Gene s

Any discussion should be carried on the User talk:Gene s

Gene s

''Archive'': User talk:Gene s/Archive 2004 05-09 There was considerable debate, but it was finally decided that country articles will only have a series box for their continent. See various conversations at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Countries. - User:SimonP 15:34, Nov 12, 2004 (UTC) : Then you should have used the comment box for your edits. Silent edits like that are not a good idea. --User:Gene s 15:37, 12 Nov 2004 (UTC) == Ivan IV of Russia--clarification please == Hi! I added a clarification to the translation of the word "grozny" in Ivan IV of Russia's nickname. As a native Russian speaker I believe "fearsome" is a more fitting word to explain it. Please clarify. Thanks, User:Kettle : You added two words: ''fearsome'' and ''fearful''. ''Fearful'' is flat wrong. ''Fearsome'' has a second meaning - the same as fearful, timid. If you look up in a dictionary, for example here [http://dictionary.reference.com/search?q=fearsome] you will see it. Thus, ''fearsome'' is also ill-fitting because of the second association. ''Dangerous'' is better fitting because in English the word as active (something which should frighten), just like ''grozny'' in Russian, as opposed to the most commonly used Russian translation ''opasny'', which is passive (something one should be afraid of). Particularly taking into account that both ''grozny'' and ''dangerous'' are used in the meaning they had some 500 years ago. --User:Gene s 10:04, 17 Nov 2004 (UTC) == von X == When is one classed under v, and when under X? Is there a rule or must we rely on tradition? (There are cases other than von Struve that depend on this) User:Urhixidur 12:30, 2004 Nov 22 (UTC) : The name "von Struve" is German for "from Struve" or "of Struve". 'Von' itself is uninformative. The last name is informative. The sorting should be done by the informative part of the last name. Compare to the similar case of French 'de', for example Guy de Maupassant is placed under 'M', not 'd'. --User:Gene s 12:39, 22 Nov 2004 (UTC) == Join Wikipedia:Russian wikipedians' notice board! == Hello! I see from your contributions that you are interested in Russian topics. Perhaps you would like to join the new Wikipedia:Russian wikipedians' notice board? It is a discussion forum for wikipedians interested in all things Russian. Also, each week we pick an unfinished stub article to improve through collaboration. Notice boards and Collaborations-Of-The-Week have become increasingly popular on wikipedia reciently, with Wikipedia:Irish wikipedians' notice board, Wikipedia:UK Wikipedians' notice board, Wikipedia:U.S. Wikipedians' notice board and many more. There is also a score board for competing collaborations! See Wikipedia talk:Featured article candidates. Isn't it about time we got articles on Russia up to standard? Hope to see you on Wikipedia:Russian wikipedians' notice board! User:Seabhcan 12:13, 25 Nov 2004 (UTC) == Chuvash people, Chuvash language == Hi! You wikifyed some text which has font support in Arial Unicode MS only. All Chuvash extra letters are supported by this font only, so wikifying, you do this letters invisible. This is not an experiment! It needs. Please replace my edition back. Regards, --User:Untifler 22:00, 30 Nov 2004 (UTC) : If you look at the edit hostory of Chuvash article, you will see that I have not edited it. Regarding the Chuvash language article - I wikified the alphabet sections. I have not changed any of the characters. The section looks fine in my Mozilla FF 1.0. In MSIE 6.0 both your original formatting and the wikified formatting produce blocks in place of some letters. The same blocks appear thoughout the article text as well. So, I don't think there is any advantage to your formatting compare to standard wiki. : By the way, don't forget to log in. Otherwise it's unclear who this 217.30.250.133 is. : --User:Gene s 05:26, 1 Dec 2004 (UTC) ==The Humungous Image Tagging Project== Hi. You've helped with the Wikipedia:WikiProject Wiki Syntax, so I thought it worth alerting you to the latest and greatest of Wikipedia fixing project, User:Yann/Untagged Images, which is seeking to put copyright tags on all of the untagged images. There are probably, oh, thirty thousand or so to do (he said, reaching into the air for a large figure). But hey: they're images ... you'll get to see lots of random pretty pictures. That must be better than looking for ''at at'' and ''the the'', non? You know you'll love it. best wishes --User:Tagishsimon User_talk:Tagishsimon == Article Licensing == Hi, I've User:rambot#Free the Rambot Articles project to get users to Wikipedia:Multi-licensing all of their contributions that they've made to either (1) all U.S. state, county, and city articles or (2) all articles, using the Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike (''CC-by-sa'') v1.0 and v2.0 Creative Commons Licenses or into the public domain if they prefer. The ''CC-by-sa'' license is a true free documentation license that is similar to Wikipedia's license, the GFDL, but it allows other projects, such as WikiTravel, to use our articles. Since you are among the Wikipedia:List_of_Wikipedians_by_number_of_edits Wikipedians by edits, I was wondering if you would be willing to multi-license all of your contributions or at ''minimum'' those on the geographic articles. Over 90% of people asked have agreed. For More Information: *User talk:Ram-Man#Multi-Licensing FAQ - Lots of questions answered *Wikipedia:Multi-licensing *User:rambot#Free the Rambot Articles project To allow us to track those users who muli-license their contributions, many users copy and paste the "" template into their user page, but there are other options at Wikipedia:Template messages/User namespace#Licensing Templates. The following examples could also copied and pasted into your user page: :Option 1 :I agree to Wikipedia:Multi-licensing all my contributions, with the exception of my user pages, as described below: : OR :Option 2 :I agree to Wikipedia:Multi-licensing all my contributions to any U.S. state, county, or city article as described below: : Or if you wanted to place your work into the public domain, you could replace "" with "". If you only prefer using the GFDL, I would like to know that too. ''Please let me know'' what you think at my User talk:Ram-Man. It's important to know either way so no one keeps asking. -- User:Ram-Man ([http://en.wikipedia.org/w/wiki.phtml?title=User_talk:Ram-Man&action=edit§ion=new comment]| User talk:Ram-Man == Sorry == Sorry if I've appeared short with you over the succession template discussion; it really has taken me until your most recent comment to work out what on Earth you were talking about; I'm sure that at least part of the fault over this must lie with me, and, for that, I offer my apologies. I've been a little tense of late, as the election doesn't seem to be going very well. : OK, I accept the other part of the fault :-). I apologize too.
BTW, congratulations on reaching your 2000th edit on Monday. : Thanks. Checking the background, huh? :-)
Yours,
User:Jdforrester User_talk:Jdforrester 12:01, 16 Dec 2004 (UTC) : --User:Gene s 13:33, 16 Dec 2004 (UTC) ==== I noticed you're using my template. I just made a new one that you might like better, . --User:Theodore Kloba 20:01, Dec 22, 2004 (UTC) == Crimean and Kazan Khans == Hi! I'm glad to see you contribute to articles about Tatar history. difference between Safag�r�y and Safa Giray is such: the second name was used in Crimean Tatar language and similar to Turkish name. The first is used Kazan Tatar language, what is known also like Tatar language. So, names I use are Kazan names, becose I don't know any other. But it is quite normal, that person, born in Crimea was writen as in Crimean Tatar/ But Otemish<->�temiş is absolutely wrong. this is Turkish/Crimean Tatar name of Kazan person. Tatar and Russian (if it is interesting for you) is Utamesh<->�t�meş. So let"s continue disscussion at User:Untifler_00:45,_1_Jan_2005_(UTC)khans">Talk:List of Kazan --User:Untifler 00:45, 1 Jan 2005 (UTC)khans. :See Giray Dynasty--User:217.30.254.98 18:25, 8 Jan 2005 (UTC) :: It has the same problem as the majority of such articles - it's written in a language other than English. The title is wrong too. It's not the Giray Dynasty. It's the list of Crimean Khans. The dynasty was much bigger than that. --User:Gene s 05:30, 10 Jan 2005 (UTC) == Brokgaus-Efron Encyclopedia == Hi,
On Kasimov you mention the Brokgaus-Efron Encyclopedia as source in the public domain. Would you mind writing the page Brokgaus-Efron Encyclopedia, with the years and stuff, so we can all see why there's no copyright?
User:Aliter 00:23, 6 Jan 2005 (UTC) : I will, when I have time. But if the question of B-E copyright bothers you, you can look it up in [http://www.google.com/search?hl=en&lr=&q=brokgauz-efron&btnG=Search Google] to make sure it was published between 1890 and 1917, and then write the article yourself. --User:Gene s 07:50, 6 Jan 2005 (UTC) ==Wladislaus== Royal titles in Latin: Vladislaus Quartus Dei gratia rex Poloniae, magnus dux Lithuaniae, Russiae, Prussiae, Masoviae, Samogitiae, Livoniaeque, necnon Suecorum, Gothorum Vandalorumque haereditarius rex, electus magnus dux Moschoviae English translation: Vladislaus IV by God's grace king of Poland, grand duke of Lithuania, Ruthenia, Prussia, Masovia, Samogitia, Livonia, and also hereditary king of the Swedes, Goths and Vandals, elected tsar of Russia. is it enough?--User:Emax 07:51, Jan 12, 2005 (UTC) : You are giving evidence that he assumed such title, i.e. made a claim to the thone. That's good for him, but not enough for an encyclopedia article. Did he actually rule Muscovy for 3 years? Is there any evidence that he issued decees and they were followed? And, by the way, use talk page of the article, not my talk page. By writing here you are writing to me alone. By using article talk page you are talking to everybody involved. --User:Gene s 07:57, 12 Jan 2005 (UTC) ::The Russians elected him, so whats the problem?--User:Emax 08:08, Jan 12, 2005 (UTC) ::: Why do you insist on using my talk page instead of the talk page of the article? I moved this discussion to Talk:Michael I of Russia == Silent reverts == ''Please explain why you are engaging in silent revert war over a number of articles on Russian/Polish history. Do you have any difficulty using Edit summary and Talk pages? --User:Gene s 08:33, 12 Jan 2005 (UTC)'' I engage in reverts of incorrect information, because and only when I truly believe it is incorrect. Sometimes I have a difficulty using Talk pages (when I run out of coins in an internet cafe) and sometimes I forget the edit summaries. Mea Culpa. User:Space Cadet 08:42, 12 Jan 2005 (UTC) : You refusal to discuss the changes is abuse of wiki process. Lack of coins is not a good excuse. If you continue to revert pages silently, I will bring this issue up for arbitration. You can be banned from editing Wiki for such abuse. --User:Gene s 08:47, 12 Jan 2005 (UTC) ==Space Cadet== I just noticed that you'd been having trouble with Space Cadet long before I'd encountered him first today. Could you take a look at his unexplained POV revert at Polish-Soviet War? Thanks. User:172 22:09, 12 Jan 2005 (UTC) : Answered on your talk page --User:Gene s 06:11, 13 Jan 2005 (UTC) ==LI Mandelstam== in Russian Raman scattering is called "combination light scattering" (from combination of frequencies). It is difficult to translate correctly , because combinatorial has the flavor and meaning from combinatorics. Again, in Russian combinatorial=kombinatornoe and what is needed is "kombinazionnoe". I will be gald if somebody offers better translation, but combinatorial is almost certainly wrong. Google shows several "combination". I would probably use "combinational", but I thought that "combination" might be an established term. : Answered at Talk:Leonid Isaakovich Mandelshtam. --User:Gene s 08:20, 14 Jan 2005 (UTC) ==re Russia== It's my understanding that the main article should summarize a section's topic, and link to a more detailed article if such exists. The previous little section was no "summary" ... it started with WWI. The stuff I added to make it a "summary" still leaves the entire "History" section significantly shorter than the "Borders" section, and I think about the correct length for this article.User:Sfahey 14:49, 15 Jan 2005 (UTC) ==Russia-geo-stub== Hello Gene - Thought you might like to know there is now a separate geography stub template especially for Russian-related geography articles: . I've been busily sifting through the (4000!) geo stubs, trying to cut them down to a more easily dealt with number by putting about half of them into subcategories, and having one for Russia seemed logical. I noticed your name cropping up a lot in the edit histories of Russian geo stubs, so I though I'd let you know about this. I've also put it on the Russian Wikipedians' Notice Board, but if you can think of anywhere else to put it to let people know it's there to be used, please do so. Thanks! User:Grutness|^{User_talk:Grutness} 04:59, 21 Jan 2005 (UTC) : Good idea. Thanks. --User:Gene s 05:38, 21 Jan 2005 (UTC) ==Tatarstan/Temp== Subj. Your comments would be much appreciated.—User:Ezhiki 22:29, Jan 25, 2005 (UTC) ==See also== Thanks for the tip on the Eschatology page. I still need to internalize the style book here.--User:Cberlet 16:04, 27 Jan 2005 (UTC) ==Collaboration of the week== Military history of the Soviet Union is this week's Collaboration of the Week. Please contribute to it to help make it a feature article ==Mikhail Glinsky== Please see how our Polish friends mutilate the page on Mikhail Glinsky. What do you think about it? User:Ghirlandajo 12:40, 1 Feb 2005 (UTC) ==User:Emax== It looks like User:Emax has made only 3 reverts while 4 are needed to break the 3RR. Can you point out which edits you consider reverts? User:MacGyverMagic|User talk:MacGyverMagic 19:36, Feb 1, 2005 (UTC) : Here are the four reverts: [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Michal_Glinski&diff=9867694&oldid=9859689][http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Michal_Glinski&diff=9859277&oldid=9859006][http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Michal_Glinski&diff=9858336&oldid=9857496][http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Michal_Glinski&diff=9855435&oldid=9855352] They are not 100% identical, but essentially they are reverts since he keeps reverting the disputed changes. The other changes are purely cosmetic. --User:Gene s 05:26, 2 Feb 2005 (UTC) == Second Chechen War == Hi Gene S, I've rewritten substantial portions of Second Chechen War to remove the copyvio and (hopefully) to tidy up NPOV issues. It still needs some work; if you think there's anything important missing or misrepresented then dive in. (If it looks like there's going to be an edit war over any contentious points, hopefully we can hash things out on the Talk:Second Chechen War.) Cheers, User:TenOfAllTrades | User talk:TenOfAllTrades 23:29, 19 Mar 2005 (UTC) = template:succession box = Why the separation to template:start box and end box? Seems excessively granular, to the point of being more cumbersome in practice. What cohesion is that separation supposed to bring? -User:Stevertigo|User_talk:Stevertigo 08:20, 11 May 2005 (UTC)

See other meanings of words starting from letter:

G

GA | GB | GC | GD | GE | GF | GH | GI | GJ | GK | GL | GM | GN | GO | GP | GR | GS | GT | GU | GW | GX | GY | GZ |

Words begining with Gene_s:

Genessee_River
Genessee_River
Genessee_river
Gene_s
Gene_s
Gene_s/Archive_2004_05-09
Gene_Sarazen
Gene_Scott
Gene_Scott
Gene_selection
Gene_sequencer
Gene_sequencing
Gene_sequencing
Gene_Sharp
Gene_Sharp
Gene_Shoemaker
Gene_Shue
Gene_silencing
Gene_Simmons
Gene_Simmons
Gene_Siskel
Gene_Snisky
Gene_Snitsky
Gene_Snyder_Freeway
Gene_Spafford
Gene_Spafford
Gene_Spafford/temp
Gene_Sperling
Gene_splicing
Gene_Stallings
Gene_Starwind
Gene_Starwind
Gene_Stratton
Gene_Stratton_Porter