
===Archived talk=== * [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User_talk:Pavel_Vozenilek/Archive1 Archive 1] (Aug 10 2004 - Apr 20 2005) ===Regarding my page edits=== Pavel I noticed that you reverted all my changes to WikiPedia. First of all, you shouldn't second guess that I was linking to my own sites as "advertising or a mere collection of external links". I am not a webmaster, nor do I own any sites. I was linking to those sites because I felt that they were beneficial to WikiPedia not only for the different pictures of composers, but also for the audio files of composers. What joy does one get from reading a biography of a musical composer, if they cannot hear some actually MUSIC of a composer. The sites I linked to provide a service which WikiPedia main site does NOT offer. Therefore your claim "Please do not add links to pages which contain no new information compared to the article" is not legitimate, for I am added a link to a page which DOES in fact give new information, in the format of music. Please put back my additions, as I feel you are harming the WikiPedia community as a whole by disallowing useful information, which could be used to enrich WikiPedia. ---- Actually, Pavel, that was a legitimate complaint, and I would like you to revert the changes you made, this was a legitimate submission to VfD and you have blatantly subverted the rules of Wikipedia in reversing my submission, I would like to submission re-set, or I will have to do it myself, thanks User:68.42.0.182 ===Administrator=== Pavel, I notice that you often post on WP:VIP when vandalism is taking place and request that repeat vandals be blocked. Would you want to be nominated for administrator? That would allow you to perform the blocks yourself. You seem to be quite active on this front, which is important for the functioning of Wikipedia. User:Firebug 18:47, 21 Apr 2005 (UTC) : Yes. I have suspicion WP:VIP is a black hole where people could complain and nothing ever comes out of it. User:Pavel Vozenilek 22:01, 21 Apr 2005 (UTC) ::You are doing great work in combating vandals here. I came to your talk page thinking to award you a barnstar, but I see Firebug is in the process of nominating you for adminship, which is much more important. ::Most of the time, a vandal goes away when you post the first test message on his talkpage. I often see your messages on VIP, but when I check the vandal, they've stopped posting. A few vandals continue until they get the test4 warning and then stop. Of course, a few continue and have to be blocked. I suggest that you not post on the VIP page unless a vandal is continuing for more than a few minutes after you've put up your first warning to them (give them time to notice the warning). ::You should also be aware that we never block an IP address permanently, since there's a strong likelihood that it will not be held by that particular vandal forever. You should not ask for permanent blocks on such addresses. ::I'll support you for administrator when Firebug nominates you, but you have to promise that you won't block people for excessive periods, or block them without giving them fair warning that they will be blocked if they don't change their behaviour.-User:Gadfium 02:52, 27 Apr 2005 (UTC) Firebug has now nominated you for adminship. Please go to Wikipedia:Requests for adminship/Pavel Vozenilek, accept the nomination, and answer the standard questions.-User:Gadfium 04:47, 27 Apr 2005 (UTC) == Regarding my RfA == Hello Pavel Vozenilek. I wanted to tell you that was promoted to admin today. Thank you for the time you took to review my contributions. Know that I will keep the concerns you raised on my RfA page in mind, and that I am doing my best to address them. User:Phils 20:00, 21 Apr 2005 (UTC) == Neni zac == Prosim -- and thanks for writing the base article on this interesting topic and for correcting my typos. User:Mwalcoff 13:29, 22 Apr 2005 (UTC) ==My adminship: thanks== Hi Pavel Vozenilek. Thanks very much for your vote for my RfA. I promise to be prudent, wise, sagacious and totally unilateral in all my admin affairs. I should say that I am very pleased at the number of people who supported me – it's very nice to know I'm making a positive impact. Cheers again, User:Smoddy User talk:Smoddy 20:57, 24 Apr 2005 (UTC) ==Re: 156.63.253.3== You recently warned the person using this IP. I'd just like to inform you of the vandalism he committed on the Glacier page which I reverted. --User:RobbieFal 23:15, 25 Apr 2005 (UTC) == Re: User:Whodidit == Hello Pavel. If you had checked the Vandals list, you would have seen my name under April 23: Wikipedia:Vandalism in Progress#Whodunit and Whodidit and Whoisit and Whowasit and now Whowillitbe. Predictably, you did not check, so now only one of my sockpuppets is blocked, and I can go on my own merry way! Nice spring day, don't you think? Anyway, gotta go, more pages are waiting to be wrecked. Bye! User:Whodunit 21:53, 26 Apr 2005 (UTC) == Fiji's father == Yes. I'll find references and post them on the appropriate talk page. Mara led Fiji to independence from the United Kingdom, and Ganilau was the first president of the Fijian republic. Sukuna is generally regarded as the greatest of the three, as he forged modern political institutions in the pre-independence era and mentored the generation that led the country after independence. I believe his birthday is a national holiday. I'll check my sources, and will report back. User:Davidcannon 00:43, 27 Apr 2005 (UTC) :I am aware that there are different opinions about that list. The arguments have been tossed around since long before either of us was involved. I'll admit to being something of an inclusionist, so I'm biased. But I'll defer to the consensus opinion, if one emerges. Sukuna should unquestionably be in the list (I've found a source and will post in a few minutes); I believe the other two should be also, but if the strict criteria of naming only "official" national fathers is applied, they could be removed. Sukuna ''is'' official; his birthday (which is mondayzed to the last Monday in May) is a national public holiday, with public celebrations. The other two are unofficial: Mara was called the nation's father by both supporters and opponents at his funeral, as was Ganilau (whose death - in 1993 - was not "recent", as you say). Anyway, I think it's important to see what everybody else thinks and establish some consensus for the size and content of the page. There's no such thing as ownership of articles on Wikipedia. User:Davidcannon 01:06, 27 Apr 2005 (UTC) == My RfA == Although you did not support my RfA, I would just like to thank you for your comments, which I will take in the spirit they were given. I will do my best to live up to the responsibility of adminship and hopefully show to you the trust is deserved. --User:Khaosworks 07:07, 27 Apr 2005 (UTC) == Whodunit == Someone else had already got this user with a 48-hour block. When that expires, we'll see what happens; I blocked his sockpuppet indefinitely, but I think that it would be wrong to block A for being a sockpuppet of B and then B for being a sockpuppet of A... I'm inclined to agree with you, though, that (if he comes back) this user is heading for an indefinite block, because he's clearly an idiot without a life who's only interested in making a fool of himself. User:Mel Etitis (Μελ_Ετητης)">User talk:Mel Etitis 09:12, 27 Apr 2005 (UTC) :Dear Pavel, if only it could be that way! Whodunit may be blocked, but there are other ways I can get into Wikipedia. The truth is that the world is full of bad people and disappointments. If you do not brace yourself for an attack, you will most likely be overwhelmed. That's what's happening to Wikipedia right now. Do you not see, all these Vandals and Saxons and Goths are climbing right over Wikipedia's walls - the login page - and right into the castle! Then, our sysop knights try cut them down, but these vandals get back up and wreck the buildings in the fortress. Then, the only option will be to "protect" these damaged buildings from further attack. The problem is that other altruistic people are blocked from repairing these damaged buildings! The vandals move on to other buildings (there are infinitely many in this castle, remember), and then we will have to protect each building in the castle. Nobody will have freedom, and only the admins will have access to every page in Wikipedia. And if we make everybody into admins in order to give everyone equal rights, then we will be in the same situation as before. That's why I tried to make a point, both in my broken messages and in vandalizing Wikipedia: your meagre defense systems can not yet stop an obsessed vandal from wrecking Wikipedia. And if many strike at the same time, God knows what will happen to the Free Kingdom of Wikipedia... Make a petition to the programmers before it is too late, because one day, it will happen. Even if it won't, it's always better to be prepared and protected. My suggestion: ::->Make an email address necessary for new users. :So long - User:Whoisthat 13:23, 27 Apr 2005 (UTC) ==Thank you== Hello, Pavel. Thanks for your vote at my adminship nomination. I appreciate the support. Cheers! — User:Trilobite (User_talk:Trilobite) 13:28, 27 Apr 2005 (UTC) == FlaBot == The bot has the botflag and doesnt appear in the recent-change list. --User:FlaBot 10:13, 30 Apr 2005 (UTC) == Not vandalism == Please look a little more carefully. I have reinstated and clarified my edits. Please read before reverting. Thank you. User:62.214.23.113 == Thank you, Pavel! == For your vote and comments in support of my RfA. I greatly appreciate the confidence you place in me and I hope to live up to it! User:El C 00:44, 2 May 2005 (UTC) == My RFA == Thank you for your comments on my RFA. Although the voting period just ended with a 14-8-2 vote, I will admit once and for all that I used it more as an evaluation of myself. Being promoted would have been a plus. I was more interested in who voted, when they voted, who would change their votes and when, and the comments I would receive. Hopefully I will correct the main weakness that was raised by those who voted oppose -- that I was too eager to put articles on VFD. Also, I will try to interact more with those Wikipedians who did not vote at all. As for next month, I don't know if I will nominate myself again. I might not think about it until somebody else puts me up there on RFA at a later date. Eventually, I see myself as an admin, especially as the number of articles and users continues to grow. Thanks again and good luck at improving this vast archive of free knowledge. User:Zzyzx11 User talk:Zzyzx11 09:17, 3 May 2005 (UTC) ==Your RFA== I'm sorry that didn't work out for you, but I hope you'll keep up the good work fighting vandals anyway.-User:Gadfium 00:45, 5 May 2005 (UTC) So you reverted my changes! What exactely do you mean by: "They contain some inaccuracies and common media myths" thanks - Luke == Update on Aesthetic Realism article == I continue to try to maintain a balanced article on [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Aesthetic_Realism Aesthetic Realism] in the face of the vandalism by the group's supporters, who continue to try to excise criticism of the group and other salient facts, such as that their founder killed himself. They also continue to reinsert unsubstantiated claims removed by other (independent) Wikipedians, who have no experience with the group and are not on one side or the other. When either the AR people or I revert to a version that we like we generally label it as "Reverting to pre-vandalized version". Obviously each of us considers the others' edits to be vandalism. I'm writing to you now because they labeled their latest revert, "restoring vandalized page to version of 7 Apr 2005 validated by Pavel Vozenilik". But since 7 Apr both sides and independents had added or edited quite a bit of content, and I thought that the article was finally starting to shape up. So I'm wondering about their using your name to support their recent revert. Have you seen the article since 7 Apr, and if so do you really feel that the community is better served by the 7 Apr article than by a more current version? Or do you think a more recent version is better? Thank you for your time, User:Michaelbluejay 06:27, 11 May 2005 (UTC) == Germanic vs German == No doubt you are correct that a link to Germany is not ideal, although it is probably better than German which is a disambiguation page. For Germanic people the choice is between Germanic tribes and Ethnic German (Germanic itself is a disambuiguation page.) Please feel free to improve any of these links you come across, I have revisited Jihlava nd will try to do better in future! Regards, User:Rich Farmbrough 10:47, 14 May 2005 (UTC) == Marshall and Soviet threat == Isn't the fact that Red Army was stationed in Poland, and was used as a tool (togheter with NKVD) to persecute (often, execute) Armia Krajowa members and extend pressure on the representatives of Polish government in exile and its representatives in country (theoretical coalition with communists) sufficient to say there was a military threat? --User:Piotrus User_talk:Piotrus 10:59, 14 May 2005 (UTC) : Good point, it wasn't very clear - I hope if it fixed now, feel free to improve this further. --User:Piotrus User_talk:Piotrus 11:17, 14 May 2005 (UTC) == Paroubek etc. == All right, I will think about it again and - if I have time - will probably put back the one paragraph about the confidence vote. My opinion on this is not that strong either, I just wanted to see what reason you had to remove it all. Anyway, glad to hear that anyone found and uses the diacritics page! Good luck. User:Matt_Borak User_talk:Matt_Borak 07:17, 18 May 2005 (UTC) == 199.217.32.2 vandal == It looks like this guy has made hundreds of malicious and possibly difficult to catch vandalisms. I haven't gone back far in his history but I notice you reverted many of them. Is this guy under control? --User:Malathion 02:12, 19 May 2005 (UTC) == Template:Unencyclopedic == Hi, please don't use this template for the time being. There is no consensus for its use on Wikipedia articles. See Template talk:Unencyclopedic. Thanks,--User:EloquenceUser:Eloquence/CP 19:29, May 19, 2005 (UTC) ==66.25.166.173 vandal== Dear Pavel Vozenilek, I thank you for catching vandalism to the article about Eli Siegel a while ago. The same person you caught under the IP of 66.25.166.173 has begun his nasty work again--but expanded--under the IP of 141.150.36.175 and the username of Michaelbluejay -- (or an anonymous pal of his). Can you help? I have called for mediation and am about to call for more. There is a lot of conversation about this matter. I hope you have time to, at least, look into it and advise. My name is Arnold Perey, my website is www.perey-anthropology.net. --User:Aperey 20:55, 20 May 2005 (UTC) == Votes for deletion/Continuum calculator == Hello Pavel, thanks much for discussing the article. Since I am interested to keep the article I have overworked it a bit and I have added an explanation to the vote list. I would be glad if you had another look. Thanks. -- User:Karsten88 15:27, 21 May 2005 (CEST) == RK string search algorithm == Pavel, In the pseudocode of the RK string search algorithm, if ''hs'' is given as ''hash(s[1..n])'', the algorithm can not detect a target pattern which occurs on the first ''m'' bytes of a given text. Your point on the case where ''m'' is larger than ''n'' is correct, but I thought that such a parameter range check can be assumed to have been performed prior to calling the function. Btw, what do you think about the following sentence which is quoted from the sentence right beneath the pseudocode. "Lines 2,3, and 6 each require omega(m) time." If you still think ''hs := hash(s[1...n])'' is correct, why don't you modify the above sentence too? --User:Chang.h.kim 06:08, 23 May 2005 (UTC) ==CSR/SSR== There was only one Snemovňa národou. It was elected separately in the two republics, but nevertheless it was only one body... And I am quite sure it had only 1 veto right. So unless you have a good argument (because I am definitely not an expert in the Federal Assembly), I will revert it to 4 later. User:Juro 02:23, 31 May 2005 (UTC) == Czech city template == To co pridavas k ceskym mestum rozhodne neni Wikipedia:Template_messages. Ja bych si to predstavoval spis jako neco co jsem zkusil u Chlumec nad Cidlinou. User:Mikeshk 04:32, 31 May 2005 (UTC) =="botched up"== Hi, as you're not a native speaker of English (I guess) I just thought I'd give you the tip that describing someone's infobox as "botched up" (as you did on Decin) will be understood as Wikipedia:Civility. Perhaps you could just write "changed template" in future. User:Saintswithin 07:43, 31 May 2005 (UTC) == Image of 2ch on Internet forum == Hiya Pavel Vozenilek, as you've contributed to internet forum in the past, could you please read Talk:Internet_forum#2ch_image_-_encyclopedaic.3F, and offer your opinions, so we can reach consensus on which image to include? User:Talrias (User_talk:Talrias | Special:Emailuser/Talrias | Special:Contributions/Talrias) 09:10, 31 May 2005 (UTC) == City template for Jicin == Hi, I see your point but I hadn't found any better template so I used that one, though I am well aware of irrelevancy of some items in it (water area, the time zones…). I had a look at the one you suggested, but it still needs to be worked on, e.g. it should be able to downsize the coat of arms automatically, as template City Infobox City does. So I'd prefer leaving this one, in spite of its imperfections (I wouldn't call it botched-up, sounds too rude to me) until a better one is created, preferably an international, I don't think every country needs its own city template. User:Caroig 09:05, 1 June 2005 (UTC) ==Thank You== What a year! My first year in Wiki, a featured article and now administrator. Thank you for your support. User: Marine 69-71 (UTC) == David Bronstein == Do you have link or reference for you edit in David Bronstein? Pavel Vozenilek 19:48, 17 Mar 2005 (UTC) GM Larry Evans expanded on theories that game 23 of the Bronstein-Botvinnik match was thrown. Bronstein states in his book, the Sorceror's Apprentice that "he was subjected to strong physcological pressures away from the board" On Zurich 1953, read here www.chesscafe.com/text/skittles173.pdf == Jiri Cerovsky == I've listed the Jiri Cerovsky page as a VfD, hope you'll support me. User:Oneliner 08:42, 9 Jun 2005 (UTC) == Careful with that word "vandalism"! == Hi Pavel, congratulations on your dedication to the "admirable but completely hopeless battle with vandals", but do be careful that everything you revert is indeed vandalism and not just something you haven't heard of or don't understand. (It's easily done, I've been guilty of it myself.) On 20 Mar 2005 you reverted a small edit to University of Oxford as "vandalism" which was nothing of the sort. The Assassins and the Bullingdon, added by an anon contributor to the list of Oxford "Institutions", are indeed two well-known (not to say notorious) Oxford dining societies. For your interest, see my article on the Bullingdon Club. Best wishes User:Flapdragon 14:46, 9 Jun 2005 (UTC) ==Bay of Pigs Invasion== Just responding to your comment back in May on this page. Vandalism such as that can be easily reverted by going to the history of the page and selecting a prior version of the article before the vandalised version. Then just save the clean version as a minor edit to wipe out the inane scribblings. Apologies if you already knew this. User:Lisiate 22:29, 13 Jun 2005 (UTC) == CfD accidental deletion == Hey, I noticed that you accidentally deleted most of the June 13's CfD entries. [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia%3ACategories_for_deletion%2FLog%2F2005_June_13&diff=15187609&oldid=15183503] Just wanted you to know that I reverted it back and then re-added your most recent vote. Cheers.--User:BaronLarfUser talk:BaronLarf 19:12, Jun 14, 2005 (UTC) == Cat speedy == ''"Category:Mozart symphonies - The contents have been moved to Category:Symphonies by Wolfgang Amadeus Mozart to match the naming scheme."'' - there was some talk on CSD whether this should be a speedy deletion criterion. Since a proposal for expanding speedy criteria is likely going to happen soon, I'd like to have your feedback on wording one for cases such as this. Yours, User:Radiant!User_talk:Radiant!>|<">meta:mergist 07:38, Jun 15, 2005 (UTC) == Chanov picture == Hello, I asked an author of picture for permission and I inserted picture simply to show him, how would it look like so when I receive an answer I will change the tag... Well I do not now how Chanov changed since the photo was taken but I pretty sure it is the most dirty place in czech republic:-) And hey, thanks for adding City tables to Most and Chanov, good work ;-) --User:Josef Sábl cz 09:22, 17 Jun 2005 (UTC) == My Rfa == Thank you for supporting me! --User:Kbdank71 13:35, 17 Jun 2005 (UTC) ==Serapeum== What specific things are you talking about? Please clarify--User:Kazuba 17 Jun 2005 Hi Pavel. I have alerted the reader something has been omitted and kept the link so that the reader will be extra watchful and learn something extra from reading the link. Here the writer has failed to show the part of the story that occurs before the Pagans have barricaded themselves in the Serapeum. What started the conflict. Something was found beneath a temple; is one of them. Only by reviewing his cited sources can this be detected. We will never know "what really happened in this story" but we can learn there can be bias reporting. In the study of literature there is a process known as redaction criticism where different versions of the same story are examined to seek the ancient author or authors' intent. This is an important lesson to learn when studying the surviving records or "stories" of the past or just about anything else. Compare. Gather data. What is the motive for telling me this story this way? Is it strictly to increase my knowlege or is there propaganda or intent involved? Be cautious and wary if you are not familiar with the subject matter, and if you are out of your field. DO NOT RUSH TO A CONVICTION! Learn about the writer from reading his material if possible. That's it. User:Kazuba 18 Jun 05 == RfA == Thank you very much for your vote of support on my administrative nomination! User:Schissel : User_talk:Schissel 01:38, Jun 20, 2005 (UTC) ==Rotten links== Can you explain to me any way these links violate Wikipedia's external linking policy, or hurt the articles they appear in?--User:TheGrzaGrza">User Talk:TheGrza 02:17, Jun 20, 2005 (UTC) Please read the articles before you decide. They are much longer then before and DO add a lot to the articles they have been linked to. There are still miniscule articles, but I am not linking to those for precisely the reasons you have noted.--User:TheGrzaGrza">User Talk:TheGrza 02:26, Jun 20, 2005 (UTC) As requested by User:Sockatume on the ViP page, I've posted this on RfC under Bohemian Grove (the first page I added a link to). I've also moved our conversation to that talk page in order to centralize it.--User:TheGrzaGrza">User Talk:TheGrza 06:58, Jun 20, 2005 (UTC) == Rotten Links == Hey, These links aren't indiscriminate and they do contain information or characterization that isn't available in the articles, specifically the Hashshashin link to al-Qaeda which is not found in either article.--User:TheGrzaGrza">User Talk:TheGrza 01:47, Jun 20, 2005 (UTC) : Could you please take care of these links (or find more people who could) - I am unable to handle such avalanche and am giving up. I noticed VIP so hopefully he'll be stopped sometime. I have suspicion the links are added by robot, I have never seen such massive vawe of linking here. User:Pavel Vozenilek 02:41, 20 Jun 2005 (UTC) ::Heya, thanks for helping out. It would appear I'm getting a knack for disappearing when there's work to be done, at least it wasn't my fault for a change this time. I'm not sure this qualifies as vandalism, but it would appear things have settled now and the links have been removed again. --User:Weyes(User talk:Weyes) 15:12, 2005 Jun 21 (UTC) ==Serapeum note== Revised caution note. Thanks, Pavel. You might find Ancient history: ''What is written ancient history?'' of interest. User:Kazuba 22 Jun 05
''Whereof one has nothing to say, thereof one must stay silent.'' Freely adopted from Ludwig Wittgenstein. I'm from the Czech Republic and work as SW developer. Most of my edits are about the country and software but way too much of my time is taken dealing with vandals. I found that during 2005 summer number of vandalisms dropped quite a lot. User:Diceman_19:58,_17_May_2005_(UTC)">Image:Barnstar.png|frame|left|Hi, they give Barnstars to all sorts of idiots, I thought I'd give one to someone who deserves it. - User:Diceman 19:58, 17 May 2005 (UTC)
See other meanings of words starting from letter:
Words begining with Pavel_Vozenilek:
Pavel_Vozenilek
Pavel_Vozenilek
Pavel_Vozenilek/Archive1
Pavel Vozenilek
===Archived talk=== * [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User_talk:Pavel_Vozenilek/Archive1 Archive 1] (Aug 10 2004 - Apr 20 2005) ===Regarding my page edits=== Pavel I noticed that you reverted all my changes to WikiPedia. First of all, you shouldn't second guess that I was linking to my own sites as "advertising or a mere collection of external links". I am not a webmaster, nor do I own any sites. I was linking to those sites because I felt that they were beneficial to WikiPedia not only for the different pictures of composers, but also for the audio files of composers. What joy does one get from reading a biography of a musical composer, if they cannot hear some actually MUSIC of a composer. The sites I linked to provide a service which WikiPedia main site does NOT offer. Therefore your claim "Please do not add links to pages which contain no new information compared to the article" is not legitimate, for I am added a link to a page which DOES in fact give new information, in the format of music. Please put back my additions, as I feel you are harming the WikiPedia community as a whole by disallowing useful information, which could be used to enrich WikiPedia. ---- Actually, Pavel, that was a legitimate complaint, and I would like you to revert the changes you made, this was a legitimate submission to VfD and you have blatantly subverted the rules of Wikipedia in reversing my submission, I would like to submission re-set, or I will have to do it myself, thanks User:68.42.0.182 ===Administrator=== Pavel, I notice that you often post on WP:VIP when vandalism is taking place and request that repeat vandals be blocked. Would you want to be nominated for administrator? That would allow you to perform the blocks yourself. You seem to be quite active on this front, which is important for the functioning of Wikipedia. User:Firebug 18:47, 21 Apr 2005 (UTC) : Yes. I have suspicion WP:VIP is a black hole where people could complain and nothing ever comes out of it. User:Pavel Vozenilek 22:01, 21 Apr 2005 (UTC) ::You are doing great work in combating vandals here. I came to your talk page thinking to award you a barnstar, but I see Firebug is in the process of nominating you for adminship, which is much more important. ::Most of the time, a vandal goes away when you post the first test message on his talkpage. I often see your messages on VIP, but when I check the vandal, they've stopped posting. A few vandals continue until they get the test4 warning and then stop. Of course, a few continue and have to be blocked. I suggest that you not post on the VIP page unless a vandal is continuing for more than a few minutes after you've put up your first warning to them (give them time to notice the warning). ::You should also be aware that we never block an IP address permanently, since there's a strong likelihood that it will not be held by that particular vandal forever. You should not ask for permanent blocks on such addresses. ::I'll support you for administrator when Firebug nominates you, but you have to promise that you won't block people for excessive periods, or block them without giving them fair warning that they will be blocked if they don't change their behaviour.-User:Gadfium 02:52, 27 Apr 2005 (UTC) Firebug has now nominated you for adminship. Please go to Wikipedia:Requests for adminship/Pavel Vozenilek, accept the nomination, and answer the standard questions.-User:Gadfium 04:47, 27 Apr 2005 (UTC) == Regarding my RfA == Hello Pavel Vozenilek. I wanted to tell you that was promoted to admin today. Thank you for the time you took to review my contributions. Know that I will keep the concerns you raised on my RfA page in mind, and that I am doing my best to address them. User:Phils 20:00, 21 Apr 2005 (UTC) == Neni zac == Prosim -- and thanks for writing the base article on this interesting topic and for correcting my typos. User:Mwalcoff 13:29, 22 Apr 2005 (UTC) ==My adminship: thanks== Hi Pavel Vozenilek. Thanks very much for your vote for my RfA. I promise to be prudent, wise, sagacious and totally unilateral in all my admin affairs. I should say that I am very pleased at the number of people who supported me – it's very nice to know I'm making a positive impact. Cheers again, User:Smoddy User talk:Smoddy 20:57, 24 Apr 2005 (UTC) ==Re: 156.63.253.3== You recently warned the person using this IP. I'd just like to inform you of the vandalism he committed on the Glacier page which I reverted. --User:RobbieFal 23:15, 25 Apr 2005 (UTC) == Re: User:Whodidit == Hello Pavel. If you had checked the Vandals list, you would have seen my name under April 23: Wikipedia:Vandalism in Progress#Whodunit and Whodidit and Whoisit and Whowasit and now Whowillitbe. Predictably, you did not check, so now only one of my sockpuppets is blocked, and I can go on my own merry way! Nice spring day, don't you think? Anyway, gotta go, more pages are waiting to be wrecked. Bye! User:Whodunit 21:53, 26 Apr 2005 (UTC) == Fiji's father == Yes. I'll find references and post them on the appropriate talk page. Mara led Fiji to independence from the United Kingdom, and Ganilau was the first president of the Fijian republic. Sukuna is generally regarded as the greatest of the three, as he forged modern political institutions in the pre-independence era and mentored the generation that led the country after independence. I believe his birthday is a national holiday. I'll check my sources, and will report back. User:Davidcannon 00:43, 27 Apr 2005 (UTC) :I am aware that there are different opinions about that list. The arguments have been tossed around since long before either of us was involved. I'll admit to being something of an inclusionist, so I'm biased. But I'll defer to the consensus opinion, if one emerges. Sukuna should unquestionably be in the list (I've found a source and will post in a few minutes); I believe the other two should be also, but if the strict criteria of naming only "official" national fathers is applied, they could be removed. Sukuna ''is'' official; his birthday (which is mondayzed to the last Monday in May) is a national public holiday, with public celebrations. The other two are unofficial: Mara was called the nation's father by both supporters and opponents at his funeral, as was Ganilau (whose death - in 1993 - was not "recent", as you say). Anyway, I think it's important to see what everybody else thinks and establish some consensus for the size and content of the page. There's no such thing as ownership of articles on Wikipedia. User:Davidcannon 01:06, 27 Apr 2005 (UTC) == My RfA == Although you did not support my RfA, I would just like to thank you for your comments, which I will take in the spirit they were given. I will do my best to live up to the responsibility of adminship and hopefully show to you the trust is deserved. --User:Khaosworks 07:07, 27 Apr 2005 (UTC) == Whodunit == Someone else had already got this user with a 48-hour block. When that expires, we'll see what happens; I blocked his sockpuppet indefinitely, but I think that it would be wrong to block A for being a sockpuppet of B and then B for being a sockpuppet of A... I'm inclined to agree with you, though, that (if he comes back) this user is heading for an indefinite block, because he's clearly an idiot without a life who's only interested in making a fool of himself. User:Mel Etitis (Μελ_Ετητης)">User talk:Mel Etitis 09:12, 27 Apr 2005 (UTC) :Dear Pavel, if only it could be that way! Whodunit may be blocked, but there are other ways I can get into Wikipedia. The truth is that the world is full of bad people and disappointments. If you do not brace yourself for an attack, you will most likely be overwhelmed. That's what's happening to Wikipedia right now. Do you not see, all these Vandals and Saxons and Goths are climbing right over Wikipedia's walls - the login page - and right into the castle! Then, our sysop knights try cut them down, but these vandals get back up and wreck the buildings in the fortress. Then, the only option will be to "protect" these damaged buildings from further attack. The problem is that other altruistic people are blocked from repairing these damaged buildings! The vandals move on to other buildings (there are infinitely many in this castle, remember), and then we will have to protect each building in the castle. Nobody will have freedom, and only the admins will have access to every page in Wikipedia. And if we make everybody into admins in order to give everyone equal rights, then we will be in the same situation as before. That's why I tried to make a point, both in my broken messages and in vandalizing Wikipedia: your meagre defense systems can not yet stop an obsessed vandal from wrecking Wikipedia. And if many strike at the same time, God knows what will happen to the Free Kingdom of Wikipedia... Make a petition to the programmers before it is too late, because one day, it will happen. Even if it won't, it's always better to be prepared and protected. My suggestion: ::->Make an email address necessary for new users. :So long - User:Whoisthat 13:23, 27 Apr 2005 (UTC) ==Thank you== Hello, Pavel. Thanks for your vote at my adminship nomination. I appreciate the support. Cheers! — User:Trilobite (User_talk:Trilobite) 13:28, 27 Apr 2005 (UTC) == FlaBot == The bot has the botflag and doesnt appear in the recent-change list. --User:FlaBot 10:13, 30 Apr 2005 (UTC) == Not vandalism == Please look a little more carefully. I have reinstated and clarified my edits. Please read before reverting. Thank you. User:62.214.23.113 == Thank you, Pavel! == For your vote and comments in support of my RfA. I greatly appreciate the confidence you place in me and I hope to live up to it! User:El C 00:44, 2 May 2005 (UTC) == My RFA == Thank you for your comments on my RFA. Although the voting period just ended with a 14-8-2 vote, I will admit once and for all that I used it more as an evaluation of myself. Being promoted would have been a plus. I was more interested in who voted, when they voted, who would change their votes and when, and the comments I would receive. Hopefully I will correct the main weakness that was raised by those who voted oppose -- that I was too eager to put articles on VFD. Also, I will try to interact more with those Wikipedians who did not vote at all. As for next month, I don't know if I will nominate myself again. I might not think about it until somebody else puts me up there on RFA at a later date. Eventually, I see myself as an admin, especially as the number of articles and users continues to grow. Thanks again and good luck at improving this vast archive of free knowledge. User:Zzyzx11 User talk:Zzyzx11 09:17, 3 May 2005 (UTC) ==Your RFA== I'm sorry that didn't work out for you, but I hope you'll keep up the good work fighting vandals anyway.-User:Gadfium 00:45, 5 May 2005 (UTC) So you reverted my changes! What exactely do you mean by: "They contain some inaccuracies and common media myths" thanks - Luke == Update on Aesthetic Realism article == I continue to try to maintain a balanced article on [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Aesthetic_Realism Aesthetic Realism] in the face of the vandalism by the group's supporters, who continue to try to excise criticism of the group and other salient facts, such as that their founder killed himself. They also continue to reinsert unsubstantiated claims removed by other (independent) Wikipedians, who have no experience with the group and are not on one side or the other. When either the AR people or I revert to a version that we like we generally label it as "Reverting to pre-vandalized version". Obviously each of us considers the others' edits to be vandalism. I'm writing to you now because they labeled their latest revert, "restoring vandalized page to version of 7 Apr 2005 validated by Pavel Vozenilik". But since 7 Apr both sides and independents had added or edited quite a bit of content, and I thought that the article was finally starting to shape up. So I'm wondering about their using your name to support their recent revert. Have you seen the article since 7 Apr, and if so do you really feel that the community is better served by the 7 Apr article than by a more current version? Or do you think a more recent version is better? Thank you for your time, User:Michaelbluejay 06:27, 11 May 2005 (UTC) == Germanic vs German == No doubt you are correct that a link to Germany is not ideal, although it is probably better than German which is a disambiguation page. For Germanic people the choice is between Germanic tribes and Ethnic German (Germanic itself is a disambuiguation page.) Please feel free to improve any of these links you come across, I have revisited Jihlava nd will try to do better in future! Regards, User:Rich Farmbrough 10:47, 14 May 2005 (UTC) == Marshall and Soviet threat == Isn't the fact that Red Army was stationed in Poland, and was used as a tool (togheter with NKVD) to persecute (often, execute) Armia Krajowa members and extend pressure on the representatives of Polish government in exile and its representatives in country (theoretical coalition with communists) sufficient to say there was a military threat? --User:Piotrus User_talk:Piotrus 10:59, 14 May 2005 (UTC) : Good point, it wasn't very clear - I hope if it fixed now, feel free to improve this further. --User:Piotrus User_talk:Piotrus 11:17, 14 May 2005 (UTC) == Paroubek etc. == All right, I will think about it again and - if I have time - will probably put back the one paragraph about the confidence vote. My opinion on this is not that strong either, I just wanted to see what reason you had to remove it all. Anyway, glad to hear that anyone found and uses the diacritics page! Good luck. User:Matt_Borak User_talk:Matt_Borak 07:17, 18 May 2005 (UTC) == 199.217.32.2 vandal == It looks like this guy has made hundreds of malicious and possibly difficult to catch vandalisms. I haven't gone back far in his history but I notice you reverted many of them. Is this guy under control? --User:Malathion 02:12, 19 May 2005 (UTC) == Template:Unencyclopedic == Hi, please don't use this template for the time being. There is no consensus for its use on Wikipedia articles. See Template talk:Unencyclopedic. Thanks,--User:EloquenceUser:Eloquence/CP 19:29, May 19, 2005 (UTC) ==66.25.166.173 vandal== Dear Pavel Vozenilek, I thank you for catching vandalism to the article about Eli Siegel a while ago. The same person you caught under the IP of 66.25.166.173 has begun his nasty work again--but expanded--under the IP of 141.150.36.175 and the username of Michaelbluejay -- (or an anonymous pal of his). Can you help? I have called for mediation and am about to call for more. There is a lot of conversation about this matter. I hope you have time to, at least, look into it and advise. My name is Arnold Perey, my website is www.perey-anthropology.net. --User:Aperey 20:55, 20 May 2005 (UTC) == Votes for deletion/Continuum calculator == Hello Pavel, thanks much for discussing the article. Since I am interested to keep the article I have overworked it a bit and I have added an explanation to the vote list. I would be glad if you had another look. Thanks. -- User:Karsten88 15:27, 21 May 2005 (CEST) == RK string search algorithm == Pavel, In the pseudocode of the RK string search algorithm, if ''hs'' is given as ''hash(s[1..n])'', the algorithm can not detect a target pattern which occurs on the first ''m'' bytes of a given text. Your point on the case where ''m'' is larger than ''n'' is correct, but I thought that such a parameter range check can be assumed to have been performed prior to calling the function. Btw, what do you think about the following sentence which is quoted from the sentence right beneath the pseudocode. "Lines 2,3, and 6 each require omega(m) time." If you still think ''hs := hash(s[1...n])'' is correct, why don't you modify the above sentence too? --User:Chang.h.kim 06:08, 23 May 2005 (UTC) ==CSR/SSR== There was only one Snemovňa národou. It was elected separately in the two republics, but nevertheless it was only one body... And I am quite sure it had only 1 veto right. So unless you have a good argument (because I am definitely not an expert in the Federal Assembly), I will revert it to 4 later. User:Juro 02:23, 31 May 2005 (UTC) == Czech city template == To co pridavas k ceskym mestum rozhodne neni Wikipedia:Template_messages. Ja bych si to predstavoval spis jako neco co jsem zkusil u Chlumec nad Cidlinou. User:Mikeshk 04:32, 31 May 2005 (UTC) =="botched up"== Hi, as you're not a native speaker of English (I guess) I just thought I'd give you the tip that describing someone's infobox as "botched up" (as you did on Decin) will be understood as Wikipedia:Civility. Perhaps you could just write "changed template" in future. User:Saintswithin 07:43, 31 May 2005 (UTC) == Image of 2ch on Internet forum == Hiya Pavel Vozenilek, as you've contributed to internet forum in the past, could you please read Talk:Internet_forum#2ch_image_-_encyclopedaic.3F, and offer your opinions, so we can reach consensus on which image to include? User:Talrias (User_talk:Talrias | Special:Emailuser/Talrias | Special:Contributions/Talrias) 09:10, 31 May 2005 (UTC) == City template for Jicin == Hi, I see your point but I hadn't found any better template so I used that one, though I am well aware of irrelevancy of some items in it (water area, the time zones…). I had a look at the one you suggested, but it still needs to be worked on, e.g. it should be able to downsize the coat of arms automatically, as template City Infobox City does. So I'd prefer leaving this one, in spite of its imperfections (I wouldn't call it botched-up, sounds too rude to me) until a better one is created, preferably an international, I don't think every country needs its own city template. User:Caroig 09:05, 1 June 2005 (UTC) ==Thank You== What a year! My first year in Wiki, a featured article and now administrator. Thank you for your support. User: Marine 69-71 (UTC) == David Bronstein == Do you have link or reference for you edit in David Bronstein? Pavel Vozenilek 19:48, 17 Mar 2005 (UTC) GM Larry Evans expanded on theories that game 23 of the Bronstein-Botvinnik match was thrown. Bronstein states in his book, the Sorceror's Apprentice that "he was subjected to strong physcological pressures away from the board" On Zurich 1953, read here www.chesscafe.com/text/skittles173.pdf == Jiri Cerovsky == I've listed the Jiri Cerovsky page as a VfD, hope you'll support me. User:Oneliner 08:42, 9 Jun 2005 (UTC) == Careful with that word "vandalism"! == Hi Pavel, congratulations on your dedication to the "admirable but completely hopeless battle with vandals", but do be careful that everything you revert is indeed vandalism and not just something you haven't heard of or don't understand. (It's easily done, I've been guilty of it myself.) On 20 Mar 2005 you reverted a small edit to University of Oxford as "vandalism" which was nothing of the sort. The Assassins and the Bullingdon, added by an anon contributor to the list of Oxford "Institutions", are indeed two well-known (not to say notorious) Oxford dining societies. For your interest, see my article on the Bullingdon Club. Best wishes User:Flapdragon 14:46, 9 Jun 2005 (UTC) ==Bay of Pigs Invasion== Just responding to your comment back in May on this page. Vandalism such as that can be easily reverted by going to the history of the page and selecting a prior version of the article before the vandalised version. Then just save the clean version as a minor edit to wipe out the inane scribblings. Apologies if you already knew this. User:Lisiate 22:29, 13 Jun 2005 (UTC) == CfD accidental deletion == Hey, I noticed that you accidentally deleted most of the June 13's CfD entries. [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia%3ACategories_for_deletion%2FLog%2F2005_June_13&diff=15187609&oldid=15183503] Just wanted you to know that I reverted it back and then re-added your most recent vote. Cheers.--User:BaronLarfUser talk:BaronLarf 19:12, Jun 14, 2005 (UTC) == Cat speedy == ''"Category:Mozart symphonies - The contents have been moved to Category:Symphonies by Wolfgang Amadeus Mozart to match the naming scheme."'' - there was some talk on CSD whether this should be a speedy deletion criterion. Since a proposal for expanding speedy criteria is likely going to happen soon, I'd like to have your feedback on wording one for cases such as this. Yours, User:Radiant!User_talk:Radiant!>|<">meta:mergist 07:38, Jun 15, 2005 (UTC) == Chanov picture == Hello, I asked an author of picture for permission and I inserted picture simply to show him, how would it look like so when I receive an answer I will change the tag... Well I do not now how Chanov changed since the photo was taken but I pretty sure it is the most dirty place in czech republic:-) And hey, thanks for adding City tables to Most and Chanov, good work ;-) --User:Josef Sábl cz 09:22, 17 Jun 2005 (UTC) == My Rfa == Thank you for supporting me! --User:Kbdank71 13:35, 17 Jun 2005 (UTC) ==Serapeum== What specific things are you talking about? Please clarify--User:Kazuba 17 Jun 2005 Hi Pavel. I have alerted the reader something has been omitted and kept the link so that the reader will be extra watchful and learn something extra from reading the link. Here the writer has failed to show the part of the story that occurs before the Pagans have barricaded themselves in the Serapeum. What started the conflict. Something was found beneath a temple; is one of them. Only by reviewing his cited sources can this be detected. We will never know "what really happened in this story" but we can learn there can be bias reporting. In the study of literature there is a process known as redaction criticism where different versions of the same story are examined to seek the ancient author or authors' intent. This is an important lesson to learn when studying the surviving records or "stories" of the past or just about anything else. Compare. Gather data. What is the motive for telling me this story this way? Is it strictly to increase my knowlege or is there propaganda or intent involved? Be cautious and wary if you are not familiar with the subject matter, and if you are out of your field. DO NOT RUSH TO A CONVICTION! Learn about the writer from reading his material if possible. That's it. User:Kazuba 18 Jun 05 == RfA == Thank you very much for your vote of support on my administrative nomination! User:Schissel : User_talk:Schissel 01:38, Jun 20, 2005 (UTC) ==Rotten links== Can you explain to me any way these links violate Wikipedia's external linking policy, or hurt the articles they appear in?--User:TheGrzaGrza">User Talk:TheGrza 02:17, Jun 20, 2005 (UTC) Please read the articles before you decide. They are much longer then before and DO add a lot to the articles they have been linked to. There are still miniscule articles, but I am not linking to those for precisely the reasons you have noted.--User:TheGrzaGrza">User Talk:TheGrza 02:26, Jun 20, 2005 (UTC) As requested by User:Sockatume on the ViP page, I've posted this on RfC under Bohemian Grove (the first page I added a link to). I've also moved our conversation to that talk page in order to centralize it.--User:TheGrzaGrza">User Talk:TheGrza 06:58, Jun 20, 2005 (UTC) == Rotten Links == Hey, These links aren't indiscriminate and they do contain information or characterization that isn't available in the articles, specifically the Hashshashin link to al-Qaeda which is not found in either article.--User:TheGrzaGrza">User Talk:TheGrza 01:47, Jun 20, 2005 (UTC) : Could you please take care of these links (or find more people who could) - I am unable to handle such avalanche and am giving up. I noticed VIP so hopefully he'll be stopped sometime. I have suspicion the links are added by robot, I have never seen such massive vawe of linking here. User:Pavel Vozenilek 02:41, 20 Jun 2005 (UTC) ::Heya, thanks for helping out. It would appear I'm getting a knack for disappearing when there's work to be done, at least it wasn't my fault for a change this time. I'm not sure this qualifies as vandalism, but it would appear things have settled now and the links have been removed again. --User:Weyes(User talk:Weyes) 15:12, 2005 Jun 21 (UTC) ==Serapeum note== Revised caution note. Thanks, Pavel. You might find Ancient history: ''What is written ancient history?'' of interest. User:Kazuba 22 Jun 05
Pavel Vozenilek
''Whereof one has nothing to say, thereof one must stay silent.'' Freely adopted from Ludwig Wittgenstein. I'm from the Czech Republic and work as SW developer. Most of my edits are about the country and software but way too much of my time is taken dealing with vandals. I found that during 2005 summer number of vandalisms dropped quite a lot. User:Diceman_19:58,_17_May_2005_(UTC)">Image:Barnstar.png|frame|left|Hi, they give Barnstars to all sorts of idiots, I thought I'd give one to someone who deserves it. - User:Diceman 19:58, 17 May 2005 (UTC)
See other meanings of words starting from letter:
P
PA | PB | PC | PD | PE | PF | PG | PH | PI | PJ | PK | PL | PM | PN | PO | PR | PS | PT | PU | PW | PX | PY | PZ |Words begining with Pavel_Vozenilek:
Pavel_Vozenilek
Pavel_Vozenilek
Pavel_Vozenilek/Archive1
These materials are based on Wikipedia and licensed under the GNU FDL
YouTube.com videos better site than Turbo Tax 2007
