Image:Qur'an.jpg|This picture, often mistakenly regarded as showing the late Pontiff kissing the Qur'an, in fact shows John Paul II reverencing a Book of the Gospels.
Image:Dalai Lama.jpg|John Paul II meets Tenzin Gyatso, 14th Dalai Lama at the Vatican in 1999.
Image:Jp2lutheran_2.jpg|Pope John Paul II becomes the first pope ever to preach in a Lutheranism church; Rome, December 1983
Image:jp ii wailing_wall.jpg|John Paul II prays and expresses sorrow for past Catholic mistreatment of Jews at the Western Wall.
Image:Jp2synogogue.jpg|Pope John Paul II visiting The Great Synagogue of Rome in April 1986
Image:Pope_and_Christodoulos2.jpg|Pope John Paul II and Archbishop Christodoulos issue a "common declaration".
==== Relations with the Jewish people ====
Relations between Catholicism and Judaism improved during the pontificate of John Paul II. He spoke frequently about the Church's relationship with Jews. In 1979 he became the first Pope to visit Auschwitz concentration camp in Poland, where many of his countrymen (mostly Polish Jews) had perished under Nazi rule. Shortly afterward, he became the first modern Pope to visit a synagogue when he visited the Synagogue of Rome on 13 April1986.
In March 2000, John Paul II visited Yad Vashem, (the Israeli national Holocaust memorial) in Israel and later touched the holiest site in Judaism, the Western Wall in Jerusalem. In October 2003 the Anti-Defamation League (ADL) issued a statement congratulating John Paul II on entering the 25th year of his papacy.
Immediately after the pope's death, the ADL issued a statement that Pope John Paul II had revolutionized Catholic-Jewish relations, saying that "more change for the better took place in his 27 year Papacy than in the nearly 2,000 years before." (''Pope John Paul II: An Appreciation: A Visionary Remembered'').
A number of points of dispute still exist between the Catholic Church and the Jewish community, including World War II-related issues and issues of doctrine. Nonetheless, the number of issues that divide Jewish groups and the Vatican has dropped significantly during the last 40 years.
==== Relations with the Eastern Orthodox Church ====
In May 1999, John Paul II visited Romania on the invitation from Patriarch Teoctist of the Romanian Orthodox Church. This was the first time a pope had visited a predominantly Eastern Orthodox country since the East-West Schism in 1054. On his arrival, the Patriarch and the President of Romania, Emil Constantinescu, greeted the Pope. The Patriarch stated, "The second millennium of Christian history began with a painful wounding of the unity of the Church; the end of this millennium has seen a real commitment to restoring Christian unity."
John Paul II visited other heavily Orthodox areas such as Ukraine, despite lack of welcome at times, and he said that an end to the Schism was one of his fondest wishes.
Pope John Paul II could not escape the controversy of the involvement of Croatian Catholic clergy with the Ustasa regime of World War II in his relations with the Serb Orthodox Church. He beatified Aloysius Stepinac in 1998, the Croatian war-time Archbishop of Zagreb, a move seen negatively by those who believe that he was an active collaborator with the Ustase fascist regime. On 22 June2003 he visited Banja Luka in Bosnia and Herzegovina.
The Pope had been also saying during his entire pontificate that one of his greatest dreams was to visit Russia, but this never occurred. He had made several attempts to solve the problems which arose over a period of centuries between the Roman Catholic Church and Russian Orthodox Church churches, like giving back the KazanIcon in August 2004. However, the Orthodox side was not that enthusiastic, making statements like: "The question of the visit of the Pope in Russia is not connected by the journalists with the problems between the Churches, which are now unreal to solve, but with giving back one of many sacred things, which were illegally stolen from Russia." (Vsevolod Chaplin).
===The Pope for youth===
[[Image:Toronto.jpg|frame|left|120px|Pope John Paul II met a quarter of a million young people in Toronto in 2002]]
John Paul II had a special relationship also with Catholic youth and is known by some as The Pope for Youth. He was a hero to many of them.
He established World Youth Day in 1984 with the intention of bringing young Catholics from all parts of the world together to celebrate their faith. These weeklong meetings of youth occur every two or three years, attracting hundreds of thousands of young people, who go there to sing, party, have a good time and deepen their faith. His most faithful youths gathered themselves in two organizations: "papaboys" and "papagirls."
=== Apologies ===
Over the later parts of his reign, John Paul II made several apologies to various peoples that had been wronged by the Catholic Church through the years. He publicly made apologies for over 100 of these mistakes, including:
*The persecution of the Italian scientist and philosopher Galileo Galilei in the trial by the Roman Catholic Church in 1633 (31 October1992).
*Catholic involvement with the African slave trade (9 August1993).
*The Church's role in Execution by burning and the religious wars that followed the Protestant Reformation (May 1995, in the Czech Republic).
*The injustices committed against women in the name of Christ, the violation of women's rights and for the historical denigration of women (10 July1995, in a letter to "every woman").
*Inactivity and silence of Roman Catholics during the Holocaust (16 March1998).
*For the execution of Jan Hus in 1415 (18 December1999).
*For the sins of Catholics throughout the ages for violating "the rights of ethnic groups and peoples, and [for showing] contempt for their cultures and religious traditions". (12 March2000, during a public Mass of Pardons).
*For the sins of the Fourth Crusade in 1204. (4 May2001, to the Patriarch of Constantinople).
*For missionary abuses in the past against indigenous peoples of the South Pacific (22 November2001, via the Internet).
*For the massacre of Aztecs and other Mesoamericans by the Spain in the name of the Church.
=== Social and political stances ===
[[Image:Yad Vashem.jpg|thumb|John Paul at the Holocaust memorial of Yad Vashem.]]
John Paul II was a conservative on doctrine and issues relating to reproduction and the ordination of women.
A series of 129 lectures given by John Paul during his Wednesday audiences in Rome between September 1979 and November 1984 were later compiled and published as a single work entitled "Theology of the Body," an extended meditation on the nature of human sexuality and masculinity in human life. He also extended it to condemnation of abortion, euthanasia and virtually all uses of capital punishment, calling them all a part of the "culture of death" that is pervasive in the modern world. His stands on warfare, capital punishment, world debt forgiveness, and poverty issues were considered politically liberal, showing that "conservative" and "liberal" political labels are not easily assigned to religious leaders.
The pope, who began his papacy when the Soviet Union controlled his native country of Poland, as well as the rest of Eastern Europe, was a harsh critic of communism and offered support to those fighting for change, like the Polish Solidarity movement. Soviet leader Mikhail Gorbachev once said the collapse of the Iron Curtain would have been impossible without John Paul II. This view is shared by many people of the post-Soviet states, who view him, as well as Ronald Reagan, as the heroes responsible for bringing an end to the communist tyranny. In later years, John Paul II also criticized some of the more extreme versions of corporate capitalism.
In 2000 he publicly endorsed the Jubilee 2000 campaign on Africandebt relief fronted by Irish rock stars Bob Geldof and Bono. It was reported that during this period, U2 (band)'s recording sessions were repeatedly interrupted by phone calls from the pope, wanting to discuss the campaign with Bono.
In 2003 John Paul II also became a prominent critic of the 2003 invasion of Iraq. He sent former Nunciature to the United StatesPío Cardinal Laghi to talk with President of the United StatesGeorge W. Bush to express opposition to the war. John Paul II said that it was up to the United Nations to solve the international conflict through diplomacy and that a unilateral aggression is a crime against peace and a violation of international law.
In European Union negotiations for a new European Constitution in 2003 and 2004, the Vatican's representatives failed to secure any mention of Europe's "Christian heritage"—one of the pope's cherished goals.
The pope was also a leading critic of same-sex marriage. In his last book, ''Memory and Identity'', he referred to the "pressures" on the European Parliament to permit same-sex marriage. Reuters quotes the pope as writing, "It is legitimate and necessary to ask oneself if this is not perhaps part of a new ideology of evil, perhaps more insidious and hidden, which attempts to pit human rights against the family and against man."
The Pope also criticized transsexual and transgender people, as the Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith, which he supervised, banned them from serving in church positions, as well as considering them to have "mental pathologies".
===Criticism===
[[Image:Pope John Paul II with Pinochet.jpg|left|thumb|Pope John Paul II with Chilean military President Augusto Pinochet.]]
One charge sometimes leveled at John Paul II was that his opposition of Communism led him to support anti-Marxistright-wingdictators. John Paul II occasionally met with dictators such as Augusto Pinochet of Chile. John Paul II invited Pinochet to restore democracy, but, critics claim, not in as firm terms as the ones he used against communist countries. When the Cold War ended some conservatives in turn argued that the Pope moved too far left on foreign policy, and had pacifist views that were too extreme. His opposition to the 2003 Iraq War was criticized for this reason.
John Paul II was also criticized for his support of the Opus Dei prelature and the canonization of its founder, Josemaría Escrivá, whose opponents call him an admirer of Spain dictator Francisco Franco.
John Paul II's beliefs about gender roles and human sexuality also came under attack. Some feminism criticized his positions on the role of women, and gay-rights activists disagreed with criticism of homosexuality and same-sex marriage.
His opposition to artificial contraception was particularly controversial. Claims were made that John Paul II's papacy spread an unproven belief that condoms do not block the spread of HIV; between these two claims, many critics have blamed him for contributing to AIDS in Africas in Africa and elsewhere in which millions have died. His supporters disagree and stress the importance of sexual abstinence in preventing the spread of AIDS. Critics have also claimed that the large families caused by lack of contraception have exacerbated Third World poverty and problems such as street children in South America.
John Paul II was also criticized for the way he administered the Church; in particular, critics charged that he failed to respond quickly enough to the Roman Catholic Church sex abuse scandal. He was also criticized for Centralization power back to the Vatican following the earlier decentralization of Pope John XXIII. As such he was regarded by some as a strict authoritarian.
Besides all the criticism from those demanding modernization, Traditional Catholics were at times equally vehement in denouncing him from the right, demanding a return to the Tridentine Mass and repudiation of the reforms instituted after the Second Vatican Council, such as the use of the venacular language in Mass.
== Other ==
Euro_coin.">image:Eurovatican.jpg|thumb|215px|Pope John Paul II appears on the Vatican's Euro coin.
*John Paul II's apostolic motto was ''Totus Tuus'' ("all yours"); he borrowed the motto from the Marian consecrating prayer of Saint Louis Marie Grignion de Montfort.
*According to a ''New York Post'' article of 19 February2002, John Paul II personally performed three exorcisms during his tenure as pope. The first exorcism was performed on a woman in 1982. His second was in September 2000 when he performed the rite on a nineteen-year-old woman who had become enraged in St Peter's Square. A year later, in September 2001, he performed an exorcism on a twenty-year-old woman.
*The John Paul II International Airport (IATA airport code: KRK), in Balice, Poland, near Kraków where he served as Archbishop before being elected Pope, was named in his honour.
*In 2004 he received an extraordinary Charlemagne Award of the city of Aachen, Germany.
*The Harlem Globetrotters visited Pope John Paul II at the Vatican City in November of 2000 and named the Pontiff an Honorary Harlem Globetrotter.
*On 23 March1999, John Paul II released his debut CD "[http://www.abbapater.com/ Abbà Pater]".
*John Paul II has been featured on at least seven popular albums in his native Poland. Most notably singer/songwriterStanislaw Sojka’s 2003 album, “Jan Pawel II -- Tryptyk Rzymski”, a ten-track collection of the Pope's poems set to music, reached No. 1.
*In 2003, his death was List of premature obituaries by CNN when his pre-written obituary (along with those of several other famous figures) was inadvertently published on CNN's web site due to a lapse in password protection.
== Further reading ==
=== Books by John Paul II ===
In Order (Sort):
====Meditations and philosophy====
* ''Memory and Identity - Conversations at the Dawn of a Millennium'', published by Rizzoli (22 March2005) ISBN 0847827615 - conversational presentation of John Paul II's views on many secular topics, such as evil, freedom, contemporary Europe, nationalism, and democracy. Included in the book is also a transcript of the Pope's discussion on his assassination attempt in 1981.
* ''Rise, Let Us Be On Our Way'', Warner Books (28 September2004),ISBN 0446577812 - mostly addressed to his bishops, however a rich source of inspiration for everyone having knowledge of Christianity.
* ''Pope John Paul II - In My Own Words'', Gramercy (6 August2002) ISBN 0517220849 - best-seller, a compilation book of carefully selected words and prayers of John Paul II, compiled by Anthony F. Chiffolo.
* ''Gift and Mystery - On the Fiftieth Anniversary of My Priestly Ordination'', Image (20 April1999) ISBN 0385493711 - about being a priest.
* ''Crossing the Threshold of Hope'', Knopf (19 September, 1995), ISBN 0679765611 - edited by Vittorio Messori. John Paul II makes many of his teachings and ideas more accessible.
* ''The Way to Christ - Spiritual Exercises'', HarperSanFrancisco (7 October1994) ISBN 0060642165 - conversational presentation of two retreats Karol Woytła gave 10 years apart before becoming pope. In that time he served in Kraków as bishop and cardinal. A direct and touching book.
* ''Person and Act'', by Karol Wojtyla; before his papacy, (28 February1979) ISBN 9027709858. In depth phenomenological work tied to Thomistic Ethics, apparently there is a bad translation entitled "the Acting Person".
* ''Love and Responsibility'', by Karol Woytła before his papacy, Ignatius Press; Rev. edition (1 April1993) ISBN 0898704456 - in depth philosophical analysis of human love and sexuality.
====Plays by John Paul II====
* ''Our God's Brother'', Ave Maria Press (September 1995) ISBN 0877938709 - this play was written by Karol Wojtyla in Poland during World War II when the Nazis were suppressing Culture of Poland (1944).
* ''The Jeweller's Shop: A Meditation on the Sacrament of Matrimony, Passing on Occasion into a Drama'', Arrow, (17 March1980) ISBN 009140861X.
Both of these plays were filmed:
*''Our God's brother'' (in Polish: ''Brat naszego Boga''), 123 min, 1997, colour, directed by Krzysztof Zanussi. [http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0119846/ IMDb entry].
*''La Bottega dell'orefice'' (English: ''The Jeweller's Shop''), 88 min (Canada)/95 min (USA), 1988, colour, directed by Michael Joseph Anderson. [http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0094787/ IMDb entry].
====Poetry by John Paul II====
* ''The Poetry of Pope John Paul II'', USCCB (1 September2003) ISBN 1574555561 - poems written in the summer of 2002.
* ''The Place Within: The Poetry of Pope John Paul II'', Random House; 1st edition (25 October1994) ISBN 0679760644 - lyrical poetry
===Biographies of Pope John Paul II===
* ''Witness to Hope'', George Weigel, HarperCollins (1999, 2001) ISBN 006018793X.
* ''Man of the Century: The Life and Times of Pope John Paul II'', Jonathan Kwitny, Henry Holt and Company, 1997.
* ''His Holiness: John Paul II and the History of Our Time, Carl Bernstein and Marco Politi, Doubleday, 1996.
* ''Pope John Paul II: The Biography'', Tad Szulc, Scribner, 1995.
== Films about Pope John Paul II ==
* ''Pope John Paul II: The Movie'', directed by Herbert Wise, starring Albert Finney, Nigel Hawthorne, Alfred Burke, John McEnery, Patrick Stewart.
* ''Pope John Paul's Third Pilgrimage to His Homeland'', a documentary on John Paul's June 1987 visit to Poland.
* ''From a Far Country (1981)'', directed by Krzysztof Zanussi.
* ''The Millennial Pope: John Paul II (1999) (TV)'', a documentary directed by Helen Whitney.
* ''Storia di Carlo'', polish title: ''Karol. Człowiek, który został papieżem'', 2005, a documentary, directed by Giacomo Batiatto, based upon a book by Gian Franco Svidercoschi.
== See also ==
*List of Encyclicals of Pope John Paul II
*List of pastoral visits of Pope John Paul II outside Italy
*List of Roman Catholic bishops of Kraków
*Papal election, 2005
*Papabili
*Personalism
*Popemobile
*Antipope#Sedevacantist antipopes
*The Incredible Popeman
== Notes ==
# Pronounced KARR-ol YOO-zef voy-TIH-wah, International Phonetic Alphabet , .
# "[http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/world/europe/4399189.stm Frail Pope suffers heart failure]," ''BBC News'', April 1, 2005 (accessed June 11, 2005).
# "[http://news.bbc.co.uk/onthisday/hi/dates/stories/june/2/newsid_3972000/3972361.stm 1979: Millions cheer as the Pope comes home]," from "On This Day, June 2, 1979," ''BBC News'' (accessed June 11, 2005).
# Ryan Chilcote, "[http://www.cnn.com/2005/WORLD/europe/04/03/pope.gorbachev/index.html Gorbachev: Pope was 'example to all of us']," ''CNN'', April 4, 2005 (accessed June 11, 2005).
# Polly Toynbee, "[http://www.guardian.co.uk/pope/story/0,12272,1065041,00.html False paeans to the Pope]," ''The Guardian '', October 17, 2003 (accessed June 11, 2005).
# "[http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/7848742/ Pope rocks Polish pop music charts]," ''MSNBC News'', May 14, 2005 (accessed June 11, 2005).
== References ==
*The Pope Blog (2005). [http://thepopeblog.blogspot.com/2005/04/last-will-and-testament-of-pope-john.html The Last Will and Testament of Pope John Paul II (translated from Italian by V.I.S.)]. Retrieved 7 April, 2005. (Wikisource:Testament Jana Pawła II)
*''The Message of Fatima Tarcisio Bertone'' with introduction by Tarcisio Bertone. ''[http://www.vatican.va/phome_en.htm The Holy See]''
*[http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/world/europe/4253415.stm "'Cured' Pope returns to Vatican"] (10 February, 2005). ''BBC News''.
*D'Emilio, Frances (31 March, 2005). [http://story.news.yahoo.com/news?tmpl=story&cid=514&u=/ap/20050401/ap_on_re_eu/pope_5 "Pope Has High Fever From Urinary Infection"]. ''The Associated Press'', published on ''Yahoo! News''.
*Domínguez, J. (no date). "[http://religion-cults.com/pope/communism.htm Pope John Paul II and Communism]". ''World Religions and 101 Cults''. Retrieved 4 April, 2005.
*[http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/world/europe/4399189.stm "Frail Pope suffers heart failure"] (1 April, 2005). ''BBC News''.
* "[http://www.dw-world.de/dw/article/0,1564,1538173,00.html Stasi Files Implicate KGB in Pope Shooting]" (1 April, 2005). ''Deutsche Welle''.
*Address of Bishop Stanislaw Dziwisz On Sunday, 13 May, 2001 to the Catholic University of Lublin on the 20th anniversary of the assassination attempt, published by Catholic Culture: [http://www.catholicculture.org/docs/doc_view.cfm?recnum=3699 Dziwisz Address]
*Time Magazine, 25 January, 1982: [http://www.time.com/time/archive/preview/0,10987,925231,00.html The Pope vs. his doctors]
*The Pope Blog (2005). [http://thepopeblog.blogspot.com/2005/04/final-letter-of-pope-john-paul-ii-to.html Final Letter of Pope John Paul II to the Faithful (translated from Italian)]. Retrieved 3 April, 2005.
*Lorenzi, Rossella (22 March, 2005). [http://dsc.discovery.com/news/briefs/20050321/popeill.html "Pope's Condition Not Improving"]. ''Discovery News''.
*Navarro-Valls, Joaquin (2005). [http://www.vatican.va/gpII/bulletin/B0183-XX.01.pdf Il Santo Padre è deceduto questa sera alle ore 21.37 nel Suo appartamento privato]. Retrieved 2 April, 2005. (''The Holy Father passed away at 9:37 this evening in his private apartment.'')
*[http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/world/europe/4344923.stm "Pope returns to Vatican after op"] (13 March2005). ''BBC News''.
*[http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/7022618/ "Pope back at Vatican by Easter? It's possible"] (3 March, 2005). ''The Associated Press'', republished on ''MSNBC''.
*PunditGuy (2005). [http://www.punditguy.com/2005/04/pope_watch.html 11:37 AM - AP, Reuters / Flash from the Vatican, Pope John Paul II is dead.]. Retrieved 2 April, 2005.
*St Anthony Messenger Press (2005). [http://www.americancatholic.org/news/pope/popehospitalized/ Pope John Paul II's Final Days]. Retrieved 2 April, 2005.
*Interview with AM Programme, ''ABC Radio'' (Australia). 3 April, 2005. Subject: Death of Pope John Paul II; helicopter crash in Indonesia.
* [http://www.cnn.com/2005/WORLD/europe/03/31/pope1/index.html "Vatican source: Pope given last rites"] (31 March, 2005). ''CNN''.
*Wojtyla, Karol (2005). [http://www.vatican.va/holy_father/john_paul_ii/index.htm The Holy See - The Holy Father - John Paul II]. Retrieved 2 April, 2005.
*Wojtyla, Karol (2005). [http://imdb.com/name/nm0937552/ Pope John Paul II]. Internet Movie Database. Retrieved 2 April, 2005.
*[http://www.cnn.com/2005/WORLD/europe/04/01/pope1/index.html "World awaits word on pope's condition"] (2 April, 2005). ''CNN''.
==External links==
* [http://www.vatican.va/ Vatican: the Holy See]
* [http://www.vatican.va/holy_father/john_paul_ii/index.htm The Holy See - The Holy Father - John Paul II]
* [http://www.zpub.com/un/pope/ The "UNOFFICIAL" Pope John Paul II]
* [http://www.popejohnpaul.com/ Pope John Paul:The most revered human being on earth]
===Criticism===
*[http://www.greenleft.org.au/back/2005/621/621p19.htm Pope John Paul II, a reactionary in shepherd's clothing] by Barry Healy (Green Left Weekly)
*[http://www.wsws.org/articles/2005/apr2005/pope-a06.shtml Pope John Paul II: a political obituary] by Marius Heuser and Peter Schwarz (World Socialist Web Site)
*[http://www.diacritica.com/sobaka/2005/johnpaul.html The Anti-Pope: The Two Faces of Pope John Paul II] by Cali Ruchala (Sobaka)
*[http://emperors-clothes.com/vatican/pope-1.htm Truth vs. Hype: The policies of the Vatican under John Paul II regarding Jews and the Holocaust, Yugoslavia and El Salvador] by Jared Israel (Emperor's Clothes)
*[http://www.salon.com/opinion/feature/2005/04/05/mother/index.html Why I can't mourn the pope] by Joan Walsh (Salon)
*[http://www.guardian.co.uk/pope/story/0,12272,1451750,00.html The Pope has blood on his hands] by Terry Eagleton (The Guardian)
*[http://www.remember-chile.org.uk/comment/vatican.htm Pinochet's men in the Vatican] by Juan-José Tamayo-Acosta (Remember-Chile)
*[http://www.wsws.org/articles/1999/mar1999/pope-m04.shtml Why the Vatican defends mass murder] by Bill Vann (World Socialist Web Site)
*[http://www.ipsnews.net/africa/interna.asp?idnews=28139 The Great Restorer] IPS Africa quotes Leonardo Boff
*[http://www.we-are-church.org/imwac/press/PR1_en.htm A Pope and a Pontificate Full of Contradictions] "We Are Church" movement press release
*[http://www.balkanalysis.com/modules.php?name=News&file=article&sid=523 Another Side of the Pope: John Paul II's Balkan legacy] by Carl Savich (Balkanalysis.com)
===Directory categories===
*[http://search.looksmart.com/p/browse/us1/us317837/us317918/us969562/us1142623/us53323/us266042/us10025672/us553539/us1005380/us893180/ LookSmart - Pope John Paul II]
*[http://dmoz.org/Society/Religion_and_Spirituality/Christianity/Denominations/Catholicism/Popes/J/John_Paul_II/ Open Directory Project - John Paul II]
*[http://dir.yahoo.com/society_and_culture/religion_and_spirituality/faiths_and_practices/christianity/denominations_and_sects/catholic/people/popes/pope_john_paul_ii__1920_2005_/ Yahoo! - Pope John Paul II]
1920 births2005 deathsKarlspreis laureatesPolyglotsPolish bishopsPapal conclavesPope John Paul IIPopesServants of GodPresidential Medal of Freedom recipientsang:Pápa Iohannes Paulus IIfur:Pape Zuan Pauli IIhi:पोप जॉन पॉलla:Ioannes Paulus IIlv:Pāvests Jānis Pāvils IIli:Johannes Paulus IIms:Paus John Paul IIzh-min-nan:Jio̍k-bōng Pó-lo̍k IImo:Иоан Паул ал Ⅱ-ляnds:Johannes Paul II.scn:Giuvanni Paulu IIsimple:Pope John Paul IIth:สมเด็จพระสันตะปาปาจอห์น ปอลที่ 2vi:Gioan Phaolô II
Pope John Paul II
An anon nominated this article to be a Featured Article but did not do the nomination correctly, so I'm placing the tag here now.
:Oops, forgot to sign. :) User:Flcelloguy 22:09, 11 Jun 2005 (UTC)
::For my own reference: [http://www.answers.com/topic/john-paul-ii LINK/REFERENCE]
Because of their length, the previous discussions on this page have been archived.
If further archiving is needed, see Wikipedia:How to archive a talk page.
Previous discussions:
*Talk:Pope John Paul II/Archive1:
*Talk:Pope John Paul II/Archive2:
*Talk:Pope John Paul II/Archive3:
----
==The section regardling "Criticism"==
The section regarding "Criticism" states: ''"Former United States president Bill Clinton added after the pontiff's death that the Pope 'may have had a mixed legacy,' but he called him a man with a great feel for human dignity.[8] (http://apnews.myway.com/article/20050406/D89A4IV80.html) Current president George Bush disagreed, claiming that John Paul will have a clear and excellent legacy of peace, compassion and 'setting a clear moral tone.' [9]"'' Is the second sentence really necessary given the title of the section? Hopefully this article does not need a "Rebuttle to the Criticism" section. I'm not so sure that the quote from Clinton is necessary either given that it doesn't address a specific criticism. User:Edwardian 16:11, 12 Apr 2005 (UTC)
:''Former President Clinton said....'' ''President Bush said ...'' -- Will anybody still be interested in what they said, two weeks from now?
:And if yes, what did Carter and the other Bush say? What about the first ladies? -- I think I better go find out now if at least the Austrian chancellor and the head of the opposition agreed on whether the Pope's legacy is "clear" or "mixed", so that I can add this crucial bit of information to the article as well... -- User:Austrian 23:44, 12 Apr 2005 (UTC)
::Don't forget to poll Hollywood. We wouldn't want to miss out on the latest dish on "JP". User:Variable 02:17, 13 Apr 2005 (UTC)
::Amen to that! I have removed the remarks from Clinton and Bush. User:Edwardian 01:30, 13 Apr 2005 (UTC)
:::Amen, amen! 01:56, Apr 13, 2005 (UTC)
==Views on various issues==
The introduction states: ''"He spoke out against communism, imperialism, materialism, Nazism, racism, oppression, secularism, feminism, poverty, and unrestrained capitalism. While he was on friendly terms with many industrialized heads of state, he reserved a special opprobrium for consumerism attributing it to hedonism." '' Is there any reason why the second sentence should stand alone rather than be incorporated into the first (i.e. ''"He spoke out against communism, consumerism, hedonism, imperialism, materialism, Nazism, racism, oppression, secularism, feminism, poverty, and unrestrained capitalism."'')? User:Edwardian 15:57, 12 Apr 2005 (UTC)
:You happened to land on the article when somebody was trying to strip that 2nd sentence of most its meaning. It's now restored and I think you can see it deserves its place. JPII really thought of this secular consumerism as one of the greatest threats to Western psychological/spiritual well being going forward, second only to unbelief itself. User:JDG 07:41, 18 Apr 2005 (UTC)
==Picture caption==
Isn't the box thing at the top of the photo a bit much? We don't do it for other monarchs nor for other religious leaders. I notice we don't do it for every pope either, just far enough back to make the casual researcher think that it's a common style for all. And what's with the Latin? Was there any justification for any of this?Grace Note 00:23, 12 Apr 2005 (UTC)
:As for the use of Latin, see reversals war in the history of the article "Pope John Paul I" to get a clearer picture. This was a compromise. --Eleassar777 11:01, 12 Apr 2005 (UTC)
::I don't pretty much care whether or not Latin is used or the office the person held was prominently displayed at the header of the infobox like it was before the changes made by Grace Note. She asked what my intentions were. Just to make my intentions clear with the new infobox, I just wanted to make the infobox look nicer than it was and add it to all the papal articles for consistency. If you all want to hash out little details about the infobox, such as the use of the Latin name, you might as well take it to :Template:Infobox pope for further discussion. --User:Gerald Farinas 14:58, 12 Apr 2005 (UTC)
:::I think we should use the Latin name where it it now. Latin is the official language of the Vatican, and since he is the sole ruler of Vatican City, we should put his name as it is in "his" language. On the part of the infobox, it just collects relevant information into a spot at the head of the article. If the box isn't on all of the articles, we should eventually put them there. It just takes time to go through 250-odd pope articles. 22:37, Apr 12, 2005 (UTC)
::::I'm working as fast as I can to get those infoboxes on all the papal articles! A gay boy from far north Chicago can only do so much, despite what people think they can do. Hehe. --User:Gerald Farinas 00:15, 13 Apr 2005 (UTC)
:::::So what's your angle, Gerald? You are devoting much time to this and the funeral article. Are you a gay Catholic? Are you an unbeliever who happens to dig the cardinals' wardrobes, or the pomp and circumstance or somesuch? Do you just enjoy the irony? Do fill us in. User:JDG 20:23, 18 Apr 2005 (UTC)
== Trips Between Countries ==
I removed text about the Pope's journys being made to link the "Abrahamic" religions. I don't think this is necessarily true: the Pope visited countries with high Catholic populations (such as those in Latin America) and low Jewish/Muslim populations. How could he connect the three religions here. Sure, some trips were made to emphasize the connections, but on a whole, it's not true.
Also, I removed a edit stating he had "allegedly" canonized more saints then all of his predecessors. I think this is pretty much a given fact. 23:05, Apr 12, 2005 (UTC)
:Actually it isn't. It is a bit of hyperbole.
* The method by which saints are canonised has changed, so one is not comparing like with like.
* I have seen no statistical evidence to show that he ''has'' canonised more under the modern method.
And no, that isn't just nickpicking. Newspapers right now talk about the church electing a seventy-something pope as if it does it once and a while to have a short pontificate. I researched the ''real'' facts. John XXIII was the first seventy-something pope for over two centuries. So just because it is a 'given fact' doesn't make it an ''actual fact''. At most we should mention the ''claim'' that he canonised more saints than all his precedessors. But we should not state it as fact. After all the media stated ''as fact'' that the camerlengo hit JPII on the head with a silver hammer. B******t. That ceremony has not happened for generations and was officially abolished by JPII in the mid 1990s. ''Media facts'' and ''actual facts'' are often quite different. Fear''ÉIREANN''">User:Jtdirl 00:12, 13 Apr 2005 (UTC)
:Well, ok, you're right. I think that there was no real canonization process back in the early days of the Church. It was probably more like popular acclaim: you knew a person was holy in their life, then they were killed by the Romans. Later, you go pray at their tomb in the catacombs. I'll try to rework it so the articles "claims" the fact/
You're also totally right about the nitpicking of detail in articles. This stuff is what makes Wikipedia more reliable and dependable in academic circumstances. 01:05, Apr 14, 2005 (UTC)
==Duplication==
We seem to have 2 biographies now, plus a seperate page ? User:Andycjp
:Yes, there was a major duplication of sections of the article, and at least one section got lost. This would almost certainly be because of a software problem, and not a vandalism. I think it's all fixed now. I suspect this is happening more often in this article than in most, because of the large number of changes made and because the article is longer than our normally recommended maximum length.-User:Gadfium 03:24, 14 Apr 2005 (UTC)
=="The Great" - 2 0r 3?==
It is in some places said that Pope Nicholas I, (819?-867, Pope 858-867) was also considered "the Great", although I was not myself aware of this before JPII died and the discussion of his greatness began in earnest. Our own wikipedia article states this, does anyone else know why generally there are only considered 2 (Gregory and Leo)? (User:GreetingsEarthling, although I am not logged in) User:136.242.24.150 04:05, 14 Apr 2005 (UTC)
:If no one has any objections, then, I'll change the article to reflect that Nicholas I is considered "The Great" and so therefore JPII, if he achieves that titles, will be the fourth.User:GreetingsEarthling 06:28, 16 Apr 2005 (UTC)
I would support this with a credible source/reference provided. It is through popular and consistent use of the word great that popes eventually become Great. --User:Eleassar777 06:33, 16 Apr 2005 (UTC)
:[http://catholicherald.com/saunders/05ws/ws050414.htm This] is by a priest I know and respect. He makes no mention of Nicholas I. Before I change this article back, however, I would like to know why the Wikipedia Nicholas I entry lists him as "Great", since that is what this article should go by. User:GreetingsEarthling 06:57, 16 Apr 2005 (UTC)
With all respect, this author does not mention Saint Nicholas. I would suppose that to be relevant he should either confirm or deny the fact that Saint Nicholas is called the Great, which is what some people believe. I have found several online sources listing Saint Nicholas as Nicholas the Great:
*[http://www.archindy.org/criterion/national/04-04-bishops.htm The Criterion online edition] - the opinion of bishop Thomas G. Doran
*[ftp://members.aol.com/kcc1tim/nicholas.txt Nicholas.txt] - should be copied in a text browser
*[http://directory.google.com/Top/Society/Religion_and_Spirituality/Christianity/People/Saints/N/Saint_Nicholas_I/ Google directory]
*[http://www.geocities.com/Athens/Ithaca/6461/9cent.html 9cent.html]
Using the phrase "Nicholas the Great", there are many other web pages offered by Google. I don't know what is true, but it is evident that at least some people believe that Nicholas I was "the Great" too. This should be further verified in printed sources. --User:Eleassar777 13:18, 16 Apr 2005 (UTC)
:Well, to be fair, the article I linked to says, "Two popes have had the title, 'the Great' appended to their name", thus implicitly excluding Nicholas I (the author could hardly have listed every Pope who does not deserve the title!). That having been said, though, enough people seem to consider Nicholas I "Great" that he ought to be included, IMHO. User:GreetingsEarthling 22:14, 16 Apr 2005 (UTC)
To note, the Catholic Encyclopedia does not call him the great, but the 11th edition of Britannica does. User:John KenneyUser_talk:John Kenney 14:54, 16 Apr 2005 (UTC)
:Interestingly enough, that's not quite right. The Catholic Encyclopedia [http://www.newadvent.org/cathen/11054a.htm article] on him does not call him "Nicholas the Great", just "one of the great popes of the Middle Ages", but the [http://www.newadvent.org/cathen/12272b.htm complete listing of popes] does call him "St. Nicholas I (the Great)". (He's #106, for quick reference). User:GreetingsEarthling 22:29, 16 Apr 2005 (UTC)
Pope Benedict XVI has referred to him as "the Great" in public, and the Cardinals were reffering to him as "Magnus" in the conclave. Since the new pope says it, it must be. '' Papa Facit. ''
--User:64.135.173.5 01:59, 20 Apr 2005 (UTC)
That's garbage. He wasn't speaking ''ex cathedra'' on matters of faith. User:John KenneyUser_talk:John Kenney 02:11, 20 Apr 2005 (UTC)
==Article too long==
I think that each section should be short with a longer version in separate articles, the same way we do it with countries' articles, because this one is becomming way too long and with too many sections. What do you think?User:Cjrs 79 17:15, Apr 16, 2005 (UTC)
:I would support this, however don't have time to participate actively to such a degree. --User:Eleassar777 20:12, 16 Apr 2005 (UTC)
:In principle, I agree, but I personally would wait until the frequency of edits drops somewhere much below the current ~500 edits/week, especially given the section edit/page duplication bug. User:Niteowlneils 01:53, 18 Apr 2005 (UTC)
:I disagree with breaking up articles of this size, but I seem to be distinctly in the minority on this question. When a unified topic (like one guy's life) is sliced up I always get the feeling I may have missed something essential because perhaps I didn't click every single link. If it's all in one big article I know everything is right in front of me... I don't think we should worry about length until about 75k. Oh well if I have the energy maybe I'll try to kick off a definitive debate about this, with vote (unless it's been done?). User:JDG 04:51, 18 Apr 2005 (UTC)
== recent edits regarding election of John Paul II ==
Does anyone really have a reliable source about how he came to be elected. I'm refering to this section: ''Voting in the second conclave was divided between two particularly strong candidates: Giuseppe Cardinal Siri, the Archbishop of Genoa, and Giovanni Cardinal Benelli, the Archbishop of Florence and a close associate of Pope John Paul I. In early ballots, Benelli came within nine votes of victory. However Wojtyła secured election as a compromise candidate, in part through the support of Franz Cardinal König and others who had previously supported Giuseppe Cardinal Siri.'' which (as of now) is in the main article. I read that, and I say to myself, how could anyone really know if that is true or not, unless one of the cardinals openly broke his vow to keep the conclave secret. User:Mpearl 01:36, Apr 17, 2005 (UTC)
== A concern about opening paragraphs ==
This is generally a fine article, but I wonder if the 2nd and 3rd paragraphs, if left unbalanced, are the best way to represent JPII's overall approach to the world through his papacy. These paragraphs have long lists of the things opposed or criticized by JPII and no mention of any positive impulses or motivations. I suppose it is more difficult to express these in a standard expository way, as it is awkward to write something like "he was in favor of love between people and nations". But an attempt should be made... I would also include a section on his writings beyond the existing list of his publications. In particular, his activity as a philosopher and as a poet would merit notice quite apart from his involvement with the church (the publication list itself needs work-- for instance it gives the impression his first book of verse came out in 1994 while there was a worldwide printing in all major languages of his early poems well before 1980). User:JDG 16:54, 18 Apr 2005 (UTC)
== Spoke out against oppression? Not really. ==
How much sense does it make to list the ideologies and political movements that John Paul II denounced? Too many of them contradict each other, like racism, Communism, poverty, feminism, and oppression. The last time I looked, Communism and feminism were developed to fight oppression, especially poverty. Plus, JP II's sexist, stereotypical views on women negate whatever "commitment" he expressed toward fighting global oppression. It's the global oppression of women that facilitates the misery most humans experience.
The contradiction of the Pope's (and the Vatican's) positions on gender really need to be explored more seriously. I am limited when it comes to an in-depth knowledge of Catholicism, thus I wouldn't really wouldn't know where to start any argument from. But I know there are Catholic Church experts out there that are also wise about gender and sexual oppression---I know there is. Y'all folks need to speak up. --User:Pinko1977 06:03, 19 Apr 2005 (UTC)
:Probably you should correct your admitted lack of "knowledge of Catholicism" before getting on a soapbox about it. Your statements don't hang together very well. It's true, for instance, that Marxism fancied itself developed to fight oppression. The Catholic Church from the beginning of Marxism predicted that any ideology built upon a rejection of God would, despite all rhetoric, become oppressive itself. The 8 million+ who died unnatural deaths under Stalin alone argue for the truth of the Church's prediction... As for things like feminism, modern feminism has likewise built into itself tenets the Church could hardly be expected to like, such as deep loathing for all "patriarchal power structures". Yo Pinko-- the Church *is* a patriarchal power structure. You expect it to negate itself? No, feminism will have to battle those it denounces and I know where I'd put my chips on this one.... User:JDG 06:30, 19 Apr 2005 (UTC)
::Wojtyla's active crackdown of liberation theology speaks volumes to his commitment to opressed peoples. Not to mention his lack of criticism of the brutal dictatorships of Chile and Argentina. — User:Miguel 09:55, 2005 Apr 19
(UTC)
:::Just wanted to remind that in the period of Stalin communism was not reached - that was only a "transitory period". --User:Eleassar777 13:34, 19 Apr 2005 (UTC)
JDG, please explain how my arguments "don't hold together well" before you attack them. I admitted I don't know much about the RCC, so I suggested that people who do advance this argument, which is exactly what the people who responded after you did. By the way, I know full well that feminism views the Church as a patriarchal institution, thank you for clarifying. As a Marxist and a feminist, I should know that. --User:Pinko1977 21:20, 19 Apr 2005 (UTC)
:Right, so here's your logic: blue is a very nice color; mass murderer X wears blue shirts very often; how on earth could this Church and its popes oppose MMX? User:JDG 08:05, 20 Apr 2005 (UTC)
It is important to define whether Pope John Paul II opposed to communism as a social and economic system, to communism as an ideology, to communism as a political movement that wants to implement the system or to all of them.
If he opposed to communism as the social and economic system, that would mean that he opposed to the only system in which there is no poverty. I can not understand how this would be possible, as no such system exists anywhere in the world. Therefore the Pope was only able to fight against communism as an ideology (a set of ideas) and to its political movements.
If the system would exist, the Pope would contradict himself in his fight against both the communism and poverty at the same time. As it does not, everything depends on whether this ideology can possibly be realized. If this is not so, he fought against the ideology which cannot be realized and he does not contradict himself. If this ideology is realizable, he contradicts himself.
Therefore, I suggest that the article states: As believed by such-and-such people (who do not believe communism is realizable) Pope John Paul II fought against the ideology of communism and its political movements, but at the same time also against poverty, although relatively ineffectively. Others believe that he contradicted himself this way, as the realization of communism would mean that the only system, in which there is no poverty, is attained. --User:Eleassar777 15:08, 20 Apr 2005 (UTC)
Leaving aside the ideologies he opposed, what about In many ways, he fought against oppression, secularism and poverty? What does "in many ways" mean? I doubt many people apart from his supporters would see it like that. Can anyone name, say, three practical things JP2 did to make a real difference to poverty? This is not an attempt to stir up more controversy but a genuine request for information, as the above reads like a pretty partial statement with perhaps a bolted-on attempt to tone it down ("in many ways") that doesn't quite make sense. Clearly any pontiff is going to be opposed to these obvious evils but I think unless something can be added to justify this statement it should be removed. User:Flapdragon 10:01, 24 Apr 2005 (UTC)
:I remember that together with Bono from U2 (band) he fought to get the debts of 23 underdeveloped countries cancelled and succeeded. I also know that Church helps people in underdeveloped countries very much both with material and psychological support. At the other side, I believe he would made a deeper impact, if he had not opposed the use of birth control. Therefore, I think that the sentence you mention should not be removed, but made more specific.
:Another thing, I have found something interesting on [http://www.jamaicaobserver.com/columns/html/20050406T200000-0500_78226_OBS_POPE_JOHN_PAUL_II.asp this web page]: "Many have stated that John Paul fought against liberation theology. I suspect that most who say that did not ever read the speech made by Pope John Paul 11 in Pueblo, Mexico, in 1979, which was the first of his 129 papal visits. But as usual those that know the least have the most talk!
:What he said was that the church did not need any political philosophy or ideology to be on the side of the poor, because this was already stated in the gospels. What the Pope did was to make the gospel the centre of liberation theology which was further manifested in his first two encyclicals Redemptoris Homini (Redeemer of Man) and Laborem Exercens (On Human Labour)."
:Can anyone comment this?
Well, I lived in a communist country and I know that communism is bad. Any system which deprives people of the fruits of their work is bad, because it leads to people not wanting to work. As the saying in Poland went: "This belongs to everyone, that is to no one". Lack of respect of private ownership depravated human souls. Communism is a system in which everyone is poor, so everyone is equal.
:I mainly agree. Especially when you say that people do not want to work anymore. I also lived in a socialist state and know this. Otherwise, I don't know why everbody would be poor - poor is defined relatively to rich. If there are no rich men, nobody can be poor. Nonetheless, don't forget that communism is seen as an utopia by the majority of people. By the way, did you notice that Wikipedia is similar to communism in some elements? There is/was even a page about this - I just don't know anymore where it is located. --User:Eleassar777 11:49, 14 May 2005 (UTC)
::Well, you may always compare people to history. If in one country there are lacks of shoes and food, and they once have had shoes and food, then we may conclude that, althoutgh is everyone equal, everyone is equally poor (in comparison to historical experience). Wikipedia similar to communism? How? You may also argue that wikipedia is prime example of extreme right - libertarianism :) User:Szopen 15:12, 14 May 2005 (UTC)
As for feminism, well, one can be against aggressive feminism and still being for equal treatment of woman and man. I see no contradiction in here. Feminist argues for state-regulated relationship between man and woman and argues that man and woman are totally equal. Non-feminist argues that man and woman are not the same, that they are both valuable for society and their role in society is uncomparable, and equal respect is needed and equal rights (but not privileges) for both sexes. User:Szopen 07:44, 14 May 2005 (UTC)
==His Holiness==
Is there any reason why JPIIs official title, 'His Holiness' has been removed? User:DJ Clayworth 18:25, 20 Apr 2005 (UTC)
Someone claimed that he lost it after he died. I wouldn't know about this. --User:Eleassar777 21:45, 20 Apr 2005 (UTC)
I am opposed to the use of Style (manner of address) in articles, but was outvoted (though maybe it should be revisited). But current policy dictates that he should be ''His Holiness'' whether alive or dead. Fear''ÉIREANN''">User:Jtdirl 23:39, 20 Apr 2005 (UTC)
It is a title that can only apply to the living pontiff, not the dead. User:Rangeley 06:02, 21 Apr 2005 (UTC)
Indeed. No dead person has a style, to the best of my knowledge - at least, I have seen not seen ANY dead person with a style on Wikipedia. Of course, I disagree that live people should have them, but dead people certainly should not - I've never heard someone refer to a dead person as "His Excellency". User:Titanium Dragon 01:30, 22 Apr 2005 (UTC)
:I don't believe that at all. I think it's usual to retain a title on death. George VI is formally known as His Late Majesty, and his queen Her Late Majesty. Where do you get the idea that a style ceases on death? It seems a strange idea to me, to respect someone when they're alive and then reverse that term of respect on death, User:Jguk 09:24, 22 Apr 2005 (UTC)
If we were writing a history of the current pope, Big Ben, then there would be some point in not using the style for earlier pontiffs. But each article here is a self-contained biography. It is standard in such circumstances to outline what was their style in the office. Hence the logical use of ''His Holiness'' for all past popes, ''His/Her Majesty'' for past monarchs, HRH/HIRM/HSH etc for past holders of those styles. It is perfectly standard form. Fear''ÉIREANN''">User:Jtdirl 01:29, 25 Apr 2005 (UTC)
*Though the person might be dead, we still give them a title. We still call Diana Princess, Reagan President, Rainier Prince, Brezhnev Premier, etc. User:Zscout370 01:44, 25 Apr 2005 (UTC)
:Don't forget about John Paul II ''Pope''. ;) --User:Eleassar777 09:06, 25 Apr 2005 (UTC)
::Wouldn't those be honorifics or titles rather than styles? No deceased monarchs/popes used to have them, but they all have Pope/Prince/whatever. There's a difference. User:Titanium Dragon 11:14, 4 May 2005 (UTC)
All popes even after death retain the the title his holiness. However, a cause for beatification for Wojtyla will be opened in July. Until that date, his title will be Servant of God. When the proccess starts he willbe Venerable, and when if he is beatified he will be Blessed. User:Coburnpharr04 04:20, 13 Jun 2005 (UTC)
:Correction. The process started, as declared by Pope Benedict XVI, and that is the reason why he is called Servant of God now. (The Church used to give the title of Venerable when they started the process; now they don't. It's a totally separate phase of canonization apart from being called Servant of God, these days.) When a declaration of heroicity is promulgated (a legal document of the Church), then he will receive the title of Venerable. After a few miracles attributed to him are made official, he will be beatified and receive the title of Blessed. After more miracles are made official he will then be canonized. It's all set in canon law. --User:Gerald Farinas 04:33, 13 Jun 2005 (UTC)
==Pictures==
commons:Johannes Paulus II has some new free pictures of John Paul II. Wouldn't it be good to replace some of the fair use images here with some free ones from Commons? I know that fair use is ok at en:, but free pics should in my opinion be used where available. User:Ausir 08:41, 22 Apr 2005 (UTC)
== Question ==
Do you think this image can be used here somewhere? User:Zscout370 21:45, 24 Apr 2005 (UTC)
:How about Ring of the Fisherman? User:Pmadrid 20:40, 14 May 2005 (UTC)
Is it right to say in the begining of the article that he was Pope of the Roman Catholic Church since he was also Pope of the Eastern Rite Churches? Wouldn't it be better to say Pope of the Catholic Church?
:Roman Catholic Church includes the Eastern Rite churches. The Pope is Patriarch of the Latin Church, which with the Eastern Rite churches makes up the Roman Catholic Church. User:Pmadrid 20:40, 14 May 2005 (UTC)
== What About Mary? ==
It's my understanding as a non-Catholic that the Pope venerated Mary to such a degree that he called out to her in a crisis (such as the assassination attempt), not to God, and planned to proclaim her Co-Redeemer with Christ -- a "God the Mother," if you will. This would fit the logical grid, but would have created yet another aspect of a godhead already split in three. According to Newsweek, his advisors had to plead long and hard with him not to take this step, because so many popes since the Reformation have used Mary as an in-your-face use of Catholic power to irritate Protestants. That was not his intent, of course. Anyone knowledgeable in what I thought was THE agenda closest to John Paul's heart? (Note the big M on his crest.)
User:YankeeInCA 00:59, 25 Apr 2005 (UTC)
:The Pope surely was an admirer of Mary and I can believe he was planning to proclaim her co-Redemtrix ("the Mother Suffering"), Mediatrix ("the Mother Nourishing"), and Advocate ("the Mother Interceding")... This is not a new doctrine - just it wasn't proclaimed ''ex cathedra''. However, I won't believe that he planned to proclaim her "God the Mother" as long as I don't read it printed in several recognized journals I respect and books written in NPOV.
:I have found some links online using Google (the phrase: ''mary co-redeemer newsweek''). Here I post three of them, each with its own understanding.
*[http://religion-cults.com/mary/coredeemer.htm Mary Co-redeemer, Mediator and Advocate]
*[http://www.exorthodoxforchrist.com/mary.htm A critical commentary]
*[http://www.religioustolerance.org/mary_cor.htm From ReligiousTolerance.org]
The controversy of this issue is apparent. However, the Pope was not stupid - he was an excellent theologian and philosopher and co-operated significantly with Mr Ratzinger. I can't imagine that his wish was to create another God, neither deliberately and even more unlikely, by accident. My personal opinion is that his agenda is most closely explained in the article accessible through the first link. --User:Eleassar777 09:04, 25 Apr 2005 (UTC)
Thank you. Part of the strength of the Church has been playing the role, if you will, of angels rushing in where fools fear to tread. One of the articles you cite mentions fear of alienating Anglicans, yet my Anglican (Episcopalian) mother recently joined a secret Marian sisterhood, a surprising about-face for a Massachusetts Yankee to say the least. The lack a female aspect of God in the Abrahamic faiths (in order of revelation: Judaism, Christianity, Islam, and the Protestant sects) is a grave weakness, and only the Catholic Church has had the balls (so to speak) to face the problem. User:YankeeInCA 06:54, 30 Apr 2005 (UTC)
Mary has been always strongly worshipped in Poland. She was even declared queen of Poland, you know. Her "holy portrait" in czestochowa each year brings thousands and thousands of pilgrimes. User:Szopen 07:40, 14 May 2005 (UTC)
:Couldn't help commenting on an aside here - "However, the Pope was not stupid - he was an excellent theologian and philosopher". No doubt he was an excellent theologian, but (speaking as someone with two philosophy degrees) popes don't make excellent philosophers. You won't find many modern-day professional philosophers who believe in God, because religions (particularly Christianity) are philosophically a joke. This is why God is typically relegated to a separate university subject, theology. User:Bfinn 12:22, 21 May 2005 (UTC)
== Latin Name ==
Hey. Ought we to put the name in Latin as ''Ioannes Paulus P.P. II'' (or something like that)? That's how it is in his signature, right? Just checking, not sure so I'm not going to change it. --User:Jenmoa 04:02, 5 May 2005 (UTC)
== My missing edit summary ==
I apologize, I accidently clicked save before writing an edit summary. I removed ''"On May 13 2005 Pope Benedict XVI started the process of beatification, the first step to making him a saint."'' because Pope Benedict XVI is still alive and is ineligible for sainthood. — ''oo64eva (Alex)'' (User: oo64eva | User_talk:Oo64eva | Special:Contributions/Oo64eva) @ 09:25, May 13, 2005 (UTC)
:Okay I see what this contributor intended. I will make it clearer. — ''oo64eva (Alex)'' (User: oo64eva | User_talk:Oo64eva | Special:Contributions/Oo64eva) @ 09:26, May 13, 2005 (UTC)
== Sainthood criteria? ==
"Throughout his papacy, John Paul II generated billions of dollars in income for the Catholic Church, and is therefore being strongly considered for sainthood."
Understandably I was a bit confused when I read this. From my understanding of the Catholic Church, I was under the opinion that sainthood was conferred for being a good person, inspiring the faithful, and comitting what would be considered by the faithful as miracles - not from dollars and cents. This appears to suggest that the primary reason that the late Pope was being considered for sainthood would be the fact that he had brought a lot of money to the Church, and strikes me as being at least slightly POV or perhaps in poor taste.
== St Peter POV ==
I'm concerned about POV in the article regarding the "pontificate" of St Peter. First, Protestant and Orthodox Christians don't accept that Peter was Pope at all. Second, secular history really does not support the idea that the Bishops of Rome claimed supremacy over the western church until the fifth century or so. A while ago, I modified the article to say that JPII was the second-longest reigning pope, after Pius IX and said, parenthetically, that Catholics consider St. Peter to be the first pope and ergo, JP II would be considered the 3rd longest reigning pope in that view. To blithely say that he is the "3rd longest reigning Pope" without caveat, is taking for granted a sectarian and un-proven assertion and passing it off as fact. Shouldn't a commitment to neutrality require us to rely on secular history? User:Sumergocognito 00:17, 15 May 2005 (UTC)
St Peter as Pope isn't POV. The orthodox would agree with the catholic view, the difference is only about the extent of the pope's authority. Even protestants might agree that Peter was what the Church calls the Pope, they'd rather argue that his successors aren't really successors. According to your reasoning you should protest that JP was pope, was head of the Church etc. Peter is always heading the list of Popes, that's part of the office. There's no such thing as secular history - only history! And history does not say what you would have her. The petrine tradition at Rome and claims of primacy (again, the content is disputed between Rome and Constantinople) are very early.
User:Str1977 20:38, 16 May 2005 (UTC)
While Peter may have been Bishop of Rome (and certainly is traditionally considered the first Bishop of Rome), he was certainly not "pope" - I agree he heads the list of Popes, but given that he was not called "Pope" as a formal title, and given that the Bishop of Rome had no primacy until the 4th century, maybe, it seems awkward to just call him "Pope." In terms of the issue of long-reigning popes, this seems problematic for another reason - for popes from, I don't know, the 3rd century on, we have a fairly good sense of length of reign. Before that, there's no real evidence. Peter's reign is entirely based on tradition, and he may not have even ever been to Rome, for all we really know. As such, it seems problematic to put the length of his reign in the same category as that of Pius IX, of whom we have meticulous historical records which would, I imagine, allow us to measure his papacy to the hour. Some sort of clarification seems in order here. User:John KenneyUser_talk:John Kenney 03:52, 20 May 2005 (UTC)
:You have a point when you say that the term ‘Pope’ or ‘papa’ was not recorded in the early years, at least until Damasus (366-384) or Siricius (384-399). However, I suggest, it is still valid to use the term Pope for that early Bishops of Rome because it has been used since antiquity. The Crypt of the Popes in the Catacombs of Saint Callixtus has provided us with information on the early Popes. These catacombs were abandoned, looted and collapsed after the barbarian invasions. They remained undisturbed until excavations by archaeologists 1850 onwards. A marble dedicatory slab by Damasus (366-384) contains the line “Here lie the brotherhood of Popes”. 9 Popes appear to have been buried there, although only six inscriptions survive. There are five original sepulchral inscriptions. The earliest being for Pontianus (230-235). So here we have a Pope, Damasus, using the term "Pope" to refer to other Popes back to, at least 235. Therefore, I suggest that the term "Pope" has a sufficiently long history for us to use it here. (source: ‘The Catacombs of St, Callixtus’ isbn 88-209-1902-8 ) (plus I was there) --User:ClemMcGann 10:36, 20 May 2005 (UTC)
::It would seem correct then to refer to Damasus as pope if there is credible evidence that he, in life, claimed the papal title. However, it is problematic to base our assumptions about the church's earliest period on the claims of subsequent generations. Popes do, arguably, have a vested interest in attributing titles to their predecessors, particularly if these titles are innovations. It seems wisest to me to rely on contemporary sources to determine if a title is accurate. Is a fourth century pope contemporary to St. Peter? Thank you though, for adding this information. User:Sumergocognito 18:16, 21 May 2005 (UTC)
:It is not true that the Orthodox consider St. Peter the first bishop of Rome, so there's no "certainly" about it. He was an Apostle, an office distinct from that of bishop even though the bishops are their successors. (Which is to say, that a bishop is not an Apostle. It's certainly possible for an Apostle to have been a bishop. The claim is that this is not true in this case.) In Orthodox tradition the first bishop of Rome is St. Linus. See for example [https://listserv.indiana.edu/cgi-bin/wa-iub.exe?A2=ind0007b&L=orthodox&F=&S=&P=3198 this post] by an Orthodox bishop on the subject. Furthermore, Eusebius is quite clear on the joint founding of the Roman community by both Peter and Paul and claims a similar foundation for the Church of Antioch.
:So Peter is not the first Pope of Rome, not so much because we can't definitively document the use of the title at that time (I concede that it may well have been used from the beginning) but becuase he simp