==redirect== I'm confused - can someone explain why Qu redirects here? -- User:Chuq 02:36, 19 Oct 2004 (UTC) : My guess would be becuase qu is the ISO language name for quechua (ie. en=english) User:The bellman 13:18, 2004 Dec 17 (UTC) ==controversy== The validity of the Quechumaran Proposal is very controversial. Many are against combining the Quechuan and Aymaran families into this stock. The claims against the proposal have also been highly criticized. They may be related but the evidence is currently inconclusive. Interested readers are recommended to consult the summaries in the following: * Campbell, Lyle. (1995). The Quechumaran hypothesis and lessons for distant genetic comparison. ''Diachronica'', ''12'', 157-200. * Campbell, Lyle. (1997). ''American Indian languages: The historical linguistics of native America'' (pp. 273-283). New York: Oxford University Press. ISBN 0-19-509427-1. - User:Ish ishwar 05:59, 2005 Feb 24 (UTC) :Yeah, there's really no genetic relation between quechua and aymara. For example, the suffix for plural in quechua is "-kuna", but in aymara it's "-naka"; This kind of sustancial differences shows it. --User:Huhsunqu 14:02, 4 Apr 2005 (UTC) ==Requested move== The point of having articles named XXX language is disambiguation, not to follow unofficial standard. Since there is to my knowledge no "Quechua people", I don't see the point of such a move. See Esperanto and Inuktitut for an example of language articles that simply don't need the extra "language"-addition. I would like to avoid yet more unnecessary mistakes like that of Urdu language. That move was obvi--User:Huhsunqu 04:30, 9 Jun 2005 (UTC)ously made by someone who didn't read the info at Wikipedia:WikiProject Languages#Structure properly. User:Karmosin User talk:Karmosin 22:07, Jun 7, 2005 (UTC) :There is no -article- Quechua people, but there definitely are [http://quechuabenefit.org/index.cfm?fuseaction=category.display&category_id=2 Quechua people]. Some of the articles which link to Quechua are referring to the people, as well, for instance Puno Region. User:Rebrane 22:20, 8 Jun 2005 (UTC) ::No, there's no ''Quechua People''. Some people wants to group all peruvian (also bolivian and ecuatorian) Andean etnies as a single one but, once again, there's more than one Quechua speaking etny. --User:Huhsunqu 04:30, 9 Jun 2005 (UTC) :::I understand. Well, I would withdraw the proposed move, but it looks like someone has already done it. I'd support moving it back, though. I also think we should have an article about the groups of people who speak Quechua, but I apparently am not the one to write it. User:Rebrane 14:31, 9 Jun 2005 (UTC)
#REDIRECT Quechua language
See other meanings of words starting from letter:A | B | C | C | D | E | F | G | H | I | J | K | L | M | N | O | P | R | S | T | U | V | X | Y | Z |
Quechua
==redirect== I'm confused - can someone explain why Qu redirects here? -- User:Chuq 02:36, 19 Oct 2004 (UTC) : My guess would be becuase qu is the ISO language name for quechua (ie. en=english) User:The bellman 13:18, 2004 Dec 17 (UTC) ==controversy== The validity of the Quechumaran Proposal is very controversial. Many are against combining the Quechuan and Aymaran families into this stock. The claims against the proposal have also been highly criticized. They may be related but the evidence is currently inconclusive. Interested readers are recommended to consult the summaries in the following: * Campbell, Lyle. (1995). The Quechumaran hypothesis and lessons for distant genetic comparison. ''Diachronica'', ''12'', 157-200. * Campbell, Lyle. (1997). ''American Indian languages: The historical linguistics of native America'' (pp. 273-283). New York: Oxford University Press. ISBN 0-19-509427-1. - User:Ish ishwar 05:59, 2005 Feb 24 (UTC) :Yeah, there's really no genetic relation between quechua and aymara. For example, the suffix for plural in quechua is "-kuna", but in aymara it's "-naka"; This kind of sustancial differences shows it. --User:Huhsunqu 14:02, 4 Apr 2005 (UTC) ==Requested move== The point of having articles named XXX language is disambiguation, not to follow unofficial standard. Since there is to my knowledge no "Quechua people", I don't see the point of such a move. See Esperanto and Inuktitut for an example of language articles that simply don't need the extra "language"-addition. I would like to avoid yet more unnecessary mistakes like that of Urdu language. That move was obvi--User:Huhsunqu 04:30, 9 Jun 2005 (UTC)ously made by someone who didn't read the info at Wikipedia:WikiProject Languages#Structure properly. User:Karmosin User talk:Karmosin 22:07, Jun 7, 2005 (UTC) :There is no -article- Quechua people, but there definitely are [http://quechuabenefit.org/index.cfm?fuseaction=category.display&category_id=2 Quechua people]. Some of the articles which link to Quechua are referring to the people, as well, for instance Puno Region. User:Rebrane 22:20, 8 Jun 2005 (UTC) ::No, there's no ''Quechua People''. Some people wants to group all peruvian (also bolivian and ecuatorian) Andean etnies as a single one but, once again, there's more than one Quechua speaking etny. --User:Huhsunqu 04:30, 9 Jun 2005 (UTC) :::I understand. Well, I would withdraw the proposed move, but it looks like someone has already done it. I'd support moving it back, though. I also think we should have an article about the groups of people who speak Quechua, but I apparently am not the one to write it. User:Rebrane 14:31, 9 Jun 2005 (UTC)
Quechua
#REDIRECT Quechua language
See other meanings of words starting from letter:A | B | C | C | D | E | F | G | H | I | J | K | L | M | N | O | P | R | S | T | U | V | X | Y | Z |
These materials are based on Wikipedia and licensed under the GNU FDL
YouTube.com videos better site than Turbo Tax 2007
