----
Member since sept 2002.
*wikipedia is VERY free: someone that censors is more wrong than someone thats trying to say something. For those of you that are not too enlightened, i suggest you thoroughly think about my statement.
In other words, I am the original author. I'll see what I can do about Wikification.
Hi Hfastedge,
I'm glad that's cleared up. I'm leaving a somewhat altered note on them, which states I'm the authour of the source material. I realized the original attempt seemed to be claiming some kind of 'ownership' of the relevant Wikipedia pages.
What I don't intend to do is directly copy all my Mesozoic mammals into Wikidom, but to mould the information in. Some of what I have available is unnecessarily detailed. Other bits are too speculative. In some cases, eg. Zofiabaatar, I don't happen to have much more than the barest details, so editing would be pointless.
By wikification, am I right in thinking you mean integrating the stuff with already existing entries; eg. linking the word Jurassic to the 'Jurassic' entry and so? That can be worked on. I think this'll be easier once I've imported all the multituberculate mammal material.
----
re:chess -- I agree with you, but my only objective was to unclutter the Wikipedia:Village pump page. You should address yourself to User:Dietary Fiber, who put the problems together. User:Slrubenstein
----
You got some gall asking for favors, buddy. --User:Brion VIBBER 22:13 Mar 28, 2003 (UTC)
----
In response to your question:
The Constitution says in Article 1, Section 3, Clause 4:
''The Vice President of the United States shall be President of the Senate, but shall have no Vote, unless they be equally divided.''
When a Senator refers to Mr. President, this refers to three people: The Vice-President (Dick Cheney), the President Pro Tem (Ted Stevens), or whoever is in the chair during the session. When a Senator refers to George W. Bush, they refer to him as the President of the United States.
--user:hoshie
--------
Hi the intention is not to bother, but to inform, thats what an encyclopedia is for. I have only written a couple of the articles on commercials. If you think the subject is covered too much, you need to check the List of television programs. I only write about things that have been, in my opinion, remarkable and because of that, worthy of an article.
For example, Ken Buchanan, I thought he was a remarkable boxer, many call him the greatest world champion ever to come from Scotland. But most encyclopedias would overlook any other boxer that is not Muhammad Ali. Ken Buchanan beat guys like Carlos Ortiz and Ismael Laguna. Not only that, bu because of boxing's often ridiculous policies, when it came down to his career, he was basically an expatriate in his own homeland. Not many outside scotland might know who he is, but he was a world champion boxer and he went through large personal tribulations because of being one. I thought that I'd write on him because the public should know about him.
As far as the commercials go, I am not sure I will write any articles about commercials anymore, but the Pepsi commercial with Shaquille O' Neal and the Southwest AirlinesWanna get away? ads are very famous, and in my opinion, funny, although I didnt critic the commercials because everyone has their own opinion about them and you know, these articles have to be kept npov.
Other than that, thank you for reading the articles ad God bless you.
Sincerely yours
''User:AntonioMartin''
----
Thanks for the pointer to the Japanese page for mailman! I'll ask his help. User:Tomos 20:34 May 8, 2003 (UTC)
update
Well, after having looked at the pages in that site, it became rather clear that the more recent versions (2.1.1 or later) of mailman is supposedly free of the problem. Ours now is 2.0.13. I guess I should ask Jason if it is easy and possible to upgrade mailman to a later version. User:Tomos 06:19 May 9, 2003 (UTC)
:another update. I got an email from Jason. He said there is a real possibility that the software upgrade will happen. It seems that he and others are thinking about moving the mailing list to another server. That, he says, generally involves software upgrading. He did not mention when that would happen, though. User:Tomos 09:35 17 May 2003 (UTC)
----
Would you like to do the honors of shrinking down your newer version of :image:Honigbiene.JPG so it can fit nicely in the table at the longly-named How to tell a honeybee from a wasp, hornet, etc. page, or should I do it myself? -- User:JohnOwens 12:33 May 11, 2003 (UTC)
Hi. Please see my note on the image of al-Aqsa. It is not the mosque discussed in the article. User:Danny
----
The image you added to Coca Cola appears to be copyrighted. Given that both copyrights and trademarks are involved here, I suggest you remove it. --User:Eloquence 17:26 May 12, 2003 (UTC)
----
I think that Futurama (animated series) is the first Undisambiguation page I have made. I went to Futurama expecting to find the series, and found that it house 3 articles. I figured there was more than enough there on the cartoon to make it is't own page, so I did. If you are wondering what possesed me to goto the Futurama page, I wanted to put a quote of Fry's on my user page, but I wanted to link to the Futurama article. So I went to see if that article existed. Then I decided to move it to it's own page. Alas, I haven't found the quote I want yet :). It's somewhere on my computer at home, but I won't be there till monday (3 days) :(. User:Mbecker 00:38 17 May 2003 (UTC)
----
Hi, I moved the famous Bob Jackson photograph of Jack Ruby shooting Lee Harvey Oswald to Talk:Lee Harvey Oswald pending clarification of copyright and use permission. -- User:Infrogmation 15:26 22 May 2003 (UTC)
----
Concerning maps of Japanese regions: The resources I listed in the map are only a reference from where I got the outline for the Japanese prefectures. From there I did a some editing and added the colors. I also uploaded the original gimp file under Wikipedia:WikiProject_Japanese_prefectures/Images just in case someone wants to do their own version or wants to improve the images.
I'm not quite sure about the tempura pic I can try finding one on the net but usually I only use pics I have shot myself just to make sure the copyright is ok (I know I'm overly paranoid).
Can you clarify about the picture size ref. you made. Are you refering to images I uploaded or are you asking about how to do proper image processing? --cheers User:Synthetik 13:55 28 May 2003 (UTC)
-----------
What's with busking? I think you've been around long enough to know that this is not even a wikipedia:Stub. No intro, no complete sentence nothing. --User:Eloquence 15:01 29 May 2003 (UTC)
''Mea culpa. Mea maxima culpa! I accidentially put this message on your main page:''
Please follow the Wikipedia:Naming conventions (names and titles) when naming royal pages on wiki. Unless a crown prince has a specific title, they are put in as ''Crown Prince'' even if they haven't that formal title, to make clear that they are heir apparent to a throne. That is particularly with regard to principalities, to distinguish the reigning prince (often called the 'hereditary prince') from the heir. Those who don't know might not understand Prince Albert of Monaco is the hereditary prince yet but the crown prince. User:Jtdirl 22:29 28 May 2003 (UTC) User:Jtdirl 21:26 29 May 2003 (UTC)
----
In the UK, we don't generally have non roundabout intersection style traffic circles (with cars on the circle required to give way). So I'm unqualified to provide such an illustration, although I could have a go and ask people to comment if it's incorrect. User:Mintguy
----
I have been ''trying'' to keep your haphazard changes to the Python programming language article integrated. I have ''not'' simply been deleting them. However, when you add statements which are not true, use the page as a platform for advocacy, or fail to respond to critiques addressed to you, it is hard ''not'' to step on your contributions somewhat in setting things aright.
I have several times seen you make additions which were simply ''false'' -- for instance, claiming that Python is an interpreted language rather than bytecode-compiled; that it is unsuited for large projects; or that its dynamic typing is a design flaw or oversight. These are not matters of opinion -- they are simply ''not true,'' and so it is entirely fitting that they be removed from the article.
I've also seen you use the article for what seem to me to be passing snipes against dynamically typed languages, for instance claiming that Python's Extreme Programming-informed unit testing framework exists to make up for the absence of static type checking. I don't know what your problem is with dynamically-typed languages, but that claim is also simply factually false. Unit testing is a valuable tool for correctness in just about any language, including statically typed ones.
: no, i said nothing about python's unit testing framework. Rather i meant that unit testing is a recommended practice for dynamically typed languages.
You have also failed to respond to critiques of your changes on that article's Talk page. This is a far greater problem, in my opinion, because it suggests that you are not interested in cooperating or explaining your changes. This makes it extraordinarily difficult to work with your edits -- since they are neither explained when made, nor defended when challenged. --User:Fubar Obfusco 19:09 7 Jun 2003 (UTC)
:If you've deleted the items from the culture list, please put them back up.
----
Don't send me demands for responses when you don't respond substantively to critiques of your edits. The article talk page is the appropriate forum, but you've never used it. --User:Fubar Obfusco 23:23 17 Jun 2003 (UTC)
----
Ah yes, I noticed the issue with the name just after I uploaded, next time I'll be more descriptive. However, the image guide for wikipedia suggests images have a 150-200 pixel width, dimensions I went somewhat over with that picture. I do have a much larger version (1 meg or so) but didn't want to slow down the loading of that page too much for those not blessed with broadband. Perhaps I'll upload that and add a link to the image description page as time and my erratic (but broadband) internet connection permits. Thanks for the pointers! User:Basil Fawlty 19:34 24 Jun 2003 (UTC)
----
Hi, thanks for your criticism of Data strobe encoding in User_talk:194.113.59.80. I fixed most of the points you brought up, with the exception of XOR as it should be easily inferrable how to apply the truth table to logic values (especially with the new graphic). User:Colin Marquardt 18:09, 13 Aug 2003 (UTC)
----------------
Hi! Thanks for reading the article I began writing about Raul Barragan and for fixing it. The only thing is, I speak English perfectly! Ive been in the United States 13 years and prior to that, my fmaily spoke English (although on special occasions only) in Puerto Rico.
I had to use many words such as allegedly and supposedly because you know how it is, suppose the subject of the article understands English, he could read it and maybe sue us if I wrote that he did it as if it was a fact. Other things that I found out during research of the person I thought were irrevelant enough to leave them out. But I dont know, I mean, articles here (and thank God so) are to be left for every editor to judge.
Anyways, thanks, and may the almighty Lord and God in Heaven bless you!
Sincerely yours,
''User:AntonioMartin''
----
Do you have permission to post the image at Image:Autotrans.jpg? The site does not appear to give permission to use its images, but I don't read Japanese. Also, why the caption 'A typical neutrino event at Super K )' ??
I'm also not sure the picture really adds anything to the article, so I'm removing it. Sure, it shows some of the internals of an auto trans, but not in a way that helps anyone who doesn't know how they work. --User:Morven 06:30, 7 Oct 2003 (UTC)
----
Please take time to credit photos such as I did with [http://www.wikipedia.org/wiki/Image:Star_WR124_small.jpg http://www.wikipedia.org/wiki/Image:Star_WR124_small.jpg] User:Pizza Puzzle
----
Hunter, is it really necessary to upload "Larger images" as well as small? The image in the article should be sufficient. A larger image just consumes system resources which are at a premium these days. --User:Fernkes 00:58, Oct 13, 2003 (UTC)
Hi, you seem inactive, but they are getting ready to delete your history of Tibet article, which as you note in the comments you obtained from the website Friends of Tibet, New Zealand, http://www.friends-of-tibet.org.nz/tibet.html Is there any basis for useing this material on Wikipedia. For example did you have permission or are you the author? User:Fred Bauder 02:09, 2 Nov 2003 (UTC) Please respond on my user talk page or email me should you log back in and notice this question.
----
''Any simple image processing tool can obtain the size of an image. As wikipedia allows for anyone to reupload images, someone that chooses to resize one of yours will also have to change the name of the image in the wiki. These are two reasons that you should stop this process. If you need coaxing, i can give you a tool i have been using that allows me to upload images automatically from the command line''
Whatever does this mean, I have absolutely no idea what you're talking about! Perhaps you sent the message to the wrong person? User:Arpingstone 08:53, 21 Nov 2003 (UTC)
== testing ==
yoyo?
----
Re: 190px-Greece-Cat.jpg - I was just replacing an existing image - Please forgive my laziness - User:Gaz 11:31, 24 Feb 2004 (UTC)
----
The reason why I say that, for permutation, the two concepts are related, is that saying that there are two meanings implies that the two ideas are completely distinct - but they are not distinct. User:Dysprosia 02:47, 28 Mar 2004 (UTC)
==Move page tests==
These have now all been deleted. Please don't do that again. Thanks. -- User:Francs2000 | User talk:Francs2000 21:48, 26 Apr 2004 (UTC)
:And I'm supposed to know that these weren't just random tests by someone not used to the system... how exactly? I do not appreciate your tone on my user talk page, and I'm sorry to have dented your ego. -- User:Francs2000 | User talk:Francs2000 00:44, 27 Apr 2004 (UTC)
Hmm, why did you move Search_engine_optimization -> Searchability optimization ? User:Kim Bruning 01:19, 14 May 2004 (UTC)
:Basic english. I strongly care that the term be corrected. the search engine itself is not being optimized. The pages that are being optimized. User:Hfastedge 02:40, 15 May 2004 (UTC)
:: Ok, Alright, let's go and explain that to the other folk(s) on Talk:Searchability_optimization, I'll copy your comment there and reply there also. :) User:Kim Bruning 09:19, 15 May 2004 (UTC)
==B-E condensate image description==
Please include a description on . What is it plotting? Experiment or simulation, and what is the citation? Where does the picture come from? (Is it copyrighted?) User:Stevenj 19:28, Jun 5, 2004 (UTC)
On my talk page, you wrote:
:''re the b/e condensate, just check out original quote from the version where i just added the image. You may want to bring back this text that echoes both of our concerns. re the copyright concern, no i will not engage you or anyone about _concerns_ unless the concern is from a federalcourt of the country i live in.''
I can't understand what you are saying. What original quote? What "version" where you "just added the image?" Are you referring to the Bose-Einstein condensate page? But that does not describe the image axes, or say whether it is experiment or simulation, or give a reference, or say where you got the image.
Please edit Image:Bose_Einstein_condensate.png to add:
* A citation (literature or web) that describes the image.
* A link or description of where you got the image.
* A description of what is being plotted ... at least the axes of the plot and whether it is theory or experiment.
User:Stevenj 20:41, Jun 12, 2004 (UTC)
==Fusion power images==
I think a picture of the sun has a place there, since the sun really does work as a huge reactor in the sense that it generates useful power from the nuclear fusion process (the picture nicely illustrates just how much power fusion can generate). Of course, there should be pictures (photos and diagrams) of reactors and various devices related to them, ''in addition''. There are few articles on Wikipedia that suffer from having too many images :) - User:FredrikUser talk:Fredrik 20:22, 12 Jun 2004 (UTC)
== Panama Canel Photo you uploaded ==
Hi, I would like to know on the photo you uploaded from stanford.edu. Because of difference between US Copyright Law and Japanese one, some images on EN WP may violate the Japanese Law, then we are a bit suspicous. (We are not under the grant of ''Fair Use''.) If you give me a confirmation are released under GFDL, you will be very appliciated. User:KIZU 10:07, 25 Jun 2004 (UTC)
:You are not the police or public-attorney. I strongly suggest you do not try to enforce any laws or try to enforce any interpretations of laws on wikipedia: its harmful. User:Hfastedge 06:06, 25 Jul 2004 (UTC)
== Re: enlisted ranks ==
Nope, but it can be done easily. The Army, Air Force and the Marines refer to them as the same; it is only the Navy that uses sailor's terms (like Admiral, etc). Template:US officer ranks I guess?
Hfastedge wrote:
also, do you know of the practice of calling officers lower than (a major i think) by the name of "corporal".