Insurance - meaning of word
Rozmiar: 8938 bajtów


Insurance



Insurance, in law and economics, is a form of risk management primarily used to Hedge (finance) against the risk of potential financial loss. Ideally, insurance is defined as the equitable transfer of the risk of a potential loss, from one entity to another, in exchange for a reasonable fee. In practice, however, the business of providing insurance protection often ends up in litigation between the parties involved, while the responsibilities of regulating insurance markets routinely winds up as a political football for government agencies. ==Indemnification== An entity seeking to transfer risk (an individual, corporation, or association of any type) becomes the 'insured' party once risk is assumed by an 'insurer', the insuring party, by means of a contract, defined as an insurance 'policy'. This legal contract sets out terms and conditions specifying the amount of coverage (compensation) to be rendered to the insured, by the insurer upon assumption of risk, in the event of a loss, and all the specific perils covered against (indemnity), for the term of the contract. When insured parties experience a loss, for a specified peril, the coverage entitles the policyholder to make a 'claim' against the insurer for the amount of loss as specified by the policy contract. The fee paid by the insured to the insurer for assuming the risk is called the 'premium'. Insurance premiums from many clients are used to fund accounts set aside for later payment of claims - in theory for a relatively few claimants - and for overhead costs. So long as an insurer maintains adequate funds set aside for anticipated losses, the remaining magin becomes their profit. ===Example: home insurance=== For example, let us assume a home is purchased for $100,000. Knowing the loss of the home from a peril would cause significant financial loss, insurance coverage is ordinarily acquired in the form of a homeowner's policy. The insurance company charges the insured a premium, of perhaps $1,000 a year in this example, for assuming liability for the risk. At this point, the risk of loss has been transferred from the insured to the insurance company. In the event of a covered peril, the insurer pays the claimant the amount of loss according to the terms of the contract, in ordinary circumstances, which may amount to the cost of replacing or repairing the home. ==Determination of rate structures== The insurer uses actuarial science to quantify the risk they are willing to assume. Data is generated to approximate future claims, ordinarily with reasonable accuracy. Actuarial science uses statistics and probability to analyze the risks associated with the range of perils covered, and these scientific principles are used by insurers, in conjuction with additional factors, to determine rate structures. For example, many individuals purchase homeowner's insurance policies by signing a contract paying a premium to an insurance company. If a covered loss occurs, the insurer is obligated by the terms of the contract to honor the insured's claim. For some policyholders, the amount of insurance benefits received from their insurer will greatly exceed the expense of premiums paid. Others may never make a claim or receive any benefit other than the peace of mind rendered by the security of an insurance policy. When averaged, the total claims expense paid by an insurer should be less than the total premiums paid by their policyholders, with the difference allocated to overhead and profit. Insurance companies also earn investment profits. These are generated by investing premiums received until they are needed to pay claims. This money is called the 'float'. The insurer may make profits or losses from the value change in the float as well as interest or dividend on the float. In the United States, the underwriting loss of property and casualty insurance companies was $142.3 billion in the five years ending 2003. But overall profit for the same period was $68.4 billion, at the result of float. ==Gambling analogy== Some people consider insurance a type of gambling (particularly as associated with moral hazard) that executes over the policy period. The insurance company bets that you or your property will not suffer a loss while you put money on the opposite outcome. The difference in the fees paid to the insurance company versus the amount for which they can be held liable if an accident happens is roughly analogous to the odds one might expect when betting on a horse-racing (for example, 10 to 1). For this reason, a number of religion groups including the Amish avoid insurance and instead depend on support provided by their community when disasters strike. In closed, supportive communities where others will actually step in to rebuild lost property, this arrangement can work. Most society could not effectively support this type of system and the system will not work for large risks. ==History of insurance== Early methods of transferring or distributing risk were practiced by Babylonia traders as long ago as the 2nd millennium BCE. The Babylonians developed a system which was recorded in the famous Code of Hammurabi, c. 1750 BC and practiced by early Mediterranean sailing merchants. If a merchant received a loan to fund his shipment, he would pay the lender an additional sum in exchange for the lender's guarantee to cancel the loan should the shipment be stolen. A thousand years later, the Rhodes invented the concept of the 'general average'. Merchants whose goods were being shipped together would pay proportionally divided premium which would be used to reimburse any merchant whose goods were jettisoned during storm or sinkage. The Ancient Greece and Ancient Rome introduced the origins of health and life insurance c. 600 AD when they organized guilds called "benevolent societies" which acted to care for the family and funeral expenses of members upon death. Guilds in the Middle Ages served a similar purpose. The Talmud deals with several aspects of insuring goods. Insurance became far more sophisticated in post-Renaissance Europe, and specialized varieties developed. Insurance as we know it today can be traced to the Great Fire of London, which in 1666 devoured 13,200 houses. In the aftermath of this disaster Nicholas Barbon opened an office to insure buildings. In 1680 he established England's first fire insurance company, "The Fire Office", to insure brick and frame homes. The first insurance company in the United States provided fire insurance and was formed in Charles Town (modern-day Charleston), South Carolina in 1732. Benjamin Franklin helped to popularize and make standard the practice of insurance, particularly against fire. In 1752, he founded the Philadelphia Contributorship for the Insurance of Houses from Loss by Fire. Franklin's company was the first to make contributions toward fire prevention. Not only did his company warn against certain fire hazards, it refused to insure certain buildings where the risk of fire was too great, such as all wooden houses. In the United States, regulation of the insurance industry is highly Balkanization, with primary responsibility assumed by individual U.S. state insurance departments. Whereas insurance markets have become centralized nationally and internationally, State insurance commissioners operate individually, though at times in concert through a national insurance commissioner's organization. In the State of New York, which has unique laws in keeping with its stature as a global business center, attorney general Elliott Spitzer has been in a unique position to grapple with major national insurance brokerages. Spitzer found that Balkanization steered business to insurance carriers based on the amount of contingent commissions that could be extracted from carriers, rather than basing decisions on whether carriers had the best deals for clients. == Types of insurance == Any risk that can be quantified probably has a type of insurance to protect it. Among the different types of insurance are: *Auto insurance, also known as ''auto insurance'', ''car insurance'' and in the UK as ''motor insurance'', is probably the most common form of insurance and may cover both legal Liability#In_law claims against the driver and loss of or damage to the vehicle itself. *Casualty insurance insures against accidents, not necessarily tied to any specific property. *Credit insurance pays some or all of a loan back when certain things happen to the borrower such as unemployment, disability, or death. *Financial loss insurance protects individuals and companies against various financial risks. For example, a business might purchase cover to protect it from loss of sales if a fire in a factory prevented it from carrying out its business for a time. Insurance might also cover failure of a creditor to pay money it owes to the insured. Fidelity bonds and surety bonds are included in this category. *Health insurance covers medicine bills incurred because of disease or accidents. *Liability insurance covers legal claims against the insured. For example, a doctor may purchase insurance to cover any legal claims against him if he were to be convicted of a mistake in treating a patient. *Life insurance provides a benefit to a decedent's family or other designated beneficiary, to replace loss of the insured's income and provide for burial and other final expenses. **annuity provide a stream of payments and are generally classified as insurance because they are issued by insurance companies and regulated as insurance. Annuities and pensions that pay a benefit for life are sometimes regarded as insurance against the possibility that a retirement will outlive his or her financial resources. In that sense, they are the complement of life insurance. *Political risk insurance can be taken out by businesses with operations in country in which there is a risk that revolution or other politics conditions will result in a loss. *Property insurance provides protection against risks to property, such as fire, theft or weather damage. This includes specialized forms of insurance such as fire insurance, flood insurance, earthquake insurance, home insurance or boiler insurance. *Terrorism insurance *Title insurance provides a guarantee that title to real property is vested in the purchaser and/or mortgagee, free and clear of liens or encumbrances. It is usually issued in conjunction with a search of the public records done at the time of a real estate transaction. *Workers' compensation insurance replaces all or part of a worker's wages lost and accompanying medical expense incurred due to a job-related injury. A single policy may cover risks in one or more of the above categories. For example, car insurance would typically cover both property risk (covering the risk of theft or damage to the car) and liability risk (covering legal claims from say, causing an accident). A homeowner's insurance policy in the US typically includes property insurance covering damage to the home and the owner's belongings, liability insurance covering certain legal claims against the owner, and even a small amount of health insurance for medical expenses of guests who are injured on the owner's property. Potential sources of risk that may give rise to claims are known as "perils". Examples of perils might be fire, theft, earthquake, hurricane and many other potential risks. An insurance policy will set out in details which perils are covered by the policy and which are not. ==Types of insurance companies== Insurance companies may be classified as *''Life'' insurance companies, who sell life insurance, annuities and pensions products. *''Non-life'' or ''general'' insurance companies, who sell other types of insurance. In most countries, life and non-life insurers are subject to different regulations, tax and accounting rules. The main reason for the distinction between the two types of company is that life business is very long term in nature — coverage for life assurance or a pension can cover risks over many decades. By contrast, non-life insurance cover usually covers a shorter period, such as one year. Insurance companies are generally classified as either ''mutual'' or ''stock'' companies. This is more of a traditional distinction as true mutual companies are becoming rare. Mutual companies are owned by the policyholders, while stockholders, (who may or may not own policies) own stock insurance companies. ''Reinsurance'' companies are insurance companies that sell policies to other insurance companies, allowing them to reduce their risks and protect themselves from very large losses. The reinsurance market is dominated by a few very large companies, with huge reserves. There are also companies known as 'insurance consultants'. Like a mortgage broker, these companies are paid a fee by the customer to shop around for the best insurance policy amongst many companies . Similar to an insurance consultant, an 'insurance broker' also shops around for the best insurance policy amongst many companies. However, with insurance brokers, the fee is usually paid in the form of commission from the insurer that is selected rather than directly from the client. ==Life insurance and saving== Certain life insurance contracts accumulate cash values, which may be taken by the insured if the policy is surrendered or which may be borrowed against. Some policies, such as annuities and financial endowment policies, are financial instruments to accumulate or liquidation wealth when it is needed. See life insurance. In many countries, such as the US and the UK, tax law provides that the interest on this cash value is not taxable under certain circumstances. This leads to widespread use of life insurance as a tax-efficient method of saving as well as protection in the event of early death. ==Financial viability of insurance companies== Financial stability and strength of the insurance company should be a major consideration when purchasing an insurance contract. An insurance premium paid currently provides coverage for losses that might arise many years in the future. For that reason, the viability of the insurance carrier is very important. In recent years, a number of insurance companies have become insolvent, leaving their policyholders with no coverage (or coverage only from a government-backed insurance pool with less attractive payouts for losses). A number of independent rating agencies, such as Best's, provide information and rate the financial viability of insurance companies. ==Controversies== === Insurance insulates too much === By creating a "security blanket" for its insureds, an insurance company may inadvertently find that its insureds may not be as risk-averse as they should be (since the insured assumes the risk belongs to the insurer). To reduce their own financial exposure, insurance companies have contractual clauses that mitigate their obligation to provide coverage if the insured engages in some kind of behavior that grossly magnifies their risk of loss or liability. For example, liability insurance providers do not provide coverage for liability arising from intentional torts committed by the insured. Even if a provider was irrational enough to try to provide such coverage, it is against the public policy of most countries to allow such insurance to exist, and thus it is usually illegal. ===Complexity of insurance policy contracts=== Insurance policies can be complex and some policyholders may not understand all the fees, regulation and coverages included in a policy. As a result, people could buy policies at unfavorable terms. In response to these issues, governments often make detailed regulations that set down minimum standards for policies and govern how they may be advertising and sold. Many individuals purchase policies through an insurance broker. The broker can counsel the policyholder on which coverage to purchase and limitations of the policy. A broker generally holds contracts with many insurers which allows the broker to "shop" the market for the best rates and coverage possible. === Redlining === Redlining is the practice of some insurance companies to deny the issuance of coverage in specific geographic areas, usually due to an increased likelihood of risk; the validity of the assessment may be real or perceived, though it is often attributed to discrimation. Evaluation of risk, when an insurer determines a premium or premium rate structure, considers quantifiable factors, including location, credit scores, gender, occupation, marital status, and education level. However, the use of these essential factors, whether inappropriately or not, are often considered to be 'unfair' or racist by some consumers and their advocates, sometimes leading to political disputes about insurers' determination of premiums and possible government intervention to limit the factors used. A refutation to this is that the job of an insurance underwriter is to properly categorize a given risk as to the likelihood that the loss will occur. Any factor that causes a greater likelihood of loss should in theory, be charged a higher rate. This is a basic principle of insurance and must be followed for insurance companies or groups to operate properly, even for non-profit organizations. Thus, discrimination of potential insureds by legitimate factors is central to insurance. Therefore the only thing that can be considered legitimately "unfair" are practices that discrimination against a given group without actual factors that show that the group is a higher risk. So, eliminating real factors discriminates against other insureds by forcing them to bear part of the cost of the disallowed perceived factors. ranging from rising expenses for insurers due to the spread of insurance fraud schemes on the one hand, to charges from consumers of discriminatory rate structures and unfair claims handling practices on the other. === Health insurance === Health insurance, which is coverage for individuals to protect them against medical costs, is a highly charged and political issue in the United States, which does not have socialized health coverage. In theory, the market for health insurance provision should function in a manner similar to other insurance coverages, but the skyrocketing cost of health coverage has disrupted markets around the globe, but perhaps most glaringly in the US. Please see health insurance for a discussion of this category. ==Glossary== * 'Combined ratio' (calculated by dividing the sum of incurred losses and expenses by earned premium) = (incurred losses + incurred underwriting expenses) ÷ earned premiums; (or) = loss ratio + expense ratio + dividend ratio. A lower number indicates a better return on the amount of capital placed at risk by an insurer. ==Quote== * Maurice_R._Greenberg told his board of directors, "you can't even spell 'insurance'"[http://editor.slate.msn.com/default.aspx/id/2116167/nav/ais/] ((hearsay, April 2005) ==See also== * Cindy Ossias * False insurance claims * Financial services (broader industry to which insurance belongs) ===Lists=== * List of finance topics#insurance * List of finance topics * List of U.S. insurance companies ==External links== *Insurance industry statistics in the U.S. [http://www.iii.org/media/facts/statsbyissue/industry/] Insurance Service industries

Insurance



---- This article seriously needs input from economists and marketing people. I'll do what I can when I have the time, but it reads like a current affairs piece and doesn't contain any discussion of fundamental features of insurance markets like information assymetry, moral hazard and adverse selection and the associated marketing techniques to avoid them. ---- Private health insurance is a major matter only for travellers and citizens of the US. It does not deserve this much space in this article. Move it to a more specific article like US health insurance. Most people reading this are not Americans, and don't care. What you say can be said in about one paragraph on that issue. :Private health insurance is available even in (nearly all) countries with public health insurance, and is worth discussing. I do think there could be a whole article on the ethical debate. User:Tempshill 20:21, 3 Nov 2003 (UTC) There is plenty to talk about insurance in general, e.g . reinsurance markets (see commodity markets for an example of how that could be structured), morbidity calculations, actuarial professions, use of insurance for portfolio management (very common as a tax planning instrument), etc., etc., etc., etc. ---- This page needs work. There's a lot more to be said about insurance. Also, the "abuses" section needs to be rewritten for NPOV. -- User:Cjmnyc 07:48, 31 Jul 2003 (UTC) ---- Insurance is a complex and remarkably interesting subject. Someone smarter than I needs to work on this one. I have been doing some work on List of civic, fraternal, service, and professional organizations American Fraternal Groups and note the large number of modern insurance companies who evolved from such groups. User: PaulinSaudi == what about insurance brokers? == such as Marsh&McLennan and Aon? == Lack of Knowledge of Policyholders == I removed the portion of this that mentioned poorer policyholders not understaing the fees in insurance documents. I suppose I felt uncomfortable connecting lack of financial resources with lack of intellectual ability. I feel this section needs more work, as does the rest of the article - I plan on adding to the introductory section, perhaps including concepts such as insurable interest, insurability, underwriting etc. Perhaps contrasting insurance with gambling (as is done on the gambling page). --User:Socs 09:30, 16 Jun 2004 (UTC) ==Removed paragraph== Removed this paragraph: it is rambling, non-insurance-specific, and has no important point to make. User:Smyth">User:Smyth|– User:Smyth 00:06, 30 Oct 2004 (UTC) :Large organizations have a much harder time managing money than individuals. While large organizations have more clout and are better and negotiating contracts, they lack the ability to micromanage their money. This has to do with scale. To a multi-billion dollar company a million dollars is an accounting blip, but to most people it is enough money to retire. As a result the organization sets the prices for policies and services at some level and acts as a monopoly. Without freemarket competition their is an incentive to increase prices. The other paragraph added by the same anon is nearly as bad, very POV and very little information. I'll remove it for now and we can refactor it and put it back in. - User:Taxman 18:06, Nov 8, 2004 (UTC) :'Law of Diminishing Returns' :Insurance is based on the idea of managing risk, but what happens when everyone cashes in their policy. The net result is that insurance becomes a tax. Also insurers can deny policies based of preexisiting conditions and can limit the coverage of insurance. When combined with high premiums, what is the point of having insurance? It would be better to take the money spent on insurance and invest it. That way the policy holder will have control over how the money is spent. The only problem is accumulating enough money to make the system self sustainable. This is a chicken egg problem. == Lack of Marine Insurance & Air Cargo Insurance == Lack of Marine Insurance and Air Cargo Insurance. Need any expert from Insurance Business to input. ==Added== Added statistics and an external link. User:Johnwhunt 00:06, 22 Mar 2005 (UTC) ==Rework agenda== *Taxman suggested developing salvage plans for this article. While many groan at the notion of committees, they do share one drawback in common with democracy: being the worst possible choice, except the rest. In any case, anyone is welcome to add to, or amend, the 'agenda' items below. The agenda will simply draw from the above suggestions for now, but perhaps will be prioritized later; meanwhile, another go at reworking the article... User:Ombudsman 03:25, 16 Jun 2005 (UTC) {| border=1 cellpadding=1 cellspacing=0 |- | objective summary | date proposed | progress to date | completion date? |- style="background: lightblue;" ! lightspeedy tasks: prompt attention needed | | | |- | | | | |- | | | | |- | | | | |- | ~ | ~ | ~ | ~ |- | ~ | ~ | ~ | ~ |- style="background: lightgreen;" ! main proposal sounding board | | | |- | separate Insurance ethics article needed | 3 Nov 2003 | ~ | ~ |- | separate US health insurance article? | 1 Oct 2004 | ~ | ~ |- | develop & expand Policy article | 16 Jun 2005 | ~ | ~ |- | need expert: Marine insurance, Air cargo insurance | 11 Jan 2005 | ~ | ~ |- | ins. market fundamentals: Moral hazard, Information assymetry, Adverse selection, techniques to avoid such risks | 1 Oct 2004 | ~ | ~ |- | content addressing Insurable interest, Insurability, Underwriting, etc. | 16 Jun 2004 | ~ | ~ |- | what about Insurance broker? | 2 Jun 2004 | added brief mention of Marsh 6/15/05 | ~ |- | US Friendly society, history | 12 Dec 2003 | ~ | ~ |- | Reinsurance market, & its structure | ~ | ~ | ~ |- | Morbidity calculation & Actuary | 23 Jan 2003 | ~ | ~ |- | insurer (insured?) Portfolio management | 23 Jan 2003 | ~ | ~ |- | address: complexities of Contract, fees; insured's misunderstanding | 16 Jun 2004 | ~ | ~ |- | Risk spreading, Risk pool | ~ | ~ | ~ |- | insurer portfolio Administrative incompetence and/or separate Portfolio mis-management article | ~ | ~ | ~ |- | effects of September 11, 2001 attack; Put option & Call option on 9/11 | 16 Jun 2005 | ~ | ~ |- | | | | |- | | | | |- | ~ | ~ | ~ | ~ |- | ~ | ~ | ~ | ~ |- style="background: orange;" ! touchy feelings: NPOV or Pavlov needed? | | | |- | input from Economist, Marketing | 1 Oct 2004 | ~ | ~ |- | private health insurance available in countries with Publicly funded medicine | 3 Nov 2003 | ~ | ~ |- | | | | |- | | | | |- | | | | |- | ~ | ~ | ~ | ~ |- | ~ | ~ | ~ | ~ |- style="background: pink;" ! fuzzy-logic: content gutwrenchers | | | |- | Start Insurance Wikiproject? pinned (please do not remove) | 16 Jun 2005 | ~ | ~ |- | what should top level sections be? (pinned - please do not remove) | 16 Jun 2005 | ~ | ~ |- | which topics need separate sections? (pinned) | 16 Jun 2005 | ~ | ~ |- | insurers manage risk, but profit (unfairly?) when policies cashed in early | ~ | ~ | ~ |- | private health insurance less common outside US; deserves less space? | 23 Jan 2003 | ~ | ~ |- | | | | |- | | | | |- | | | | |- | | | | |- | ~ | ~ | ~ | ~ |- | ~ | ~ | ~ | ~ |} ===agenda discussion=== Ok, most of that looks pretty good. I was looking for more of a simple text outline, but this works too. I didn't want to comment in the table, but what do you mean by "fuzzy-logic gutwrenchers" and "touchy feelings:". I don't know if you're going to get much of a committee, you might be it. Also I think we should flesh out the material in the article sections, and make fixing up a lead section to the last thing. First, maybe we should decide what topics need their own sections, what are the top level sections, etc. - User:Taxman User talk:Taxman 14:43, Jun 16, 2005 (UTC) *Unlike Insurance contract, agenda section titles need brevity, without the complexities that disengage them from a mere mortal's sensory realities. The blue and green agenda sections address absolute, straightforward content issues that can be handled in a relatively objective manner; sky is blue, green light kinda stuff. Encyclopedic content, by definition, is extruded through deductive, algorithmic superficial processes, perhaps filtered in the upper agenda sections; moderation of subsurface POV issues and political compass matters can be addressed in the lower sections. The laws of organizational entropy ensure the influence of absolutist objectivity may well consolidate issues in the upper section, finding enhancement through the ministrations of small tent, blue sky expert worship minions (see Post Autistic Economics). The orange and soft rose sections deal with relative, absolutely subjective matters; 'shortest path isn't a straight line', 'Danger, Will Robinson', 'rose colored glasses' sorta stuff. Discussion of relatively subjective issues will find sanctuary in the wilderness of this talk page, perhaps protected in the lower sections, where Non-Aristotelian logic laws, obeyed by Church of the Holy Donut congregants and their ilk, govern survival of the fittest beyond the tent shielding whatever it is the prevailing paradigm happens to be. The committee idea may seem over the top for the moment, but this aspect of the agenda is intentionally open-ended, as a Wikipedia:WikiProject Insurance is anticipated; the Wiki will be around long term, yes? User:Ombudsman 19:17, 16 Jun 2005 (UTC)

Insurance



Business Financial services Risk Security Service industries


See other meanings of words starting from letter:

I

IA | IB | IC | ID | IE | IF | IG | IH | IJ | IK | IL | IM | IN | IO | IP | IR | IS | IT | IU | IW | IX | IY | IZ |

Words begining with Insurance:

Insurance
Insurance
Insurance
Insurance_agent
Insurance_companies
Insurance_Companies_of_Canada
Insurance_companies_of_France
Insurance_companies_of_Germany
Insurance_companies_of_Hong_Kong
Insurance_companies_of_Switzerland
Insurance_companies_of_the_Netherlands
Insurance_companies_of_the_People's_Republic_of_China
Insurance_companies_of_the_United_Kingdom
Insurance_companies_of_the_United_States
Insurance_company
Insurance_contract
Insurance_Corporation_of_British_Columbia
Insurance_fraud
Insurance_group
Insurance_Institute_for_Highway_Safety
Insurance_of_terrorism
Insurance_policies
Insurance_policy
Insurance_premium


These materials are based on Wikipedia and licensed under the GNU FDL



YouTube.com videos better site than Turbo Tax 2007
encyklopedia online