Hello Dking, thanks for your edits at cult. But please provide more references for what you wrote because the subject is complicated, diverse and controversial. Thanks. User:Andries 07:30, 4 Jun 2005 (UTC) ---- Welcome! Hello, and Wikipedia:Welcome, newcomers to Wikipedia. Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few good links for newcomers: *Wikipedia:Five pillars *Wikipedia:How to edit a page *Wikipedia:Tutorial *Wikipedia:Picture tutorial *Wikipedia:How to write a great article *Wikipedia:Naming conventions *Wikipedia:Manual of Style *If you're ready for the complete list of Wikipedia documentation, there's also Wikipedia:Topical index. I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedia:Wikipedians! By the way, you can sign your name on Talk and vote pages using three tildes, like this: ~~~. Four tildes (~~~~) produces your name and the current date. If you have any questions, see the Wikipedia:Help, add a question to the Wikipedia:village pump or ask me on my Talk page. Again, welcome! Cheers, -User:Willmcw 15:32, Jun 4, 2005 (UTC) == Providing sources == Hey, Dking. As you've already probably noticed, certain editors at the cult articles are pro-cult POV pushers of the first order, masters of a double standard under which even the most preposterous allegation made against Rick Ross or Margaret Singer or the anti-cult movement is given prominence, and yet any statement ''against'' cultic groups or any of their leaders is likely to be removed immediately with the claims "that's not sufficiently referenced" and "cite your sources". When recommendations for 'proper conduct' are being wielded as weapons by blatant hypocrites with ulterior motives, it can be hard to find a reason to take anything they say seriously. Nevertheless, there ''are'' certain principles which Wikipedia does hold, and which you should give serious attention to -- even if the pro-cult guerillas are proclaiming them insincerely, with a full intent to break those same rules once it becomes convenient, these are still the principles that are valued by the people who are actually acting on Wikipedia in good faith. Wherever possible, Wikipedia:cite your sources so that the people who are acting in good faith can know that your claims are based on research, and the POV-pushers will have to go through even more absurd verbal contortions (which they ''will'') trying to find an excuse to delete them. -- User:Antaeus Feldspar 19:50, 4 Jun 2005 (UTC)
See other meanings of words starting from letter:
Words begining with Dking:
Dking
Dking/dking
Dking
Hello Dking, thanks for your edits at cult. But please provide more references for what you wrote because the subject is complicated, diverse and controversial. Thanks. User:Andries 07:30, 4 Jun 2005 (UTC) ---- Welcome! Hello, and Wikipedia:Welcome, newcomers to Wikipedia. Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few good links for newcomers: *Wikipedia:Five pillars *Wikipedia:How to edit a page *Wikipedia:Tutorial *Wikipedia:Picture tutorial *Wikipedia:How to write a great article *Wikipedia:Naming conventions *Wikipedia:Manual of Style *If you're ready for the complete list of Wikipedia documentation, there's also Wikipedia:Topical index. I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedia:Wikipedians! By the way, you can sign your name on Talk and vote pages using three tildes, like this: ~~~. Four tildes (~~~~) produces your name and the current date. If you have any questions, see the Wikipedia:Help, add a question to the Wikipedia:village pump or ask me on my Talk page. Again, welcome! Cheers, -User:Willmcw 15:32, Jun 4, 2005 (UTC) == Providing sources == Hey, Dking. As you've already probably noticed, certain editors at the cult articles are pro-cult POV pushers of the first order, masters of a double standard under which even the most preposterous allegation made against Rick Ross or Margaret Singer or the anti-cult movement is given prominence, and yet any statement ''against'' cultic groups or any of their leaders is likely to be removed immediately with the claims "that's not sufficiently referenced" and "cite your sources". When recommendations for 'proper conduct' are being wielded as weapons by blatant hypocrites with ulterior motives, it can be hard to find a reason to take anything they say seriously. Nevertheless, there ''are'' certain principles which Wikipedia does hold, and which you should give serious attention to -- even if the pro-cult guerillas are proclaiming them insincerely, with a full intent to break those same rules once it becomes convenient, these are still the principles that are valued by the people who are actually acting on Wikipedia in good faith. Wherever possible, Wikipedia:cite your sources so that the people who are acting in good faith can know that your claims are based on research, and the POV-pushers will have to go through even more absurd verbal contortions (which they ''will'') trying to find an excuse to delete them. -- User:Antaeus Feldspar 19:50, 4 Jun 2005 (UTC)
See other meanings of words starting from letter:
D
DA | DB | DC | DE | DF | DG | DH | DI | DJ | DK | DL | DM | DN | DO | DP | DR | DS | DT | DU | DW | DX | DY | DZ |Words begining with Dking:
Dking
Dking/dking
Sponsored links: praca, nurkowanie.
These materials are based on Wikipedia and licensed under the GNU FDL
YouTube.com videos better site than Turbo Tax 2007
