#REDIRECT poverty line
The poverty line is the level of income below which one cannot afford to purchase all the resources one requires to live. People who have an income below the poverty line have no discretionary disposable income, by definition. It is widely discussed how and where to set the poverty line. In practice, different countries often use different poverty lines. Globally, however, it is more common to use only one poverty line in order to compare economic welfare levels. When comparing poverty across countries, the PPP exchange rates are used. These measure purchasing power parity and are used because povertylevels otherwise would change with the normal exchange rates. Thus, 'living for under $1 a day' should be understood as having a daily total consumption of goods and services comparable to the amount of goods and services that can be bought in the US for $1. Notice that e.g. selfproduced goods and public services are included in this. Almost all societies have some of their citizens living in poverty. The poverty line is useful as an economic tool by which to measure such people and consider socioeconomic reforms such as welfare and unemployment insurance to reduce poverty. Determining the poverty line is often done by considering the essential resources that an average human adult consumes in one year and then summing their cost. This approach is needs based in that an assessment is made of the minimum expenditure needed to maintain a tolerable life. This was the original basis of the poverty line in the United States, which has since been uprated for price changes. In developing countries, the largest of these resources is typically the rent required to live in an apartment, so historically, economists have paid particular attention to the real estate market and housing prices as having a strong influence on the poverty line. Individual factors are often used to handle various circumstances, such as whether one is a parent, elderly, a child, married, etc. ==Problems with using a poverty line== Using a poverty line is problematic because having an income marginally above it is not substantially different from having an income marginally below it: the negative effects of poverty tend to be continuous rather than discrete, and the same low income affects different people in different ways. To overcome this poverty indexes are sometimes used instead; see income inequality metrics. A poverty line relies on a quantitative measure of income. If other human development-indicators like health and education shall be used, these must be quantified, which is not easy. ==Using poverty lines== Poverty lines can be used in different ways: * Social Security benefit based. If a government guarantees to make income up to some particular level then being below that line is presumably being in poverty - the problem is that if a government becomes more stingy, then poverty may appear to decrease. * A relative income line, related to some fraction (mathematics) of typical incomes. This excludes the wealthiest individuals from the calculation. For example, the OECD and the European Union uses 60% of national median equivalised household income. * A relative figure fixed in time and only adjusted for inflation - thus avoiding the possibility that if income inequality increases, then poverty may otherwise also increase. * When the World Bank calculates its "$1 a day" statistics, it uses a poverty line. ==Absolute poverty== A measure of ''absolute poverty'' quantifies the number of people below a poverty line, and this poverty line is thought to be independent of time and place. For the measure to be absolute, the line must be the same in different countries. Also, it does not change when the income distribution change. This is only possible when all consumed goods and services are counted and when PPP-exchange rates are used (see purchasing power parity). The intution behind an absolute measure is that mere survival takes the same amount of good across the world and that everybody should be subject to the same standards. Notice that if everyone's income in an economy increases, and the income distribution does not change, absolute poverty will decline. Furthermore, the rate of absolute poverty can decline even though inequality in increasing - as long as the poorest gets a higher income than they had before. This type of measure is often contrasted with measures of relative poverty (see below), which classify entities as "poor" not by comparing them to a fixed cutoff point, but by comparing them to others in the population under study. (The term ''absolute poverty'' is also sometimes used as a synonym for extreme poverty.) ==Relative poverty== A measure of ''relative poverty'' definines "poverty" as being below some relative poverty line. An example is when poverty is defined as households who earn less than 25% of the median income is a measure of relative poverty. Notice that if everyone's income in an economy increases, but the income distribution stays the same, relative poverty will also stay the same. Measures of relative poverty are almost the same as measuring inequality: If a society gets a more equal income distribution, relative poverty will fall. The phrase ''relative poverty'' can also be used in a different sense to mean "moderate poverty". For example, a standard of living or level of income which is higher than what is needed to satisfy basic needs (like water, food, clothing, shelter, and basic health care), but which is still significantly lower than that of the majority of the population under consideration. ==See also== * income inequality metrics * purchasing power parity ==External links== * [http://topics.developmentgateway.org/poverty/rc/BrowseContent.do~source=RCContentUser~folderId=3330 Poverty Indicators, Statistics & Measurement] ==References== Ray, Debraj 1998, ''Development Economics'', Princton Universty Press, ISBN 0691017069. Socioeconomics
:''Whether someone in this situation is "living in poverty" depends on who's doing the talking. Some advocates say that welfare]] programs should be taken into account; thus, a person receiving government assistance may be living well above the poverty level, if all sources of income are summed up. Other advocates apply the term "living in poverty" in a way that seems to include people whose private and public income exceeds the poverty line.'' Wikipedia:Avoid weasel words?. Who are you talking about? Do these people have names? Also, what do you care about the turn-of-phrase ''living in poverty''? User:DanKeshet :As far as I know, welfare programs, at least in the US, leave their recipients below the poverty line. If you're aware of any exceptions, Ed, please identify them.User:Vicki Rosenzweig 20:36, 20 Aug 2003 (UTC) Too tired and too poor to do it tonight, Dan/Vicki. I'll brush up on the facts tomorrow or over the weekend. Thanks for the rv, I'm wikied out... --User:Ed Poor 20:47, 20 Aug 2003 (UTC) ==Growth== I have removed this statement because it is about the determinants of economic growth, not poverty. Wheter or not inequality leads to growth should be discussed somewhere else, I think. "It is not in a society's interest to have a large percentage of its citizens living below the poverty line as they have no disposable income and thus adversely affect economic growth. A baseline goal for a progressive government is to have all of its constituents possess an income level at least that of the poverty line." == References == I will supply some references tomorrow...
See other meanings of words starting from letter:
Words begining with Poverty_line:
Poverty_Line
Poverty_line
Poverty_line
Poverty_line_in_the_United_States
Poverty_line_in_the_United_States
Poverty Line
#REDIRECT poverty line
Poverty line
The poverty line is the level of income below which one cannot afford to purchase all the resources one requires to live. People who have an income below the poverty line have no discretionary disposable income, by definition. It is widely discussed how and where to set the poverty line. In practice, different countries often use different poverty lines. Globally, however, it is more common to use only one poverty line in order to compare economic welfare levels. When comparing poverty across countries, the PPP exchange rates are used. These measure purchasing power parity and are used because povertylevels otherwise would change with the normal exchange rates. Thus, 'living for under $1 a day' should be understood as having a daily total consumption of goods and services comparable to the amount of goods and services that can be bought in the US for $1. Notice that e.g. selfproduced goods and public services are included in this. Almost all societies have some of their citizens living in poverty. The poverty line is useful as an economic tool by which to measure such people and consider socioeconomic reforms such as welfare and unemployment insurance to reduce poverty. Determining the poverty line is often done by considering the essential resources that an average human adult consumes in one year and then summing their cost. This approach is needs based in that an assessment is made of the minimum expenditure needed to maintain a tolerable life. This was the original basis of the poverty line in the United States, which has since been uprated for price changes. In developing countries, the largest of these resources is typically the rent required to live in an apartment, so historically, economists have paid particular attention to the real estate market and housing prices as having a strong influence on the poverty line. Individual factors are often used to handle various circumstances, such as whether one is a parent, elderly, a child, married, etc. ==Problems with using a poverty line== Using a poverty line is problematic because having an income marginally above it is not substantially different from having an income marginally below it: the negative effects of poverty tend to be continuous rather than discrete, and the same low income affects different people in different ways. To overcome this poverty indexes are sometimes used instead; see income inequality metrics. A poverty line relies on a quantitative measure of income. If other human development-indicators like health and education shall be used, these must be quantified, which is not easy. ==Using poverty lines== Poverty lines can be used in different ways: * Social Security benefit based. If a government guarantees to make income up to some particular level then being below that line is presumably being in poverty - the problem is that if a government becomes more stingy, then poverty may appear to decrease. * A relative income line, related to some fraction (mathematics) of typical incomes. This excludes the wealthiest individuals from the calculation. For example, the OECD and the European Union uses 60% of national median equivalised household income. * A relative figure fixed in time and only adjusted for inflation - thus avoiding the possibility that if income inequality increases, then poverty may otherwise also increase. * When the World Bank calculates its "$1 a day" statistics, it uses a poverty line. ==Absolute poverty== A measure of ''absolute poverty'' quantifies the number of people below a poverty line, and this poverty line is thought to be independent of time and place. For the measure to be absolute, the line must be the same in different countries. Also, it does not change when the income distribution change. This is only possible when all consumed goods and services are counted and when PPP-exchange rates are used (see purchasing power parity). The intution behind an absolute measure is that mere survival takes the same amount of good across the world and that everybody should be subject to the same standards. Notice that if everyone's income in an economy increases, and the income distribution does not change, absolute poverty will decline. Furthermore, the rate of absolute poverty can decline even though inequality in increasing - as long as the poorest gets a higher income than they had before. This type of measure is often contrasted with measures of relative poverty (see below), which classify entities as "poor" not by comparing them to a fixed cutoff point, but by comparing them to others in the population under study. (The term ''absolute poverty'' is also sometimes used as a synonym for extreme poverty.) ==Relative poverty== A measure of ''relative poverty'' definines "poverty" as being below some relative poverty line. An example is when poverty is defined as households who earn less than 25% of the median income is a measure of relative poverty. Notice that if everyone's income in an economy increases, but the income distribution stays the same, relative poverty will also stay the same. Measures of relative poverty are almost the same as measuring inequality: If a society gets a more equal income distribution, relative poverty will fall. The phrase ''relative poverty'' can also be used in a different sense to mean "moderate poverty". For example, a standard of living or level of income which is higher than what is needed to satisfy basic needs (like water, food, clothing, shelter, and basic health care), but which is still significantly lower than that of the majority of the population under consideration. ==See also== * income inequality metrics * purchasing power parity ==External links== * [http://topics.developmentgateway.org/poverty/rc/BrowseContent.do~source=RCContentUser~folderId=3330 Poverty Indicators, Statistics & Measurement] ==References== Ray, Debraj 1998, ''Development Economics'', Princton Universty Press, ISBN 0691017069. Socioeconomics
Poverty line
:''Whether someone in this situation is "living in poverty" depends on who's doing the talking. Some advocates say that welfare]] programs should be taken into account; thus, a person receiving government assistance may be living well above the poverty level, if all sources of income are summed up. Other advocates apply the term "living in poverty" in a way that seems to include people whose private and public income exceeds the poverty line.'' Wikipedia:Avoid weasel words?. Who are you talking about? Do these people have names? Also, what do you care about the turn-of-phrase ''living in poverty''? User:DanKeshet :As far as I know, welfare programs, at least in the US, leave their recipients below the poverty line. If you're aware of any exceptions, Ed, please identify them.User:Vicki Rosenzweig 20:36, 20 Aug 2003 (UTC) Too tired and too poor to do it tonight, Dan/Vicki. I'll brush up on the facts tomorrow or over the weekend. Thanks for the rv, I'm wikied out... --User:Ed Poor 20:47, 20 Aug 2003 (UTC) ==Growth== I have removed this statement because it is about the determinants of economic growth, not poverty. Wheter or not inequality leads to growth should be discussed somewhere else, I think. "It is not in a society's interest to have a large percentage of its citizens living below the poverty line as they have no disposable income and thus adversely affect economic growth. A baseline goal for a progressive government is to have all of its constituents possess an income level at least that of the poverty line." == References == I will supply some references tomorrow...
See other meanings of words starting from letter:
P
PA | PB | PC | PD | PE | PF | PG | PH | PI | PJ | PK | PL | PM | PN | PO | PR | PS | PT | PU | PW | PX | PY | PZ |Words begining with Poverty_line:
Poverty_Line
Poverty_line
Poverty_line
Poverty_line_in_the_United_States
Poverty_line_in_the_United_States
These materials are based on Wikipedia and licensed under the GNU FDL
YouTube.com videos better site than Turbo Tax 2007
