I've broken this up into four separate articles without otherwise changing the content - so far. I may revise the text for the "device" article at a later time.
This comes in the wake of establishing a Library of Congress classification page for Class C, particularly with reference to subclass CD. I hope to now revise the links to "seal" to be ones to the relevant article.
== Why can't we... ==
use Seal for the animal and move other links to Seal (disambiguation)?? User:66.32.109.248 01:23, 5 May 2004 (UTC)
I have requested that the contents page be moved to Seal (disambiguation) and that the seal page then redirect to Pinnipedia (with a disambiguation notice on that page) --User:Clawed 05:46, 28 Apr 2005 (UTC)
*Oppose. "Seals" in the sense of seal (device) are important in many historical, biographical or art historical topics. It's not a particularly outlandish subject, but the title is a bit non-obvious, and that page should not be too difficult to find. User:Tupsharru 07:37, 28 Apr 2005 (UTC)
*oppose. seals (the animals) and seals (the device) are probably equally important, so there's not one definition that clearly stands out as the most used. I think seal should stay the disambig. page. User:LachatdelarueUser_talk:Lachatdelarue 21:46, 28 Apr 2005 (UTC)
*Oppose. For me, Seal is a U.S._Navy_SEALs in the first place :) User:DmitryKo 19:18, 4 May 2005 (UTC)
*Support, judging by links alone, Pinnipeds are certianly more linked to than seal (device) or U.S. Navy SEALs. User:Megan1967 08:32, 5 May 2005 (UTC)
*Oppose. The animal doesn't seem to be the clear primary target of this name, or even the majority use. Should remain a disambig. User:Jonathunder 02:25, 2005 May 6 (UTC)
*Oppose. As said above, there is an ambiguity of name, and one is not more important or necessarily prevalent than another. Logically, a disambiguation page is required. User:Rincebrain 08:25, 2005 May 6 (UTC)
User:VioletrigaUser_talk:violetriga 18:54, 6 May 2005 (UTC)