|
||
|

VandereschNew Wikepedian (from 20/03/2002) My name is Andrew van der Esch. I am of Dutch nationality but since 20 years I am living in Italy. I am a scientist working on secondary metabolites from plants. Born 1955, married and two kids. User:Vanderesch/sandbox VandereschDear experienced Wikepedians. I have now added my article and after much moving around by other wikepedians it has finally landed where it should be and the dependence on Mahogany has been broken. Thanks Vicky Rosenzweig!! My problem now is that I would like Google to find the article when one searches for Neem. How is that done? Thanks to anyone who can help me out on that one.----- Have a look at http://www.google.com/addurl.html --User:JeLuF Hello there, Welcome, newcomers to the 'pedia! I hope you like the place and decide to wikipedians. If you need any questions answered about the project then check out Wikipedia:Help or drop me a user talk:maveric149. Cheers! --user:maveric149 Hi maveric, sorry for not reacting before but I had the Login problem many had. I logged in and as soon as I went to another page only my IP number came up. That way I couldn't check my own user page which I check through my Watchlist. Thanks for offering help. I probably will need it in the near future as I will want to add some things to the article on [Neem] I wrote. Good work and all the best. Andrew Hi maveric, I am back again and already may need your help. I would like google to find the article on Neem in Wikipedia. As you can see on my own User page user:Vanderesch somebody suggested a way, but after 3 weeks Google still doesn't come up with a hit on the Neem article. Do you know a solution that might work?? Googles webcrawler Googlebot periodically downloads the all wikipedia pages. It does take a few more weeks to a couple of months for Googlebot to get back around to wikipedia since it is constantly downloading and indexing at least some part of the net. Just give it some time and Google will display Neem. Cheers! --maveric Hi Andrew. Welcome to the 'pedia. That darn John is too quick for me. :) Still, great minds think alike: when I hit the edit conflict, his edit and mine were virtually identical. As for your size question, that could be more difficult. Small images, especially line drawings with lines off the simple vertical and horizontal, do not scale well. In this particular case, the size of the image looks just right to me: I wouldn't change it. But for future reference, I'll mention that what you really need to do to produce a reasonable quality image of any given size is work from a very large original and let your image-editing software have as many pixels to work with as possible. Also, try to shrink in even fractions. A 33% shrink, for example, nearly always looks much better than a 37% or 31% shrink. So, it looks as though there was no need for me to answer at all in this case. (John obviously types faster than I do. I guess he cheats and uses both hands at the same time!) But you are always welcome to ask. Sing out if you have any other questions. Cheers -- Tony. (User:Tannin 13:28 19 May 2003 (UTC)) : You know, that "both hands" comment might not reflect well upon you. ;) But yes, I agreed that it was just about the right size as it was, it just needed to be moved to where it would be visible "above the fold", which it wasn't before. And although I don't think it bears specifically on shrinking, you could probably get some good information about how to treat the images at Wikipedia:How to keep image file sizes as small as possible. -- User:JohnOwens 13:41 19 May 2003 (UTC) :: Actually, more generally, the pages listed at Wikipedia:Graphics tutorials might have more relevant material than that one; I haven't looked through all of them yet. -- User:JohnOwens 13:45 19 May 2003 (UTC) The Short-toed Eagle pic could stand to shrink a bit too, I see. Would you like me to do the honors, or have you found a way to do it yet? -- User:JohnOwens 14:18 21 May 2003 (UTC) ---- Andrew, when you leave a message, the best way to sign is using three tildes media:largepic.jpg | ho letto i tuoi suggerimenti, ed a questo proposito di scrivo. Una "Taxobox" con molti livelli può risultare pesante, non ho problemi nell'applicarla, cambiando il template per il futuro. Per quanto riguarda i nomi, preferisco l'italiano per identificare la suddivisione tassonomica, anche se poi la voce l'ho registrata in latino. Poichè avevo scelto una box più limitata, in certi casi ho messo sia latino che italiano, ma nel caso di box che inizi dal regno e meglio limitarsi all'italiano. L'aggiunta dei nomi in lingue straniere per le specie, serve per riconoscere animali in testi stranieri (molto spesso mi sono scontrato con articoli in internet, facenti riferimento ad animali, di cui non capivo la specie se non molto a grandi linee, come per i gabbiani). La classificazione tassonimica è sempre un problema, suddivisioni, generi, specie sono sempre in evoluzione. Io ho come base, una enciclopedia molto recente "Handbook of the Birds of the World" di Josep del Hoyo, Andrew Elliot e Jordi Sargatal dell Lynx Edicions di Barcellona. La trattazione degli uccelli è molto ampia e dettagliata con l'indicazione anche di Rhea pennata, ma come primo inizio identificativo, sostituito poi con Pterocnemia pennata. Poiche il libro è completo, mancano solo gli "oscini" o passeracei, che sono ancora in corso di produzione, ritengo di tenerlo come base per tutti i miei articoli, eventualmente si puo creare la voce Rhea pennata, con un "REDIRECT" verso Pterocnemia pennata. OK? Renato Caniatti, Genova 24/9/2003 ---- To revert an article, just click on the article history, select the most recent non-vandalized version near the top, then click on "edit page". Then put something like "Reverted to last version by ''someone''" in the Summary and click on save page. You can also edit the article prior to saving it if that's necessary (for example, if you want to include some more recent edit). User:Daniel Quinlan 10:08, Nov 10, 2003 (UTC) ---- Thanks for the compliments and advice. I may come back to Poetry in a couple of days to see if I can edit. User:Bmills 12:04, 19 Nov 2003 (UTC) ---- hello, thanks for the pointer. This is what i do in these cases (If its not a copyvio): I put a note in the user talk page, refering (kindly) him/her the the help pages. If they dont do anything, then i wikify the text, removing some eventual POViness. I dont do it right away because i think people are entitles to discover wiki by themselves! Cheers, User:Muriel Gottrop 14:40, 19 Nov 2003 (UTC) == Your sandbox == Do you want your sandbox delete? If not, then I suggest you remove the delete message from it or someone might do so. User:Dori | User talk:Dori 14:43, Mar 3, 2004 (UTC) == Broadcom == Hi! I 'm John Martinez and I work as a journalist in Japan. Do you have to delete Broadcom? Broadcom and Intel are involved with a dispute with China concerning WiFi and proprietorship. Both Broadcom and Intel are playing significant roles in the openning up of the Chinese industry, especially the wireless industry. Please do not delete the broadcom article. I am in not profiting from the article nor I am doing it for publicity. I am the author but wasn't logged in at that time. ==Borage== Hi Andrew, with nl: unreachable (I keep getting 'could not locate server') I'll answer you here: I added an image link to the taxobox on Borage. Becuase the dutch wiki cannot be accessd at the moment, I cannot save the image there and upload it here. I will try to do so later this evening or tomorrow. User:TeunSpaans 17:38, 28 Sep 2004 (UTC) == Commonwealth Secondary == Hi. Re: Commonwealth Secondary - I agree that this should be deleted but it is not a candidate for speedy deletion - please list on Wikipedia:Votes for deletion if appropriate. - User:TextureUser Talk:TextureUser:Texture 15:27, 29 Apr 2004 (UTC) == Article Licensing == Hi, I've User:rambot#Free the Rambot Articles project to get users to Wikipedia:Multi-licensing all of their contributions that they've made to either (1) all U.S. state, county, and city articles or (2) all articles, using the Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike (''CC-by-sa'') v1.0 and v2.0 Creative Commons Licenses or into the public domain if they prefer. The ''CC-by-sa'' license is a true free documentation license that is similar to Wikipedia's license, the GFDL, but it allows other projects, such as WikiTravel, to use our articles. Since you are among the Wikipedia:List_of_Wikipedians_by_number_of_edits Wikipedians by edits, I was wondering if you would be willing to multi-license all of your contributions or at ''minimum'' those on the geographic articles. Over 90% of people asked have agreed. For More Information: *User talk:Ram-Man#Multi-Licensing FAQ - Lots of questions answered *Wikipedia:Multi-licensing *User:rambot#Free the Rambot Articles project To allow us to track those users who muli-license their contributions, many users copy and paste the " See other meanings of words starting from letter: VWords begining with Vanderesch: Vanderesch Vanderesch Vanderesch/sandbox Vanderesch/sandbox |
|
These materials are based on Wikipedia and licensed under the GNU FDL
YouTube.com videos better site than Turbo Tax 2007 | ||
|
|