Wikipedians_by_number_of_edits Wikipedians by edits, I was wondering if you would be willing to multi-license all of your contributions or at ''minimum'' those on the geographic articles. Over 90% of people asked have agreed. For More Information: *User talk:Ram-Man#Multi-Licensing FAQ - Lots of questions answered *Wikipedia:Multi-licensing *User:rambot#Free the Rambot Articles project To allow us to track those users who muli-license their contributions, many users copy and paste the "I agree to Wikipedia:Multi-licensing all my contributions, with the exception of my user pages, as described below:
:I agree to Wikipedia:Multi-licensing all my contributions to any U.S. state, county, or city article as described below:
:
One of these days, I'll figure out something of value to put here. Until that day, I'll just leave this: Better two months late than never, I suppose.
See other meanings of words starting from letter:
Words begining with Xanzzibar:
Xanzzibar
Xanzzibar
Xanzzibar
==Categorization== Hello, and thanks for your contributions! It would be great if you could make your categorizing of bridges more specific so that the bottom-level :Category:Bridges doesn't just become a meaningless list of thousands of bridges all over the world. Each state category (i.e., :Category:New York) should have its own "Bridges of..." category, which could get even more particular if there are a lot of bridges in a particular locality (such as NYC). This not only solves the problem of keeping the categories organized, but it also makes for easy cross-referencing to the localities where the bridges are located, rather than just tacking on another general category header onto the article. I noticed that most of those you were categorizing connect separate states, however, but there is also a :Category:Bridges in the United States that may be the best we can do with those. Thanks! User:Postdlf 19:35 23 June 2004 (UTC) I went ahead and swapped the NJ-PA bridges to Bidges in the US, like you suggested. There's no NJ bridges category yet, so I just wiped the Riverside-Delanco's categorization for now, until there's enough NJ bridges on Wiki to make a category for it worthwhile. Hope that's better. --User:Xanzzibar 22:28, 23 Jun 2004 (UTC) == yo == you did the most arbitrary shit possible to wawa. why? They weren't arbitrary. The article's subject is only put in bold for its first occurance in the article. "It's" to "its" was a necessary fix from a contraction to the possessive, and I don't think Super Wawas deserve their own article. What can be said about them to make it deserve its own article, instead of a subsection on the primary? ==The Humungous Image Tagging Project== Hi. You've helped with the Wikipedia:WikiProject Wiki Syntax, so I thought it worth alerting you to the latest and greatest of Wikipedia fixing project, User:Yann/Untagged Images, which is seeking to put copyright tags on all of the untagged images. There are probably, oh, thirty thousand or so to do (he said, reaching into the air for a large figure). But hey: they're images ... you'll get to see lots of random pretty pictures. That must be better than looking for ''at at'' and ''the the'', non? You know you'll love it. best wishes --User:Tagishsimon User_talk:Tagishsimon == Article Licensing == Hi, I've User:rambot#Free the Rambot Articles project to get users to Wikipedia:Multi-licensing all of their contributions that they've made to either (1) all U.S. state, county, and city articles or (2) all articles, using the Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike (''CC-by-sa'') v1.0 and v2.0 Creative Commons Licenses or into the public domain if they prefer. The ''CC-by-sa'' license is a true free documentation license that is similar to Wikipedia's license, the GFDL, but it allows other projects, such as WikiTravel, to use our articles. Since you are among the Wikipedia:List_of_Wikipedians_by_number_of_edits Wikipedians by edits, I was wondering if you would be willing to multi-license all of your contributions or at ''minimum'' those on the geographic articles. Over 90% of people asked have agreed. For More Information: *User talk:Ram-Man#Multi-Licensing FAQ - Lots of questions answered *Wikipedia:Multi-licensing *User:rambot#Free the Rambot Articles project To allow us to track those users who muli-license their contributions, many users copy and paste the "
Xanzzibar
One of these days, I'll figure out something of value to put here. Until that day, I'll just leave this: Better two months late than never, I suppose.
See other meanings of words starting from letter:
X
Words begining with Xanzzibar:
Xanzzibar
Xanzzibar
These materials are based on Wikipedia and licensed under the GNU FDL
YouTube.com videos better site than Turbo Tax 2007
