VIP

#REDIRECT V.I.P.

ViP

#REDIRECT Wikipedia:Vandalism in progress

Vip

#redirect Template:User

Vip

Usage: Expansion: A page link that depends on a parameter is assumed by the system to be a link to a nonexisting page and therefore rendered as a link to the edit page. To avoid this, external link style is used. What the heck happened to this thing? It's a mess! And it isn't working on the WP:VIP page any more. User:RickKUser talk:RickK 19:07, Aug 14, 2004 (UTC) :Hmm, it seems to be working just sometimes for whatever weird reason. Seems to be a bug. --User:ContiE|User talk:ContiE 19:29, Aug 14, 2004 (UTC) *There are at least two problems: :#A particular templates will not get expanded more than 5 times on the same page. This is bad for the WP:VIP page, where the template could be used hundreds of times. :#: I reported this as a bug at http://bugzilla.wikipedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=55 :#The {} sometimes expands to the value of the ''user'' parameter passed to the template, and sometimes expands to "{" followed by the expansion of }, followed by "}". This makes the template page itself look funny, even though the expansion in normal use should look better. :—User:AlanBarrett 10:54, 15 Aug 2004 (UTC) == Please don't use this template == Have you checked to see what kind of performance hit evaluating this template a thousand times has? Note that you can't use this template as a subst: , which is the only way it might truly be useful... instead it must be regenerated each time by evaluating this mess of brackets, and the relevant wikitext isn't available from VIP for cutting and pasting to another page, such as an RfC. Kind of like Gnu copyright; once you start using Template:ViP, it's hard to stop. User:Sj+">User Talk:Sj 23:55, 18 Aug 2004 (UTC) :I'll change the instruction on WP:VIP to subst:. There should be no problem with it then, I think. --User:ContiE|User talk:ContiE 00:19, Aug 19, 2004 (UTC) == merge with Template:User? == This is very similar to another template. "User" seems to be a more general name for this template function. Any objections to changing the WP:VIP instructions, redirecting this template, and eventually orphaning it? -- User:Netoholic User talk:Netoholic :Template:User is definitely nicer, named parameters aren't necessary here. I'm all for changing WP:VIP to using T:User, but this one cannot be redirected, as the calling syntax for templates with named parameters doesn't work on templates with positional parameters. Changing all the pages on which it's used isn't viable I think, and even if it were you'd be changing people's signatures too, so I'm not sure it'd be a good idea. --User:fvw*">User talk:Fvw 01:23, 2005 Feb 2 (UTC) ::: That is really frustrating. I told Sam Spade User talk:Sam Spade/ - archive/archive Januar 2004 2#Signature that he shouldn't use this template as a signature. Bah, it's his own fault. -- User:Netoholic User talk:Netoholic 01:57, 2005 Feb 2 (UTC) ::I originally created this template for WP:VIP, hence the name (I was never good in such things). Template:User seems to do the job as well, and as the creator of this template I just want to say that I don't oppose the merge, however it will be done. :-) --User:ContiE|User talk:ContiE 01:34, Feb 2, 2005 (UTC) ===WTF?=== I don't mind if you want to merge this page w that page, or ruin my signature, or whatever you think your doing, but explaining things to me in a sensible manner might have been a good idea. User_talk:Sam_Spade#your_signature_.28again.29 is no way to communicate. A link ''here'' might have been nice, or an explanation of what the major malfunction is. I'd like to hear from someone ''other'' than Netoholic, if you please. 21:46, 7 Feb 2005 (UTC) : Template:vip was not created to be used for your signature. Your use of it is a growing drain on the server resources. Normally, a signature is just text on a page, by using a template, the system has to keep track not only in case the template changes, but also all the Special:Whatlinkshere\Template:Vip. What a mess. I did ask kindly a while back. -- User:Netoholic User talk:Netoholic 21:54, 2005 Feb 7 (UTC) If anyone other than Netoholic would like to communicate, I'd be greatful. I frankly don't know what the heck he's talking about. 22:14, 7 Feb 2005 (UTC) :OK, I think I know what Netoholic was talking about now. How is this? (User:Sam Spade | user_talk:Sam Spade | Special:contributions/Sam Spade) 11:53, 8 Feb 2005 (UTC)

Vip

#REDIRECT V.I.P.

See other meanings of words starting from letter:

V

Words begining with VIP:

VIP
ViP
Vip
Vip
Vip
Vipaka
Vipankumar
Vipassana
Vipassana
Vipassana_jhanas
Vipassana_movement
Vipava
Vipava,_Slovenia
Vipentry
Viper
Viper
Viper's_Bugloss
Viper's_bugloss.JPG
VIPER.JPG
Viper.jpg
Vipera_berus
Vipera_russelli
Viperball
Viperch
Viperfish
Viperidae
Viperinae
Vipers
Vipers
Vipersp51
Vipers_bugloss1.JPG
Viper_(comics)
Viper_(disambiguation)
Viper_(rocket)
Viper_AGM-80A
Viper_Dart
Viper_Falcon
Viper_Hyper_Animation_series
Viper_Hyper_Animation_series
Viper_hyper_animation_series
Viper_in_the_Fist
Viper_Mutagen_368
Viper_Records
Viper_Room
Viper_series
Viper_Squad
Viper_Viper
Viper_Viper
Vipinchawla
Vipin_Singh
Vipiteno
Viplavakari_Lanka_Sama_Samaja_Party
Vipns.com
Vippk
VIPS
Vipsania_Agrippina
Vipsania_Julia
Vipsania_Marcella
VIPtemplate
VIPtemplate
Vipul
Vipul's_Razor
Vipul.solanki
Vipul.solanki/Desk
Vipul_Agarwal
Vipul_pratap
Vipul_Ved_Prakash
Vipuser
Vipuser
Vipuser_v1.PNG
Vip_kellykey.jpg