High Frequency Active Auroral Research Program

[[Image:HAARP site.jpg|right|thumb|333px|Aerial view of HAARP site, looking towards Mt. Sanford, in the Wrangell-St. Elias National Park[http://www.haarp.alaska.edu/haarp/ohd.html]. (''Image from HAARP used in accordance with terms.'')]] The High Frequency Active Auroral Research Program (HAARP) is a US Air Force, US Navy and University of Alaska funded investigation to "understand, simulate and control ionosphere processes that might alter the performance of communication and surveillance systems" started in 1993 for a proposed twenty year series of experiments. It is similar to numerous existing ionospheric heaters around the world, and has a large suite of diagnostic instruments that facilitate its use to increase scientific understanding of ionospheric dynamics. Some controversy surrounds HAARP, many have expressed fears of it being used as a nefarious weapon. Most scientists involved in aeronomy, space science, or plasma physics dismiss these fears as unfounded. ==The HAARP Site== The program site is near Gakona, Alaska (lat. 62.39� N, long 145.15� W), just West of the Wrangell-Saint Elias National Park. An environmental impact statement led to permission for an array of up to 180 antennas to be erected. HAARP has been constructed at the previous site of an over the horizon radar (OTH). A large structure, built to house the OTH now houses the HAARP control room, kitchen, and offices. Several other small structures house various instruments. The Ionospheric Research Instrument (IRI) is the primary instrument at HAARP: a high-frequency (HF) transmitter system used to temporarily modify the ionosphere. Such modification is quickly overwhelmed by natural ionospheric processes once the transmitter is turned off. Study of this modified volume yields important information for understanding natural ionospheric processes.

During active ionospheric research, the signal generated by the transmitter system is delivered to the antenna array, transmitted in an upward direction, and is partially absorbed, at an altitude between 100 to 350 km (depending on operating frequency), in a small volume a few hundred meters thick and a few tens of kilometers in diameter over the site. The intensity of the HF signal in the ionosphere is less than 3 microwatts per cm², tens of thousands of times less than the Sun's natural electromagnetic radiation reaching the earth and hundreds of times less than even the normal random variations in intensity of the Sun's natural ultraviolet (UV) energy which creates the ionosphere. The small effects that are produced, however, can be observed with the sensitive scientific instruments installed at the HAARP facility and these observations can provide new information about the dynamics of plasmas and new insight into the processes of solar-terrestrial interactions. [http://www.haarp.alaska.edu/haarp/tech.html]

The HAARP site has been constructed [http://www.haarp.alaska.edu/haarp/phases.html in three distinct phases]. The Developmental Prototype (DP) had 18 antenna elements, organized in three columns by six rows. It was fed with a total of 360 kilowatts (KW) combined transmiter output power. The DP transmitted just enough power for the most basic of ionospheric testing. The Filled Developmental Prototype (FDP) had 48 antenna units arrayed in six columns by eight rows, with 960 KW of transmitter power. It was fairly comparable to other ionospheric heating facilities. This was used for a number of successful scientific experiments and ionospheric exploration campaigns over the years. The Final IRI (FIRI) will be the final build of the IRI. It has 180 antenna units, organized in 15 columns by 12 rows, yielding a theoretical maximum gain of 31 dB. A total of 3600 KW (3.6 MW) of transmitter power will feed it. The total Effective radiated power (ERP) will be 3,981 MW (96 dBW). As of the summer of 2005, all the antennas were in place, but the final quota of transmitters had not yet been installed. Each antenna element[http://www.haarp.alaska.edu/haarp/ant3.html][http://www.haarp.alaska.edu/haarp/ant2.html] consists of a crossed dipole that can be polarized for linear, ordinary mode (O-mode), or extraordinary mode (X-mode) transmission and reception. Each part of the two section crossed dipoles are individually fed from a custom built transmitter, that has been specially designed with very low distortion. The ERP of the IRI is limited by more than a factor of 10 at its lower operating frequencies. Much of this is due to higher antenna losses and a less efficient antenna pattern. HAARP can transmit between 2.8 and 10 MHz. This frequency range lies above the AM radio broadcast band and well below Citizens' Band frequency allocations. HAARP is only licensed to transmit in certain segments of this frequency range, however. When the IRI is transmitting, the bandwidth of the transmitted signal is 100 kHz or less. The IRI can transmit continuously (CW) or pulses as short as 100 microseconds (μs). CW transmission is generally used for ionospheric modification, while short pulses are frequently repeated, and the IRI is used as a radar system. Researchers can run experiments that use both modes of transmission, modifying the ionosphere for a predetermined amount of time, then measuring the decay of modification effects with pulsed transmissions. ===Ionospheric Heating Facilities=== [[Image:HAARP comparison.gif|right|frame|[http://www.haarp.alaska.edu/haarp/fcomp.html Comparison of HAARP with other ionospheric facilities] (''From the HAARP website, public use permitted if source cited'')]] The HAARP IRI is an ionospheric heater, one of many around the world. It is comparable in function and power to most of them. ==== Platteville ==== One of the earliest ionospheric heating facilities was at Platteville, Colorado, capable of radiating about 100 MW ERP. Early experiments included HF heater induced air-glow, heater-induced spread F, wide band heater-induced absorption, and heater-created field-aligned ionization. The Platteville heater operated from 1968 - 1984. ==== Current Facilities ==== The United States has three ionospheric heating facilities: HAARP, HIPAS, near Fairbanks, Alaska, and (currently offline for modifications) one at the Arecibo Observatory in Puerto Rico. The [http://www.eiscat.se/about.html European Incoherent Scatter] Scientific Association (EISCAT) operates an ionospheric heating facility, capable of transmitting over 1 GW [http://www.kurasc.kyoto-u.ac.jp/s-ramp/abstract/s19.txt] (10,000,000,000 Watts) effective radiated power (ERP), near Troms� in Norway. Russia has the Sura ionospheric heating facility, near Nizhniy Novgorod, capable of transmitting 300 MW ERP. === Diagnostic Instrumentation === ==== VHF Radar ==== ==== UHF Radar ==== ==== Digisonde ==== A ionospheric sounding provides ionospheric profiles, allowing scientists to choose appropriate frequencies for IRI operation. HAARP makes current and historic digisonde information available online. *[http://137.229.36.56/ Digisonde home page] ==== HF Receivers ==== ==== Fluxgate Magnetometer ==== A fluxgate magnetometer, built by the University of Alaska, Geophysical Institute is available to chart variations in the earth's magnetic field. Rapid and sharp changes may indicate a geomagnetic storm. *[http://137.229.36.30/cgi-bin/magnetometer/gak-mag.cgi Current and archived magnetometer data] ==== Induction Magnetometer ==== An induction magnetometer, provided by the University of Tokyo, measures the changing geomagnetic field in the ULF (Ultra low frequency) range of 0-5 Hz. *[http://137.229.36.30/cgi-bin/scmag/disp-scmag.cgi Induction Magnetometer data page] *[http://www.haarp.alaska.edu/haarp/magind.html Induction Magentometer description page] == Research at HAARP == === Ionospheric Heating === ==== Plasma Line Observations ==== ==== Stimulated Electron Emission Observations ==== ==== Gyro-frequency Heating Research ==== ==== Spread F Observations ==== ==== Airglow Observations ==== ==== Heating Induced Scintillation Observations ==== ==== VLF and ELF Generation Observations ==== === Radio Observations of Meteors === === Polar Mesospheric Summer Echos === Polar Mesospheric Summer Echos (PMSE) have been studied using the IRI as a powerful radar, as well as with the 28 MHz radar, and the two VHF radars at 49 MHz and 139 MHz. The presence of multiple radars spanning both HF and VHF bands allows scientists to make comparative measurements that may someday lead to an understanding of the processes that form these elusive phenomenon. ==Stated Objectives== The HAARP project aims to direct a 3.6 megawatt signal, in the 2.8-10 MHz region of the HF band, into the ionosphere. The signal may be pulsed or continuous wave. Then effects of the transmission and any recovery period will be examined associated instrumentation, including VHF and UHF radars, HF receivers, and optical cameras. According to the HAARP team, this will advance the study of basic natural processes that occur in the ionosphere under the natural but much stronger influence of solar interaction, as well as how the natural ionosphere affects radio signals. This will enable scientists to develop techniques to mitigate these effects in order to improve the reliability and/or performance of communication and navigation systems, which would have a wide range of applications in both the civilian and military sectors. The project is funded by the Office of Naval Research and jointly managed by the ONR and Air Force Research Laboratory, with the principal involvement of the University of Alaska. Fourteen other universities and educational institutions have been involved in the development of the project and its instruments, namely the University of Alaska, Penn State University (ARL), Boston College, UCLA, Clemson University, Dartmouth College, Cornell University, Johns Hopkins University, University of Maryland, College Park, University of Massachusetts, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Polytechnic University, Stanford University, and the University of Tulsa. The project's specifications were developed by the universities, which are continuing to play a major role in the design of future research efforts. There is both military and commercial interest in its outcome, as many communications and navigation systems depend on signals being reflected from the ionosphere or passing through the ionosphere to satellites. The HAARP project offers annual open days to permit the general public to visit the facility, and makes a public virtue of openness; according to the team, "there are no classified documents pertaining to HAARP." Each summer, HAARP holds a summer-school for visiting students, giving them an opportunity to do research with one of the world's foremost research instruments. ==HAARP Controversy== Numerous parties have found reasons to suspect that HAARP is more than the government claims it to be. Various theories draw on brain-waves, Nikolai Tesla, confusion of the ionosphere with the neutral atmosphere, and over-stated claims of HAARP supporters. Many of the concerns about HAARP have been presented so as to be dismissed as "conspiracy theories" by some, while seen as proof of nefarious governmental plotting by others. === HAARP's Detractors === ====Waste==== The most frequently ignored criticism of HAARP is that it is expensive. The cost of building HAARP has exceeded the cost dollar-adjusted cost of similar facilities around the world. HAARP was constructed at the site of an obsoleted over-the-horizon radar facility for political reasons, but its location was less than ideal from a scientific perspective. Some believe that it was constructed as a pork barrel project for Alaska by Senator Ted Stevens. ====Weapon==== The objectives of the HAARP project became the subject of controversy in the mid-1990s, following claims that the antennas could be used as a weapon. A small group of American physicists aired complaints in scientific journals such as ''Physics and Society'', charging that HAARP could be seeking ways to blow other countries' spacecraft out of the sky or disrupt communications over large portions of the planet. The physicist critics of HAARP have had little complaint about the project's current stage, but have expressed fears that it could in future be expanded into an experimental weapon. These concerns were amplified by Bernard Eastlund, a physicist who developed some of the concepts behind HAARP in the 1980s and proposed using high-frequency radio waves to beam large amounts of power into the ionosphere, energizing its electrons and ions in order to disable incoming missiles and knock out enemy satellite communications. The US military became interested in the idea as an alternative to the laser-based Strategic Defense Initiative. However, Eastlund's ideas were eventually dropped as SDI itself mutated into the more limited National Missile Defense of today. The contractors selected to build HAARP have denied that any of Eastlund's patents were used in the development of the project. After the physicists raised early concerns, the controversy was stoked by local activism. In September 1995, a book entitled ''Angels Don't Play This HAARP: Advances in Tesla Technology'' was written by a resident of Eagle River, Alaska, claiming that the project ''in its present stage'' could be used for "geophysical warfare". HAARP has subsequently become a target for those who have suggested that it could be used to test the ability "to deliver very large amount of energy, comparable to a nuclear bomb, anywhere on earth", "changing weather patterns", "blocking all global communications", "disrupting human mental processes" and mind control, communicating with submarines, and "x-raying the earth". Many of these statements are backed up by known information about the effects of electromagnetic radiation on human and animal biology. For instance, on the issue of disrupting human mental processes, in the early 1960's, Dr. Andrija Puharich discovered various mental effects of ELF, specifically that 7.83 Hz made a person feel good, producing an altered-state; that 10.80 Hz caused riotous behavior; and that 6.6 Hz caused depression. The mental-disruption possibilities for HAARP are the most disturbing. On the issue of its capacity to deliver nuclear bomb type electromagnetic "snaps" wherever desired, the U.S. military says on the record that the HAARP system could give the military a tool to replace the electromagnetic pulse effect of atmospheric thermonuclear devices (still considered a viable option by the military through at least 1986). As for the issue of geophysical warfare, this is well documented as well. Air Force documents revealed that a system had been developed for manipulating and disturbing human mental processes through pulsed radio-frequency radiation over large geographical areas. The most telling material about this technology came from writings of Zbigniew Brzezinski (former National Security Advisory to U.S. President Carter) and J.F. MacDonald (science advisor to U.S. President Johnson and a professor of Geophysics at UCLA), as they wrote about use of power-beaming transmitters for geophysical and environmental warfare. The documents showed how these effects might be caused, and the negative effects on human heath and thinking. \"An Eco-Type of Terrorism,\" Says U.S. Secretary of Defense In April 1997, the then U.S. Secretary of Defense William Cohen publicly discussed the dangers of HAARP-like technology, saying "[o]thers are engaging even in an ''eco-type of terrorism'' whereby they can alter the climate, set off earthquakes, volcanoes remotely through the use of electromagnetic waves... So there are plenty of ingenious minds out there that are at work finding ways in which they can wreak terror upon other nations... It's real, and that's the reason why we have to intensify our efforts." This quote derives from an April 1997 counterterrorism conference sponsored by former Senator Sam Nunn, quoted from "DoD News Briefing, Secretary of Defense William S. Cohen, Q&A at the Conference on Terrorism, Weapons of Mass Destruction, and U.S. Strategy," held at the University of Georgia-Athens, Apr. 28, 1997. In short the Secretary of Defense of the United States confirmed that there are indeed novel kinds of EM weapons right now and have been in existence for some time, which have been and are being used to (1) initiate earthquakes, (2) engineer the weather and climate, and (3) initiate the eruption of volcanoes. In October 2001, United States House of Representatives bill HR2977 was introduced by Ohio Rep. Dennis Kucinich. It called for the peaceful uses of space, and a ban on 'exotic weapons'. Section 7 of his 'Space Preservation Act of 2001' sought specifically to prohibit 'chemtrails', 'HAARP' and 'planet threatening weapons' by name. Kucinich even recently told the inside scoop on why his bill was yanked out of circulation. The removal of his bill was under pressure, according to Kucinich. He told the ''Columbus Alive'' newspaper (Jan. 24, 2002) that despite official denials, as head of the Armed Services oversight committee he is well acquainted with chemtrail and HAARP projects. "The truth is there's an entire program in the Dept. of Defense - 'Vision for 2020' - that's developing these weapons," Kucinich told reporter Bob Fitrakis. ====Wardenclyffe ==== Some have claimed that the HAARP facility may be similar in operation to the Wardenclyffe Tower, developed by Nikola Tesla as a communications facility. Though never completed successfully in Tesla's lifetime due to lack of funding, and finally dismantled for scrap during wartime, people who draw parallels between HAARP and Wardenclyffe contend that its principles are currently being implemented by the HAARP project. While Tesla's tower was to be his supreme test of the applicability of transmitted power, HAARP is being used to study ionospheric effects on radio communication. Wardenclyffe also provides a basis for a current search for practical applications for focused wave and particle beams, such as the laser and maser, which according to some could have allowed wireless transceiving to any distance with negligible loss due to radiation. Tesla claimed that the Wardenclyffe tower could have produced explosive releases of energy, transmitting weaponized impulses of electromagnetic energy. The likelihood of this working was, however, never satisfactorily established, and at the time Tesla was in outright rivalry with Thomas Edison and both were making rather extreme claims. ====Russians==== In August 2002, further support for those critical of HAARP technology came from the State Duma (parliament) of Russia. The Duma published a critical report on HAARP written by the international affairs and defense committees, signed by 90 deputies and presented to President Vladimir Putin. The report claimed that "the U.S. is creating new integral geophysical weapons that may influence the near-Earth medium with high-frequency radio waves ... The significance of this qualitative leap could be compared to the transition from cold steel to fire arms, or from conventional weapons to nuclear weapons. This new type of weapons differs from previous types in that the near-Earth medium becomes at once an object of direct influence and its component." However, given the timing of the Russian intervention, it is likely that it was related to a controversy at the time concerning the US withdrawal in June 2002 from the Russian-American Anti-Ballistic Missile Treaty. This high level concern is paralled in the April 1997 statement by the U.S. Secretary of Defense over the power of such electromagnetic weaponry. ===HAARP's Defenders=== The critics' views have been rejected by HAARP's defenders, who have pointed out that the amount of energy at the project's disposal is minuscule compared to the colossal energies dumped into the atmosphere by solar radiation and thunderstorms. A University of Alaska, Geophysical Institute scientist has compared HAARP to an "immersion heater in the Yukon River." It would also be unable to effect any long-lasting changes; as the ionosphere is inherently a chaotically turbulent region, any artificially induced changes would be "swept clean" within seconds or minutes at the most. Ionospheric heating experiments performed at the Arecibo Observatory's ionospheric heater and incoherent scatter radar have shown that no matter how long the ionosphere is modified, it returns to normal within the same period of time - in the absence of sunlight. Ionospheric heating cannot be performed while the sun illuminates the ionosphere for two reasons: * Solar UV creates the ionospheric D-region, which absorbs the radio waves used for ionospheric heating. * The solar flux overwhelms any effect of ionospheric heating. (needs to be verified User:JohnElder 01:50, 13 Jun 2005 (UTC)) HAARP's supporters also point to the lack of serious scientific evidence to support some of the more exotic claims being made about HAARP, such as the conjecture that the system caused the 2003 North America blackout or earthquakes. Most scientists reject the extreme criticism of HAARP as "utter nonsense," especially aeronomers and space-physicists who have a solid understanding of the accusations levelled at HAARP. Books, such as ''Angel's don't Play this HAARP'', are often circulated and ridiculed in private. The scientific community puts forth little or no effort to defend HAARP, because they perceive those who attack HAARP as lacking sufficient understanding of science to criticize HAARP competently. ==See also== *Plasma Physics *Ionosphere *Ionospheric heater *High Frequency - HF *Very Low Frequency - VLF *Ultra low frequency - ULF *Extremely Low Frequency - ELF *Platteville Atmospheric Observatory *Arecibo Observatory *EISCAT *HIPAS *Sura Ionospheric Heating Facility *William E. Gordon *ionospheric sounding *Magnetometer *Nikola Tesla *Teleforce *Environmentalism *Conspiracy theories * Do not confuse with Project HARP ==External links== * [http://www.haarp.alaska.edu/ High Frequency Active Auroral Research Program]. US Air Force, US Navy, and University of Alaska. * [http://www.haarp.alaska.edu/haarp/elfindex.html ELF Generation Using HAARP]. * [http://www.haarp.alaska.edu/haarp/cam.fcgi HAARP Cam] - live daylight pictures of the HAARP antenna array. * [http://www.eiscat.se/heating/ EISCAT's Ionospheric Heating Facility] * [http://www.ngdc.noaa.gov/stp/IONO/Dynasonde/SpEatHeating.htm Ionospheric Heating Experiment] * [http://www-star.stanford.edu/~vlf/HAARP/ Impact of HAARP on VLF signals] - a 2% effect. * [http://www.eiscat.uit.no/heating/abs7.html Early Ionospheric Modification Work at Arecibo] * [http://grison.colorado.edu/pao-lower/History/history_references.html Platteville Heating Experiments] * [http://www.haarp.alaska.edu/haarp/imref.html References on Ionospheric Interaction] * [http://www-star.stanford.edu/~vlf/pars/pars.htm Polar Aeronomy and Radio Science (PARS)] - ULF/ELF/VLF PROJECT * [http://www.bariumblues.com/haarp_executive_summary.htm HAARP Executive Summary] * Personal website of [http://jerryesmith.com/ Jerry E. Smith] author of ''HAARP: The Ultimate Weapon of the Conspiracy'' (Adventures Unlimited Press, 1998). *[http://www-star.stanford.edu/~vlf/Science/Science.html VLF Tutorial] Stanford University * [http://portland.indymedia.org/en/2004/12/305741.shtml] "HAARP Tremors Rock Earth Deep Beneath San Andreas Fault," ''Portland IMC'' * [http://portland.indymedia.org/en/2005/01/307309.shtml] "Scalar Electromagnetics: The Secret 20th Century Parallel Technological Path." ''Portland IMC''. The article is an assemblage of mostly information by scalar electromagnetics scientist Tom Bearden. * [http://publish.portland.indymedia.org/en/2005/01/308464.shtml] or [http://www.indybay.org/news/2005/06/1745064.php] 51 minute documentary, "HAARP: Holes in Heaven". The documentary features the authors who wrote the book ''Angels Don't Play this HAARP: Advances in Tesla Technology,'' and interviews biologists, ecologists, and HAARP technologists directly associated with the project and its patents. ---- Plasma physics Space plasmas Atmosphere Conspiracy theories

High Frequency Active Auroral Research Program

== Tesla claim == Moved from the article: : Some have pointed out that the constructed towers are similar in appearance to the Wardenclyffe Tower of Nikola Tesla, another favourite topic of the conspiracy theories, one that is particularly interesting considering they don't look even remotely like the Wardenclyffe Tower. Who makes the claim? Also, this is very awkwardly written. Please rephrase and provide a citation.User:Eloquence 13:53, Mar 14, 2004 (UTC) : 1st, I readdedx it ... : Who makes the claim? Several ppl have ... it's common in some "fringe" text about harp ... do a google search over it, you can find it (If you look into Wardenclyffe Tower, you'd know this) ... : Awkwardly written? rewrite it ... but don't remove the information. : Rephrase? I'll try that ... : Provide a citation? I'll look into it ... but it's not necessary. : User:Reddi Guys, I have to remove this again. Wardenclyffe was a single tower that looked like an oversized iron mushroom. IRI looks like a series of "normal" radio antennas that you might see anywhere. They look NOTHING WHATSOEVER ALIKE. The only linkage is in the minds of the theorists, who apparently are unable to play that game from Seasame Street, "which of these things is not like the other". User:Maury Markowitz 23:36, 21 Mar 2004 (UTC) : Appearantly you ''do not'' understand the operations of Wardenclyffe. : The appearance is different. The principles of each have common facets. : Readded. : User:Reddi Remove again, for the reasons explained in my note on your personal page, and above. If you wish to retain it, we'll need something more than name-calling. User:Maury Markowitz 12:42, 29 Mar 2004 (UTC) : Look up Nikola Tesla and his research on the Iononsphere. User:Reddi == Renamed from HAARP == Renamed article from HAARP due to Wikipedia no-abbreviation naming policy. Redirection entries in place. (User:SEWilco 04:56, 14 Mar 2005 (UTC)) ==NPOV== Way, way too much of this article is devoted to the conspiracy theory and very little to the actual science behind HAARP. Please balance this out. User:Goferwiki 12:57, 26 Apr 2005 (UTC) :You're an editor too. Be bold. Cheers, -User:Willmcw 05:01, Apr 28, 2005 (UTC) == Removed Erroneous Material ==

It even gave the frequency ranges where these effects could occur -- the same ranges which HAARP is capable of broadcasting.

HAARP is not capable of broadcasting at a frequency lower than 2.8 MHz - see the specifications at the [http://www.haarp.alaska.edu/haarp/trans.html HAARP Transmitter Page]. While it can cause ELF waves to occur, it does not - it cannot - actually broadcast them. VLF and ELF can only be produced by transmitting two different frequencies from sections of the HAARP array, separated by the desired frequency. The combination of these two beams in the ionosphere produces VLF or ELF waves in the pico-Tesla range, much weaker than the 3.6 MW signal transmitted from HAARP.

More than 40 pages of the book by Jeane Manning and Dr. Nick Badich cites dozens of footnotes, chronicling the work of Harvard professors, military planners and scientists as they plan and test this use of the electromagnetic technology. For example, one of the papers describing this use was from the International Red Cross in Geneva.

There is no book by Jeane Manning and Dr. Nick Badich.

"X-raying the earth" is done already through electromagnetic wave scanning technology, in oil prospecting for instance. The technique is to pump very low watt and low frequency waves deep into the crust. Different materials innately have different reflection frequencies. It is just that simple to locate oil deposits in this way, by what particular reverberations are given off. Turning this technique into a weapon is just as easy as pumping up the watts at a particular identified reverberative location, whether it is an oil field--or an earthquake fault line. If this is found disbelievable, then you have some catching up to do. Let's go back to 1997.

This paragraph is full of confused jargon, and does not clearly specify anything. The author confuses "[''sic''] watts" with power as well as x-rays and ground penetrating radar. The claim that "turning up the watts at a particular identified reverberative location" will make HAARP into a weapon is neither good English nor good science. Before these outrageous claims are included, they need to be substantiated by quality science that demonstrates specific instances of RF radiation causing earthquakes. The language of "If this is found disbelievable, then you have some catching up to do," has no place on on Wikipedia.

HAARP's gainsaying defenders however have been in turn rejected by an originator of the HAARP technology patents, Bernard Eastlund, who says that such comments totally ignore the issue of pulsing technology capacity that has been installed after his tenure was closed there--which can be at a factor of many times greater intensity.

Eastlund is not a defender of HAARP, so this does not belong in the defenders of HAARP section.

Trull, D., "''[http://www.parascope.com/en/0996/tesla6.htm Tesla: The Electric Magician], Chapter 6, The Forgotten Genius''". Enigma Editor, parascope.com.

This is not source material, nor is it relevant to HAARP itself. The link should be on a Tesla page. (6-14-05) * User:JohnElder 00:08, 15 Jun 2005 (UTC) == Objection to John Elder's Edits == First, there is indeed a book by these two authors. Angels Don't Play This haarp: Advances in Tesla Technology by Nick Begich, Jeane Manning. So your valiant claim to remove "erroneous" information actually was instead introducing erroneous information and intentionally misleading. Why? Second, as for your other claim that "this paragraph is full of confused jargon," well that is merely John's opinion as well. Besides this information and its verbiage was taken ''directly'' from an interview with an oil prospector describing his industry's techniques so John is mistaken. John should do more research before promoting his opinions about what is "erroneous" or not. Sad, really. To JohnElder: Please stop removing content from Wikipedia. It is considered vandalism. Your talk comments have added nonsense as well. If you want to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you continue to vandalize pages, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Thank you. --User:ReSearcher 20:29, 9 Jun 2005 (UTC) ---- : I had no intent to mislead, and I don't believe I did. There is no book by Nick Badich, as the original author claimed. ''Angels don't Play this HAARP'' is indeed a real book. Sloppy writing and sloppy thinking do not belong on Wikipedia. : I have done plenty of research. I know a bit about both seismic techniques and the use of Ground Penetrating Radar for exploring the stratigraphy of an area. I also know the difference between "Watts" and "Power (physics)." And I know that x-raying the earth is utter nonsense. Just the phrase "reverberative location" demonstrates that the author cannot adequately describe the oil exploration process. If the paragraph was based on an interview with somebody, then making a transcript of the relevant part of the interview into a page of supporting documentation would be useful - as well as naming the people involved in the interview, their credentials, the date, and the place. : Get used to the editing, though. I didn't stop because the text was correct - I stopped because I needed to rest a bit. The HAARP page will be a quality page that describes the facility, the resources there, the work done, and references the controversies about it. I believe that there should be a separate page for all the HAARP conspiracy theories - especially the more speculative ones - the ones that talk about possible HAARP effects if it were much larger. As the page grows to better reflect the capabilities of HAARP, size alone will become an argument for relocating conspiracy theories. : Removing erroneous content is not vandalism. If I were a vandal, I would simply delete it instead of moving it to the talk page and explaining why it does not belong on the oringal WP page. :* User:JohnElder 20:53, 9 Jun 2005 (UTC) ==Well, I welcome JohnElder then, until...== Welcome then. However, you have brushed over the fact that you did remove information, regardless of what you say. The perfect alibi for maintaining vandalism is a claim of "correcting erroneous information". Plus, you write with a real chip on your shoulder. And you claim to have total knowledge of HAARP and its project? Really, John! That's quite a big ego you have there: it's an impossibilty for a civilian to have such knowledge when the project has top secret connections, and when patent holder of much of the HAARP motifs, Bernard Eastlund, himself has said the technology there has now a pulsing capacity. Blithe dogmatic comments are very unfortunate when we are all picking our way here with a touchy subject. Your comments are not a sign of rationality or capacity for self-reflection in my opinion or a sign of capacity for weighing the issue of incomplete information in this case, where we all have limited information. However, that being said, with baited breath (or biting toungue) I do welcome you and I look forward to reading other's chipping in on the topic, and not chipping out from it without tenable explanations. --User:ReSearcher 21:12, 9 Jun 2005 (UTC) * Some of us have less limited information than others. Ego size and capacity for self-reflection have little to do with scientific accuracy. Even civilians can learn enough about radio science to evaluate whether or not some of the more spectacular claims about the weaponization of HAARP have any basis in reality. If you think the information I removed should be re-inserted, correct the problems and put it back! As I said above, it's not vandalism, it's editing. ::User:JohnElder 22:46, 14 Jun 2005 (UTC) I think this problem can be solved this way: there sould be the factual sections about HAARP ( and John Elder has done a great job of addressing this, I am back on the job now too) and a conspiracy theory section on HAARP. That will balance out the articles. I am workin' on something in the sandbox, when it is presentable, I will post it. User:Goferwiki 09:16, 16 Jun 2005 (UTC) ::Also per "ReSearcher"'s remarks: none of us have all the info about HAARP. What we do have is the offical line plus the science. The offical line can be discussed on another page. I think it our duty on wiki to present the facts "as we know them" because this is an encylopedia. Furthermore, based on principals of physics "as we know those to date" it is safe to discredit some of the claims. However I think the otherside can have its day in court, just on another page and not on the HAARP one. This article is very near being balanced enought to remove the NPOV.User:Goferwiki 10:43, 16 Jun 2005 (UTC) == Reverted Graph Sizing == Place a thumbnail for the photos - that's OK. But the graph is tough to read (at least for me) when resized to 375 px. Please leave it full-sized for those of us with older eyes. User:JohnElder 00:32, 23 Jun 2005 (UTC)

See other meanings of words starting from letter:

H

HA | HB | HC | HD | HE | HF | HG | HI | HJ | HK | HL | HM | HN | HO | HP | HR | HS | HT | HU | HW | HX | HY | HZ |

Words begining with High_Frequency_Active_Auroral_Research_Program:

High_Frequency_Active_Auroral_Research_Program
High_Frequency_Active_Auroral_Research_Program