
This social history article treats the role of the piano in the home, from its invention in the early 18th century to the present day. Throughout the 18th century and early 19th century, pianos were financially beyond the reach of most families, and the pianos of those times were generally the property of the gentry and the aristocracy. Visiting music masters taught their children, more often the girls than the boys, to play the piano. It was widely felt at the time that ability to play the piano made young women more marriageable. Women who had learned to play as children often continued to play as adults, thus providing music in their households. For instance, Emma Wedgwood (1808-1896), the granddaughter of the wealthy industrialist Josiah Wedgwood took piano lessons from none other than Frédéric Chopin, and apparently achieved a fair level of proficiency. Following her marriage to Charles Darwin, Emma still played the piano daily, while her husband listened appreciatively. A number of female piano students became outright ''virtuose'', and the skills of woman pianists inspired the work of Haydn, Wolfgang Amadeus Mozart, and Ludwig van Beethoven, who dedicated difficult-to-play works to their woman friends. However, careers as concert musicians were typically open only to men (an important exception was Clara Schumann). Over the course of the 19th and 20th century, the middle class of Europe and North America increased in both numbers and prosperity. This increase produced a corresponding rise in the domestic importance of the piano, as ever more families became able to afford pianos and piano instruction. The piano also become common in public institutions, such as schools, hotels, and public houses. As elements of the Western middle class lifestyle gradually spread to other nations, the piano became common in these nations as well, for example in Japan. To understand the rise of the piano among the middle class, it is helpful to remember that before mechanical and electronic reproduction, music was in fact performed on a daily basis by ordinary people. For instance, the working people of every nation generated a body of folk music, which was transmitted orally down through the generations and sung by all. The parents of Joseph Haydn (1732-1809) could not read music, yet Haydn's father (who worked as a wheelwright) taught himself to play the harp, and the Haydn family frequently played and sang together. With rising prosperity, the many families that could now afford pianos and music adapted their home-grown musical abilities to the new instrument, and the piano become a major source of music in the home. Amateur pianists in the home often kept track of the doings of the leading pianists and composers of their day. Professional virtuosi wrote books and methods for the study of piano playing, which sold widely. The virtuosi also prepared their own editions of classical works, which included detailed marks of tempo and expression to guide the amateur who wanted to use their playing as a model. (Today, students are usually encouraged to work from an urtext edition.) The piano compositions of the great composers often sold well among amateurs, despite the fact that, starting with Ludwig van Beethoven, they were often far too hard for anyone but a trained virtuoso to play perfectly. Evidently, the amateur pianists obtained satisfaction from coming to grips with the finest music, even if they could not perform it from start to finish. A favorite form of musical recreation in the home was playing works for four-hand piano, in which the two players sit side by side at a single piano. Sometimes members of the household would sing or play other instruments along with the piano. Parents whose children showed unusual talent often pushed them toward professional careers, sometimes making great sacrifices to make this possible. Artur Schnabel's book ''My Life and Music'' (reprinted 1988; Mineola, NY: Dover) vividly depicts his own experience along this lines, which took place in the Austro-Hungarian Empire in the late 19th century. The piano's status in the home remained secure until technology made possible the enjoyment of music in passive form. First the player piano (ca. 1900), then the home phonograph (which became common in the decade before World War I), then the radio (in the 1920s) dealt severe blows to amateur piano-playing as a form of domestic recreation. During the Great Depression of the 1930s, piano sales dropped sharply, and many manufacturers went out of business. Another blow to the piano was the widespread acceptance in the late 20th century of the electronic keyboard. This instrument, in its cheaper forms, is widely considered to provide only a poor substitute for the tonal quality of a good piano (see piano for why), but it is much more flexible and in many ways better suited to the performance of popular music. Nevertheless, the piano survives to this day in many 21st century homes. The pianos being bought today tend to be of higher quality and more expensive than those of several decades ago, suggesting perhaps that domestic piano playing may have concentrated itself in homes of wealthier or better-educated members of the middle class. It is unlikely that ability to play the piano contributes much these days to the marriageability of daughters, but many parents still feel today that piano lessons teach their children concentration and self-discipline, and open a door into the world of classical music. == Reference == *''Piano roles : three hundred years of life with the piano'' by James Parakilas (New Haven, CT: Yale University Press, 1999) is a history of the piano and its role in society. Piano
==Is this article NPOV?== This doesn't seem very NPOV to me-what do other people think? - Adrian. :Social history has a particular approach that has its critics, see historiography. Within the very well established academic discipline of social history this is how we study different social phenomenon. Perhaps you could explain why you do not think it is POV and either right an article from within the rubric of a different disciplinary approach and make reference to it here. Remember it is entitled social history of the piano. If you want to write a more general history of the piano article this could be linked to it, in my opinion. User:Alex756 17:16, 3 Oct 2003 (UTC) ---- There's something right about what Adrian is saying. As far as I know all the facts I put into the article are true (though some are harder to verify, like beliefs concerning marriageability). However, in retrospect it seems to me I may have selected these facts on purpose to evoke a sense of nostalgia for a musically-participatory era now largely gone. One remedy for this might be to explore ''why'' people gave up their pianos as soon as radios, record players, etc. appeared on the scene. I don't understand myself how this happened, but perhaps other contributors could say something useful. NPOV-monitors interested in similar cases might enjoy looking at folk music (where a previous Wikipedian also expresses regret for loss of participatory music), and popular music, where commercial purveyors of music are duly bashed as Philistines. :User:Opus33 21:38, 3 Oct 2003 (UTC) ==Sexual selection and evolution of music== Hoping not to provoke rage, I've reverted: :"Darwin wrote several pages on the evolution of music by sexual selection in ''The Descent of Man'' (1871)." I think that the evolution of music is an important and interesting topic, and I know that Darwin isn't the only one who thinks that sexual selection was responsible; there's a certain amount of more recent work as well. But does this really have much to do with the ''social history of the piano''? I've tried to find a way to think of this sentence as relevant--for instance, perhaps we might suppose that when Darwin lounged on the couch and listened to Emma play, his inner animal was aroused. But we have no way of knowing this, and indeed it seems more likely to me that Emma's piano playing was part of her lifelong task of humoring an invalid. If there is to be an example of the piano as an instrument of seduction, there surely is a better one available than Emma and Charles! On the other hand, the Wikipedia seems to have nothing at all on the evolution of music, including the sexual selection theory. Could the author of this passage perhaps be persuaded to write at least a starter article in this area? Thanks, User:Opus33 22:37, 31 May 2004 (UTC)
See other meanings of words starting from letter:
Words begining with Social_history_of_the_piano:
Social_history_of_the_piano
Social_history_of_the_piano
Social history of the piano
This social history article treats the role of the piano in the home, from its invention in the early 18th century to the present day. Throughout the 18th century and early 19th century, pianos were financially beyond the reach of most families, and the pianos of those times were generally the property of the gentry and the aristocracy. Visiting music masters taught their children, more often the girls than the boys, to play the piano. It was widely felt at the time that ability to play the piano made young women more marriageable. Women who had learned to play as children often continued to play as adults, thus providing music in their households. For instance, Emma Wedgwood (1808-1896), the granddaughter of the wealthy industrialist Josiah Wedgwood took piano lessons from none other than Frédéric Chopin, and apparently achieved a fair level of proficiency. Following her marriage to Charles Darwin, Emma still played the piano daily, while her husband listened appreciatively. A number of female piano students became outright ''virtuose'', and the skills of woman pianists inspired the work of Haydn, Wolfgang Amadeus Mozart, and Ludwig van Beethoven, who dedicated difficult-to-play works to their woman friends. However, careers as concert musicians were typically open only to men (an important exception was Clara Schumann). Over the course of the 19th and 20th century, the middle class of Europe and North America increased in both numbers and prosperity. This increase produced a corresponding rise in the domestic importance of the piano, as ever more families became able to afford pianos and piano instruction. The piano also become common in public institutions, such as schools, hotels, and public houses. As elements of the Western middle class lifestyle gradually spread to other nations, the piano became common in these nations as well, for example in Japan. To understand the rise of the piano among the middle class, it is helpful to remember that before mechanical and electronic reproduction, music was in fact performed on a daily basis by ordinary people. For instance, the working people of every nation generated a body of folk music, which was transmitted orally down through the generations and sung by all. The parents of Joseph Haydn (1732-1809) could not read music, yet Haydn's father (who worked as a wheelwright) taught himself to play the harp, and the Haydn family frequently played and sang together. With rising prosperity, the many families that could now afford pianos and music adapted their home-grown musical abilities to the new instrument, and the piano become a major source of music in the home. Amateur pianists in the home often kept track of the doings of the leading pianists and composers of their day. Professional virtuosi wrote books and methods for the study of piano playing, which sold widely. The virtuosi also prepared their own editions of classical works, which included detailed marks of tempo and expression to guide the amateur who wanted to use their playing as a model. (Today, students are usually encouraged to work from an urtext edition.) The piano compositions of the great composers often sold well among amateurs, despite the fact that, starting with Ludwig van Beethoven, they were often far too hard for anyone but a trained virtuoso to play perfectly. Evidently, the amateur pianists obtained satisfaction from coming to grips with the finest music, even if they could not perform it from start to finish. A favorite form of musical recreation in the home was playing works for four-hand piano, in which the two players sit side by side at a single piano. Sometimes members of the household would sing or play other instruments along with the piano. Parents whose children showed unusual talent often pushed them toward professional careers, sometimes making great sacrifices to make this possible. Artur Schnabel's book ''My Life and Music'' (reprinted 1988; Mineola, NY: Dover) vividly depicts his own experience along this lines, which took place in the Austro-Hungarian Empire in the late 19th century. The piano's status in the home remained secure until technology made possible the enjoyment of music in passive form. First the player piano (ca. 1900), then the home phonograph (which became common in the decade before World War I), then the radio (in the 1920s) dealt severe blows to amateur piano-playing as a form of domestic recreation. During the Great Depression of the 1930s, piano sales dropped sharply, and many manufacturers went out of business. Another blow to the piano was the widespread acceptance in the late 20th century of the electronic keyboard. This instrument, in its cheaper forms, is widely considered to provide only a poor substitute for the tonal quality of a good piano (see piano for why), but it is much more flexible and in many ways better suited to the performance of popular music. Nevertheless, the piano survives to this day in many 21st century homes. The pianos being bought today tend to be of higher quality and more expensive than those of several decades ago, suggesting perhaps that domestic piano playing may have concentrated itself in homes of wealthier or better-educated members of the middle class. It is unlikely that ability to play the piano contributes much these days to the marriageability of daughters, but many parents still feel today that piano lessons teach their children concentration and self-discipline, and open a door into the world of classical music. == Reference == *''Piano roles : three hundred years of life with the piano'' by James Parakilas (New Haven, CT: Yale University Press, 1999) is a history of the piano and its role in society. Piano
Social history of the piano
==Is this article NPOV?== This doesn't seem very NPOV to me-what do other people think? - Adrian. :Social history has a particular approach that has its critics, see historiography. Within the very well established academic discipline of social history this is how we study different social phenomenon. Perhaps you could explain why you do not think it is POV and either right an article from within the rubric of a different disciplinary approach and make reference to it here. Remember it is entitled social history of the piano. If you want to write a more general history of the piano article this could be linked to it, in my opinion. User:Alex756 17:16, 3 Oct 2003 (UTC) ---- There's something right about what Adrian is saying. As far as I know all the facts I put into the article are true (though some are harder to verify, like beliefs concerning marriageability). However, in retrospect it seems to me I may have selected these facts on purpose to evoke a sense of nostalgia for a musically-participatory era now largely gone. One remedy for this might be to explore ''why'' people gave up their pianos as soon as radios, record players, etc. appeared on the scene. I don't understand myself how this happened, but perhaps other contributors could say something useful. NPOV-monitors interested in similar cases might enjoy looking at folk music (where a previous Wikipedian also expresses regret for loss of participatory music), and popular music, where commercial purveyors of music are duly bashed as Philistines. :User:Opus33 21:38, 3 Oct 2003 (UTC) ==Sexual selection and evolution of music== Hoping not to provoke rage, I've reverted: :"Darwin wrote several pages on the evolution of music by sexual selection in ''The Descent of Man'' (1871)." I think that the evolution of music is an important and interesting topic, and I know that Darwin isn't the only one who thinks that sexual selection was responsible; there's a certain amount of more recent work as well. But does this really have much to do with the ''social history of the piano''? I've tried to find a way to think of this sentence as relevant--for instance, perhaps we might suppose that when Darwin lounged on the couch and listened to Emma play, his inner animal was aroused. But we have no way of knowing this, and indeed it seems more likely to me that Emma's piano playing was part of her lifelong task of humoring an invalid. If there is to be an example of the piano as an instrument of seduction, there surely is a better one available than Emma and Charles! On the other hand, the Wikipedia seems to have nothing at all on the evolution of music, including the sexual selection theory. Could the author of this passage perhaps be persuaded to write at least a starter article in this area? Thanks, User:Opus33 22:37, 31 May 2004 (UTC)
See other meanings of words starting from letter:
S
SB | SC | SD | SE | SF | SG | SH | SI | SJ | SK | SL | SM | SN | SO | SP | SR | SS | ST | SU | SW | SX | SY | SZ |Words begining with Social_history_of_the_piano:
Social_history_of_the_piano
Social_history_of_the_piano
These materials are based on Wikipedia and licensed under the GNU FDL
YouTube.com videos better site than Turbo Tax 2007
