User:harry491 User_talk:harry491 02:03, May 25, 2005 (UTC) PS thanks for cleaning up the Reagan vandalism. ==Hello!== Hi, welcome to wikipedia. You seem to be a rather nice and sane person, let's see how you do on the wiki too! :-) User:Kim Bruning 21:34, 25 May 2005 (UTC) *kerblink* Looks like SPUI is going crazy again with his wierd edits. How odd... ;-) User:Kim Bruning 19:14, 27 May 2005 (UTC) == Thank you for your support == Thank you for supporting my candidacy for administrator. User:Kelly Martin 15:12, Jun 10, 2005 (UTC) == Vandalism == Robert consistently remove facts from reliable sources. His personal opinions are unreference and often out of date. He is not an expert in this field but he consistently remove quotes by the leading experts Gallo, Fauci, Weiss and others. I am not an AIDS denialist and resent this ''ad hominum'' attack. We should be discussing the article! User:Fred2005 14:44, 14 Jun 2005 (UTC) :This is not relevant. Refrain, refrain, refrain, from inflammitory statements--User:Tznkai 14:45, 14 Jun 2005 (UTC) == VFD listing == Just thought I'd let you know - subpages are case sensitive. I've corrected the template call on the VFD page. Cheers, User:Alphax User talk:AlphaxSpecial:Emailuser/AlphaxSpecial:Contributions/Alphax 14:45, 14 Jun 2005 (UTC) == Wikipedia:Votes for deletion/Self-induced abortion == Hi. Sorry for getting snippy and inflamatory on the vfd page. I tend to get defensive of my articles. I appreciate your open-mindedness on the topic, and willingness to be persuaded by contrary arguments - those are the marks of a great contributor. Cheers. -- BDAbramson">User:BDAbramson User talk:BDAbramson 01:46, 2005 Jun 15 (UTC) *Thank you for withdrawing the VfD. I assure you that I will continue to work on improving and substantiating the article. -- BDAbramson">User:BDAbramson User talk:BDAbramson 01:17, 2005 Jun 16 (UTC) == Excising sections == Perhaps you should consider that dispute resolution doesn't magically happen simply because you "excise" a section from an article and ask everyone to talk about it. Maybe that's all well and good when you're dealing with rational users. The AIDS article is under attack by conspiracy theorists. You are relatively new to both the article and to Wikipedia, so perhaps you haven't realized this yet. User:Rhobite 16:41, Jun 15, 2005 (UTC) :I am acting in good faith and for a better article. ::I'm sure you are acting in good faith, but your actions themselves are detrimental. User:Rhobite 17:00, Jun 15, 2005 (UTC) ===Double pro-life=== Sorry for messing things up in editing this section. Gone for today. User:Str1977 22:19, 16 Jun 2005 (UTC) No problem. Been a little frustrated, i've been working on that article all day. sorry if I seemed snappy--User:Tznkai 22:21, 16 Jun 2005 (UTC) That's all right. I think it's difficult to walk the fine line between reducing and including. Also thanks for deleting the cynicism section on religion and abortion - I reduced it considerably a few weeks ago, cutting out, well, quite cynic language, and cut it down the things actually saying something about the issue. However, I didn't dare deleting it all, lest I be accused of "religious imperialism" or something like that. So thanks. User:Str1977 07:54, 17 Jun 2005 (UTC) == Abortion == You're welcome, although it may be premature... but always nice to know I'm doing something useful around here. :-D - User:RoyBoyUser talk:RoyBoy User:RoyBoy/The 800 Club 23:52, 20 Jun 2005 (UTC) ==Comments from A ghost== I see 3RRs on Intelligent design. I got it from here for a couple hours. Can you report this? I haven't had too before.--User:A ghost 20:38, 21 Jun 2005 (UTC) :Thanks for the effort. I'm glad we got him to talk.--User:A ghost 21:57, 21 Jun 2005 (UTC)
I was told doing this would make me more legitimate, but I have no desire to talk about myself at the moment. Well. That was funny. For some reason I can't get the little vandalsim sticker back that was added as a well meaning joke related to IRC Unless that just worked. This stemmed from the idea that I won't consider myself a truly good editor until someone goes out of the way to vandalize me. And it happened for real on 6:23, 7 Jun 2005. I'm so proud. Thanks to Boothy443 for the catch. Oh, since some people on IRC are still unaware of this fact, I am NOT a sockpuppet! Tznkai's Little Green Men rules: The LGM rule: Articles should be written for the Little Green Men from outerspace. Articles must be useful and informative. Everything else is secondary. LGMs are easly confused: They have not been living here forever, and therefore need context to understand what we write. LGMs like it if you Kiss_principle: Keep It Simple Stupid, or if you prefer short and sweet. It is not true that the more information you have the better an article is. Information has to be obviously useful and relevant. LGMs are short: remove barriers for entry for the LGMs. Avoid convuluted sentances and overuse of jargon. LGMs have taste: Information is all well and good, but it has to be more useful than it is distasteful. This is not censorship, this is civility. LGMs have Attention-deficit hyperactivity disorder: Articles should be as should be as terse but intresting as possible, otherwise the LGMs get bored and leave. LGMs have a fear of conflict: Escalation is bad.
See other meanings of words starting from letter:
Words begining with Tznkai:
Tznkai
Tznkai
Tznkai
User:harry491 User_talk:harry491 02:03, May 25, 2005 (UTC) PS thanks for cleaning up the Reagan vandalism. ==Hello!== Hi, welcome to wikipedia. You seem to be a rather nice and sane person, let's see how you do on the wiki too! :-) User:Kim Bruning 21:34, 25 May 2005 (UTC) *kerblink* Looks like SPUI is going crazy again with his wierd edits. How odd... ;-) User:Kim Bruning 19:14, 27 May 2005 (UTC) == Thank you for your support == Thank you for supporting my candidacy for administrator. User:Kelly Martin 15:12, Jun 10, 2005 (UTC) == Vandalism == Robert consistently remove facts from reliable sources. His personal opinions are unreference and often out of date. He is not an expert in this field but he consistently remove quotes by the leading experts Gallo, Fauci, Weiss and others. I am not an AIDS denialist and resent this ''ad hominum'' attack. We should be discussing the article! User:Fred2005 14:44, 14 Jun 2005 (UTC) :This is not relevant. Refrain, refrain, refrain, from inflammitory statements--User:Tznkai 14:45, 14 Jun 2005 (UTC) == VFD listing == Just thought I'd let you know - subpages are case sensitive. I've corrected the template call on the VFD page. Cheers, User:Alphax User talk:AlphaxSpecial:Emailuser/AlphaxSpecial:Contributions/Alphax 14:45, 14 Jun 2005 (UTC) == Wikipedia:Votes for deletion/Self-induced abortion == Hi. Sorry for getting snippy and inflamatory on the vfd page. I tend to get defensive of my articles. I appreciate your open-mindedness on the topic, and willingness to be persuaded by contrary arguments - those are the marks of a great contributor. Cheers. -- BDAbramson">User:BDAbramson User talk:BDAbramson 01:46, 2005 Jun 15 (UTC) *Thank you for withdrawing the VfD. I assure you that I will continue to work on improving and substantiating the article. -- BDAbramson">User:BDAbramson User talk:BDAbramson 01:17, 2005 Jun 16 (UTC) == Excising sections == Perhaps you should consider that dispute resolution doesn't magically happen simply because you "excise" a section from an article and ask everyone to talk about it. Maybe that's all well and good when you're dealing with rational users. The AIDS article is under attack by conspiracy theorists. You are relatively new to both the article and to Wikipedia, so perhaps you haven't realized this yet. User:Rhobite 16:41, Jun 15, 2005 (UTC) :I am acting in good faith and for a better article. ::I'm sure you are acting in good faith, but your actions themselves are detrimental. User:Rhobite 17:00, Jun 15, 2005 (UTC) ===Double pro-life=== Sorry for messing things up in editing this section. Gone for today. User:Str1977 22:19, 16 Jun 2005 (UTC) No problem. Been a little frustrated, i've been working on that article all day. sorry if I seemed snappy--User:Tznkai 22:21, 16 Jun 2005 (UTC) That's all right. I think it's difficult to walk the fine line between reducing and including. Also thanks for deleting the cynicism section on religion and abortion - I reduced it considerably a few weeks ago, cutting out, well, quite cynic language, and cut it down the things actually saying something about the issue. However, I didn't dare deleting it all, lest I be accused of "religious imperialism" or something like that. So thanks. User:Str1977 07:54, 17 Jun 2005 (UTC) == Abortion == You're welcome, although it may be premature... but always nice to know I'm doing something useful around here. :-D - User:RoyBoyUser talk:RoyBoy User:RoyBoy/The 800 Club 23:52, 20 Jun 2005 (UTC) ==Comments from A ghost== I see 3RRs on Intelligent design. I got it from here for a couple hours. Can you report this? I haven't had too before.--User:A ghost 20:38, 21 Jun 2005 (UTC) :Thanks for the effort. I'm glad we got him to talk.--User:A ghost 21:57, 21 Jun 2005 (UTC)
Tznkai
I was told doing this would make me more legitimate, but I have no desire to talk about myself at the moment. Well. That was funny. For some reason I can't get the little vandalsim sticker back that was added as a well meaning joke related to IRC Unless that just worked. This stemmed from the idea that I won't consider myself a truly good editor until someone goes out of the way to vandalize me. And it happened for real on 6:23, 7 Jun 2005. I'm so proud. Thanks to Boothy443 for the catch. Oh, since some people on IRC are still unaware of this fact, I am NOT a sockpuppet! Tznkai's Little Green Men rules: The LGM rule: Articles should be written for the Little Green Men from outerspace. Articles must be useful and informative. Everything else is secondary. LGMs are easly confused: They have not been living here forever, and therefore need context to understand what we write. LGMs like it if you Kiss_principle: Keep It Simple Stupid, or if you prefer short and sweet. It is not true that the more information you have the better an article is. Information has to be obviously useful and relevant. LGMs are short: remove barriers for entry for the LGMs. Avoid convuluted sentances and overuse of jargon. LGMs have taste: Information is all well and good, but it has to be more useful than it is distasteful. This is not censorship, this is civility. LGMs have Attention-deficit hyperactivity disorder: Articles should be as should be as terse but intresting as possible, otherwise the LGMs get bored and leave. LGMs have a fear of conflict: Escalation is bad.
See other meanings of words starting from letter:
T
TA | TB | TC | TD | TE | TF | TG | TH | TI | TJ | TK | TL | TŁ | TM | TN | TO | TP | TR | TS | TU | TW | TX | TY | TZ |Words begining with Tznkai:
Tznkai
Tznkai
These materials are based on Wikipedia and licensed under the GNU FDL
YouTube.com videos better site than Turbo Tax 2007
