
This user is under a Wikipedia:Bans and blocks. All edits by this user will be reverted. Please do not reinstate any edits made by this user. Some of the identities suspected of being used by multiple hardbanned user DW: * User:Black Widow ~ Special:Contributions/Black_Widow Hardbanned - ''Images uploaded since ban deleted'' * User:Ron Davis ~ Special:Contributions/Ron_Davis - ''Images uploaded since ban deleted'' * User:Elliot ~ Special:Contributions/Elliot - ''Images uploaded since ban deleted'' * User:Olga Bityerkokoff ~ Special:Contributions/Olga_Bityerkokoff - ''Images uploaded since ban deleted'' * User:Jacques Delson ~ Special:Contributions/Jacques_Delson - ''Images uploaded since ban deleted'' * User:ChuckM ~ Special:Contributions/ChuckM Hardbanned - ''Images uploaded since ban deleted'' * User:Joe Canuck ~ Special:Contributions/Joe_Canuck Hardbanned - ''Images uploaded since ban deleted'' * User:Sue Michael Canuck ~ Special:Contributions/Sue_Michael_Canuck Hardbanned - ''Images uploaded since ban deleted'' * User:NightCrawler ~ Special:Contributions/NightCrawler - ''Images uploaded since ban deleted'' * User:Chris Jones ~ Special:Contributions/Chris Jones - ''Images uploaded since ban deleted'' * User:Wei Chin Ho ~ Special:Contributions/Wei Chin Ho - ''Images uploaded since ban deleted'' * User:Angelique ~ Special:Contributions/Angelique - ''Images uploaded since ban deleted'' * User:Triton ~ Special:Contributions/Triton * User:JillandJack ~ Special:Contributions/JillandJack * User:Oirvine ~ Special:Contributions/Oirvine
Suspected pseudonym: user:Joe Canuck More discussion related to DW (as Angelique): /Quebec issue Most wanted: * The Club of Rome; * Hudson Think Tank * H.L. Hunt and sons * J.Paul Getty family & museum DW, it is Wikipedia convention to include a complete sentence i nthe first line of every article. Please don't go around changing that. -- User:Zoe Look at all of the articles written by anybody else. Do you see them doing it the way you're doing? I will continue to change them if you put them back the way they were. -- User:Zoe ---- DW -- I showed you mine -- Now why don't you show us yours? User:JHK ---- I don't see very well what makes you think I have any knowledge in politics. But I'll see what I can do user:Anthere ---- Hey, DW, I've been following the List of Famous Canadians "debate" and I just wanted to put my two cents in. First of all, if you are truly trying to change the tenor of the "discussion" by signing in under a different username and pretending to be someone else, then that alone is, in my mind, enough to warrant a temporary ban as it shows a basic disregard for the principles of cooperation and scholarship. It is deceptive and lowers the threshold of morality for the entire Wikipedia. Secondly, I have taught five-year-old children who have responded to arguments more intelligently and with greater maturity than you have shown. I don't know how old you are, but if you are, in fact, older than twelve, I suggest you think long and hard about your response to disagreements. Thirdly, you seem to be placing an awful lot of importance on an article that, in my eyes, is not too important at all. I can not think of any reason why I might ever want to look at a list of famous Canadians and I believe all such lists are useless, but I do not interfere and attempt to delete them. Your repeated vandalism of the page, and I don't see how it could be characterized as anything else since it violates the obviously agreed upon community standard, is shameful no matter how many other wonderfully written and edited articles you have written. Fourthly, your ad hominem attacks are irrelevant and silly. Even assuming Jeronimo espoused actual racist beliefs towards Americans, this should not be barring him from writing an article on Canadians (which are not the same thing as Americans, as I'm sure you know if you are, in fact, Canadian). Similarly, your statements that no Dutch person would name himself Jeronimo may or may not have any basis in fact whatsoever. I have had no luck in deciphering exactly what the problem with the name is, however it is most certainly not evidence of any quality that he is not Dutch. My understanding is that the Netherlands is a diverse land with many different positions and viewpoints, and I certainly hope there is enough cultural acceptance there to allow any citizen to go by any name. And for the record, I do know two born-and-bred patriotic Americans named Benedict, and one named Arnold. In light of all these things (and the comments on your user page and talk page), I must conclude that if I had the power to, I would have banned you (and all your aliases) several days ago. I hope you never get involved with any of the articles I am working on, and I would not be sorry in the slightest to see you leave Wikipedia permanently. I don't believe the Wikipedia Community needs or wants contributors like you. User:Tokerboy 18:03 Oct 14, 2002 (UTC) :Ahem, excuse me. DW's squabble with Jeronimo about whether a given musical group are "famous" enough -- is not actually vandalism. Deleting the whole page and writing KEWL is vandalism. There's no way Jimbo is going to ban him, simply because you (and maybe me) think he's on the wrong side in an edit war. Now, let's go back to Talk:List of famous Canadians and hash this thing out. --User:Ed Poor
::One man's vandalism is another man's graffiti art or direct action protest.
I didn't mean to suggest that Jimbo or anyone else will ban him because he's on the wrong side in an edit war, but because of his immaturity and unwillingness to compromise. I simply stated that I would, if I could, ban him, or at least seek a community acceptance of banning him. I have no problems with anyone discussing the meaning of the word "famous," I simply believe that DW has shown that he is unwilling to discuss anything and would prefer to use deception and pigheaded stubbornness to convince everyone to give up and leave him alone to do as he pleases. Any attempts at discussing this with him, Ed, is welcome and well-meaning but will probably be useless. User:Tokerboy 18:35 Oct 14, 2002 (UTC)
----
I posted some questions at Talk: Politics of Canada--a few sentences are very confusing right now, and some important details are lacking. You seem to know a lot about the Quebec independence thing, so maybe you can help? User:Tokerboy 21:39 Oct 20, 2002 (UTC)
----
I thought the accepted disambiguation format for movies was to use the title then (movie), or the title then (year movie) if there are more than one? User:Koyaanis Qatsi
:See Talk:Blue (Kieslowski movie)
----
Do we have permission to use the image at Juliette Binoche? User:Koyaanis Qatsi 02:14 Dec 7, 2002 (UTC)
Of course! ...DW
----
DW:
# Please don't scribble on my user page. My User talk:Magnus Manske will do just fine. I will also get notified if there's a message for me there.
# I already answered you on the above page.
# "You were told already..." - did you become owner of wikipedia? I wasn't notified of that! Apologies, your majesty! ;-)
# As far as I remember (and I'm with wikipedia almost since the beginning), a maximum width of 350 pixel for images was agreed upon, so an image won't be too large even on smaller screens.
# What is it with your "2.5 inches"? Are you talking about ''screen width'' or ''resolution''? Or do you mean image size in terms of byte??
User:Magnus Manske 20:49 Jan 1, 2003 (UTC)
----
DW, you are correct in one point: it is 250, not 350 pixel (Wikipedia:Image use policy). And, with my mentioning of being here a long time I was merely trying to point out your attitude, which is a little absolutistic ("...images ''are'' too large...","...you were told..."). Well, maybe the NPOV is finally getting to me ;-)
You still haven't told me what you mean with "2.5 inches", though... --User:Magnus Manske 22:21 Jan 2, 2003 (UTC) ----- DW I wonder if the images you've uploaded are really free of right ? User:Ericd ---- Hi DW, Could you put some information about the source and copyright status of the Golda Meir image on its description page please? Thanks. User:Mswake 12:16 Jan 17, 2003 (UTC) ---- DW Your answer in Talk:Front de Libération du Québec was your first answer on a talk page. I think it's a good thing. Can you also give some answers to questions about source and copyright status of the images you've uploaded. Thanks. User:Ericd ---- DW, You have produced a lot of good work in the Wikipedia, and I'd hate to see us develop hard feelings. If you really feel that the Wikipedia consensus is wrong, please discuss it either on the mailing list or at the Wikipedia:Village pump page. It's not ''my'' standards that I'm adhering to, it's what the Wikipedia community in general have decided. -- User:Zoe ---- DW, I just discovered that you actually *replace* my images, instead of uploading your smalled version to a different name (e.g., "xx_small.jpg"). An example of that is media:Peter Paul Rubens.jpg. Please link to that larger version from the image desctiption via the media namespace, as I did above. Also, do that for all the images you already have "overwritten". Thanks, User:Magnus Manske 21:16 Jan 24, 2003 (UTC) ---- Re my talk page: By shrinking my images, information is lost. While that might be not a real problem on the screen, it starts getting ugly when someone tries to print such an image. So, usual practice (you can find many examples of this in the image list, just search it for "small") for shrinking an image "xx.jpg" is to * either upload the smaller image as "xx (small).jpg", and change the link on the page, * or to upload the large image as "xx (large).jpg", and upload the small image as "xx.jpg". In any case, on the image description page of the small image should be a media: link to the large one. Yes, I know the large image is still in the "history" list, but it is unlikely to be found there. --User:Magnus Manske 22:23 Jan 24, 2003 (UTC) ---- I wish you would quit abusing other contributors; I'm embarassed for you to see the things you say. We're all here because we believe in what wikipedia stands for, other people just as much as you, and friendliness would go a long way towards making everyone's time here pleasant. ---- DW, what image are you talking about? It would be nice to know exactly which sin you're accusing me of, I lose track ;-) While I'm at it, you are (still) in error about image sizes in pixels and inches. Let me phrase it in bold text: There is no relation between the size of an image in inches and pixels. Find an image, look at it on your screen when set to 1024x768, take a ruler and measure the width. Now do the same again, but at 640x480. Then do both of that on a screen with a different physical size. Then save that image, open it in Paintshop (or whatever). Set it to 75 dpi and print it. Then set it to 600 dpi and print again. Notice a pattern there? All of them are different sizes in inch, but the same size in pixels. Got it? --User:Magnus Manske ---- DW's latest threats have been placed on the Wiki list and sent around, as requested by some other members. ---- DW, sorry to do this but at Jimbo's request I have blocked your ability to contribute to this website as a "signed-in user". --User:Ed Poor ---- Others have weighed in on your userpage, and I must agree that I find it offensive and silly. Assuming you are really DW's widow, I should certainly hope that you realize that no one on Wikipedia murdered him, and I resent the accusation otherwise; of course, if you have serious reasons for believing that Mav or Zoe or someone else actually murdered him in any relevant meaning of the word, then this doesn't apply. Otherwise, I request that you change your user page as it is unnecessarily inflammatory and misleading. With regards to your late husbands comments re: my comments in the edit window of Brion Vibber's talk page (''I did an illegal search query -- cuz I am a bad ass'') and another user, the specific complaint of which I am currently unable to find, I note that your late husband has left the following comments in the edit comments box: *''02:53 Jan 30, 2003 Amedeo Modigliani (Fixing yp an article which morons keep changing to an arbirary policy that they falsely call a Wikipedia policy. This is the tenth+ time I have fixed their mess )'' *''21:23 Oct 12, 2002 . . DW (Hopefully, final deletions of American hater Osama bin Jeronimo's work)'' *''02:59 Jan 30, 2003 User talk:Jtdirl (Note to a mental midget )'' *''(cur) (last) . . 22:41 Jan 20, 2003 . . 64.228.30.101 (putting back my photos that idiot, Ericd removed without reason and a severe lack odf brains...DW)'' *''I don't understand the morons who think they are making a contribution with half-assed material that is of little interest or benefit to anyone except the retard who posted it. I had not intended, but will get around to doing this one properly.....DW'' (Talk:Anouk Aimée) While I can understand DW's apprehension about his daughter being exposed to my and someone else's comments in the freely accessible Recent Changes page, I should certainly hope that he (and you) can/could/will differentiate and explain the differences between something that uses foul language but is obviously meant to be a joke (such as my note to Brion) and your late husband's hate-filled attacks on other contributors. If his (and, presumably, your) daughter grows up not understanding the difference between these two ideas, then I hope she leaves home as soon as possible to learn the difference between off-color humor and speech expressing vicious hatred towards another person. This, of course, includes comparing, without any noticeable proof, an individual to Osama Bin Laden -- as far as hate speech goes, this about as hateful as possible and I, for one, find it imeasurably hateful as it trivializes bin Laden's evil by equating with what is, at most, a disagreement over what qualifies as a famous Canadian. I certainly hope, for your daughter's sake, that you understand the difference between a statement of hatred and the humorous use of a word commonly perceived as impolite. Tell DW I said wuzzup User:TUF-KAT ---- Text from user page moved here ---- This space here at the top is where users normally put in some information about themselves, eg. qualifications, experience, or just plain personal data. It would be nice to know more about you, DW. I'd hate to think that there is nothing to know. Best regards, User:Deb 10:06 Jan 26, 2003 (UTC) P.S. Woof! Welcome, DW! May I recommend the Welcome, newcomers article to your attention? As well as outlining Wikipedia standards on the neutral point of view, it should point you to the standards and instructions for adding images to articles. Hope you enjoy contributing! User:-- April 08:40 Aug 9, 2002 (PDT) Yes, welcome. Do you have a better picture of the Arrow? We don't use BMP here since that's a Microsoft-only format, and anyway it was really badly dithered. Do you know where the original came from? I'm sure we can produce a better picture from the original. --User:Lee Daniel Crocker Actually it's not a Microsoft-only format (GIMP handles it well), but it's not well compressed, nor is it widely supported in web browsers. -User:PierreAbbat Yes, I used GIMP to convert it, but the format itself ws designed by Microsoft for Microsoft Windows, and is particularly suited to the Win32 API. Sure, a few folks have nonetheless figured it out and can use them on real computers :-), but it's still ''primarily'' a Windows thing, and I don't want to have to repeat that whole last paragraph every time I tell someone not to use it. --LDC ---- Welcome, DW. Might I suggest that you also check out the Naming conventions article? And, if you like, tell us a bit about yourself! Enjoy! User:JHK ---- DW -- Regarding linking the Carolingian Dynasty article forward -- it will not be done until there is proper material added to the list for non-French Carolingians and an explanation that they aren't exclusively a part of French History. At present, I believe there is a link in History of France to Carolingians which is much more comprehensive and explains more than a bunch of names. If you are concerned about this, or would like more of an explanation, I suggest you read my extensive comments at Talk:Carolingian Dynasty. Thanks User:JHK ---- DW -- please not the format we use for alternate language names, perhaps by looking at an article on a Holy Roman Emperor or Polish City. You will note that we place the alternate, usually non-English, names in parentheses after the name of the language in italics). Just because you want everybody to use the French names doesn't mean you should go through and write them all in French, except for the article title. If you are truly attempting o expand knowledge, then you should write as if your audience knows very little -- you might think it a natural conclusion for people to see Henri throughout an article on Henry I of France asd figure it out that Henri is Franch for Henry, but it isn't really that way. Many people will just be confused. User:JHK ---- DW -- generally, we respond to people's comments -- is there a problem with the way we've been doing articles? If so, you should perhaps offer alternative ways of doing things. You're putting huge amounts of interesting info in, but it's looking very cribbed from other sources (are they PD) and there is perhaps more genealogical info than is necessary in historical biography. I say this because people often see a list of names and decide they should link to their own articles, which is not always a good idea. We often know so little about younger daughters, etc., that there's no point in an encyclopedia, althought there would be in a dictionary of biography -- but wikipedia is not a dictionary. User:JHK ---- DW, I'm rather confused at what you are attempting to accomplish here at Wikipedia. The project succeeds only because people are willing to work with each other and establish common conventions. Those conventions are certainly open to change, but coming in as a new contributor and unilaterally changing them is not the way to go about it. Why not work with the other contributors here, instead of chnaging things as you alone see fit? If you want to work on Wikipedia, you should take a look at Wikipedia:Neutral point of view and Wikipedia:Naming conventions for a start. --User:Stephen Gilbert ---- Yo, DW. I like a lot of your ideas, and so do others. But please try not to be so antagonistic. You wrote, to Magnus, "Instead of trying to be a hero and getting people like Zoe to stroke your ego, slow down and do things properly. Looking at a page with your kind of minimal input and poor quality, overwhelming photos, is what turns people away from Wikipedia." You also wrote, to Zoe, some interesting, if rude, words about marketing expertise. It occurs to me, and I hope you'll reflect on this and take it to heart, that you might apply some marketing expertise to your presentation of your self. Regard the rest of us as potential customers for your ideas -- and sell those ideas to us in an appealing package, rather than yelling at us. --Jimbo Wales ------------- Hey DW! Thanks so much for being here. You seem so knowledgeable about so many things (so few of us are!). I wish you liked us one-tenth as much as we like you. User:Arthur3030 01:42 Jan 26, 2003 (UTC) ----------------- DW, It is imperative that you stop being mean to people. Your work is generally good, why are you doing this? Please email me: jwales@bomis.com, and let's chat about it. I hate to ban good people, but if you continue to insult people, I'll have no choice. --user:Jimbo Wales ----------------- DW, I thought you made a good point about putting a country of origin next to a person's details. Sometimes it makes sense and sometimes it doesn't. For example, nation-states were born with the Treaty of Westphalia (1648). Prior to that, the concept of countries was quite fluid. City-states were more often the norm (in areas that had advanced beyond tribalism). I'd like to see Zoe explain better whether she wants this to be an iron rule or a guideline to be used as appropriate. Anyway, you've poisoned the well a bit on this one by editing the George Washington page directly rather than by using a Talk: page, which would have been more diplomatic. It's hard to take your side to the extent that you engage in ad hominem attacks. When someone's ideas are mistaken, it is more effective to attack the ideas than to attack the person. Attacking the person here is likely to end in banishment. I hope that doesn't happen, because I like your work. User:Mcarling 21:34 Jan 27, 2003 (UTC) :#It's not my policy. :#Of coure it isn't useful in cases where there is no advantage in using an arbitrary nationality. As I've said elsewhere, when I wrote the Laurence Harvey article, I said he was "Latvia-born", not "Latvian". -- User:Zoe ------ The french wikipedia might find benefit in knowing precisely the reason why that user was hard banned. It is not clearly mentionned in the user page. We understood it was related to image use, which could be under copyright. We would like to know more. Also, we would like to know if some pictures, uploaded by this user, and still on en:wikipedia, may be consider safe or not. example : . User:Anthere == Article Licensing == Hi, I've User:rambot#Free the Rambot Articles project to get users to Wikipedia:Multi-licensing all of their contributions that they've made to either (1) all U.S. state, county, and city articles or (2) all articles, using the Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike (''CC-by-sa'') v1.0 and v2.0 Creative Commons Licenses or into the public domain if they prefer. The ''CC-by-sa'' license is a true free documentation license that is similar to Wikipedia's license, the GFDL, but it allows other projects, such as WikiTravel, to use our articles. Since you are among the Wikipedia:List_of_Wikipedians_by_number_of_edits Wikipedians by edits, I was wondering if you would be willing to multi-license all of your contributions or at ''minimum'' those on the geographic articles. Over 90% of people asked have agreed. For More Information: *User talk:Ram-Man#Multi-Licensing FAQ - Lots of questions answered *Wikipedia:Multi-licensing *User:rambot#Free the Rambot Articles project To allow us to track those users who muli-license their contributions, many users copy and paste the "I agree to Wikipedia:Multi-licensing all my contributions, with the exception of my user pages, as described below:
:I agree to Wikipedia:Multi-licensing all my contributions to any U.S. state, county, or city article as described below:
:User_Talk:Poccil,_User:Poccil/Automation.js)">User:Poccil|User:Poccil (User Talk:Poccil, User:Poccil/Automation.js) 03:54, Dec 11, 2004 (UTC)
P.S. You can help tag other images at User:Yann/Untagged_Images. Thanks again.
==Unverified images==
Hi! Thanks for uploading the following image:
*:Image:GeorgesBizet.jpg
I notice it currently doesn't have an Wikipedia:Image copyright tags. Could you add one to let us know its copyright status? (You can use User_Talk:Poccil,_User:Poccil/Automation.js)">User:Poccil|User:Poccil (User Talk:Poccil, User:Poccil/Automation.js) 22:21, Dec 20, 2004 (UTC)
P.S. You can help tag other images at User:Yann/Untagged_Images. Thanks again.
==Unverified images==
Hi! Thanks for uploading the following image:
*:Image:LaBourdaisiere.JPG
I notice it currently doesn't have an Wikipedia:Image copyright tags. Could you add one to let us know its copyright status? (You can use
DW can stand for: *''Data Warehouse'' *''Deutsche Welle'' *''Drum Workshop'', more commonly known as ''DW Drums'' *''Doctor Who'' *''Dreamweaver'', as in Macromedia Dreamweaver *''Darkwing'', as in Darkwing Duck *''Discworld'' *''Don't worry'', used in Instant Messaging culture *Doomworld, a Doom-related website Dora Winifred, a character in the Arthur TV show & books by Marc Brown Lists of two-letter combinations
I have *NEVER* heard DW used as a nickname for Doctor Who, even from the most obsessed fan of the show I know. However, Deutsche Welle actively use DW as an onair nickname. IMO this page should redirect there and not pander to a rarely if ever used nickname. User:Kiand 03:02, 19 Feb 2005 (UTC)
#redirect DW
I have made a very heavy cut of your Day-Age Creationism. Basically everything baring the first paragraph. I am sure you will feel this is unjustified, but I hope that on re-reading the excised material you can see my reasoning - it is not relevant, it is not focussed, it is POV. Such a block of material should develop the arguments/reasoning of the Creationist and I did not feel this was so. If you still disagree please restore the extra material, I will not start an edit war over this. User:TwoOneTwo 23:24, 15 Dec 2003 (UTC)
See other meanings of words starting from letter:
Words begining with Dw:
DW
DW
DW
DW
Dw
Dw
DW-TV
Dw.exe
DW/Quebec_issue
DW1979
DW1979
DW40
DWA
Dwad
Dwadachamsha
Dwadasama
Dwain_Chambers
Dwain_Messer
Dwain_Messer
Dwale
Dwalin
Dwane
Dwane_Casey
Dwang
Dwang
Dwan_Gate
Dwapara_Yuga
Dwapara_Yukam
Dwapar_Yuga
Dwaraka
DWARF
Dwarf
Dwarf
Dwarf(D&D)
Dwarfgoby
Dwarfing
Dwarfism
Dwarfism
Dwarfs
Dwarfs
Dwarfs_(Discworld)
Dwarf_(D&D)
Dwarf_(disambiguation)
Dwarf_(Inheritance)
Dwarf_(Legend_of_Zelda)
Dwarf_(Middle-earth)
Dwarf_(Middle-earth)
Dwarf_(Norse)
Dwarf_(Norse)
Dwarf_(Warhammer)
Dwarf_azalea
Dwarf_Beech
Dwarf_Beech
Dwarf_Buckweat_in_Cinder_Garden_at_Craters_of_the_Moon_National_Monument.jpeg
Dwarf_Campbell's_Russian_Hamster
Dwarf_crab
Dwarf_Danio
Dwarf_danio
Dwarf_elephant
Dwarf_elephant
Dwarf_elliptical_galaxies
Dwarf_elliptical_galaxies
Dwarf_elliptical_galaxy
Dwarf_galaxies
Dwarf_galaxies
Dwarf_Galaxy
Dwarf_galaxy
Dwarf_galaxy_problem
Dwarf_goby
Dwarf_hamster
Dwarf_Kirlston
Dwarf_Kirlston
Dwarf_Marmoset
Dwarf_Marmoset
Dwarf_Minke_Whale
Dwarf_Mummy_of_Wyoming
Dwarf_mummy_of_Wyoming
Dwarf_Palmetto
Dwarf_pipesnake
Dwarf_pipe_snake
Dwarf_plant
Dwarf_rabbits
Dwarf_Raven
Dwarf_Siberian_Pine
Dwarf_Sperm_Whale
Dwarf_Sperm_Whale
Dwarf_sperm_whale
Dwarf_spheroidal_galaxies
Dwarf_spheroidal_galaxies
Dwarf_spheroidal_galaxy
Dwarf_Spheroidal_Galaxy_NGC_185
Dwarf_spider
Dwarf_spider_droid
Dwarf_spider_droid
Dwarf_star
Dwarf_Sundew
Dwarf_tapeworm
Dwarf_throw
Dwarf_throwing
Dwarf_tossing
Dwarf_tossing
Dwarf_Wedge_Mussel
Dwarf_wedge_mussel
Dwarf_Willow
Dwarka
Dwarkanath_Kotnis
Dwarkanath_Tagore
Dwarkanath_Tagore
Dwarrow
Dwarven
Dwarven_Mine
Dwarves
Dwarves
Dwarves
Dwarves
Dwarves
Dwarves
Dwarves.jpeg
Dwarves_(band)
Dwarves_(Middle-Earth)
Dwarves_(Middle-earth)
Dwarves_(Middle-earth)
Dwarves_albums
Dwarvish
Dwarvish_language
DWay
DWay
Dwayne
Dwayne_Andreas
Dwayne_Bravo
Dwayne_DeRosario
Dwayne_De_Rosario
Dwayne_Douglas_Johnson
Dwayne_Goettel
Dwayne_Goettel
Dwayne_Hickman
Dwayne_Johnson
Dwayne_Johnson
Dwayne_McCall
Dwayne_McDuffie
Dwayne_Peel
Dwayne_Schintzius
Dwayne_Turner
Dwayne_Wade
DWB
DWB
Dwbird2
Dwbird2
DWC
DWDM
Dweeberkitty
Dweebs
Dweekly
Dweekly
Dweezil_&_Lisa
Dweezil_Zappa
Dweezil_Zappa
Dweezil_Zappa_albums
DWehner
DWeir
DWeir
Dweir
Dweir
DWEL
Dwell
Dweller_in_the_Gulf
Dwelling
Dwelling
Dwellings
Dwell_magazine
DWEM
Dwemer
DWG
DwGriffith
Dwheeler
Dwheeler
Dwhelan
Dwhite21787
Dwhitney
Dwhitney
DWI
Dwight
Dwight
Dwight
Dwight,_IL
Dwight,_Illinois
Dwight,_Kansas
Dwight,_KS
Dwight,_ND
Dwight,_NE
Dwight,_Nebraska
Dwight,_North_Dakota
Dwight-Englewood_High_School
Dwight-Englewood_High_School
Dwight-Englewood_School
Dwight-Englewood_School
DwightLinn
Dwightny
Dwight_Chapin
Dwight_Chapin
Dwight_Clark
Dwight_Conrad
Dwight_Conrad
Dwight_D._Eisenhower
Dwight_D._Eisenhower
Dwight_D._Eisenhower_Army_Medical_Center
Dwight_D._Eisenhower_Library
Dwight_D._Eisenhower_System_of_Interstate_and_Defense_Highways
Dwight_D._Opperman
Dwight_David_Eisenhower
Dwight_David_Eisenhower
Dwight_Davis
Dwight_Duncan
Dwight_Dunfield
Dwight_D_Eisenhower
Dwight_Eddleman
Dwight_Eisenhower
Dwight_Eisenhower
Dwight_eisenhower
Dwight_Evans
Dwight_E_Eisenhower
Dwight_F._Davis
Dwight_Filley_Davis
Dwight_Freeney
Dwight_Frye
Dwight_Gooden
Dwight_Griswold
Dwight_H._Green
Dwight_Henry
Dwight_Howard
Dwight_Jaynes
Dwight_L._Chapin
Dwight_L._Chapin
Dwight_L._Moody
Dwight_Look_College_of_Engineering
Dwight_Lyman_Moody
Dwight_M._Sabin
Dwight_May_Sabin
Dwight_Mission
Dwight_Mission,_OK
Dwight_Mission,_Oklahoma
Dwight_Morrow
Dwight_Muhammad_Qawi
Dwight_Phillips
Dwight_Presbyterian_Mission
Dwight_Sabin
Dwight_School
Dwight_Schultz
Dwight_Schulz
Dwight_Stephenson
Dwight_Tillery
Dwight_Township,_MI
Dwight_Township,_Michigan
Dwight_W._Morrow
Dwight_Watson
Dwight_Whitney_Morrow
Dwight_Yoakam
Dwight_Yoakam
Dwight_Yoakim
Dwight_Yoakum
Dwight_Yokam
Dwight_Yokum
Dwight_York
Dwight_York
Dwight_Yorke
Dwight_Yorke_Stadium
Dwija
Dwika
Dwilke
Dwilke
DWIM
Dwimmerlaik
Dwimorberg
Dwindrim
Dwindrim
Dwindrim/2004_February_Archive
Dwindrim/2004_February_Archive
Dwindrim/2004_March-April10_Archive
Dwindrim/Archives
Dwindrim/graphics
Dwindrim/images
Dwindrim/List_of_gender_names
Dwindrim/Rocket_fuel
Dwindrim/Testaroonies!!!
Dwindrim/Useful_stuff
Dwindrim/Useful_stuff
Dwindrim/User_talk:Dwindrim/2004_April_Archive
Dwindrim/User_talk:Dwindrim/2004_December_Archive
Dwindrim/User_talk:Dwindrim/2004_February_Archive
Dwindrim/User_talk:Dwindrim/2004_July_Archive
Dwindrim/User_talk:Dwindrim/2004_June_Archive
Dwindrim/User_talk:Dwindrim/2004_March-April10_Archive
Dwindrim/User_talk:Dwindrim/2004_May_Archive
Dwindrim/WE2
Dwindrim/Wildflowers_of_the_Canadian_Rocky_Mountains
Dwingaloo_1
Dwingeloo
Dwingeloo_1
Dwingeloo_2
Dwitzel
Dwi_(prefix)
Dwjoyes
DWM
Dwmorris
Dwmyers
Dwmyers
Dwoodhou
Dworkin
Dworkin_Barimen
Dworshak_National_Fish_Hatchery
DWP
DWR
Dws
Dws
Dws/Sandbox
Dwstein
DWT
Dwvanstone
Dwward
Dwx
Dwyane_Wade
Dwyer_Brothers_Stable
Dwyfor
Dwyn
DW_Griffith
DW
This user is under a Wikipedia:Bans and blocks. All edits by this user will be reverted. Please do not reinstate any edits made by this user. Some of the identities suspected of being used by multiple hardbanned user DW: * User:Black Widow ~ Special:Contributions/Black_Widow Hardbanned - ''Images uploaded since ban deleted'' * User:Ron Davis ~ Special:Contributions/Ron_Davis - ''Images uploaded since ban deleted'' * User:Elliot ~ Special:Contributions/Elliot - ''Images uploaded since ban deleted'' * User:Olga Bityerkokoff ~ Special:Contributions/Olga_Bityerkokoff - ''Images uploaded since ban deleted'' * User:Jacques Delson ~ Special:Contributions/Jacques_Delson - ''Images uploaded since ban deleted'' * User:ChuckM ~ Special:Contributions/ChuckM Hardbanned - ''Images uploaded since ban deleted'' * User:Joe Canuck ~ Special:Contributions/Joe_Canuck Hardbanned - ''Images uploaded since ban deleted'' * User:Sue Michael Canuck ~ Special:Contributions/Sue_Michael_Canuck Hardbanned - ''Images uploaded since ban deleted'' * User:NightCrawler ~ Special:Contributions/NightCrawler - ''Images uploaded since ban deleted'' * User:Chris Jones ~ Special:Contributions/Chris Jones - ''Images uploaded since ban deleted'' * User:Wei Chin Ho ~ Special:Contributions/Wei Chin Ho - ''Images uploaded since ban deleted'' * User:Angelique ~ Special:Contributions/Angelique - ''Images uploaded since ban deleted'' * User:Triton ~ Special:Contributions/Triton * User:JillandJack ~ Special:Contributions/JillandJack * User:Oirvine ~ Special:Contributions/Oirvine
DW
Suspected pseudonym: user:Joe Canuck More discussion related to DW (as Angelique): /Quebec issue Most wanted: * The Club of Rome; * Hudson Think Tank * H.L. Hunt and sons * J.Paul Getty family & museum DW, it is Wikipedia convention to include a complete sentence i nthe first line of every article. Please don't go around changing that. -- User:Zoe Look at all of the articles written by anybody else. Do you see them doing it the way you're doing? I will continue to change them if you put them back the way they were. -- User:Zoe ---- DW -- I showed you mine -- Now why don't you show us yours? User:JHK ---- I don't see very well what makes you think I have any knowledge in politics. But I'll see what I can do user:Anthere ---- Hey, DW, I've been following the List of Famous Canadians "debate" and I just wanted to put my two cents in. First of all, if you are truly trying to change the tenor of the "discussion" by signing in under a different username and pretending to be someone else, then that alone is, in my mind, enough to warrant a temporary ban as it shows a basic disregard for the principles of cooperation and scholarship. It is deceptive and lowers the threshold of morality for the entire Wikipedia. Secondly, I have taught five-year-old children who have responded to arguments more intelligently and with greater maturity than you have shown. I don't know how old you are, but if you are, in fact, older than twelve, I suggest you think long and hard about your response to disagreements. Thirdly, you seem to be placing an awful lot of importance on an article that, in my eyes, is not too important at all. I can not think of any reason why I might ever want to look at a list of famous Canadians and I believe all such lists are useless, but I do not interfere and attempt to delete them. Your repeated vandalism of the page, and I don't see how it could be characterized as anything else since it violates the obviously agreed upon community standard, is shameful no matter how many other wonderfully written and edited articles you have written. Fourthly, your ad hominem attacks are irrelevant and silly. Even assuming Jeronimo espoused actual racist beliefs towards Americans, this should not be barring him from writing an article on Canadians (which are not the same thing as Americans, as I'm sure you know if you are, in fact, Canadian). Similarly, your statements that no Dutch person would name himself Jeronimo may or may not have any basis in fact whatsoever. I have had no luck in deciphering exactly what the problem with the name is, however it is most certainly not evidence of any quality that he is not Dutch. My understanding is that the Netherlands is a diverse land with many different positions and viewpoints, and I certainly hope there is enough cultural acceptance there to allow any citizen to go by any name. And for the record, I do know two born-and-bred patriotic Americans named Benedict, and one named Arnold. In light of all these things (and the comments on your user page and talk page), I must conclude that if I had the power to, I would have banned you (and all your aliases) several days ago. I hope you never get involved with any of the articles I am working on, and I would not be sorry in the slightest to see you leave Wikipedia permanently. I don't believe the Wikipedia Community needs or wants contributors like you. User:Tokerboy 18:03 Oct 14, 2002 (UTC) :Ahem, excuse me
You still haven't told me what you mean with "2.5 inches", though... --User:Magnus Manske 22:21 Jan 2, 2003 (UTC) ----- DW I wonder if the images you've uploaded are really free of right ? User:Ericd ---- Hi DW, Could you put some information about the source and copyright status of the Golda Meir image on its description page please? Thanks. User:Mswake 12:16 Jan 17, 2003 (UTC) ---- DW Your answer in Talk:Front de Libération du Québec was your first answer on a talk page. I think it's a good thing. Can you also give some answers to questions about source and copyright status of the images you've uploaded. Thanks. User:Ericd ---- DW, You have produced a lot of good work in the Wikipedia, and I'd hate to see us develop hard feelings. If you really feel that the Wikipedia consensus is wrong, please discuss it either on the mailing list or at the Wikipedia:Village pump page. It's not ''my'' standards that I'm adhering to, it's what the Wikipedia community in general have decided. -- User:Zoe ---- DW, I just discovered that you actually *replace* my images, instead of uploading your smalled version to a different name (e.g., "xx_small.jpg"). An example of that is media:Peter Paul Rubens.jpg. Please link to that larger version from the image desctiption via the media namespace, as I did above. Also, do that for all the images you already have "overwritten". Thanks, User:Magnus Manske 21:16 Jan 24, 2003 (UTC) ---- Re my talk page: By shrinking my images, information is lost. While that might be not a real problem on the screen, it starts getting ugly when someone tries to print such an image. So, usual practice (you can find many examples of this in the image list, just search it for "small") for shrinking an image "xx.jpg" is to * either upload the smaller image as "xx (small).jpg", and change the link on the page, * or to upload the large image as "xx (large).jpg", and upload the small image as "xx.jpg". In any case, on the image description page of the small image should be a media: link to the large one. Yes, I know the large image is still in the "history" list, but it is unlikely to be found there. --User:Magnus Manske 22:23 Jan 24, 2003 (UTC) ---- I wish you would quit abusing other contributors; I'm embarassed for you to see the things you say. We're all here because we believe in what wikipedia stands for, other people just as much as you, and friendliness would go a long way towards making everyone's time here pleasant. ---- DW, what image are you talking about? It would be nice to know exactly which sin you're accusing me of, I lose track ;-) While I'm at it, you are (still) in error about image sizes in pixels and inches. Let me phrase it in bold text: There is no relation between the size of an image in inches and pixels. Find an image, look at it on your screen when set to 1024x768, take a ruler and measure the width. Now do the same again, but at 640x480. Then do both of that on a screen with a different physical size. Then save that image, open it in Paintshop (or whatever). Set it to 75 dpi and print it. Then set it to 600 dpi and print again. Notice a pattern there? All of them are different sizes in inch, but the same size in pixels. Got it? --User:Magnus Manske ---- DW's latest threats have been placed on the Wiki list and sent around, as requested by some other members. ---- DW, sorry to do this but at Jimbo's request I have blocked your ability to contribute to this website as a "signed-in user". --User:Ed Poor ---- Others have weighed in on your userpage, and I must agree that I find it offensive and silly. Assuming you are really DW's widow, I should certainly hope that you realize that no one on Wikipedia murdered him, and I resent the accusation otherwise; of course, if you have serious reasons for believing that Mav or Zoe or someone else actually murdered him in any relevant meaning of the word, then this doesn't apply. Otherwise, I request that you change your user page as it is unnecessarily inflammatory and misleading. With regards to your late husbands comments re: my comments in the edit window of Brion Vibber's talk page (''I did an illegal search query -- cuz I am a bad ass'') and another user, the specific complaint of which I am currently unable to find, I note that your late husband has left the following comments in the edit comments box: *''02:53 Jan 30, 2003 Amedeo Modigliani (Fixing yp an article which morons keep changing to an arbirary policy that they falsely call a Wikipedia policy. This is the tenth+ time I have fixed their mess )'' *''21:23 Oct 12, 2002 . . DW (Hopefully, final deletions of American hater Osama bin Jeronimo's work)'' *''02:59 Jan 30, 2003 User talk:Jtdirl (Note to a mental midget )'' *''(cur) (last) . . 22:41 Jan 20, 2003 . . 64.228.30.101 (putting back my photos that idiot, Ericd removed without reason and a severe lack odf brains...DW)'' *''I don't understand the morons who think they are making a contribution with half-assed material that is of little interest or benefit to anyone except the retard who posted it. I had not intended, but will get around to doing this one properly.....DW'' (Talk:Anouk Aimée) While I can understand DW's apprehension about his daughter being exposed to my and someone else's comments in the freely accessible Recent Changes page, I should certainly hope that he (and you) can/could/will differentiate and explain the differences between something that uses foul language but is obviously meant to be a joke (such as my note to Brion) and your late husband's hate-filled attacks on other contributors. If his (and, presumably, your) daughter grows up not understanding the difference between these two ideas, then I hope she leaves home as soon as possible to learn the difference between off-color humor and speech expressing vicious hatred towards another person. This, of course, includes comparing, without any noticeable proof, an individual to Osama Bin Laden -- as far as hate speech goes, this about as hateful as possible and I, for one, find it imeasurably hateful as it trivializes bin Laden's evil by equating with what is, at most, a disagreement over what qualifies as a famous Canadian. I certainly hope, for your daughter's sake, that you understand the difference between a statement of hatred and the humorous use of a word commonly perceived as impolite. Tell DW I said wuzzup User:TUF-KAT ---- Text from user page moved here ---- This space here at the top is where users normally put in some information about themselves, eg. qualifications, experience, or just plain personal data. It would be nice to know more about you, DW. I'd hate to think that there is nothing to know. Best regards, User:Deb 10:06 Jan 26, 2003 (UTC) P.S. Woof! Welcome, DW! May I recommend the Welcome, newcomers article to your attention? As well as outlining Wikipedia standards on the neutral point of view, it should point you to the standards and instructions for adding images to articles. Hope you enjoy contributing! User:-- April 08:40 Aug 9, 2002 (PDT) Yes, welcome. Do you have a better picture of the Arrow? We don't use BMP here since that's a Microsoft-only format, and anyway it was really badly dithered. Do you know where the original came from? I'm sure we can produce a better picture from the original. --User:Lee Daniel Crocker Actually it's not a Microsoft-only format (GIMP handles it well), but it's not well compressed, nor is it widely supported in web browsers. -User:PierreAbbat Yes, I used GIMP to convert it, but the format itself ws designed by Microsoft for Microsoft Windows, and is particularly suited to the Win32 API. Sure, a few folks have nonetheless figured it out and can use them on real computers :-), but it's still ''primarily'' a Windows thing, and I don't want to have to repeat that whole last paragraph every time I tell someone not to use it. --LDC ---- Welcome, DW. Might I suggest that you also check out the Naming conventions article? And, if you like, tell us a bit about yourself! Enjoy! User:JHK ---- DW -- Regarding linking the Carolingian Dynasty article forward -- it will not be done until there is proper material added to the list for non-French Carolingians and an explanation that they aren't exclusively a part of French History. At present, I believe there is a link in History of France to Carolingians which is much more comprehensive and explains more than a bunch of names. If you are concerned about this, or would like more of an explanation, I suggest you read my extensive comments at Talk:Carolingian Dynasty. Thanks User:JHK ---- DW -- please not the format we use for alternate language names, perhaps by looking at an article on a Holy Roman Emperor or Polish City. You will note that we place the alternate, usually non-English, names in parentheses after the name of the language in italics). Just because you want everybody to use the French names doesn't mean you should go through and write them all in French, except for the article title. If you are truly attempting o expand knowledge, then you should write as if your audience knows very little -- you might think it a natural conclusion for people to see Henri throughout an article on Henry I of France asd figure it out that Henri is Franch for Henry, but it isn't really that way. Many people will just be confused. User:JHK ---- DW -- generally, we respond to people's comments -- is there a problem with the way we've been doing articles? If so, you should perhaps offer alternative ways of doing things. You're putting huge amounts of interesting info in, but it's looking very cribbed from other sources (are they PD) and there is perhaps more genealogical info than is necessary in historical biography. I say this because people often see a list of names and decide they should link to their own articles, which is not always a good idea. We often know so little about younger daughters, etc., that there's no point in an encyclopedia, althought there would be in a dictionary of biography -- but wikipedia is not a dictionary. User:JHK ---- DW, I'm rather confused at what you are attempting to accomplish here at Wikipedia. The project succeeds only because people are willing to work with each other and establish common conventions. Those conventions are certainly open to change, but coming in as a new contributor and unilaterally changing them is not the way to go about it. Why not work with the other contributors here, instead of chnaging things as you alone see fit? If you want to work on Wikipedia, you should take a look at Wikipedia:Neutral point of view and Wikipedia:Naming conventions for a start. --User:Stephen Gilbert ---- Yo, DW. I like a lot of your ideas, and so do others. But please try not to be so antagonistic. You wrote, to Magnus, "Instead of trying to be a hero and getting people like Zoe to stroke your ego, slow down and do things properly. Looking at a page with your kind of minimal input and poor quality, overwhelming photos, is what turns people away from Wikipedia." You also wrote, to Zoe, some interesting, if rude, words about marketing expertise. It occurs to me, and I hope you'll reflect on this and take it to heart, that you might apply some marketing expertise to your presentation of your self. Regard the rest of us as potential customers for your ideas -- and sell those ideas to us in an appealing package, rather than yelling at us. --Jimbo Wales ------------- Hey DW! Thanks so much for being here. You seem so knowledgeable about so many things (so few of us are!). I wish you liked us one-tenth as much as we like you. User:Arthur3030 01:42 Jan 26, 2003 (UTC) ----------------- DW, It is imperative that you stop being mean to people. Your work is generally good, why are you doing this? Please email me: jwales@bomis.com, and let's chat about it. I hate to ban good people, but if you continue to insult people, I'll have no choice. --user:Jimbo Wales ----------------- DW, I thought you made a good point about putting a country of origin next to a person's details. Sometimes it makes sense and sometimes it doesn't. For example, nation-states were born with the Treaty of Westphalia (1648). Prior to that, the concept of countries was quite fluid. City-states were more often the norm (in areas that had advanced beyond tribalism). I'd like to see Zoe explain better whether she wants this to be an iron rule or a guideline to be used as appropriate. Anyway, you've poisoned the well a bit on this one by editing the George Washington page directly rather than by using a Talk: page, which would have been more diplomatic. It's hard to take your side to the extent that you engage in ad hominem attacks. When someone's ideas are mistaken, it is more effective to attack the ideas than to attack the person. Attacking the person here is likely to end in banishment. I hope that doesn't happen, because I like your work. User:Mcarling 21:34 Jan 27, 2003 (UTC) :#It's not my policy. :#Of coure it isn't useful in cases where there is no advantage in using an arbitrary nationality. As I've said elsewhere, when I wrote the Laurence Harvey article, I said he was "Latvia-born", not "Latvian". -- User:Zoe ------ The french wikipedia might find benefit in knowing precisely the reason why that user was hard banned. It is not clearly mentionned in the user page. We understood it was related to image use, which could be under copyright. We would like to know more. Also, we would like to know if some pictures, uploaded by this user, and still on en:wikipedia, may be consider safe or not. example : . User:Anthere == Article Licensing == Hi, I've User:rambot#Free the Rambot Articles project to get users to Wikipedia:Multi-licensing all of their contributions that they've made to either (1) all U.S. state, county, and city articles or (2) all articles, using the Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike (''CC-by-sa'') v1.0 and v2.0 Creative Commons Licenses or into the public domain if they prefer. The ''CC-by-sa'' license is a true free documentation license that is similar to Wikipedia's license, the GFDL, but it allows other projects, such as WikiTravel, to use our articles. Since you are among the Wikipedia:List_of_Wikipedians_by_number_of_edits Wikipedians by edits, I was wondering if you would be willing to multi-license all of your contributions or at ''minimum'' those on the geographic articles. Over 90% of people asked have agreed. For More Information: *User talk:Ram-Man#Multi-Licensing FAQ - Lots of questions answered *Wikipedia:Multi-licensing *User:rambot#Free the Rambot Articles project To allow us to track those users who muli-license their contributions, many users copy and paste the "
DW
DW can stand for: *''Data Warehouse'' *''Deutsche Welle'' *''Drum Workshop'', more commonly known as ''DW Drums'' *''Doctor Who'' *''Dreamweaver'', as in Macromedia Dreamweaver *''Darkwing'', as in Darkwing Duck *''Discworld'' *''Don't worry'', used in Instant Messaging culture *Doomworld, a Doom-related website Dora Winifred, a character in the Arthur TV show & books by Marc Brown Lists of two-letter combinations
DW
I have *NEVER* heard DW used as a nickname for Doctor Who, even from the most obsessed fan of the show I know. However, Deutsche Welle actively use DW as an onair nickname. IMO this page should redirect there and not pander to a rarely if ever used nickname. User:Kiand 03:02, 19 Feb 2005 (UTC)
Dw
#redirect DW
Dw
I have made a very heavy cut of your Day-Age Creationism. Basically everything baring the first paragraph. I am sure you will feel this is unjustified, but I hope that on re-reading the excised material you can see my reasoning - it is not relevant, it is not focussed, it is POV. Such a block of material should develop the arguments/reasoning of the Creationist and I did not feel this was so. If you still disagree please restore the extra material, I will not start an edit war over this. User:TwoOneTwo 23:24, 15 Dec 2003 (UTC)
See other meanings of words starting from letter:
D
DA | DB | DC | DE | DF | DG | DH | DI | DJ | DK | DL | DM | DN | DO | DP | DR | DS | DT | DU | DW | DX | DY | DZ |Words begining with Dw:
DW
DW
DW
DW
Dw
Dw
DW-TV
Dw.exe
DW/Quebec_issue
DW1979
DW1979
DW40
DWA
Dwad
Dwadachamsha
Dwadasama
Dwain_Chambers
Dwain_Messer
Dwain_Messer
Dwale
Dwalin
Dwane
Dwane_Casey
Dwang
Dwang
Dwan_Gate
Dwapara_Yuga
Dwapara_Yukam
Dwapar_Yuga
Dwaraka
DWARF
Dwarf
Dwarf
Dwarf(D&D)
Dwarfgoby
Dwarfing
Dwarfism
Dwarfism
Dwarfs
Dwarfs
Dwarfs_(Discworld)
Dwarf_(D&D)
Dwarf_(disambiguation)
Dwarf_(Inheritance)
Dwarf_(Legend_of_Zelda)
Dwarf_(Middle-earth)
Dwarf_(Middle-earth)
Dwarf_(Norse)
Dwarf_(Norse)
Dwarf_(Warhammer)
Dwarf_azalea
Dwarf_Beech
Dwarf_Beech
Dwarf_Buckweat_in_Cinder_Garden_at_Craters_of_the_Moon_National_Monument.jpeg
Dwarf_Campbell's_Russian_Hamster
Dwarf_crab
Dwarf_Danio
Dwarf_danio
Dwarf_elephant
Dwarf_elephant
Dwarf_elliptical_galaxies
Dwarf_elliptical_galaxies
Dwarf_elliptical_galaxy
Dwarf_galaxies
Dwarf_galaxies
Dwarf_Galaxy
Dwarf_galaxy
Dwarf_galaxy_problem
Dwarf_goby
Dwarf_hamster
Dwarf_Kirlston
Dwarf_Kirlston
Dwarf_Marmoset
Dwarf_Marmoset
Dwarf_Minke_Whale
Dwarf_Mummy_of_Wyoming
Dwarf_mummy_of_Wyoming
Dwarf_Palmetto
Dwarf_pipesnake
Dwarf_pipe_snake
Dwarf_plant
Dwarf_rabbits
Dwarf_Raven
Dwarf_Siberian_Pine
Dwarf_Sperm_Whale
Dwarf_Sperm_Whale
Dwarf_sperm_whale
Dwarf_spheroidal_galaxies
Dwarf_spheroidal_galaxies
Dwarf_spheroidal_galaxy
Dwarf_Spheroidal_Galaxy_NGC_185
Dwarf_spider
Dwarf_spider_droid
Dwarf_spider_droid
Dwarf_star
Dwarf_Sundew
Dwarf_tapeworm
Dwarf_throw
Dwarf_throwing
Dwarf_tossing
Dwarf_tossing
Dwarf_Wedge_Mussel
Dwarf_wedge_mussel
Dwarf_Willow
Dwarka
Dwarkanath_Kotnis
Dwarkanath_Tagore
Dwarkanath_Tagore
Dwarrow
Dwarven
Dwarven_Mine
Dwarves
Dwarves
Dwarves
Dwarves
Dwarves
Dwarves
Dwarves.jpeg
Dwarves_(band)
Dwarves_(Middle-Earth)
Dwarves_(Middle-earth)
Dwarves_(Middle-earth)
Dwarves_albums
Dwarvish
Dwarvish_language
DWay
DWay
Dwayne
Dwayne_Andreas
Dwayne_Bravo
Dwayne_DeRosario
Dwayne_De_Rosario
Dwayne_Douglas_Johnson
Dwayne_Goettel
Dwayne_Goettel
Dwayne_Hickman
Dwayne_Johnson
Dwayne_Johnson
Dwayne_McCall
Dwayne_McDuffie
Dwayne_Peel
Dwayne_Schintzius
Dwayne_Turner
Dwayne_Wade
DWB
DWB
Dwbird2
Dwbird2
DWC
DWDM
Dweeberkitty
Dweebs
Dweekly
Dweekly
Dweezil_&_Lisa
Dweezil_Zappa
Dweezil_Zappa
Dweezil_Zappa_albums
DWehner
DWeir
DWeir
Dweir
Dweir
DWEL
Dwell
Dweller_in_the_Gulf
Dwelling
Dwelling
Dwellings
Dwell_magazine
DWEM
Dwemer
DWG
DwGriffith
Dwheeler
Dwheeler
Dwhelan
Dwhite21787
Dwhitney
Dwhitney
DWI
Dwight
Dwight
Dwight
Dwight,_IL
Dwight,_Illinois
Dwight,_Kansas
Dwight,_KS
Dwight,_ND
Dwight,_NE
Dwight,_Nebraska
Dwight,_North_Dakota
Dwight-Englewood_High_School
Dwight-Englewood_High_School
Dwight-Englewood_School
Dwight-Englewood_School
DwightLinn
Dwightny
Dwight_Chapin
Dwight_Chapin
Dwight_Clark
Dwight_Conrad
Dwight_Conrad
Dwight_D._Eisenhower
Dwight_D._Eisenhower
Dwight_D._Eisenhower_Army_Medical_Center
Dwight_D._Eisenhower_Library
Dwight_D._Eisenhower_System_of_Interstate_and_Defense_Highways
Dwight_D._Opperman
Dwight_David_Eisenhower
Dwight_David_Eisenhower
Dwight_Davis
Dwight_Duncan
Dwight_Dunfield
Dwight_D_Eisenhower
Dwight_Eddleman
Dwight_Eisenhower
Dwight_Eisenhower
Dwight_eisenhower
Dwight_Evans
Dwight_E_Eisenhower
Dwight_F._Davis
Dwight_Filley_Davis
Dwight_Freeney
Dwight_Frye
Dwight_Gooden
Dwight_Griswold
Dwight_H._Green
Dwight_Henry
Dwight_Howard
Dwight_Jaynes
Dwight_L._Chapin
Dwight_L._Chapin
Dwight_L._Moody
Dwight_Look_College_of_Engineering
Dwight_Lyman_Moody
Dwight_M._Sabin
Dwight_May_Sabin
Dwight_Mission
Dwight_Mission,_OK
Dwight_Mission,_Oklahoma
Dwight_Morrow
Dwight_Muhammad_Qawi
Dwight_Phillips
Dwight_Presbyterian_Mission
Dwight_Sabin
Dwight_School
Dwight_Schultz
Dwight_Schulz
Dwight_Stephenson
Dwight_Tillery
Dwight_Township,_MI
Dwight_Township,_Michigan
Dwight_W._Morrow
Dwight_Watson
Dwight_Whitney_Morrow
Dwight_Yoakam
Dwight_Yoakam
Dwight_Yoakim
Dwight_Yoakum
Dwight_Yokam
Dwight_Yokum
Dwight_York
Dwight_York
Dwight_Yorke
Dwight_Yorke_Stadium
Dwija
Dwika
Dwilke
Dwilke
DWIM
Dwimmerlaik
Dwimorberg
Dwindrim
Dwindrim
Dwindrim/2004_February_Archive
Dwindrim/2004_February_Archive
Dwindrim/2004_March-April10_Archive
Dwindrim/Archives
Dwindrim/graphics
Dwindrim/images
Dwindrim/List_of_gender_names
Dwindrim/Rocket_fuel
Dwindrim/Testaroonies!!!
Dwindrim/Useful_stuff
Dwindrim/Useful_stuff
Dwindrim/User_talk:Dwindrim/2004_April_Archive
Dwindrim/User_talk:Dwindrim/2004_December_Archive
Dwindrim/User_talk:Dwindrim/2004_February_Archive
Dwindrim/User_talk:Dwindrim/2004_July_Archive
Dwindrim/User_talk:Dwindrim/2004_June_Archive
Dwindrim/User_talk:Dwindrim/2004_March-April10_Archive
Dwindrim/User_talk:Dwindrim/2004_May_Archive
Dwindrim/WE2
Dwindrim/Wildflowers_of_the_Canadian_Rocky_Mountains
Dwingaloo_1
Dwingeloo
Dwingeloo_1
Dwingeloo_2
Dwitzel
Dwi_(prefix)
Dwjoyes
DWM
Dwmorris
Dwmyers
Dwmyers
Dwoodhou
Dworkin
Dworkin_Barimen
Dworshak_National_Fish_Hatchery
DWP
DWR
Dws
Dws
Dws/Sandbox
Dwstein
DWT
Dwvanstone
Dwward
Dwx
Dwyane_Wade
Dwyer_Brothers_Stable
Dwyfor
Dwyn
DW_Griffith
Sponsored links: praca, nurkowanie.
These materials are based on Wikipedia and licensed under the GNU FDL
Untitled Document
| Linki sponsorowane | Tani hosting | Pozycjonowanie |
YouTube.com videos better site than Turbo Tax 2007
