Microsoft's disk operating system, MS-DOS was a very widely used operating system on the PC compatible platform until recently. It has gradually been replaced on consumer desktop computers with various generations of the Windows operating system. It was originally released in 1981 and had eight major versions before Microsoft stopped development in 2000. It was the key product in Microsoft's growth from a programming languages company to a diverse software development firm, providing the company with essential revenue and marketing resources. ==History== MS-DOS was created by computer manufacturer Seattle Computer Products (SCP) in 1980 as QDOS (for Quick and Dirty Operating System), but was renamed 86-DOS because it was designed to run on the Intel 8086 processor. In a sequence of events that would later inspire much folklore, Microsoft licensed QDOS to IBM on behalf of SCP. Microsoft acquired the system for only $50,000 from SCP shortly before the PC's release. ===Development=== IBM and Microsoft both released versions of DOS; the IBM version was supplied with the IBM PC and known as PC-DOS. Originally, IBM only validated and packaged Microsoft developments, and thus IBM's versions tended to be released shortly after Microsoft's. However, MS-DOS 4.0 was actually based on IBM PC-DOS 4.0, as Microsoft was by then concentrating on OS/2 development. Microsoft released its versions under the name "MS-DOS", while IBM released its versions under the name "PC DOS". Initially, when Microsoft would license their OEM version of MS-DOS, the computer manufacturer would customize its name (i.e. TandyDOS, Compaq DOS, etc). Most of these versions were identical to the official MS-DOS; however, Microsoft began to insist that OEMs start calling the product MS-DOS. Eventually, only IBM resisted this move. * PC DOS 1.0 - August, 1981 - ''Initial release with the first IBM-PC'' * PC DOS 1.1 - May, 1982 * MS-DOS 1.25 - May, 1982 - ''First release for non-IBM hardware'' * MS-DOS 2.0 - March, 1983 - ''Introduced features from Unix such as subdirectories, handle-based file operations, command input/output redirection, and pipe (computing)s. Microsoft decided to use backslashes as pathname separators rather than slashes as on Unix apparently due to the latter character being used as the switch (command line) character in most DOS and CP/M programs.'' * PC DOS 2.1 - October, 1983 * MS-DOS 2.11 - March, 1984 * MS-DOS 3.0 - August, 1984 * MS-DOS 3.1 - November, 1984 * MS-DOS 3.2 - January, 1986 - ''Supported 2 hard disk partitions of up to 32MB, one primary and one "logical drive" in an "extended partition"'' * PC DOS 3.3 - April, 1987 * MS-DOS 3.3 - August, 1987 - ''Supported multiple logical drives'' * MS-DOS 4.0 - June, 1988 - ''actually derived from IBM's codebase rather than the reverse'' * PC DOS 4.0 - July, 1988 - ''added the DOS Shell, a graphical menu selector, & support for hard disks of >32MB using the format from Compaq DOS 3.31. Also added many bugs and offered less free conventional memory than before. Generally regarded as an unsuccessful release and to be avoided'' * MS-DOS 4.01 - November, 1988 - ''bug-fix release'' * MS-DOS 5.0 - June, 1991 - ''In response to DR-DOS 5.0, adds comparable features to that product: memory management, full-screen editor, QBasic programming language, online help, and DOS Shell gains task switcher. See DR-DOS article for more information'' * MS-DOS 6.0 - March, 1993 - ''Response to DR-DOS 6.0. Added DoubleSpace disk compression (copied from Stacker) and other features'' * MS-DOS 6.2 - November, 1993 - ''Bug fix release'' * MS-DOS 6.21 - February, 1994 - ''Following Stac lawsuit, removed DoubleSpace disk compression'' * PC DOS 6.3 - April, 1994 * MS-DOS 6.22 - June, 1994 - ''Last official stand-alone version. DoubleSpace replaced with non-infringing but compatible DriveSpace tool'' * PC DOS 7.0 - April, 1995 - ''Bundles Stacker in place of DriveSpace'' * MS-DOS 7.0 - August, 1995 - Shipped embedded in Windows 95. ''Included large disk (LBA) and Long File Name (LFN) support'' * MS-DOS 7.1 - August, 1996 - Shipped embedded in Windows 95B (OSR2) (and Windows 98 in June, 1998). ''Added support for FAT32 file system'' * MS-DOS 8.0 - September, 2000 - Shipped embedded in Windows ME. ''Last version of MS-DOS. Removes SYS command, ability to boot to command line and other features'' * PC DOS 2000 - ''Year 2000-compliant version with minor additional features. Final member of the MS-DOS family'' ''Source: [http://members.fortunecity.com/pcmuseum/dos.htm PC Museum]'' MS-DOS grew in spurts, with many significant features being taken from other products and operating systems, such as Microsoft's own Xenix - a variant on Unix - and Digital Research's DR-DOS, as well as tools and utilities including Norton Utilities, PC Tools (Microsoft Anti-Virus), QEMM expanded memory manager, Stacker disk compression, and so on. With Intel's introduction of the 80286 microprocessor, IBM and Microsoft began work on a joint project called OS/2, originally a protected mode version of MS-DOS. Later, Microsoft abandoned the project to devote full resources to Microsoft Windows and Windows NT. Digital Research Corporation created the Graphical Environment Manager graphical user interface (GUI), which reached minimal popularity on PC compatibles - it was very successful on the Atari ST machines - but got ultimately eclipsed by Microsoft's Windows 3.0 release. ===Legal issues=== As a response to Digital Research's DR-DOS 6.0, which bundled SuperStor disk compression, Microsoft opened negotiations with Stac Electronics, vendor of the most popular DOS disk compression tool, Stacker. Stac was unwilling to meet Microsoft's terms for licensing Stacker and withdrew from the negotiations. In the due diligence process, Stac engineers had shown Microsoft some Stacker source code. Soon, MS-DOS 6.0 was released, including the Microsoft DoubleSpace disk compression utility program. Stac successfully sued Microsoft for patent infringement regarding the compression algorithm used in DoubleSpace. This resulted in the release of MS-DOS 6.21, which had disk-compression removed. Shortly afterwards came version 6.22, with a new version of the disk compression system, DriveSpace, rewritten to avoid the infringing code. These tactics were common for Microsoft; the company lost another lawsuit resulting from code in Windows 3.1 which caused spurious errors when Windows was launched on DR-DOS. See the DR-DOS article for more on this and Embrace, extend and extinguish for more on Microsoft anti-competitive manouevres. Prior to 1995, Microsoft licensed MS-DOS to computer manufacturers under three types of agreement: per-processor (a fee for each system the company sold), per-system (a fee for each system of a particular model), or per-copy (a fee for each copy of MS-DOS installed). The largest manufacturers used the per-processor arrangement, which had the lowest fee. This arrangement made it expensive for the large manufacturers to migrate to any other operating system, such as DR-DOS. In 1994 the US government charged Microsoft with violations of antitrust law, and a settlement agreement limited Microsoft to per-system licensing. Digital Research did not gain by this settlement, and years later its successor in interest SCO Group sued Microsoft for damages. This lawsuit was settled with a monetary payment of 150 million dollars. ===Multitasking=== MS-DOS was not designed to be a multi-user or multitasking operating system, but many attempts were made to retrofit these capabilities. The ''Terminate and Stay Resident'' (TSR) system call originally targeted at loadable device drivers and other mostly-undocumented functions were used to create pop-up applications. Borland's SideKick personal productivity product was a notable specimen. Add-on environments like TopView and especially DESQview attempted to provide multitasking, and achieved some success when later combined with the virtual 8086 mode and virtual memory features of the Intel 80386 and later processors. Windows 2.0 and subsequent versions provided similar albeit poorer features when running in "386 enhanced" mode, but Microsoft never specifically marketed this possibility and was mostly interested in converting customers to using GUI-mode Windows applications. ==User interface== MS-DOS employs a command line interface and a batch file facility via its command Interpreter (computer software),
The "DIR" example needs to be changed. The output looks more like UNIX/Linux. I've never seen any such outpout from a DOS "DIR". : That's probably from a Windows machine running an updated version of DOS. Older DOSes, as you most rightly probably see, did not comma-separate nor tab out the display as nicely as the newer DOSes did. User:Dysprosia 12:22 26 Jul 2003 (UTC) ::It looked very strange to me. I replaced it with a heavily edited version of my root directory, from Windows 98. I stripped off the LFNs, I think it's pretty much the same as DOS now. -- User:Tim Starling 12:35 26 Jul 2003 (UTC) ::: Well, comma separation came round v6.2, but I don't think we really need to dig that far back :) Nice work User:Dysprosia == company name == I think the company name should be Seattle Computer Products, not Seattle Computer Systems. == Release timeline == I would add this timeline to the article, but it's so sketchy that I'd like to rough it out here first. : eh...nevermind. I found a good source - will put on main page -- User:RobLa 21:33, 18 Sep 2004 (UTC) ==Use of backslash== The article says: :Fearing copyright infringment complaints from AT&T, Microsoft decided to use backslashes as pathname separators rather than normal forward-slashes. I always thought backslashes were used as pathname separators because forward slashes were commonly used as the switch character in CP/M. Perhaps both reasons contributed to the decision; is it worth adding this to the article?-User:Gadfium 22:42, 13 Feb 2005 (UTC) In the absence of evidence or a coherent legal theory for the former reason, I've replaced it with the latter and made the sentence indefinite. - User:66.15.40.17 (19 June 2005) ==First sentence== The first sentence says "Microsoft's disk operating system, MS-DOS was the first operating system for the IBM PC" But the PC-DOS article says: "It is commonplace to see people write "MS-DOS was the operating system for the original IBM PC", for example - which is quite wrong: the IBM PC always shipped with PC-DOS in the traditional IBM blue wrapper." So this factual conflict needs to be resolved. --User:Blackcats 00:30, 24 Mar 2005 (UTC) : PC-DOS, as originally shipped, was pretty much MS-DOS with IBM branding. User:AlistairMcMillan 01:49, 24 Mar 2005 (UTC) ::The IBM PC was first introduced with ''three'' optional OS's. It was not sold as a complete packaged unit; you had to select the components and software you wanted. But PCDOS was only $60 while CPM-86 cost $240, and UCSD p-System was even more, which accounted for the difference in sales. --User:Blainster 05:10, 20 Jun 2005 (UTC)
See other meanings of words starting from letter:
Words begining with MS-DOS:
MS-DOS
MS-DOS
MS-DOS_Batch_File_PRogramming
MS-DOS_Shell
MS-DOS
Microsoft's disk operating system, MS-DOS was a very widely used operating system on the PC compatible platform until recently. It has gradually been replaced on consumer desktop computers with various generations of the Windows operating system. It was originally released in 1981 and had eight major versions before Microsoft stopped development in 2000. It was the key product in Microsoft's growth from a programming languages company to a diverse software development firm, providing the company with essential revenue and marketing resources. ==History== MS-DOS was created by computer manufacturer Seattle Computer Products (SCP) in 1980 as QDOS (for Quick and Dirty Operating System), but was renamed 86-DOS because it was designed to run on the Intel 8086 processor. In a sequence of events that would later inspire much folklore, Microsoft licensed QDOS to IBM on behalf of SCP. Microsoft acquired the system for only $50,000 from SCP shortly before the PC's release. ===Development=== IBM and Microsoft both released versions of DOS; the IBM version was supplied with the IBM PC and known as PC-DOS. Originally, IBM only validated and packaged Microsoft developments, and thus IBM's versions tended to be released shortly after Microsoft's. However, MS-DOS 4.0 was actually based on IBM PC-DOS 4.0, as Microsoft was by then concentrating on OS/2 development. Microsoft released its versions under the name "MS-DOS", while IBM released its versions under the name "PC DOS". Initially, when Microsoft would license their OEM version of MS-DOS, the computer manufacturer would customize its name (i.e. TandyDOS, Compaq DOS, etc). Most of these versions were identical to the official MS-DOS; however, Microsoft began to insist that OEMs start calling the product MS-DOS. Eventually, only IBM resisted this move. * PC DOS 1.0 - August, 1981 - ''Initial release with the first IBM-PC'' * PC DOS 1.1 - May, 1982 * MS-DOS 1.25 - May, 1982 - ''First release for non-IBM hardware'' * MS-DOS 2.0 - March, 1983 - ''Introduced features from Unix such as subdirectories, handle-based file operations, command input/output redirection, and pipe (computing)s. Microsoft decided to use backslashes as pathname separators rather than slashes as on Unix apparently due to the latter character being used as the switch (command line) character in most DOS and CP/M programs.'' * PC DOS 2.1 - October, 1983 * MS-DOS 2.11 - March, 1984 * MS-DOS 3.0 - August, 1984 * MS-DOS 3.1 - November, 1984 * MS-DOS 3.2 - January, 1986 - ''Supported 2 hard disk partitions of up to 32MB, one primary and one "logical drive" in an "extended partition"'' * PC DOS 3.3 - April, 1987 * MS-DOS 3.3 - August, 1987 - ''Supported multiple logical drives'' * MS-DOS 4.0 - June, 1988 - ''actually derived from IBM's codebase rather than the reverse'' * PC DOS 4.0 - July, 1988 - ''added the DOS Shell, a graphical menu selector, & support for hard disks of >32MB using the format from Compaq DOS 3.31. Also added many bugs and offered less free conventional memory than before. Generally regarded as an unsuccessful release and to be avoided'' * MS-DOS 4.01 - November, 1988 - ''bug-fix release'' * MS-DOS 5.0 - June, 1991 - ''In response to DR-DOS 5.0, adds comparable features to that product: memory management, full-screen editor, QBasic programming language, online help, and DOS Shell gains task switcher. See DR-DOS article for more information'' * MS-DOS 6.0 - March, 1993 - ''Response to DR-DOS 6.0. Added DoubleSpace disk compression (copied from Stacker) and other features'' * MS-DOS 6.2 - November, 1993 - ''Bug fix release'' * MS-DOS 6.21 - February, 1994 - ''Following Stac lawsuit, removed DoubleSpace disk compression'' * PC DOS 6.3 - April, 1994 * MS-DOS 6.22 - June, 1994 - ''Last official stand-alone version. DoubleSpace replaced with non-infringing but compatible DriveSpace tool'' * PC DOS 7.0 - April, 1995 - ''Bundles Stacker in place of DriveSpace'' * MS-DOS 7.0 - August, 1995 - Shipped embedded in Windows 95. ''Included large disk (LBA) and Long File Name (LFN) support'' * MS-DOS 7.1 - August, 1996 - Shipped embedded in Windows 95B (OSR2) (and Windows 98 in June, 1998). ''Added support for FAT32 file system'' * MS-DOS 8.0 - September, 2000 - Shipped embedded in Windows ME. ''Last version of MS-DOS. Removes SYS command, ability to boot to command line and other features'' * PC DOS 2000 - ''Year 2000-compliant version with minor additional features. Final member of the MS-DOS family'' ''Source: [http://members.fortunecity.com/pcmuseum/dos.htm PC Museum]'' MS-DOS grew in spurts, with many significant features being taken from other products and operating systems, such as Microsoft's own Xenix - a variant on Unix - and Digital Research's DR-DOS, as well as tools and utilities including Norton Utilities, PC Tools (Microsoft Anti-Virus), QEMM expanded memory manager, Stacker disk compression, and so on. With Intel's introduction of the 80286 microprocessor, IBM and Microsoft began work on a joint project called OS/2, originally a protected mode version of MS-DOS. Later, Microsoft abandoned the project to devote full resources to Microsoft Windows and Windows NT. Digital Research Corporation created the Graphical Environment Manager graphical user interface (GUI), which reached minimal popularity on PC compatibles - it was very successful on the Atari ST machines - but got ultimately eclipsed by Microsoft's Windows 3.0 release. ===Legal issues=== As a response to Digital Research's DR-DOS 6.0, which bundled SuperStor disk compression, Microsoft opened negotiations with Stac Electronics, vendor of the most popular DOS disk compression tool, Stacker. Stac was unwilling to meet Microsoft's terms for licensing Stacker and withdrew from the negotiations. In the due diligence process, Stac engineers had shown Microsoft some Stacker source code. Soon, MS-DOS 6.0 was released, including the Microsoft DoubleSpace disk compression utility program. Stac successfully sued Microsoft for patent infringement regarding the compression algorithm used in DoubleSpace. This resulted in the release of MS-DOS 6.21, which had disk-compression removed. Shortly afterwards came version 6.22, with a new version of the disk compression system, DriveSpace, rewritten to avoid the infringing code. These tactics were common for Microsoft; the company lost another lawsuit resulting from code in Windows 3.1 which caused spurious errors when Windows was launched on DR-DOS. See the DR-DOS article for more on this and Embrace, extend and extinguish for more on Microsoft anti-competitive manouevres. Prior to 1995, Microsoft licensed MS-DOS to computer manufacturers under three types of agreement: per-processor (a fee for each system the company sold), per-system (a fee for each system of a particular model), or per-copy (a fee for each copy of MS-DOS installed). The largest manufacturers used the per-processor arrangement, which had the lowest fee. This arrangement made it expensive for the large manufacturers to migrate to any other operating system, such as DR-DOS. In 1994 the US government charged Microsoft with violations of antitrust law, and a settlement agreement limited Microsoft to per-system licensing. Digital Research did not gain by this settlement, and years later its successor in interest SCO Group sued Microsoft for damages. This lawsuit was settled with a monetary payment of 150 million dollars. ===Multitasking=== MS-DOS was not designed to be a multi-user or multitasking operating system, but many attempts were made to retrofit these capabilities. The ''Terminate and Stay Resident'' (TSR) system call originally targeted at loadable device drivers and other mostly-undocumented functions were used to create pop-up applications. Borland's SideKick personal productivity product was a notable specimen. Add-on environments like TopView and especially DESQview attempted to provide multitasking, and achieved some success when later combined with the virtual 8086 mode and virtual memory features of the Intel 80386 and later processors. Windows 2.0 and subsequent versions provided similar albeit poorer features when running in "386 enhanced" mode, but Microsoft never specifically marketed this possibility and was mostly interested in converting customers to using GUI-mode Windows applications. ==User interface== MS-DOS employs a command line interface and a batch file facility via its command Interpreter (computer software),
command.com. MS-DOS was designed so users could easily substitute a different command line interpreter, for example 4DOS.
==MS-DOS compatibility with other Microsoft operating systems==
After the release of the Apple Macintosh in 1984, IBM personal computer users also desired a graphical user interface. Many programs running under MS-DOS tried to fill the void by creating their own graphical interface, such as Microsoft Word for DOS, XTree, and the Norton Shell. However, this required duplication of effort and did not provide much consistency in interface design (even between product lines).
Early versions of Microsoft Windows were ordinary programs which ran on top of MS-DOS and its clones. Later versions were launched from DOS but "extended" it by going into protected mode. Still later versions of MS Windows ran independently of DOS but included much of the old code such that DOS could run in virtual machines under the new OS.
==Related systems==
Several similar products were produced by other companies. In the case of PC-DOS and DR-DOS, it is common but incorrect to call these "clones". Given that Microsoft manufactured PC-DOS for IBM, PC-DOS and MS-DOS were (to continue the genetic analogy) "identical twins" that diverged only in adulthood and eventually became quite different products; DR-DOS was a clone of itself once removed.
* PC-DOS
* DR-DOS, Novell DOS, and OpenDOS
* FreeDOS, FreeDOS 32, and GNU/DOS
* PTS-DOS
Under Linux it is possible to run copies of DOS and many of its clones under ''dosemu'', a Linux-native virtual machine for running real mode programs. There are a number of other emulators for running DOS under various versions of UNIX, even on non-x86 platforms.
==See also==
* List of DOS commands
* Microsoft Windows
* History of Microsoft Windows
* Bad command or file name
* X86_DOS_Comparison
==External links==
* [http://www.patersontech.com/Dos/Articles.aspx Tim Patterson on DOS, the guy who wrote the QDOS OS, many articles here]
* [http://www.chebucto.ns.ca/~ak621/DOS/DOS-Head.html Richard Bonner's DOS website]
* [http://purl.oclc.org/net/Batfiles/ Batfiles: The DOS batch file programming handbook and tutorial]
* [http://www.nukesoft.co.uk/msdos/ ''MS-DOS Reference'']
* [http://www.acad.humberc.on.ca/~frig8279/osessay/dos/history ''A Brief Timeline of DOS'']
* [http://www.dosemu.org/ Linux/dosemu]
* [http://www-2.cs.cmu.edu/afs/cs/user/ralf/pub/WWW/files.html ''Ralf Brown's Interrupt List'']
DOS on IBM PC compatibles
DOS
Operating systems
Microsoft operating systems
lv:MS-DOS
MS-DOS
The "DIR" example needs to be changed. The output looks more like UNIX/Linux. I've never seen any such outpout from a DOS "DIR". : That's probably from a Windows machine running an updated version of DOS. Older DOSes, as you most rightly probably see, did not comma-separate nor tab out the display as nicely as the newer DOSes did. User:Dysprosia 12:22 26 Jul 2003 (UTC) ::It looked very strange to me. I replaced it with a heavily edited version of my root directory, from Windows 98. I stripped off the LFNs, I think it's pretty much the same as DOS now. -- User:Tim Starling 12:35 26 Jul 2003 (UTC) ::: Well, comma separation came round v6.2, but I don't think we really need to dig that far back :) Nice work User:Dysprosia == company name == I think the company name should be Seattle Computer Products, not Seattle Computer Systems. == Release timeline == I would add this timeline to the article, but it's so sketchy that I'd like to rough it out here first. : eh...nevermind. I found a good source - will put on main page -- User:RobLa 21:33, 18 Sep 2004 (UTC) ==Use of backslash== The article says: :Fearing copyright infringment complaints from AT&T, Microsoft decided to use backslashes as pathname separators rather than normal forward-slashes. I always thought backslashes were used as pathname separators because forward slashes were commonly used as the switch character in CP/M. Perhaps both reasons contributed to the decision; is it worth adding this to the article?-User:Gadfium 22:42, 13 Feb 2005 (UTC) In the absence of evidence or a coherent legal theory for the former reason, I've replaced it with the latter and made the sentence indefinite. - User:66.15.40.17 (19 June 2005) ==First sentence== The first sentence says "Microsoft's disk operating system, MS-DOS was the first operating system for the IBM PC" But the PC-DOS article says: "It is commonplace to see people write "MS-DOS was the operating system for the original IBM PC", for example - which is quite wrong: the IBM PC always shipped with PC-DOS in the traditional IBM blue wrapper." So this factual conflict needs to be resolved. --User:Blackcats 00:30, 24 Mar 2005 (UTC) : PC-DOS, as originally shipped, was pretty much MS-DOS with IBM branding. User:AlistairMcMillan 01:49, 24 Mar 2005 (UTC) ::The IBM PC was first introduced with ''three'' optional OS's. It was not sold as a complete packaged unit; you had to select the components and software you wanted. But PCDOS was only $60 while CPM-86 cost $240, and UCSD p-System was even more, which accounted for the difference in sales. --User:Blainster 05:10, 20 Jun 2005 (UTC)
See other meanings of words starting from letter:
M
MA | MB | MC | MD | ME | MF | MG | MH | MI | MJ | MK | ML | MN | MO | MP | MR | MS | MT | MU | MW | MX | MY | MZ |Words begining with MS-DOS:
MS-DOS
MS-DOS
MS-DOS_Batch_File_PRogramming
MS-DOS_Shell
These materials are based on Wikipedia and licensed under the GNU FDL
YouTube.com videos better site than Turbo Tax 2007
