--User:Flockmeal 04:12, Nov 27, 2004 (UTC) ---- On Sony While I appreciate your willingness to work on wikipedia, please refrain from calling people arses. Also, please note that "sony" is a brand of the sony corporation, and is also applied to other companies. See japanese companies in general and the concept of keiretsu for background information on branding in the japanese corporate structure. Have a wonderful New Year. User:Christopher Mahan 05:30, 30 Dec 2004 (UTC) :User:Christopher Mahan has been renaming things to be "correct" without regard to whether they are useful. He has not responded to requests to stop and discuss the issue (see Toyota). What to do next? --User:Sfoskett 14:39, Dec 30, 2004 (UTC) :Just because everybody in the world refers to the United States of America as "America", does not make it correct. Look at the "America" article. Also, I am married to a japanese. The issue of brand vs company name is a thorny one in japan. Sony Corporation is a Japanese company. Sony Corporation of America is a US company. Guess where sony.com goes: Answer: not Sony Corporation, but Sony Corporation of America. How are we supposed to describe the financial and cultural differences between these separate companies if all the links point to the same article? Hope all of you have a happy new year. User:Christopher Mahan 17:18, 30 Dec 2004 (UTC) == Consensus Science == Hi. You said, "There's an article to be written about that critique, but this isn't it" on the Wikipedia:Votes_for_deletion/Consensus_science for the consensus science article. Could you reread the article after my recent edits, and if you feel the new version is more appropriate, consider changing your deletion vote? I tried to bring it more into NPOV, and turn it into a more serious description of a critique methodology. Thanks. User:Cortonin — User:Cortonin | User talk:Cortonin 09:21, 21 Jan 2005 (UTC) == Consensus science and RFC's == (User:William M. Connolley 22:17, 24 Jan 2005 (UTC)) Hi. After your recent experiences on consensus science, you might care to comment on Wikipedia:Requests for comment/William M. Connolley and Wikipedia:Requests for comment/JonGwynne, which I've just created. == A poof documentary? == Oops. I've corrected it. User:Mel Etitis (Μελ_Ετητης)">User talk:Mel Etitis 21:22, 1 Apr 2005 (UTC) ==Vegas template== There was consensus to move the Bellagio article to Bellagio (hotel and casino), so I took the liberty of editing your template to keep it current. User:JamesMLane 20:11, 2 May 2005 (UTC)
I have proudly founded: * The Flying Pickets * Heat (magazine) * Kate Thornton * Mystic Meg * The Krankies * Fightstar * Teasmade * NT (cassette) * Ruvi * NEWS * Still video camera * Magic Link * Richard X * Clea (band) * G4 (band)
See other meanings of words starting from letter:
Words begining with Dtcdthingy:
Dtcdthingy
Dtcdthingy
Dtcdthingy/Template:Las_Vegas
Dtcdthingy
--User:Flockmeal 04:12, Nov 27, 2004 (UTC) ---- On Sony While I appreciate your willingness to work on wikipedia, please refrain from calling people arses. Also, please note that "sony" is a brand of the sony corporation, and is also applied to other companies. See japanese companies in general and the concept of keiretsu for background information on branding in the japanese corporate structure. Have a wonderful New Year. User:Christopher Mahan 05:30, 30 Dec 2004 (UTC) :User:Christopher Mahan has been renaming things to be "correct" without regard to whether they are useful. He has not responded to requests to stop and discuss the issue (see Toyota). What to do next? --User:Sfoskett 14:39, Dec 30, 2004 (UTC) :Just because everybody in the world refers to the United States of America as "America", does not make it correct. Look at the "America" article. Also, I am married to a japanese. The issue of brand vs company name is a thorny one in japan. Sony Corporation is a Japanese company. Sony Corporation of America is a US company. Guess where sony.com goes: Answer: not Sony Corporation, but Sony Corporation of America. How are we supposed to describe the financial and cultural differences between these separate companies if all the links point to the same article? Hope all of you have a happy new year. User:Christopher Mahan 17:18, 30 Dec 2004 (UTC) == Consensus Science == Hi. You said, "There's an article to be written about that critique, but this isn't it" on the Wikipedia:Votes_for_deletion/Consensus_science for the consensus science article. Could you reread the article after my recent edits, and if you feel the new version is more appropriate, consider changing your deletion vote? I tried to bring it more into NPOV, and turn it into a more serious description of a critique methodology. Thanks. User:Cortonin — User:Cortonin | User talk:Cortonin 09:21, 21 Jan 2005 (UTC) == Consensus science and RFC's == (User:William M. Connolley 22:17, 24 Jan 2005 (UTC)) Hi. After your recent experiences on consensus science, you might care to comment on Wikipedia:Requests for comment/William M. Connolley and Wikipedia:Requests for comment/JonGwynne, which I've just created. == A poof documentary? == Oops. I've corrected it. User:Mel Etitis (Μελ_Ετητης)">User talk:Mel Etitis 21:22, 1 Apr 2005 (UTC) ==Vegas template== There was consensus to move the Bellagio article to Bellagio (hotel and casino), so I took the liberty of editing your template to keep it current. User:JamesMLane 20:11, 2 May 2005 (UTC)
Dtcdthingy
I have proudly founded: * The Flying Pickets * Heat (magazine) * Kate Thornton * Mystic Meg * The Krankies * Fightstar * Teasmade * NT (cassette) * Ruvi * NEWS * Still video camera * Magic Link * Richard X * Clea (band) * G4 (band)
See other meanings of words starting from letter:
D
DA | DB | DC | DE | DF | DG | DH | DI | DJ | DK | DL | DM | DN | DO | DP | DR | DS | DT | DU | DW | DX | DY | DZ |Words begining with Dtcdthingy:
Dtcdthingy
Dtcdthingy
Dtcdthingy/Template:Las_Vegas
Sponsored links: praca, nurkowanie.
These materials are based on Wikipedia and licensed under the GNU FDL
Untitled Document
| Linki sponsorowane | Tani hosting | Pozycjonowanie |
YouTube.com videos better site than Turbo Tax 2007
