Whatcha working on there?--User:MONGO 09:31, 15 Apr 2005 (UTC) * Removal of Talk Page material for frivolous reasons [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:2003_Invasion_of_Iraq&diff=prev&oldid=11318618] : I removed this because i thought it was tasteless and unnescessary..--User:MONGO 09:31, 15 Apr 2005 (UTC) * incendiary comments on talk pages of opponents in edit war after they were blocked [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Christiaan&curid=433261&diff=0&oldid=0#3RR_violation] (later removed by Christaan as an anonymous editor [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Christiaan&curid=433261&diff=0&oldid=0]; also, suspicious-looking edits on talk pages of edit-warring allies after they were blocked [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:TDC&curid=460653&diff=0&oldid=0]) :Those aren't mine...I always use this timestamp without failure.--User:MONGO 09:33, 15 Apr 2005 (UTC) * Poor spirit (basically, admitance of pushing POV and putting tendencious edits to balance percieved POV by other users, instead of trying to find a good formulation) [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=2003_Invasion_of_Iraq&curid=201936&diff=0&oldid=0][http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:George_W._Bush&curid=203518&diff=0&oldid=0] :Not sure what you're linking me to here.--User:MONGO 09:35, 15 Apr 2005 (UTC) * failure to assume good faith, gratuitous accusations [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk%3AGeorge_W._Bush&diff=11318329&oldid=11318159] * Gratuitous insults toward New York University ("NYU (a bastion of ultra liberal idiocy)") and generally unpleasant tone [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk%3A2003_Invasion_of_Iraq&diff=11404564&oldid=11404368] : NYU is the biggest supplier of conservative haters in the U.S. My comments may have been heated but they were hardly wrong.--User:MONGO 09:39, 15 Apr 2005 (UTC) * Irrevelant rant about the author of a citation (cited to prove that the point was made, not that the point is valid) [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:2003_Invasion_of_Iraq&diff=next&oldid=11404564] : And she does refer to herself as just that...therefore her opinion and it's inclusion in the article is poor judgement if we are truly commited to building a neutral article. right?--User:MONGO 09:41, 15 Apr 2005 (UTC) * Here a message on Mongo's page where I try to talk him into ceasing his reverts on 2003 Invasion of Iraq [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:MONGO&curid=1407681&diff=0&oldid=0] : I deleted it because I didn't like the accusation when all I was trying to do was to get a discussion going.....I didn't violate any rules....Rama, you need to remind yourself that I am not your enemy...the fact that we can have arguments in cyberspace and get mad at each other and we have even agreed is proof of why Wikipedia is so great....I'll leave the article alone for awhile...prove to me that you are not POV and insert those "trivial" points you so quickly reverted.--User:MONGO 09:45, 15 Apr 2005 (UTC)
See other meanings of words starting from letter:
Words begining with Rama/MONGO:
Rama/MONGO
Rama/MONGO
Whatcha working on there?--User:MONGO 09:31, 15 Apr 2005 (UTC) * Removal of Talk Page material for frivolous reasons [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:2003_Invasion_of_Iraq&diff=prev&oldid=11318618] : I removed this because i thought it was tasteless and unnescessary..--User:MONGO 09:31, 15 Apr 2005 (UTC) * incendiary comments on talk pages of opponents in edit war after they were blocked [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Christiaan&curid=433261&diff=0&oldid=0#3RR_violation] (later removed by Christaan as an anonymous editor [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Christiaan&curid=433261&diff=0&oldid=0]; also, suspicious-looking edits on talk pages of edit-warring allies after they were blocked [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:TDC&curid=460653&diff=0&oldid=0]) :Those aren't mine...I always use this timestamp without failure.--User:MONGO 09:33, 15 Apr 2005 (UTC) * Poor spirit (basically, admitance of pushing POV and putting tendencious edits to balance percieved POV by other users, instead of trying to find a good formulation) [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=2003_Invasion_of_Iraq&curid=201936&diff=0&oldid=0][http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:George_W._Bush&curid=203518&diff=0&oldid=0] :Not sure what you're linking me to here.--User:MONGO 09:35, 15 Apr 2005 (UTC) * failure to assume good faith, gratuitous accusations [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk%3AGeorge_W._Bush&diff=11318329&oldid=11318159] * Gratuitous insults toward New York University ("NYU (a bastion of ultra liberal idiocy)") and generally unpleasant tone [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk%3A2003_Invasion_of_Iraq&diff=11404564&oldid=11404368] : NYU is the biggest supplier of conservative haters in the U.S. My comments may have been heated but they were hardly wrong.--User:MONGO 09:39, 15 Apr 2005 (UTC) * Irrevelant rant about the author of a citation (cited to prove that the point was made, not that the point is valid) [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:2003_Invasion_of_Iraq&diff=next&oldid=11404564] : And she does refer to herself as just that...therefore her opinion and it's inclusion in the article is poor judgement if we are truly commited to building a neutral article. right?--User:MONGO 09:41, 15 Apr 2005 (UTC) * Here a message on Mongo's page where I try to talk him into ceasing his reverts on 2003 Invasion of Iraq [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:MONGO&curid=1407681&diff=0&oldid=0] : I deleted it because I didn't like the accusation when all I was trying to do was to get a discussion going.....I didn't violate any rules....Rama, you need to remind yourself that I am not your enemy...the fact that we can have arguments in cyberspace and get mad at each other and we have even agreed is proof of why Wikipedia is so great....I'll leave the article alone for awhile...prove to me that you are not POV and insert those "trivial" points you so quickly reverted.--User:MONGO 09:45, 15 Apr 2005 (UTC)
See other meanings of words starting from letter:
R
RA | RB | RC | RD | RE | RF | RG | RH | RI | RJ | RK | RL | RM | RN | RO | RP | RS | RT | RU | RW | RX | RY | RZ |Words begining with Rama/MONGO:
Rama/MONGO
These materials are based on Wikipedia and licensed under the GNU FDL
YouTube.com videos better site than Turbo Tax 2007
