Leave me a [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Inter&action=edit§ion=new message] if you wish!
==Distractress==
18:34:48 N Distractress (diff; hist) . . 207.61.101.2 (Talk | contribs)
18:35:40 m Distractress (diff; hist) . . Msh210 (Talk | contribs) ()
18:35:42 Special:Log/delete (diff; hist) . . Inter (Talk | contribs) (deleted "Distractress": content was: 'Someone who distracts wellsee: MattressI'm sorry-Laura')
I'm just wondering which CSD this falls under.User:Msh210 —User:msh210 18:38, 5 May 2005 (UTC)
: Article restored. All I saw was the vandalism at the bottom. Time to stop editing for today! User:Inter\User_talk:Inter 18:43, 5 May 2005 (UTC)
== RfC-hiccup ==
There's some trouble at the RfC Wikipedia_talk:Requests_for_comment#Two-person_threshold. Two users have voiced concerns that the RfC has in fact not met the two-person threshold and should be deleted. Do you think you could consider signing despite the fact. I don't think your neutrality would be damaged by it, since the point seems to be to simply sign in the right place and having participated in trying to solve the dispute.
User:Karmosin 22:31, May 9, 2005 (UTC)
== 216.20.9.22 ==
Thanks for the block - I was getting bored adding to everything he produced. User:Algebraist 13:30, 16 May 2005 (UTC)
== Vandal man ==
I wouldnt have done it if you didn't have that counter. Atleast I was a bit crative in doing this rather than putting in insults and curse words.
Well, I guess I should have double checked the images to make sure they worked properly. But the counter is a bit of an invite to vandals to come in and do something. One can try to have a little fun with it once in a while though.
--User:80.62.170.94 16:33, 16 May 2005 (UTC)
: Creative vandalism is still only vandalism. User:Inter\User_talk:Inter 19:29, 16 May 2005 (UTC)
:: Semi true. The counter invites it and is almost an honor symbol. There are two things that, from personal restraint, let me do that. The counter its self and the fact you didn't get rid of the Pi symbol after one hack, and the ease of reverting it back to another version. I would have kept the respect of -not- doing that if you had not wrote in that note of vandlism and the counter. I would not have done it if it were not so easy to undo it. Sorry about the picture btw, I removed all the '.'s out of the article and needed to repair the pictures, thought there was a period in every space of your wiki stress pict.
::Back onto the honor symbol, don't you ever laugh about being hacked so many times? As a rating of popularity?
::: I could protect my user page, which I probably have to do at some point, but that is not in the spirit of Wikipedia. User:Inter\User_talk:Inter 11:18, 17 May 2005 (UTC)
::::You could do that, true, but maybe the wisest and most effective thing to do is to take the counter down. It is like waiving a carrot infront of users to actually do it. So you are sending mixed messages here. On the one hand, there is a bit of fun that some users get the impression that you share in because of the carrot, then this discussion is the other hand where you give a negitive signal.
::::Why didn't you take the pi sign down btw if it was another user who put it up?
::::: I like pi. User:Inter\User_talk:Inter 17:25, 17 May 2005 (UTC)
::::::LOL! I knew there was a reason I like you.
BTW, I have kidnapped a ',' from your user page. If you want to see your , again, send me 5000 pixels. If you try anything funny, I will turn your , into a . so play nice. :)
== Deleted the Artimius info in whistle register ==
Feel free to add the info back if it is true. But the only proven example of a man singing in whistle register is Adam Lopez, and he, along with Minnie Riperton and Mariah Carey have only been RUMORED to hit a C8. So if this guy can hit a C8#, I want to hear it. Right now, I don't buy it, so I deleted the info. I haven't heard Sarah MacLachlan or Ashanti Douglas pitch high either, but since the whistle register is merely the notes above E6, at last I can believe they have pitched a some point in their lives in the lower extremes of this register (as showcased by Blu Cantrell). Sorry for rambling.
==Birthday==
Happy belated birthday (only a couple of weeks off). User:BrokenSegueUser talk:BrokenSegue 01:31, 24 May 2005 (UTC)
== User talk:69.242.53.191 ==
yOU STATED:
User talk:69.242.53.191
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia.
Last and only warning. If you continue to promote yourself (or any kind of promotion) on Wikipedia, you will be blocked. Inter\Echo 20:41, 7 Apr 2005 (UTC)
____
I am not sure what I did to create this concern. What can I do to resolve this issue?
Bill Fletcher.
== User:Harry on Hills ==
Please block. User:Sjakkalle 12:19, 26 May 2005 (UTC)
: Yup. User:Inter\User_talk:Inter 12:21, 26 May 2005 (UTC)
::Thanks. User:Sjakkalle 12:26, 26 May 2005 (UTC)
:::I have reverted vandalism to your talkpage. User:Sjakkalle 12:44, 26 May 2005 (UTC)
:::: Thanks, I beat ya to the punch though. :> User:Inter\User_talk:Inter 12:48, 26 May 2005 (UTC)
I`m maksimous not vandal http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User:Maksimous&redirect=no
User:Inter\User_talk:Inter 11:36, 2 Jun 2005 (UTC)
:sorry I delete next time
:and /7u/7sik - is Elena see icq
== User:198.234.224.6 ==
I noticed you blocked this user about a week ago for vandalism. It looks like he's at it again (see his [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Contributions/198.234.224.6 contributions] for recent activity). I put him on Vandalism in Progress for vandalizing a VfD repeatedly and writing vanity articles, and today he left profane comments on several more articles. So you can probably go ahead and block him again, if you'd like. --User:Idont havaname 23:12, 3 Jun 2005 (UTC)
Update about this vandal - he's back at it. He's vandalized several more VfDs with quite a few personal attacks against me, another profane vandalism of Napoleon Dynamite (and some nonsense birthday listings on some of the days of the year articles), and several more nonsense articles. 10pm just meant he was done for the night. --User:Idont havaname 19:52, 8 Jun 2005 (UTC)
== User:213.243.154.172 ==
I've rolled back pretty much all your changes where you say that British also includes Ireland. If you want to correct these changes to Northern Ireland you are welcome to do so. User:Inter\User_talk:Inter 11:11, 5 Jun 2005 (UTC)
*I was still working, you are so impatient. I try to put the people to their correct era according the time when they were active to avoid anachronism. See Kingdom of Great Britain (1707-1801), United Kingdom of Great Britain and Ireland (1801-1922) and United Kingdom 1922-. Yes, they might have been English (or Scottish, or Irish), but they were statesmen, and there wasn't such independent states as England, Scotland or Ireland when they were active.
: See your talk page. My suggestions for how to solve this are there. User:Inter\User_talk:Inter 11:22, 5 Jun 2005 (UTC)
I would rather call it a service to visitors.
: I'll help you restore it too. :> Just a sec. User:Inter\User_talk:Inter 11:37, 5 Jun 2005 (UTC)
== Template:MedComOpenTasks ==
I came across this template you started and wanted to use it give the Mediation Committee a more transparent and smooth process. What did you mean by "Voluntary imposements"? User:MacGyverMagic|User talk:MacGyverMagic 12:12, Jun 5, 2005 (UTC)
*I'm trying to breath new life into the mediation process. I would appreciate it if you'd hold of on removing the mediation process for now. Also, I'll be trying to bring more structure to a request, much like you did in the M Cabal. In short, please wait and keep me up to date on any developments. User:MacGyverMagic|User talk:MacGyverMagic 15:07, Jun 5, 2005 (UTC)
*Can you summarize (or point me to something that tells me) why Mediation (2005) failed the last time around and what the main concerns were? User:MacGyverMagic|User talk:MacGyverMagic 17:08, Jun 5, 2005 (UTC)
== Blocking - IP has affected username ==
Hi, due to vandalism in anonymous edits by 62.254.0.32, the IP address was temporarily blocked. Unfortunately, despite having a user name, it seems to block me on and off (usually on; the fact that I got as far as to add a comment here was a surprise). While I appreciate the need to block vandals, is there a way to overcome the problem of the block affecting use of my user account? I would post this on the Village Pump, but keep on getting the 'User is blocked' page!
Thanks for your help. --User:High Hopes 10:04, 11 Jun 2005 (UTC)
*Inter, thanks for taking time to reply. A couple of other users left messages on the talkpage, and it appears to be down to our specific ISP that causes Usernames on a blocked IP to not always work. The problem appears to be better now, but thanks! --User:HighHopesUser talk:HighHopes 18:53, 11 Jun 2005 (UTC)
:* I'll remember this and look into it. User:Inter\User_talk:Inter 10:25, 13 Jun 2005 (UTC)
== blocked ==
I was editing an article and got to a page telling me that I was blocked (vandalism?). And then it worked again. What is happening? I am certainly not engaging in vandalism, is there an identity problem? Sorry, haven't seen this before. Yes, I am connecting via my ISP, could be that my IP address has changed recently.
Ok, I checked that this has something to do with NTL. However, I am logged in as TXA, so why do I get blocked by this???
Now it works, then it doesn't?
It says:
Your IP address is 62.254.0.32. Please include this address in any queries you make.
--User:Txa 20:43, 11 Jun 2005 (UTC)
*Exactly the same problem here - though the block for the IP address should have expired around 21.30 today. I hope this doesn't happen again soon, but see my talk page - the bottom message has advice on how to circumvent the issue. --User:HighHopesUser talk:HighHopes 22:16, 11 Jun 2005 (UTC)
:* you might have been blocked by somebody else. I'll put up a proxy notice. User:Inter\User_talk:Inter 23:46, 11 Jun 2005 (UTC)
== User:210.8.224.4 ==
User:210.8.224.4 continues to vandalize, even after your last warning. -- User:SamuelWantman 06:26, 13 Jun 2005 (UTC)
: Will have a look. Thanks. User:Inter\User_talk:Inter 10:23, 13 Jun 2005 (UTC)
== Copyright help?! ==
Hi, you left a message on a page that I'm trying to edit/create asking not to remove the copyright violation or I'll be blocked. Can you tell me a way to have it removed since I am authorized to use that content. I got the text from our organization's website and I am the person who created the text on there. Please help!
: See your talk page. User:Inter\User_talk:Inter 19:37, 13 Jun 2005 (UTC)
==Protection of Jihad==
While I appreciated the thought of protecting Jihad, the fact that you froze it to the version supported by known vandal Yuber is a problem.
: It always is. See m:The Wrong Version for more information. Perhaps we can discuss this on the talk page now. User:Inter\User_talk:Inter 20:59, 13 Jun 2005 (UTC)
::Don't pay attention to this guy, he is a known sockpuppet/abusive editor.User:YuberUser_talk:Yuber 21:27, 13 Jun 2005 (UTC)
::: It doesn't help matters much that you are at each other's throats. See Talk:Jihad for discussion. User:Inter\User_talk:Inter 21:43, 13 Jun 2005 (UTC)
You should be aware that both Yuber and Weyes are now serially reverting the "edits of note" comment off of the Talk:Jihad page.
----
It seems time to remove Jihad from protected status. A compromise has been proposed, without any apparent continuing disagreement, and indeed the last signed and dated activity on the Talk:Jihad was two days ago (barring my own appeal to remove protection, added today). —User:Ryanaxp 17:59, Jun 21, 2005 (UTC)
==Anon blocking==
Hi. User:137.205.192.27 just complained to me about your having blocked him for repeatedly reverting his talk page. While I can certainly see the benefits of such a policy, I can't seem to find the policy page where it says that anons aren't supposed to blank their own talk pages; could you point it out to him? Thanks, - User:Mustafaa 18:44, 14 Jun 2005 (UTC)
==Yuber case==
I am not aware of any mediation between Yuber and me.
User:Guy Montag 23:53, 14 Jun 2005 (UTC)
: See Talk:Jihad for wrapup. Good luck on the ArbCom case. User:Inter\User_talk:Inter 15:42, 15 Jun 2005 (UTC)
==Eyeon==
Hi Inter, sorry for taking so long to answer your query about Eyeon. If you look through his contribs from the start, you'll see he's made disruptive edits to several articles and talk pages. He's also created a couple of hoax articles e.g. Dieter Manisprechensie, a non-existent philosopher, now deleted. He's a serial reverter, and has been blocked twice for 3RR in eight days. He's arranged a poll on Feces with sockpuppets voting, and allegations on the talk page, which I haven't checked, of distorting the vote by deleting votes or something. The more we respond to the disruption, the happier he is. I blocked him for 3RR because, along with a sockpuppet, he reverted, from memory, six times in 10 hours. I'm deducing that User:Niglet and User:Fecologist are sockpuppets from the fact that, as new or relatively new users, it was a remarkable cooincidence that they happened to check out Feces just in time to revert to Eyeon's photograph of a turd. Feces is now protected from any further sockpuppet editing. If any of the other editors on the page want to edit it, I've made it clear I'll unlock it. So far, no one has asked, except Eyeon, which tells me something. I hope this explanation helps. Cheers, User:SlimVirginUser_talk:SlimVirgin 03:09, Jun 16, 2005 (UTC)
: Sounds like trouble. Thanks. User:Inter\User_talk:Inter 09:39, 16 Jun 2005 (UTC)
I am not trying to link spam. I have quite a few sites and have not posted any others, anywhere else on Wikipedia, ever. Please contact me if more questions. Thank you very much.
==About me==
Hi! I'm Inter. Thats what I always call myself on IRC. Speaking of IRC, I usually hang out in m:IRC channels on the Freenode network. Feel free to come and say hi, but don't ask if WP died again, we ''know'' it died. :>User:PZFUN_hereby_award_you,_Inter,_this_Wikipedia:Scandinavian_Mediators_Club_for_your_distinguished_mediator_skills.">Image:Dagham-Barnstar.png|frame|right|I, User:PZFUN hereby award you, Inter, this Wikipedia:Scandinavian Mediators Club for your distinguished mediator skills.
* I have a cat called pus which you can see on the left. Cute eh?
* I'm 26 years of age
* I work out muchly and religiously
* I live in Norway
* I'm a guy
* I am a m:Wikiholic (sporadically)
* I'm attending college
* I think:
** There is no greater mental health than what you derive from physical training, try it sometime
**That if you have any questions or thinking about starting to work out, I will answer to the best of my knowledge
**There's more to life than sitting in an office all day thinking about what ''could'' have happened
* I know:
** About music. Quite a bit. Both playing instruments and listening to obscure genres.
**About computers. Actually I know a shitload about computers and OS'es.
** That love is random. There is no such thing (or indeed person) as "the one". I think there are more than one person out there who is right for anyone, simply because of the way the boundaries for what we have in common works.
** About vandals. I deal with alot of them on my RC patrols. It's a shame somebody always tries to ruin something great like being able to edit WP anonymously. But that is simple human nature for you.