
:: Note: I may choose to reply here instead of your talk-SV Talk:User:Stevertigo Archive 1 Talk:User:Stevertigo Archive 2 Talk:User:Stevertigo Archive 3 Talk:User:Stevertigo Archive 4 Talk:User:Stevertigo Archive 5 Talk:User:Stevertigo Archive 6 Talk:User:Stevertigo Archive 7 Talk:User:Stevertigo Archive 8 Talk:User:Stevertigo Archive 9 Talk:User:Stevertigo Archive 10 ---- __TOC__ ==Article: The New Crusade:America's War on Terrorism== I want to consult with you about the inclusion of external links to Amazon. I came across them in this article you created. I can see how some might see this as commercial and was curious what your thoughts are on external links to stores.User:Tobycat 01:46, 25 Apr 2005 (UTC) Thanks for your thoughts about it - and appreciate the info. Good to know about the ISBN policy/procedure. When I mentioned ''commercial'' I guess I was referring more to the Amazon link than the article itself. I'm generally inclusionist and like the notion of information about books being in the Wikipedia. I suppose I am a little uneasy about an article linking to a point of purchase. Has there been much discussion among Wikipedians about that? I tried to find something about it and had trouble locating anything.User:Tobycat 22:15, 25 Apr 2005 (UTC) == TFD on Template:News-trade == Do not remove the TFD header from a template which is being considered for deletion until a decision has been made on that template through the WP:TFD page. Doing so is a form of vandalism. User:Kelly Martin 01:07, Apr 26, 2005 (UTC) == Template:Numbers == I have added a comment on the talk page of this template, since the heading "complex extensions" occurs twice in the body of the template. Kind regards, --User:83.88.250.55 11:00, 26 Apr 2005 (UTC) == New anti-Semitism == What recommendations would you make for the lead? --User:Viriditas | User_talk:Viriditas 21:02, 26 Apr 2005 (UTC) ::Some people may see it as "controversial" (just as some people see birth control as controversial) but I'm not sure that term is essential here. Should we modify the lead in the condom article to state, "the use of condoms is controversial". No, of course not. That lead describes what it is and how it is used. In this case, the term describes an objective phenomenon that has been documented as a resurgence and acceptability of anti-semitism. The term does not assert that "most or all political opposition toward Israel's occupation of the Palestine territories is based on an irrational hatred toward Jews", nor is that definition supported. But, the article itself certainly has POV bias (added by some editors) which we are in the middle of trying to remove and would greatly appreciate your help. --User:Viriditas | User_talk:Viriditas 21:29, 26 Apr 2005 (UTC) :::I cited the source on the talk page, and the book is found in the "further reading section". This is a partial definition, however, and could certainly be expanded to futher differentiate the new from the old anti-semitism, but the article attempts to do that in the body. --User:Viriditas | User_talk:Viriditas 21:33, 26 Apr 2005 (UTC) ::::We are in agreement on the POV sources included in the current article, and these issues are being addressed somewhat slowly. Like you, I prefer to attribute neutral sources whenever possible, and if not, attribute claimants and their positions. Any help you can offer with the content is appreciated, and I am working on clarifying the definition in the lead which I base partly on Taguieff's concept of the ""the new judeophobia" that was translated from the French as the "new anti-semitism". --User:Viriditas | User_talk:Viriditas 00:45, 27 Apr 2005 (UTC) :::::Firstly, my lead is not based primary on Targuieff, but attemps to describe the new anti-Semitism as documented in his 2002 book, which your google source does not discuss. If I may ask, who or what is your source for the critique of Targuieff, and how is it relevant to a definition of new anti-semitism? Granted, it's highly relevant if Targuieff is defining a term used in relation to something else, like Israel or Palestine, but the topic is fairly clear. Again, my lead is not based soley on Targuieff but describes the concept of the new anti-semitism in relation to the definition covered in the article. Now, if I expand the lead to cover Targuieff's definition, a cited critique of Targuieff might be necessary in the criticism section. As it stands, your google source doesn't seem to be authoritative in any way, nor is it relevant to the article. Further, the anonymous criticism which claims that Targuieff "...gives an opinion in favour of the Israelis in the territorial war which opposes them to the Palestinians," is the opinion of that anonymous source. And the claim that he "...seems to confuse anti-sionnisme and judéophobie", is erroneous as he makes the distinction clear in his 2002 book. Again, can you cite the source for this criticism? --User:Viriditas | User_talk:Viriditas 01:04, 27 Apr 2005 (UTC) ::::::You seem to have avoided my question about the source, and instead argue that because Targuieff doesn't have an article, it isn't worthy of inclusion. I haven't complained about anything, but I have asked you about the source for the criticism, so I find your reply strange. --User:Viriditas | User_talk:Viriditas 01:11, 27 Apr 2005 (UTC) This is just a note to let you know that I've read your insightful criticism on the talk page and I've moved it to its own section (since you aren't Jmabel). I should have a reply posted by tonight (I'm on HST). --User:Viriditas | User_talk:Viriditas 01:44, 1 May 2005 (UTC) == Why == *boggle* Why are you reverting my edits? – User:ClockworkSoulUser talk:ClockworkSoul 13:47, 27 Apr 2005 (UTC) Why are you creating articles like Porter's constant, which are Wikipedia:Criteria for speedy deletion as they only contain an external link? User:Ahoerstemeier 16:25, 27 Apr 2005 (UTC) :Why are all those one link articles now protected? I have the same questions about Langyel's constant.User:NatusRoma 06:02, 1 May 2005 (UTC) == Template:Tfd changes == Out of curiosity, what template are you having trouble fitting it in? I can't say I've seen that problem before. User:JYolkowski // User talk:JYolkowski 02:17, 29 Apr 2005 (UTC) == /JNT Page == Just wanted to let you know that you created the /JNT page as a regular article, rather than as a sub-page as it seems you intended. You might want to move it to the correct spot before some deletionist spots it. ;-) User:JimCollaborator User_talk:JimCollaborator 00:55, Apr 30, 2005 (UTC) == title vote on Saddam Hussein and Al-Qaeda == FYI: there is another title vote at the bottom on Talk:Saddam Hussein and Al-Qaeda User:Zen-master User talk:Zen-master 01:54, 30 Apr 2005 (UTC) == Your vote on CfD re: :Category:Iraq War and :Category:2003 Iraq conflict == Can you please go back and make your vote for ''which'' category to keep crystal clear. Maybe I'm misreading your comment, but it seems like you're in favor of keeping one of the two. In order to prevent the chance of any confusion, could you add a wiki link in your vote to the category that you wish to keep? Doing so will make tabulating votes easy and unambiguous. If I'm incorrect, and you ''do'' want to keep both, can you make that clearer in your CfD comment? User:Feco 01:55, 30 Apr 2005 (UTC) == cfd-howto == Hi - I'm curious what the rationale is for removing the howto section from WP:CFD into a template. Can you please explain? Thanks. -- User:Rick Block 04:48, 30 Apr 2005 (UTC) :Will changes to the template show up as changes for folks who watch WP:CFD? If not, seems like it might mask changes (and I'm not suggesting this is your motivation). Even if it causes no harm, I don't understand the reason to do it (surely you're not so bored that you make random changes simply because they cause no harm :) ). BTW - you can respond here if you'd like. -- User:Rick Block 00:06, 1 May 2005 (UTC) == Iraq war == Please don't make such major changes to 2003 Invasion of Iraq without discussion. Your move was very much POV and should not have been done. User:Violetriga User_talk:violetriga 11:12, 30 Apr 2005 (UTC) == Jesus == Of course I have no problem with you mediating. I don't think, though, that it is a matter of sources (but maybe I am wrong). In the specific instance I am calling attention to, I am most of all irritated by Rev of Bru's personal conduct, not explaining himself, ignoring my explanation, and then declaring that he has explained himself (just please, tell me where on the talk page you se an explanation) and that I have not explained myself! As to the substance of the edit in question I just do not know what his objections are. I think it is a matter of style and readability, he claims I am POV warring. I do not think I am POV warring, I think it is a matter of good style. So there are various elements to this problem. Please go over my account on the RfM page and then let me know if I am being unclear about something, thanks, User:Slrubenstein | User talk:Slrubenstein 23:21, 30 Apr 2005 (UTC) :Thanks. I guess I should ammend my comment about sources. It is ''possible'' that ''RoB'' thinks this is a matter of sources (in which case I hoped our discussion on the talk page in the "historicity section" would have settled them, don't know why it didn't). User:Slrubenstein | User talk:Slrubenstein 23:37, 30 Apr 2005 (UTC) For what it's worth, I much appreciate the balance the Jesus page finally appears to be achieving. I don't agree with all of it, but that's because I have my own POV, but it is fairly well established as NPOV at this point, and I rather also appreciate the thing being locked down --User:Eleuthero 05:20, 3 May 2005 (UTC) ==Guru== While you were posting a note that you've volunteered to act as mediator for the Guru article, I was posting a note, that eventually ended up on Wikipedia:Requests for page protection, to protect the article. A glance at the history log and the talk page should make the need clear. I can't recommend any particualr version to protect as I haven't been following the actual contents of the edits. Thanks for taking the role of mediator. Cheers, -User:Willmcw 23:23, Apr 30, 2005 (UTC) Thanks, Steve. Something is wrong with the format of the page. I think those two templates together are messing up the page format... --User:Zappaz 00:53, 1 May 2005 (UTC) :Steven, I have a problem with the ''factual'' accuracy warning because both Zappaz and Goethean cannot point to a certain fact that they think is wrong. They only think that the information is selective but that is not enough reason to give it a factual accuracy warning in my view. User:Andries 08:11, 1 May 2005 (UTC) :Steve, thank for your effort in meditating this article. Zappaz, keeps removing contents from the talk page that he considers libellous but I consider it important to understand the controversy regarding this article. Hence I copied it to my user page. User:Andries/guru#Why_gurus_are_controversial_in_the_West User:Andries 18:27, 1 May 2005 (UTC) FYI, the Guru article has thebig banner on your userpage. Further, people express their pov in article issues all the time - the name thing doesnt really do anything to advance a POV other than to prejudice you as one seeking to advance one - which doesnt quite work as well. -User:Stevertigo|User_talk:Stevertigo 18:02, 20 May 2005 (UTC)
== Deleting TFD's too early ==
While I can't dispute you deleting a couple of the templates (like the blank one and the disruptive LevelCheck ones), I must insist you restore :Template:Semi-policy and :Template:Valid until the voting period is complete (5 days). If you wanna help with maintenance, start from the bottom of the Wikipedia:Templates for deletion page. -- User:Netoholic User talk:Netoholic 20:42, 2005 May 18 (UTC)
== Signing your votes on TFD ==
Remember to always Wikipedia:Sign your posts on talk pages on Wikipedia:Talk page. Typing four tildes after your comment ( ~~~~ ) will insert a signature showing your Wikipedia:Username and a date/time stamp, which is very helpful. -- User:Netoholic User talk:Netoholic 02:24, 2005 May 19 (UTC)
:Sometimes I just use an -SV
:: Yes, but that's not helpful when someone wants to contact you or see what ''time'' you signed. Four tildes is easy. -- User:Netoholic User talk:Netoholic 06:16, 2005 May 19 (UTC)
==Page protection==
Greetings! I've taken the liberty of unprotecting several pages on mathematical constants you protected on April 27, as it seems to go against Wikipedia:Protection policy. A new editor came into IRC this morning asking why one of them was protected as he wished to work on it, and no valid reason for protection could be found by Rama or myself, nor were the pages listed on Wikipedia:Protected page. As presumptuous as I feel chastising an old hand, please don't do this in the future. User:Mindspillage User talk:Mindspillage 18:44, 19 May 2005 (UTC)
==Neemuch/Temp==
Please put your changes on Neemuch/Temp. User:RickKUser talk:RickK 09:25, May 22, 2005 (UTC)
== censorship ==
i would greatly appreciate it if you would:
:a) respond to my explanation for why i removed the far side comic which i placed on the talkpage the first time i removed it, which explains that it is a copyvio, that it is pov, and that comics are not encyclopedic unless the article is about the comic (have you ever seen comics used in this way in encyclopedias?).
:b) refrain from accusing me of censorship when i explain my reasoning for the removal on the talkpage (an explanation for which there was no response), stand by to watch the addition of ridiculous, inaccurate, and generally bogus edits because evolutionists don't have the courage to put npov before their own bigotry and paranoia, and have given up on adding cited, sourced descriptions of creationism because they are inevitably deleted.
:c) refrain from accusing me of censorship in edit summaries, which is not a place for such comments whether or not they are true.
thank you. User:Ungtss 13:40, 23 May 2005 (UTC)
== Worth a try ==
By your suggestion, Wikipedia:Templates_for_deletion#Template:delete. User:Radiant!User_talk:Radiant!meta:mergist 07:04, May 24, 2005 (UTC)
== Numbers template ==
At Wikipedia:WikiProject Numbers we're wondering for what kinds of pages you meant Template:Numbers to be used. User:Anton Mravcek 21:00, 24 May 2005 (UTC)
== Fixed up the first paragraph of the ACIM article ==
Dear Steve,
As per your suggestion, I have just enhanced the first paragraph of the ACIM article. Any further suggestions for improvements would be most appreciated.
Sincerely,
User:Scottperry 03:38, May 25, 2005 (UTC)
== Further cleanup of ACIM article ==
Dear Steve,
As per some of your suggestions, I have gone ahead and further cleaned up the intro to the ACIM article.
Thanks,
User:Scottperry 14:30, May 25, 2005 (UTC)
== Wikipede ==
Hi Steve. :Image:Wikipedesketch1.png was listed on WP:IFD by User:Radiant!. I don't know whether you want to delete it in favor of :Image:Wikipede1.png; anyway, I'll leave them both alone, since they're both used. Cheers, User:Dbenbenn | User talk:Dbenbenn 20:00, 28 May 2005 (UTC)
== Armenian Genocide ==
Hi. I did not revert Yce materials, but Presumably. It was copypasted from an article from the web, which alone is against Wikipedia policy of copyrights. Regards User:Fadix 01:24, 29 May 2005 (UTC)
== Thanks for the assistance with the ACIM article ==
Dear Steve,
Thanks for your many helpful comments and your work on the ACIM article. As I feel certain you must have noticed by now, this article is of particular interest to me as I am a student of this work. I would guess that you are probably a bit more on the 'right side' of the spectrum of Christianity, than I. Still, what seems to me to make Wikipedia work as well as it does is the fact that Truth is always stronger than fiction, and in the meeting place of the Wikipedia, it seems to me that eventually folks are able to come up with a greater, more whole perspective on things. More whole and complete than any one particular individual's more limited understanding of something. Your input there has indeed broadened my perspectives. Thanks....
Take care,
User:Scottperry 17:14, May 29, 2005 (UTC) == :Image:Sciencecenter.jpg == I am little confused as to who took this image. Can you clear that up? User:Burgundavia (User talk:Burgundavia) 03:54, May 30, 2005 (UTC) == Template:Special == This template was put on TFD, and the consensus was to userfy. Thus, I've moved it to User:Stevertigo/Special. Yours, User:Radiant!User_talk:Radiant!meta:mergist 08:25, Jun 1, 2005 (UTC) == Trust edit == Sad to see my "Trust is hope in action" go, but I think you're right about the inter-personal remit of "trust". The phrase just seemed so poetic... ;) == Trust == I think "Faith is hope in action" pretty much makes sense... maybe I'll have a go at the "Faith" article. User:Weaverluke == creating experimental templates == Hi Stevertigo, I'm sure you've noticed that a lot of templates that you have created have gone through tfd. I would suggest that in the future you use your userspace for your experimental templates. Then if they get widely used they can always be moved to templatespace. Would save a lot of work at tfd. Thanks in advance. --User:MarSch 12:10, 4 Jun 2005 (UTC) :Actually, perhaps you could take a look through all those project templates of yours and userfy the unused ones that you want to keep and list the rest at tfd, thanks --User:MarSch 13:37, 4 Jun 2005 (UTC) == Possible new mediator and committee chair == User:MacGyverMagic has nominated himself to be a mediator and indicated he's willing to take over as chair. In an effort to help keep the mediation process alive, it would be nice if you could comment on this at Wikipedia:Mediation Committee. --User:Michael Snow 20:12, 4 Jun 2005 (UTC) *I'm trying to get the RFM page more readable by archiving old and/or failed requests. Can you go through the list of requests and give me an update on the cases you mediated or otherwise know about? User:MacGyverMagic|User talk:MacGyverMagic 18:13, Jun 5, 2005 (UTC) == Faith == Fair cop guv'nor. ; ) User:Weaverluke 08:58, 6 Jun 2005 (UTC) ==Ethno-stub== Hi Stevertigo... any reason why you moved and deleted a heavily-used stub template, without consultation with TFD or the Stub sorting WikiProject? The template was named in accordance with the naming guidelines of WP:WSS, unlike the new name which you seem to have decided to use, and has been restored to its former place. If you plan to do such a thing in the future, please at the very least let those who use these stub templates know what you are doing, or - better still - put the suggestion up for debate in one of the places where such decisions are normally made. Don't leave stub sorters to suddenly discovere a frequently used template has disappeared. User:Grutness...''User_talk:Grutness 06:34, 9 Jun 2005 (UTC) :(you replied) ''I assume you were talking about Template:ethno-stub. I had simply forked it to separate ethnic groups and general ethnology stubs. Whats the heck's wrong with that?'' That might have been what you were trying to do, but what you actually did was move some items into ethnic-stub, then delete the original template. As to what's wrong with that, well firstly there was no discussion at WP:WSS/C about making a new template and stub category. Secondly, the deleted template was on over 200 articles, so they all suddenly sprouted redlinks. Thirdly, the deletion was done without reference to WP:TFD - it was just suddenly gone with no warning. If you want to split the category into two different categories (which, given the size of the category, isn't really necessary), then please follow the guidelines listed on the various stub-related pages in Wikipedia and go through the discussion process first! User:Grutness...''User_talk:Grutness 07:56, 10 Jun 2005 (UTC) == Ghostwriting and ACIM == Dear Steve,
I know of no other instance where the term ''ghostwriter'' actually refers to a supernatural writer. Normally the term ghostwriter refers to an author that is intentionally not listed in any way on (or in) a book. In the case of ACIM, not only did Schucman leave a spot for the author she believed wrote the book when she filed the copyright (anonymous), but within the book it is full of references to having actually been authored by Jesus. To term the authorship of ACIM as a form of ghostwriting is not consistent with the dictionary definition of ghostwriting, which is:
After reading some encyclopedia Britannica articles on other new religious movements, like Science of the Mind, Mormonism, and Christian Science, I have attempted to reword the intro along these lines, and attempted to remove some of the phrases you suggested as not being NPOV. User:Scottperry 11:11, Jun 10, 2005 (UTC) == Reply to point by point breakdown of ACIM intro == Dear Steve,
Since my last edit, I came across your point by point breakdown re the ACIM intro, and here is my point by point reply: 1. A Course In Miracles (or "ACIM") is a book on spiritual principles, * First thing - What is it? ~ A book by someone about something, read by someone, who draws x conclusions and bases x associations and concepts on it. -SV ''
In an attempt to try to centralize our recent in depth discussion of the ACIM article, I have now posted some of our recent conversation about this on the ACIM talk page at [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:A_Course_In_Miracles#Further_thougts_about_point_by_point_breakdown ACIM talk page]. Perhaps this was your initial intention when you first posted your in depth point by point breakdown there. At any rate, my most recent reply to you is also now posted there. Thanks, User:Scottperry 19:10, Jun 10, 2005 (UTC) PS: Sorry I got a little hot and bothered about some of the changes over at the ACIM article. That was a bit stupid of me. Ouch! It hurts to have to say things like this.... Cheers, User:Scottperry 04:13, Jun 18, 2005 (UTC) == Template:Merge-tasks == What is this template to be used for? Or is it no longer needed and eligible for deletion? -- User:Beland 06:00, 13 Jun 2005 (UTC) == Thanks very much == Thanks for helping in renovating my stubborn editions in the articles... thanks! Deryck C., HK,CN :Bù xie/youre absolutely welcome. :) -User:Stevertigo|User_talk:Stevertigo 09:35, 17 Jun 2005 (UTC) == WP:TFD == Template:Npov/perpetual, which you created, has been listed for deletion at WP:TFD. User:BlankVerse User talk:BlankVerse 05:45, 18 Jun 2005 (UTC) == Pakistan == Hi! I noticed you added :Image:Pakistan.gif to the top of Pakistan. The edit was done while the page was under protection, and it unfortunately made the country infobox get moved to the middle of the page under Firefox. It's also not a free image, and I'm not sure that it really belongs in the top of the article (I don't think many country articles have a map like that near the top). If the article weren't protected, I'd remove it, but since it is, I wanted to come to ask you. Please go take a look at the page in Firefox if you can, and do what you think is best. Thanks. :) User:Kmccoy User_talk:Kmccoy 01:42, 19 Jun 2005 (UTC) I messed up the image link above, and also it's been reverted anyway. Sorry for the trouble. :) == Talk:Bombing of Dresden in World War II == Do you have a source for you posting to BDWWII: :''"Out of 28,410 houses in the inner city of Dresden, 24,866 were destroyed." I would like to source the article and I do not have quite the same figures as you state for this. User:Philip Baird Shearer 18:50, 20 Jun 2005 (UTC) == Royal consorts and monarchs == hi there. i´m trying to get a discussion going to change the rules on naming consorts, monarchs, etc.. it´s a bit of mess at the moment. maybe you wanna join in and give your opinion? feel free [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia_talk:Naming_conventions_%28names_and_titles%29#Royal_consorts_and_monarchs] cheers User:Antares911 23:38, 21 Jun 2005 (UTC) == Benazir Bhutto == R you interested in to join the discussion of cleaning up the article of Benazir Bhutto? Talk:Benazir Bhutto--User:Raju1 03:14, 22 Jun 2005 (UTC)
{{scroller|700|400||---- /Tools Wikipedia:WikiProject-Wikipedia:WikiProject Inclusion - Wikipedia:WikiProject Journalism - Wikipedia:WikiProject Illustration - Wikipedia:WikiProject WikiProject - Wikipedia:WikiProject Countering Systemic Bias - Wikipedia:AssociationsWikipedia:Mediation committee - Special:Log/block Wikipedia:Today's featured article/ , ---- /* - /notes - /. - /test - /monobook.css - /? - /Iraq War - Criticism of the Iraq War -
move censor > censor (Rome) - Infotainment - News anchor Way of life Extraordinary Rendition, Template:Creationism2 Template:Semitic gods Template:Ancient gods template:USculture ---- Project: Template:Timeline-ancient - template:annotation - template:annote - template:notation - template:tooltip - Template:Unsolved - Template:access - template:noaccess - template:iraq-war - Template:Scroller - Template:RAScroller - template:mathsym Template:Scroller2 - - - Template:news-trade - Template:Phoenicians template:mass-media - Template:Timeline-ancient, Template:Timeline-empires - Ancient Near East (Ancient Orient,) and Empires - based on Short chronology(merge too) - History of Babylon, etc. - Template:math-constants - Template:Math-symbols - Template:math-explain Template:String-theory Template:Quantum-theory Template:numbers Template:Abstract-algebra Template:manifolds Template:Logic Wigner function - Template:Hypothetical - Template:Commandline ---- Template:Timeline-empires - Template:Pprotected - Template:Phoenicians - template:news-rank - Template:Adam-tree Template:Noah-tree - List of Popes (graphical) - :de:Liste der Päpste (graphisch) - Unsolved problems in physics - Template:news-trade - Template:journalism - Template:Marketing - template:prostitution ---- Reading: Transgressing the Boundaries: Towards a Transformative Hermeneutics of Quantum Gravity String theory M-theory - could use some laymanization and hard math w explanations, etc ---- }} [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Search?search=constant&fulltext=Search Search:"constant"] My first edit - sometime in Summer 2002 (Spring?). Along the way, I wrote/edited a bunch of pseudopolicy and wikiculture treatments, as well as starting those WP:WP - people used to find and link to those uberlong-titled policy pages without shortcuts, chaq. My focus is on writing good introductory paragraphs to articles which I feel could be improved. The lead sets the tone for the whole article, and its amazing how a single word can shift the tenor to or from neutrality. In some cases, my rewrites have remained untouched for months and even years, even for controversial articles. Merge: wikipedia:wikiday template:shortchronology Template:merge-tasks [[Image:Wikiday.png|right|300px|left|thumb|Wikiday chart. Current time is UTC-GMT]] Wikipedian artists {| width="270px" align="right" style="text-align:center; border:1px solid #ffc9c9; background-color:#FFFFF3;" |- padding:1em;padding-top:0.5em;" | |style="font-size: 85%"|This is a Wikipedia user page. If you find this page on any site other than Wikipedia, you are viewing a mirror site. Be aware that the page may be outdated, and that the user this page belongs to may have no personal affiliation with any site other than Wikipedia itself. The original page is located at [http://%65%6E%2E%77%69%6B%69%70%65%64%69%61%2E%6F%72%67/%77%69%6B%69/: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/:] . |}
See other meanings of words starting from letter:
Words begining with Stevertigo:
Stevertigo
Stevertigo
Stevertigo.
Stevertigo/
Stevertigo/*
Stevertigo/.
Stevertigo/?
Stevertigo/?/t
Stevertigo/cleanup
Stevertigo/DLO
Stevertigo/Draft
Stevertigo/Editorial_policy
Stevertigo/Editorial_policy
Stevertigo/Favorite_Wikipedian_quotes
Stevertigo/Grain_of_salt_(philosophical_interpretations)
Stevertigo/Gulf_war_notes
Stevertigo/Images
Stevertigo/Iraq_War
Stevertigo/Kosovo_notes
Stevertigo/Links
Stevertigo/Math-constants
Stevertigo/monobook.css
Stevertigo/monobook.css
Stevertigo/monobook.js
Stevertigo/notes
Stevertigo/old
Stevertigo/old
Stevertigo/Sand_box
Stevertigo/Special
Stevertigo/temp
Stevertigo/test
Stevertigo/Tools
Stevertigo/Tooltip-code
Stevertigo/Turkey
Stevertigo/Turkish_atrocities_against_Kurds
Stevertigo/Turkish_atrocities_against_Kurds
Stevertigo/War_on_Terror_timeline
Stevertigo:logical_fallacy
Stevertigo_Gulf_war_notes
Stevertigo
:: Note: I may choose to reply here instead of your talk-SV Talk:User:Stevertigo Archive 1 Talk:User:Stevertigo Archive 2 Talk:User:Stevertigo Archive 3 Talk:User:Stevertigo Archive 4 Talk:User:Stevertigo Archive 5 Talk:User:Stevertigo Archive 6 Talk:User:Stevertigo Archive 7 Talk:User:Stevertigo Archive 8 Talk:User:Stevertigo Archive 9 Talk:User:Stevertigo Archive 10 ---- __TOC__ ==Article: The New Crusade:America's War on Terrorism== I want to consult with you about the inclusion of external links to Amazon. I came across them in this article you created. I can see how some might see this as commercial and was curious what your thoughts are on external links to stores.User:Tobycat 01:46, 25 Apr 2005 (UTC) Thanks for your thoughts about it - and appreciate the info. Good to know about the ISBN policy/procedure. When I mentioned ''commercial'' I guess I was referring more to the Amazon link than the article itself. I'm generally inclusionist and like the notion of information about books being in the Wikipedia. I suppose I am a little uneasy about an article linking to a point of purchase. Has there been much discussion among Wikipedians about that? I tried to find something about it and had trouble locating anything.User:Tobycat 22:15, 25 Apr 2005 (UTC) == TFD on Template:News-trade == Do not remove the TFD header from a template which is being considered for deletion until a decision has been made on that template through the WP:TFD page. Doing so is a form of vandalism. User:Kelly Martin 01:07, Apr 26, 2005 (UTC) == Template:Numbers == I have added a comment on the talk page of this template, since the heading "complex extensions" occurs twice in the body of the template. Kind regards, --User:83.88.250.55 11:00, 26 Apr 2005 (UTC) == New anti-Semitism == What recommendations would you make for the lead? --User:Viriditas | User_talk:Viriditas 21:02, 26 Apr 2005 (UTC) ::Some people may see it as "controversial" (just as some people see birth control as controversial) but I'm not sure that term is essential here. Should we modify the lead in the condom article to state, "the use of condoms is controversial". No, of course not. That lead describes what it is and how it is used. In this case, the term describes an objective phenomenon that has been documented as a resurgence and acceptability of anti-semitism. The term does not assert that "most or all political opposition toward Israel's occupation of the Palestine territories is based on an irrational hatred toward Jews", nor is that definition supported. But, the article itself certainly has POV bias (added by some editors) which we are in the middle of trying to remove and would greatly appreciate your help. --User:Viriditas | User_talk:Viriditas 21:29, 26 Apr 2005 (UTC) :::I cited the source on the talk page, and the book is found in the "further reading section". This is a partial definition, however, and could certainly be expanded to futher differentiate the new from the old anti-semitism, but the article attempts to do that in the body. --User:Viriditas | User_talk:Viriditas 21:33, 26 Apr 2005 (UTC) ::::We are in agreement on the POV sources included in the current article, and these issues are being addressed somewhat slowly. Like you, I prefer to attribute neutral sources whenever possible, and if not, attribute claimants and their positions. Any help you can offer with the content is appreciated, and I am working on clarifying the definition in the lead which I base partly on Taguieff's concept of the ""the new judeophobia" that was translated from the French as the "new anti-semitism". --User:Viriditas | User_talk:Viriditas 00:45, 27 Apr 2005 (UTC) :::::Firstly, my lead is not based primary on Targuieff, but attemps to describe the new anti-Semitism as documented in his 2002 book, which your google source does not discuss. If I may ask, who or what is your source for the critique of Targuieff, and how is it relevant to a definition of new anti-semitism? Granted, it's highly relevant if Targuieff is defining a term used in relation to something else, like Israel or Palestine, but the topic is fairly clear. Again, my lead is not based soley on Targuieff but describes the concept of the new anti-semitism in relation to the definition covered in the article. Now, if I expand the lead to cover Targuieff's definition, a cited critique of Targuieff might be necessary in the criticism section. As it stands, your google source doesn't seem to be authoritative in any way, nor is it relevant to the article. Further, the anonymous criticism which claims that Targuieff "...gives an opinion in favour of the Israelis in the territorial war which opposes them to the Palestinians," is the opinion of that anonymous source. And the claim that he "...seems to confuse anti-sionnisme and judéophobie", is erroneous as he makes the distinction clear in his 2002 book. Again, can you cite the source for this criticism? --User:Viriditas | User_talk:Viriditas 01:04, 27 Apr 2005 (UTC) ::::::You seem to have avoided my question about the source, and instead argue that because Targuieff doesn't have an article, it isn't worthy of inclusion. I haven't complained about anything, but I have asked you about the source for the criticism, so I find your reply strange. --User:Viriditas | User_talk:Viriditas 01:11, 27 Apr 2005 (UTC) This is just a note to let you know that I've read your insightful criticism on the talk page and I've moved it to its own section (since you aren't Jmabel). I should have a reply posted by tonight (I'm on HST). --User:Viriditas | User_talk:Viriditas 01:44, 1 May 2005 (UTC) == Why == *boggle* Why are you reverting my edits? – User:ClockworkSoulUser talk:ClockworkSoul 13:47, 27 Apr 2005 (UTC) Why are you creating articles like Porter's constant, which are Wikipedia:Criteria for speedy deletion as they only contain an external link? User:Ahoerstemeier 16:25, 27 Apr 2005 (UTC) :Why are all those one link articles now protected? I have the same questions about Langyel's constant.User:NatusRoma 06:02, 1 May 2005 (UTC) == Template:Tfd changes == Out of curiosity, what template are you having trouble fitting it in? I can't say I've seen that problem before. User:JYolkowski // User talk:JYolkowski 02:17, 29 Apr 2005 (UTC) == /JNT Page == Just wanted to let you know that you created the /JNT page as a regular article, rather than as a sub-page as it seems you intended. You might want to move it to the correct spot before some deletionist spots it. ;-) User:JimCollaborator User_talk:JimCollaborator 00:55, Apr 30, 2005 (UTC) == title vote on Saddam Hussein and Al-Qaeda == FYI: there is another title vote at the bottom on Talk:Saddam Hussein and Al-Qaeda User:Zen-master User talk:Zen-master 01:54, 30 Apr 2005 (UTC) == Your vote on CfD re: :Category:Iraq War and :Category:2003 Iraq conflict == Can you please go back and make your vote for ''which'' category to keep crystal clear. Maybe I'm misreading your comment, but it seems like you're in favor of keeping one of the two. In order to prevent the chance of any confusion, could you add a wiki link in your vote to the category that you wish to keep? Doing so will make tabulating votes easy and unambiguous. If I'm incorrect, and you ''do'' want to keep both, can you make that clearer in your CfD comment? User:Feco 01:55, 30 Apr 2005 (UTC) == cfd-howto == Hi - I'm curious what the rationale is for removing the howto section from WP:CFD into a template. Can you please explain? Thanks. -- User:Rick Block 04:48, 30 Apr 2005 (UTC) :Will changes to the template show up as changes for folks who watch WP:CFD? If not, seems like it might mask changes (and I'm not suggesting this is your motivation). Even if it causes no harm, I don't understand the reason to do it (surely you're not so bored that you make random changes simply because they cause no harm :) ). BTW - you can respond here if you'd like. -- User:Rick Block 00:06, 1 May 2005 (UTC) == Iraq war == Please don't make such major changes to 2003 Invasion of Iraq without discussion. Your move was very much POV and should not have been done. User:Violetriga User_talk:violetriga 11:12, 30 Apr 2005 (UTC) == Jesus == Of course I have no problem with you mediating. I don't think, though, that it is a matter of sources (but maybe I am wrong). In the specific instance I am calling attention to, I am most of all irritated by Rev of Bru's personal conduct, not explaining himself, ignoring my explanation, and then declaring that he has explained himself (just please, tell me where on the talk page you se an explanation) and that I have not explained myself! As to the substance of the edit in question I just do not know what his objections are. I think it is a matter of style and readability, he claims I am POV warring. I do not think I am POV warring, I think it is a matter of good style. So there are various elements to this problem. Please go over my account on the RfM page and then let me know if I am being unclear about something, thanks, User:Slrubenstein | User talk:Slrubenstein 23:21, 30 Apr 2005 (UTC) :Thanks. I guess I should ammend my comment about sources. It is ''possible'' that ''RoB'' thinks this is a matter of sources (in which case I hoped our discussion on the talk page in the "historicity section" would have settled them, don't know why it didn't). User:Slrubenstein | User talk:Slrubenstein 23:37, 30 Apr 2005 (UTC) For what it's worth, I much appreciate the balance the Jesus page finally appears to be achieving. I don't agree with all of it, but that's because I have my own POV, but it is fairly well established as NPOV at this point, and I rather also appreciate the thing being locked down --User:Eleuthero 05:20, 3 May 2005 (UTC) ==Guru== While you were posting a note that you've volunteered to act as mediator for the Guru article, I was posting a note, that eventually ended up on Wikipedia:Requests for page protection, to protect the article. A glance at the history log and the talk page should make the need clear. I can't recommend any particualr version to protect as I haven't been following the actual contents of the edits. Thanks for taking the role of mediator. Cheers, -User:Willmcw 23:23, Apr 30, 2005 (UTC) Thanks, Steve. Something is wrong with the format of the page. I think those two templates together are messing up the page format... --User:Zappaz 00:53, 1 May 2005 (UTC) :Steven, I have a problem with the ''factual'' accuracy warning because both Zappaz and Goethean cannot point to a certain fact that they think is wrong. They only think that the information is selective but that is not enough reason to give it a factual accuracy warning in my view. User:Andries 08:11, 1 May 2005 (UTC) :Steve, thank for your effort in meditating this article. Zappaz, keeps removing contents from the talk page that he considers libellous but I consider it important to understand the controversy regarding this article. Hence I copied it to my user page. User:Andries/guru#Why_gurus_are_controversial_in_the_West User:Andries 18:27, 1 May 2005 (UTC) FYI, the Guru article has the
Thanks for your many helpful comments and your work on the ACIM article. As I feel certain you must have noticed by now, this article is of particular interest to me as I am a student of this work. I would guess that you are probably a bit more on the 'right side' of the spectrum of Christianity, than I. Still, what seems to me to make Wikipedia work as well as it does is the fact that Truth is always stronger than fiction, and in the meeting place of the Wikipedia, it seems to me that eventually folks are able to come up with a greater, more whole perspective on things. More whole and complete than any one particular individual's more limited understanding of something. Your input there has indeed broadened my perspectives. Thanks....
Take care,
User:Scottperry 17:14, May 29, 2005 (UTC) == :Image:Sciencecenter.jpg == I am little confused as to who took this image. Can you clear that up? User:Burgundavia (User talk:Burgundavia) 03:54, May 30, 2005 (UTC) == Template:Special == This template was put on TFD, and the consensus was to userfy. Thus, I've moved it to User:Stevertigo/Special. Yours, User:Radiant!User_talk:Radiant!meta:mergist 08:25, Jun 1, 2005 (UTC) == Trust edit == Sad to see my "Trust is hope in action" go, but I think you're right about the inter-personal remit of "trust". The phrase just seemed so poetic... ;) == Trust == I think "Faith is hope in action" pretty much makes sense... maybe I'll have a go at the "Faith" article. User:Weaverluke == creating experimental templates == Hi Stevertigo, I'm sure you've noticed that a lot of templates that you have created have gone through tfd. I would suggest that in the future you use your userspace for your experimental templates. Then if they get widely used they can always be moved to templatespace. Would save a lot of work at tfd. Thanks in advance. --User:MarSch 12:10, 4 Jun 2005 (UTC) :Actually, perhaps you could take a look through all those project templates of yours and userfy the unused ones that you want to keep and list the rest at tfd, thanks --User:MarSch 13:37, 4 Jun 2005 (UTC) == Possible new mediator and committee chair == User:MacGyverMagic has nominated himself to be a mediator and indicated he's willing to take over as chair. In an effort to help keep the mediation process alive, it would be nice if you could comment on this at Wikipedia:Mediation Committee. --User:Michael Snow 20:12, 4 Jun 2005 (UTC) *I'm trying to get the RFM page more readable by archiving old and/or failed requests. Can you go through the list of requests and give me an update on the cases you mediated or otherwise know about? User:MacGyverMagic|User talk:MacGyverMagic 18:13, Jun 5, 2005 (UTC) == Faith == Fair cop guv'nor. ; ) User:Weaverluke 08:58, 6 Jun 2005 (UTC) ==Ethno-stub== Hi Stevertigo... any reason why you moved and deleted a heavily-used stub template, without consultation with TFD or the Stub sorting WikiProject? The template was named in accordance with the naming guidelines of WP:WSS, unlike the new name which you seem to have decided to use, and has been restored to its former place. If you plan to do such a thing in the future, please at the very least let those who use these stub templates know what you are doing, or - better still - put the suggestion up for debate in one of the places where such decisions are normally made. Don't leave stub sorters to suddenly discovere a frequently used template has disappeared. User:Grutness...''User_talk:Grutness 06:34, 9 Jun 2005 (UTC) :(you replied) ''I assume you were talking about Template:ethno-stub. I had simply forked it to separate ethnic groups and general ethnology stubs. Whats the heck's wrong with that?'' That might have been what you were trying to do, but what you actually did was move some items into ethnic-stub, then delete the original template. As to what's wrong with that, well firstly there was no discussion at WP:WSS/C about making a new template and stub category. Secondly, the deleted template was on over 200 articles, so they all suddenly sprouted redlinks. Thirdly, the deletion was done without reference to WP:TFD - it was just suddenly gone with no warning. If you want to split the category into two different categories (which, given the size of the category, isn't really necessary), then please follow the guidelines listed on the various stub-related pages in Wikipedia and go through the discussion process first! User:Grutness...''User_talk:Grutness 07:56, 10 Jun 2005 (UTC) == Ghostwriting and ACIM == Dear Steve,
I know of no other instance where the term ''ghostwriter'' actually refers to a supernatural writer. Normally the term ghostwriter refers to an author that is intentionally not listed in any way on (or in) a book. In the case of ACIM, not only did Schucman leave a spot for the author she believed wrote the book when she filed the copyright (anonymous), but within the book it is full of references to having actually been authored by Jesus. To term the authorship of ACIM as a form of ghostwriting is not consistent with the dictionary definition of ghostwriting, which is:
''"to write speeches, books, articles, etc., for another person who is named as or presumed to be the author."''Here it is assumed that both the true author and the alleged author are being presented as real living, breathing, flesh and blood people. Ghostwriting is not to be confused with channeling, as these are two entirely different things. If you are asserting that Schucman actually knowingly wrote the work and surreptitiously tried to present Jesus as its true author, then this would not be referred to as ghostwriting, but rather as a false attribution. If you are asserting that Shucman herself ever claimed that she ghostwrote the book, then could you please list your sources for this claim? Thanks, Scott Perry == OK, lets compare apples to apples == If you want to insert the term ghostwriting into the description of ACIM, why not insert it into the various sections of the Bible where various Biblical authors claim to be quoting from God? Why use this fuzzy self assuredness when the article about the Bible says that its authors "are inspired by God"? Let's be fair about this and say instead that the "claim to be inspired by God." I'm willing to let you make these changes to the ACIM article if you would be willing to let me rewrite the article about the Bible in the same fashion. Deal? Scott
== Comparing bronze apples to fresh sprouts == Ah, so now you spring your little argument youve been itching for a while to do. In otherwords, 'How can Wikipedia support the supernatural claims in the Bible, and not those in ''my'' particular brand new religion.' First of all, Wikipedia doesnt support anything. Articles are to be written NPOV - that doesnt mean that articles dont ever use Biblespeak, rather when it ''is'' used, its used in proper context: "In the Bible, etc. etc." This is not the Schucmanism Encyclopedia. Even if the claim that Jesus wrote the thing was universal among Christians, this is not the Christian Encyclopedia. Im not particularly attached to the term ghostwriting, but your wording - that [whatever it was called] is like channeling, etc - was not neutral, and placed too much emphasis on a trivial matter - trivial, because supernatural claims, despite our understanding of them in faith, are not encyclopedically substantive.== Thanks for not insisting on referring to schucman as a ghost-writer == Dear Steve,This is of course the problem with religion - a little knowledge is a dangerous thing, and a lot of knowledge of just one thing is just plain dogma. You seem to be asserting that there is a dogmatic bias in wikipedia regarding the Bible. Its interesting, but you need to poing out specific examples, and then you need to deal with them on a case by case basis. Maybe you have a point here - I cant tell ATP. Dont forget "the log in your own" BTW. Its obviously a very touchy subject, but we deal from time to time with people seeking to push a POV in their writing, and after a while they realize that theyve already added all the ''information'' necessary to the article, but leave the writing to others. Its an important distinction - I myself have a couple times had to defer to others sometimes in cases where a conflict arose between two different POV writing styles. The question is: are yours and mine different enought to require outside help in resolving any dispute. Finally, "Ill let you..." doesnt work here - its not your article, though you have had more part than anyone in developing it. And I was simply rewriting it for sake of neutral tone - something which you should ''welcome,'' not reject - as it legitimizes and adds to your work, just as your work adds to the project. Sinreg -User:Stevertigo|User_talk:Stevertigo 05:02, 10 Jun 2005 (UTC)
After reading some encyclopedia Britannica articles on other new religious movements, like Science of the Mind, Mormonism, and Christian Science, I have attempted to reword the intro along these lines, and attempted to remove some of the phrases you suggested as not being NPOV. User:Scottperry 11:11, Jun 10, 2005 (UTC) == Reply to point by point breakdown of ACIM intro == Dear Steve,
Since my last edit, I came across your point by point breakdown re the ACIM intro, and here is my point by point reply: 1. A Course In Miracles (or "ACIM") is a book on spiritual principles, * First thing - What is it? ~ A book by someone about something, read by someone, who draws x conclusions and bases x associations and concepts on it. -SV ''
I believe that all of these topics are finally now covered in the intro.'' 2. alleged to have been written by none other than the person of Jesus Christ, * The wording "none other than..." is improper for an NPOV article. Because this sentence is speculative, (and particular to a POV interpretation) it can be dealt with later - deal with what it (the book) is first. Save claims and speculation for POV section or explicitly cite them as claims by x. -SV ''
I have removed this phrase.'' 3. via a certain type of channeling process known as inner dictation in which Helen Schucman describes herself as having been the "scribe". * Same as 1 - but at least this is clearer. -SV ''
Inserted word: claim to refer more neutrally to this process.'' 4. The official copyright claim for the book lists Helen Schucman and "Anonymous" as the authors. Presumably, here the listing of Anonymous as an author is a veiled reference to Schucman's belief or claim that Jesus Christ was the true author. * This is highly speculative, and more its speculative about a rather unconventional or difficult to rationalise claim. It needs to be determined then, if she actually claimed the work to be "ghostwritten by Gee-zuss" or if its only the claim of its practicioners. -SV ''
All of these assertions can be documented by ample already published source material. If you would like, I would be happy to provide appropriate footnoting for this.'' 5. The book was written in the style of a textbook, and contains various teachings and exercises covering the topics of forgiveness, brotherhood, and the nature of love. * This (my wording) seems clear, but works only as an intro to the contents of the book - a secondary paragraph. -SV ''
This is included in the intro as I feel that a good intro needs to briefly touch on the type of contents to be found in the book.'' 6. Schucman describes having "received" the material between 1965 and 1978, and to have transcribed it with the assistance of Bill Thetford. * This seems to contradict 3 - please distinguish her claims from the claims of her followers. -SV ''
Please elaborate. I cannot see the contradiction. BTW, Schucman never had any personal “followers”, only people who followed the teachings of ACIM who never ascribed any particular spiritual authority to her, other than having once “channeled” ACIM'' 7. The title of the book was derived from the book's core premise that love is a miracle, and it surpasses all others in value. -SV * This seems like a claim, its not necessary to attribute it perhaps, but consider "title of the book is claimed to refer to love— as a miracle above all other miracles."-SV ''
The actual text includes numerous assertions that this is its core premise. Why not allow its core premise to be laid out in the article intro?'' 8. The 365 practical exercises it contains were designed to be performed daily over the course of a year, and contain various meditations, prayers and mental exercises intended to provide practical illustrations and applications for the advancement of spiritual wisdom through forgiveness and love. * The combination of "practical" and "spiritual" is almost oxymoronic, or otherwise expressive of a particular POV which advocates a spiritual view. The problem with allowing for one such POV, it means that all variations of such POV must also be considered. Its not POV to represent POV as claims - it is POV to use language which implicitly accepts a POV premise. -SV ''
It seems to me that your assertion here that spirituality is inherently impractical is an oxymoron, and may represent a certain POV. Considering the fact that all of the exercises and teachings are meant to involve real-life situations, and not merely theories, is it not POV to insist that such is inherently impractical, and therefore to imply that the fundamental premise of the book must be inherently flawed, as you seem to be insisting?'' 9. The general teaching sections of the book consistently aim at enabling students to gain a conceptual framework (...) by which to apply the 365 daily lessons. * Remove my "metaphoric language" - overdone -SV ''
I thought you were the one who inserted this. I agree and have removed it.'' * IMHO my version was superior in that it seperated logically the general concept introduction, the claims of authorship, the contents, and the nature of the followership. Your version simply jumbles the first three and removes the fourth. -SV|t 08:25, 26 May 2005 (UTC) ''
I have since laid out the intro with separate paragraphs for each of these three things.'' Thanks, User:Scottperry 11:53, Jun 10, 2005 (UTC) == Notice: Reply to last ACIM article comment now posted on ACIM talk page == Dear Steve,
In an attempt to try to centralize our recent in depth discussion of the ACIM article, I have now posted some of our recent conversation about this on the ACIM talk page at [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:A_Course_In_Miracles#Further_thougts_about_point_by_point_breakdown ACIM talk page]. Perhaps this was your initial intention when you first posted your in depth point by point breakdown there. At any rate, my most recent reply to you is also now posted there. Thanks, User:Scottperry 19:10, Jun 10, 2005 (UTC) PS: Sorry I got a little hot and bothered about some of the changes over at the ACIM article. That was a bit stupid of me. Ouch! It hurts to have to say things like this.... Cheers, User:Scottperry 04:13, Jun 18, 2005 (UTC) == Template:Merge-tasks == What is this template to be used for? Or is it no longer needed and eligible for deletion? -- User:Beland 06:00, 13 Jun 2005 (UTC) == Thanks very much == Thanks for helping in renovating my stubborn editions in the articles... thanks! Deryck C., HK,CN :Bù xie/youre absolutely welcome. :) -User:Stevertigo|User_talk:Stevertigo 09:35, 17 Jun 2005 (UTC) == WP:TFD == Template:Npov/perpetual, which you created, has been listed for deletion at WP:TFD. User:BlankVerse User talk:BlankVerse 05:45, 18 Jun 2005 (UTC) == Pakistan == Hi! I noticed you added :Image:Pakistan.gif to the top of Pakistan. The edit was done while the page was under protection, and it unfortunately made the country infobox get moved to the middle of the page under Firefox. It's also not a free image, and I'm not sure that it really belongs in the top of the article (I don't think many country articles have a map like that near the top). If the article weren't protected, I'd remove it, but since it is, I wanted to come to ask you. Please go take a look at the page in Firefox if you can, and do what you think is best. Thanks. :) User:Kmccoy User_talk:Kmccoy 01:42, 19 Jun 2005 (UTC) I messed up the image link above, and also it's been reverted anyway. Sorry for the trouble. :) == Talk:Bombing of Dresden in World War II == Do you have a source for you posting to BDWWII: :''"Out of 28,410 houses in the inner city of Dresden, 24,866 were destroyed." I would like to source the article and I do not have quite the same figures as you state for this. User:Philip Baird Shearer 18:50, 20 Jun 2005 (UTC) == Royal consorts and monarchs == hi there. i´m trying to get a discussion going to change the rules on naming consorts, monarchs, etc.. it´s a bit of mess at the moment. maybe you wanna join in and give your opinion? feel free [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia_talk:Naming_conventions_%28names_and_titles%29#Royal_consorts_and_monarchs] cheers User:Antares911 23:38, 21 Jun 2005 (UTC) == Benazir Bhutto == R you interested in to join the discussion of cleaning up the article of Benazir Bhutto? Talk:Benazir Bhutto--User:Raju1 03:14, 22 Jun 2005 (UTC)
Stevertigo
{{scroller|700|400||---- /Tools Wikipedia:WikiProject-Wikipedia:WikiProject Inclusion - Wikipedia:WikiProject Journalism - Wikipedia:WikiProject Illustration - Wikipedia:WikiProject WikiProject - Wikipedia:WikiProject Countering Systemic Bias - Wikipedia:AssociationsWikipedia:Mediation committee - Special:Log/block Wikipedia:Today's featured article/ , ---- /* - /notes - /. - /test - /monobook.css - /? - /Iraq War - Criticism of the Iraq War -
move censor > censor (Rome) - Infotainment - News anchor Way of life Extraordinary Rendition, Template:Creationism2 Template:Semitic gods Template:Ancient gods template:USculture ---- Project: Template:Timeline-ancient - template:annotation - template:annote - template:notation - template:tooltip - Template:Unsolved - Template:access - template:noaccess - template:iraq-war - Template:Scroller - Template:RAScroller - template:mathsym Template:Scroller2 - - - Template:news-trade - Template:Phoenicians template:mass-media - Template:Timeline-ancient, Template:Timeline-empires - Ancient Near East (Ancient Orient,) and Empires - based on Short chronology(merge too) - History of Babylon, etc. - Template:math-constants - Template:Math-symbols - Template:math-explain Template:String-theory Template:Quantum-theory Template:numbers Template:Abstract-algebra Template:manifolds Template:Logic Wigner function - Template:Hypothetical - Template:Commandline ---- Template:Timeline-empires - Template:Pprotected - Template:Phoenicians - template:news-rank - Template:Adam-tree Template:Noah-tree - List of Popes (graphical) - :de:Liste der Päpste (graphisch) - Unsolved problems in physics - Template:news-trade - Template:journalism - Template:Marketing - template:prostitution ---- Reading: Transgressing the Boundaries: Towards a Transformative Hermeneutics of Quantum Gravity String theory M-theory - could use some laymanization and hard math w explanations, etc ---- }} [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Search?search=constant&fulltext=Search Search:"constant"] My first edit - sometime in Summer 2002 (Spring?). Along the way, I wrote/edited a bunch of pseudopolicy and wikiculture treatments, as well as starting those WP:WP - people used to find and link to those uberlong-titled policy pages without shortcuts, chaq. My focus is on writing good introductory paragraphs to articles which I feel could be improved. The lead sets the tone for the whole article, and its amazing how a single word can shift the tenor to or from neutrality. In some cases, my rewrites have remained untouched for months and even years, even for controversial articles. Merge: wikipedia:wikiday template:shortchronology Template:merge-tasks [[Image:Wikiday.png|right|300px|left|thumb|Wikiday chart. Current time is UTC-GMT]] Wikipedian artists {| width="270px" align="right" style="text-align:center; border:1px solid #ffc9c9; background-color:#FFFFF3;" |- padding:1em;padding-top:0.5em;" | |style="font-size: 85%"|This is a Wikipedia user page. If you find this page on any site other than Wikipedia, you are viewing a mirror site. Be aware that the page may be outdated, and that the user this page belongs to may have no personal affiliation with any site other than Wikipedia itself. The original page is located at [http://%65%6E%2E%77%69%6B%69%70%65%64%69%61%2E%6F%72%67/%77%69%6B%69/: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/:] . |}
See other meanings of words starting from letter:
S
SB | SC | SD | SE | SF | SG | SH | SI | SJ | SK | SL | SM | SN | SO | SP | SR | SS | ST | SU | SW | SX | SY | SZ |Words begining with Stevertigo:
Stevertigo
Stevertigo
Stevertigo.
Stevertigo/
Stevertigo/*
Stevertigo/.
Stevertigo/?
Stevertigo/?/t
Stevertigo/cleanup
Stevertigo/DLO
Stevertigo/Draft
Stevertigo/Editorial_policy
Stevertigo/Editorial_policy
Stevertigo/Favorite_Wikipedian_quotes
Stevertigo/Grain_of_salt_(philosophical_interpretations)
Stevertigo/Gulf_war_notes
Stevertigo/Images
Stevertigo/Iraq_War
Stevertigo/Kosovo_notes
Stevertigo/Links
Stevertigo/Math-constants
Stevertigo/monobook.css
Stevertigo/monobook.css
Stevertigo/monobook.js
Stevertigo/notes
Stevertigo/old
Stevertigo/old
Stevertigo/Sand_box
Stevertigo/Special
Stevertigo/temp
Stevertigo/test
Stevertigo/Tools
Stevertigo/Tooltip-code
Stevertigo/Turkey
Stevertigo/Turkish_atrocities_against_Kurds
Stevertigo/Turkish_atrocities_against_Kurds
Stevertigo/War_on_Terror_timeline
Stevertigo:logical_fallacy
Stevertigo_Gulf_war_notes
These materials are based on Wikipedia and licensed under the GNU FDL
YouTube.com videos better site than Turbo Tax 2007
