
Hello, Wikipedia:Welcome, newcomers to Wikipedia. I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedia:Wikipedians. Here are some useful links in case you haven't already found them; *Wikipedia:How to edit a page *Wikipedia:Naming conventions *Wikipedia:Manual of Style If you have any questions, see the Wikipedia:Help or add a question to the Wikipedia:village pump. User:Angela 22:41, 28 Aug 2003 (UTC) ---- My guess for "quantify ethical anm outcomes" in that context is "quantify ethical and moral outcomes". Does that seem right? I would fix it but I am seeing the "can't contact database server" message, and getting only a cache copy. User:EntmootsOfTrolls ---- Re Asities/Asites, don't forget about the Move-page feature. This moves a page to a new title, and preserves the edit-history. I've redirected for you, in any case :) User:Dysprosia 06:00, 30 Aug 2003 (UTC) ---- Hi, glad to see someone else taking an interest in the bird topics. I've reverted the Asites move for the following reasons: * both plurals are more-or-less equally common * The standard text is called ''Broadbills and Asites'' * The new page was an orphan, not linking to anything, including the old page, and would not have shown in eg passerine Hope this is OK, User:Jimfbleak ---- Hi, me again The bird article taxonomy is based on ''Handbook of Birds of the World'' and, for southern species, ''Hanzab''. You will appreciate that we need to have a consistency for taxonomy, otherwise all sorts of different listings will occur. Obviously you may not agree with the current taxonomic choices, but if not it needs to be discussed with User:Tannin, User:Big iron, User:Cordyph and other bird article writers. I hope this is OK. ::ignore above, I've just realised you were just correcting errors, my apologies and thanks. User:Jimfbleak 06:25, 30 Aug 2003 (UTC) ---- When I read your Madam Hooch article, I did not know that this was about the Harry Potter stories until I followed a link. That is wrong, you should have begun by informing us of that. You cannot assume that people come to your article from another article about those stories (I, in particular, did not). Also, you wrote only a dictionary definition rather than a complete sentence, and did not highlight the name Madam Hooch. User:67.4.150.5 14:30, 30 Aug 2003 (UTC) ---- You can use the ~ (tilde) feature to sign your name to talk pages. If you type~~~ (three tilde), it will translate to ''User:username '' when you save the page. If you type ~~~~ (four tilde), it will translate to ''User:username Date '' when you save the page. Cheers, User:Cyan 18:09, 30 Aug 2003 (UTC)
P.S. Don't include the ''
On wiktionary, there is an entry for Nahuatl. When I look at the dictionary that you placed on wikipedia, the spelling for the Nahuatlian name for itself is wrong. Could you please have a look and when it is wrong, change it. PS It is really easy to start a wiktionary in Nahuatl. It starts with nah.wiktionary.org and, if you are the first one, it will be ther in roundabout an hour. Then the work starts :) User:GerardM 13:54, 24 Aug 2004 (UTC) == Ceqli == Hi, I got your message. However, I'm not sure I'm able to help you; after reading through a couple of pages of debate, it seems that VfU is mostly for deleting "wrongfully deleted" articles - that is, which were not deleted for proper reasons. If people claim that votes to delete it had a consensus in favour (putting aside, for the moment, how informed those votes were), then I'm not sure that listing it on VfU will help much. It may be better to have someone re-create the article. -- User:Pne 05:37, 8 Oct 2004 (UTC) :If someone recreates the article, it will be speedy deleted, within policy, as being a recreation of a successfuly VfDd article. And, to answer your question, I voted to keep deleted because it wasn't notable. That is all. User:Ambi 09:09, 8 Oct 2004 (UTC) ::Well, I voted. Now to see whether it'll help. *shrugs* I hate politics. -- User:Pne 07:11, 9 Oct 2004 (UTC) Thanks for messaging me. I've put in my vote to undelete, and I'll also mention it elsewhere, but there does seem to be a few people who for some reason harbor a grudge and don't want it on. -- User:BRG 13:27, Oct 9, 2004 (UTC) == Article Licensing == Hi, I've User:rambot#Free the Rambot Articles project to get users to Wikipedia:Multi-licensing all of their contributions that they've made to either (1) all U.S. state, county, and city articles or (2) all articles, using the Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike (''CC-by-sa'') v1.0 and v2.0 Creative Commons Licenses or into the public domain if they prefer. The ''CC-by-sa'' license is a true free documentation license that is similar to Wikipedia's license, the GFDL, but it allows other projects, such as WikiTravel, to use our articles. Since you are among the Wikipedia:List_of_Wikipedians_by_number_of_edits Wikipedians by edits, I was wondering if you would be willing to multi-license all of your contributions or at ''minimum'' those on the geographic articles. Over 90% of people asked have agreed. For More Information: *User talk:Ram-Man#Multi-Licensing FAQ - Lots of questions answered *Wikipedia:Multi-licensing *User:rambot#Free the Rambot Articles project To allow us to track those users who muli-license their contributions, many users copy and paste the "I agree to Wikipedia:Multi-licensing all my contributions, with the exception of my user pages, as described below:
:I agree to Wikipedia:Multi-licensing all my contributions to any U.S. state, county, or city article as described below:
:
Wiwaxia is an extinct organism. Find more info for this page.
Wiwaxia is an extinct species known mainly from fossils found in Canada's Burgess Shale deposits. Although Wiwaxia is similar to a mollusk, it does not really fit this group because of its sclerites (armor). It is still controversial to what group Wiwaxia really belongs. In 1899, Wiwaxia was first described on the basis of a single spine discovered in a Middle Cambrian bed on Mount Stephen, which lies across the valley from the Burgess Shale site. Later, after Walcott's discovery of the Burgess Shale site, complete specimens became available. Wiwaxia has long spines that project in two rows along the back. These evidently provided some protection from predators. The rest of the upper (dorsal) surface is covered with small, flat, overlapping hard plates, termed sclerites. Each of these little scales was attached with a root-like base and it is assumed Wiwaxia grew by molting these plates from time to time. Since there are none on the bottom (ventral) surface, the animal partly resembles the slug, a member of the mollusk family. However, mollusks do not have any sclerite armor, so the animal's affinity to present day species is unsettled. It did have an anterior jaw with two rows of teeth on the ventral surface, suggesting it was another bottom feeder. Fossil sizes range from 1/8 to 2 inches. Wiwaxia has recently been proposed as an annelid or at least a close relative of one. The first breakthrough in establishing Wiwaxia's affinities came from a postgraduate paleontologist at Harvard who was inspired by Stephen Jay Gould's lectures a decade or so ago. This young researcher, Nick Butterfield, managed to extract pieces of the scalelike armour from the fossilized animal. When Butterfield studied their microstructure, he noticed immediately that it was the same as that of the chitinous bristles (chaetae) that project from the bodies of such modern annelids as earthworms. His conclusion, published in 1990, was that Wiwaxia was not a mollusk at all but an annelid. Fossils
See other meanings of words starting from letter:
Words begining with Wiwaxia:
Wiwaxia
Wiwaxia
Wiwaxia
Wiwaxia
Hello, Wikipedia:Welcome, newcomers to Wikipedia. I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedia:Wikipedians. Here are some useful links in case you haven't already found them; *Wikipedia:How to edit a page *Wikipedia:Naming conventions *Wikipedia:Manual of Style If you have any questions, see the Wikipedia:Help or add a question to the Wikipedia:village pump. User:Angela 22:41, 28 Aug 2003 (UTC) ---- My guess for "quantify ethical anm outcomes" in that context is "quantify ethical and moral outcomes". Does that seem right? I would fix it but I am seeing the "can't contact database server" message, and getting only a cache copy. User:EntmootsOfTrolls ---- Re Asities/Asites, don't forget about the Move-page feature. This moves a page to a new title, and preserves the edit-history. I've redirected for you, in any case :) User:Dysprosia 06:00, 30 Aug 2003 (UTC) ---- Hi, glad to see someone else taking an interest in the bird topics. I've reverted the Asites move for the following reasons: * both plurals are more-or-less equally common * The standard text is called ''Broadbills and Asites'' * The new page was an orphan, not linking to anything, including the old page, and would not have shown in eg passerine Hope this is OK, User:Jimfbleak ---- Hi, me again The bird article taxonomy is based on ''Handbook of Birds of the World'' and, for southern species, ''Hanzab''. You will appreciate that we need to have a consistency for taxonomy, otherwise all sorts of different listings will occur. Obviously you may not agree with the current taxonomic choices, but if not it needs to be discussed with User:Tannin, User:Big iron, User:Cordyph and other bird article writers. I hope this is OK. ::ignore above, I've just realised you were just correcting errors, my apologies and thanks. User:Jimfbleak 06:25, 30 Aug 2003 (UTC) ---- When I read your Madam Hooch article, I did not know that this was about the Harry Potter stories until I followed a link. That is wrong, you should have begun by informing us of that. You cannot assume that people come to your article from another article about those stories (I, in particular, did not). Also, you wrote only a dictionary definition rather than a complete sentence, and did not highlight the name Madam Hooch. User:67.4.150.5 14:30, 30 Aug 2003 (UTC) ---- You can use the ~ (tilde) feature to sign your name to talk pages. If you type
On wiktionary, there is an entry for Nahuatl. When I look at the dictionary that you placed on wikipedia, the spelling for the Nahuatlian name for itself is wrong. Could you please have a look and when it is wrong, change it. PS It is really easy to start a wiktionary in Nahuatl. It starts with nah.wiktionary.org and, if you are the first one, it will be ther in roundabout an hour. Then the work starts :) User:GerardM 13:54, 24 Aug 2004 (UTC) == Ceqli == Hi, I got your message. However, I'm not sure I'm able to help you; after reading through a couple of pages of debate, it seems that VfU is mostly for deleting "wrongfully deleted" articles - that is, which were not deleted for proper reasons. If people claim that votes to delete it had a consensus in favour (putting aside, for the moment, how informed those votes were), then I'm not sure that listing it on VfU will help much. It may be better to have someone re-create the article. -- User:Pne 05:37, 8 Oct 2004 (UTC) :If someone recreates the article, it will be speedy deleted, within policy, as being a recreation of a successfuly VfDd article. And, to answer your question, I voted to keep deleted because it wasn't notable. That is all. User:Ambi 09:09, 8 Oct 2004 (UTC) ::Well, I voted. Now to see whether it'll help. *shrugs* I hate politics. -- User:Pne 07:11, 9 Oct 2004 (UTC) Thanks for messaging me. I've put in my vote to undelete, and I'll also mention it elsewhere, but there does seem to be a few people who for some reason harbor a grudge and don't want it on. -- User:BRG 13:27, Oct 9, 2004 (UTC) == Article Licensing == Hi, I've User:rambot#Free the Rambot Articles project to get users to Wikipedia:Multi-licensing all of their contributions that they've made to either (1) all U.S. state, county, and city articles or (2) all articles, using the Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike (''CC-by-sa'') v1.0 and v2.0 Creative Commons Licenses or into the public domain if they prefer. The ''CC-by-sa'' license is a true free documentation license that is similar to Wikipedia's license, the GFDL, but it allows other projects, such as WikiTravel, to use our articles. Since you are among the Wikipedia:List_of_Wikipedians_by_number_of_edits Wikipedians by edits, I was wondering if you would be willing to multi-license all of your contributions or at ''minimum'' those on the geographic articles. Over 90% of people asked have agreed. For More Information: *User talk:Ram-Man#Multi-Licensing FAQ - Lots of questions answered *Wikipedia:Multi-licensing *User:rambot#Free the Rambot Articles project To allow us to track those users who muli-license their contributions, many users copy and paste the "
Wiwaxia
Wiwaxia is an extinct organism. Find more info for this page.
Wiwaxia
Wiwaxia is an extinct species known mainly from fossils found in Canada's Burgess Shale deposits. Although Wiwaxia is similar to a mollusk, it does not really fit this group because of its sclerites (armor). It is still controversial to what group Wiwaxia really belongs. In 1899, Wiwaxia was first described on the basis of a single spine discovered in a Middle Cambrian bed on Mount Stephen, which lies across the valley from the Burgess Shale site. Later, after Walcott's discovery of the Burgess Shale site, complete specimens became available. Wiwaxia has long spines that project in two rows along the back. These evidently provided some protection from predators. The rest of the upper (dorsal) surface is covered with small, flat, overlapping hard plates, termed sclerites. Each of these little scales was attached with a root-like base and it is assumed Wiwaxia grew by molting these plates from time to time. Since there are none on the bottom (ventral) surface, the animal partly resembles the slug, a member of the mollusk family. However, mollusks do not have any sclerite armor, so the animal's affinity to present day species is unsettled. It did have an anterior jaw with two rows of teeth on the ventral surface, suggesting it was another bottom feeder. Fossil sizes range from 1/8 to 2 inches. Wiwaxia has recently been proposed as an annelid or at least a close relative of one. The first breakthrough in establishing Wiwaxia's affinities came from a postgraduate paleontologist at Harvard who was inspired by Stephen Jay Gould's lectures a decade or so ago. This young researcher, Nick Butterfield, managed to extract pieces of the scalelike armour from the fossilized animal. When Butterfield studied their microstructure, he noticed immediately that it was the same as that of the chitinous bristles (chaetae) that project from the bodies of such modern annelids as earthworms. His conclusion, published in 1990, was that Wiwaxia was not a mollusk at all but an annelid. Fossils
See other meanings of words starting from letter:
W
WA | WB | WC | WD | WE | WF | WG | WH | WI | WJ | WK | WL | WM | WN | WO | WP | WR | WS | WT | WU | WX | WY | WZ |Words begining with Wiwaxia:
Wiwaxia
Wiwaxia
Wiwaxia
These materials are based on Wikipedia and licensed under the GNU FDL
YouTube.com videos better site than Turbo Tax 2007
