:''This article is about the mental state. See Delirium (Sandman) for the character.''
Delirium is a medicine term used to describe a mental state. Delirium is probably the single most common acute disorder affecting adults in general hospitals. It affects 10-20% of all adults in hospital, and 30-40% in older patients.
There are several definitions (including those in the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders and ICD-10). However, all include some core features.
The core features are:
* disturbance of consciousness (that is, reduced clarity of awareness of the environment, with reduced ability to focus, sustain, or shift attention
* change in cognition (eg. memory impairment) or a perceptual disturbance
* onset of hours to days, and tendency to fluctuate.
Common features include:
* intrusive abnormalities of awareness and affect, such as hallucination or innappropriate emotional states.
Delirium should be distinguished from psychosis, in which consciousness and cognition may not be impaired, and dementia which describes an acquired intellectual impairment usually resulting from a degenerative brain disease.
Delirium may be caused by severe physical or mental illness. Fever, poison (including toxic drug reactions), brain injury, surgery, severe lack of food or water, drug and severe alcohol withdrawal are all known to cause delirium.
It is also referred to as 'acute confusional state' or 'acute brain syndrome'.
===Impairment of consciousness===
A delirious person may have a clouding of awareness and consciousness. This impairment of consciousness typically fluctates, so the person may be aroused and alert for short periods of time before again relapsing into a clouded state. Fluctation may follow a pattern of diurnal variation, where consciousness levels change as the day progresses. Typically, a delirious person may be more consciousness impaired in the evening and at night.
===Confusion and disorientation===
Confusion may occur in delirium, where the sufferer loses the capacity for clear and coherent thought. It may be apparent in disorganised or incoherent speech, the inability to concentrate or a lack of goal directed thinking.
Disorientation describes the loss of awareness of the surroundings, environment and context in which the person exists. Disorientation may occur in time (not knowing what time of day, day of week, month, season or year it is), place (not know where you are) or person (not knowing who you are).
===Cognitive Impairments===
Impairments to cognition may include reduction in the function of short or long term memory, attention or problem solving.
===Abnormalities of Awareness and Affect===
hallucination (perceived sensory experience with the lack of an external source) or distortions of reality may occur in delirium. Commonly these are visual distortions, and can take the form of masses of small crawling creatures (particularly common in delirium tremens, caused by severe alcohol withdrawal) or distortions in size or intensity of the surrounding environment.
Strange belief may also be held during a delirious state, but these are not considered delusion in the clinical sense as they are considered too short lived. Interestingly, in some cases sufferers may be left with false or delusional memories after delirium, basing their memories on the confused thinking or sensory distortion which occurred.
Abnormalities of affect include any distortions to perceived or communicated emotion states. Emotional states may also fluctate, so a person may rapidly change between, for example, terror, sadness and jocularity.
===Duration===
The duration of delirium is typically affected by the underlying cause. If caused by a fever, the delirious state should subside as does the severity of the fever.
===Accounts of delirium===
Sims (1995, p31) points out a "superb detailed and lengthy description" of delirium in The Stroller's Tale from Charles Dickens' The Pickwick Papers.
===Further reading===
* Sims, A. (1995) Symptoms in the mind: An introduction to descriptive psychopathology. Edinburgh: Elsevier Science Ltd. ISBN 0702026271
* Dickens, C. (1837) The Pickwick Papers. Available for free on Project Gutenberg
* [http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?cmd=Retrieve&db=PubMed&list_uids=14966146&dopt=Abstract Burns A, Gallagley A, Byrne J. (2004)] Delirium. ''Journal of Neurology, Neurosurgery and Psychiatry'', 75 (3), 362-7.
Cognitive disorders
Delirium
Hi! Please leave your comments below.
Comments prior to:
* [http://en2.wikipedia.org/w/wiki.phtml?title=User_talk:Delirium&oldid=2035457 Dec. 24th, 2003].
* [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/wiki.phtml?title=User_talk:Delirium&oldid=4266597 June 28th, 2004].
----
== Arbitration - subject: User:Mike Storm ==
I was just wondering if you could please post your vote on the subject of User:Mike Storm on Wikipedia:Requests for arbitration. I would like to get this matter dealt with with quickly, but you're probably busy so please take your time. Thanks! User:Mike_StormUser_talk:Mike_StormUser:Mike_Storm">User:Mike Storm|User:Mike StormUser talk:Mike StormUser:Mike Storm 17:07, 5 Aug 2004 (UTC)
==Malicious Deletion Attempt===
Hello. Sorry for the imposition, but I thought you might be interested to note that an article you supported in the past on vfd has been listed again under malicious circumstances - the 3rd such attempt in 7 months. Please feel free to review the discussion and cast your vote as you feel appropriate: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Votes_for_deletion/Atlantium --User:Gene Poole 10:28, 10 Aug 2004 (UTC)
==Athos==
:''As for Athos, Greeks typically (at least in modern Greek) simply refer to mountains using the name, as typically only well-known mountains are referred to by name. Hence, the mountain is simply "Athos" (similarly, what would be called "Mount Olympus" in English is simply "Olymbos" in Greek). I suppose something like "to vouno Athos" ("the mountain 'Athos'") would be acceptable as well when context was unclear, but it is certainly not common. User:Delirium 07:43 27 Jun 2003 (UTC)''
Hello. This acknowledgement comes very late, but thanks for the explanation. User:Michael Hardy 00:44, 18 Aug 2004 (UTC)
==Ellas/Ellada==
Hello. In view of your ability to clarify the situation concerning the name ''Athos'', maybe you'd know the answer to this one too: During the recent TV coverage of the Olympics in Athens and on some web sites I find Greece referred to sometimes as ''Ellas'' and other times as ''Ellada''. I ''guessing'' that the former is nominative and the latter is accusative. Is that it? One page on the web that lists the participating countries in Greek gives ''Ellada''. But I'd have thought the nominative would be used by default. Does that make any sense? User:Michael Hardy 17:05, 7 Sep 2004 (UTC)
== Zero0000 sysop abuse claim ==
Delirium wrote in wikiEN-l:
:That's an odd position---you say he's making a dishonest claim that the
material is from a book, yet you have not actually checked whether it's
in the book or not? How do you know it's dishonest then?
:-Mark
Well said! The book currently is available in Hebrew only (to the best of my knowledge). A language that Zero0000 does not read despite residing in the area. He asks Danny to translate for him when he wants to read something. Evidence of this is available on Zero0000's talk page. User:Lance6Wins 19:09, 21 Sep 2004 (UTC)
== About Karaims ==
See Karaims Discussion--User:Björn-Isak Rosendahl 06:26, 24 Sep 2004 (UTC)
==Survey==
There is a Talk:Project_for_the_New_American_Century/Survey regarding a disputed paragraph in the PNAC article that you might be interested in. User:Kevin baas | User_talk:Kevin_baas 19:10, 2004 Oct 17 (UTC)
=="Dishonesty"==
I don't get mad easily (not once so far on Wikipedia) but you pushed the wrong button buster. There was nothing "dishonest" about my marking an added return as a minor edit. No text was changed, no secret agenda, no POV, nothing. (As to the actual matter in question, your browser may show a huge space; mine, without that return, shows the stub text crammed up against the text of the articles.) — User:Bill Thayer 23:23, 22 Oct 2004 (UTC)
== Reverting news ==
Hello Delirium, could you please explain the rationale behind reverting my revert for the same reason I reverted the article in the first place? It seems to me that either we remove all the entries that do not link to an updated article, or we change the guidelines. As it is now there is no consistency and the guidelines are blatantly ignored. The Iraq article you removed received a major update (albeit it to a list type article), and was listed for 2 days, so it seems to me it should have stayed. Regards, User:Solitude\User_talk:Solitude">User:Solitude|User:Solitude\User_talk:Solitude 15:59, Oct 26, 2004 (UTC)
==People of Arab ethnicity who are citizens of Israel==
Mustafaa and I turned Israeli Arabs into something halfway between a REDIRECT and a decent article. Any suggestions for improvement? User:Ed Pooruser talk:Ed Poor 12:39, 2 Nov 2004 (UTC)
== Arbitration ==
As a courtesy, I wanted to let you know that I have raised the question of your continued participation on the Arbitration Committee at Wikipedia talk:Arbitration Committee. --User:Michael Snow 06:30, 7 Nov 2004 (UTC)
==US Election issues==
Do you and maybe a couple of others working on this article want to meet on say wiki IRC, to discuss it, so we can try and mutually agree a consensus on its progress? User:FT2 00:18, Nov 11, 2004 (UTC)
== Actually Exit Polling Is Reliable ==
There are 2 issues, exit polling is historically reliable, but in any given situation like this one data may be wrong. Which is why it is important to figure out why there were exit polling vs actual results discrepancies (assuming there was no fraud) so exit polling techniques can be improved for the next election. So I believe you should have said it's the data that may be wrong for one reason or another, not exit polling in total.
==Trend==
[http://en.wikipedia.org/w/wiki.phtml?title=2004_U.S._Election_controversies_and_irregularities&diff=7322130&oldid=7321985]
*Do you have any sources to verify this alleged trend?
*Also "however" and "corrected" are subtle pov.
*And in general statistical analysis should not be "corrected". They should be done on raw data, and synthesized afterwards.
User:Kevin baas | User_talk:Kevin_baas 02:15, 2004 Nov 11 (UTC)
== Keeping "In the news" NPOV and credible ==
Following various attempts to add partisan and fringe stories to :Template:In the news, I've proposed a new criterion to keep such stuff out. Could you please take a look at Wikipedia talk:In the news section on the Main Page#Added new criterion to ITN guidelines and let me know what you think? -- User:ChrisO 19:12, 12 Nov 2004 (UTC)
==list of exponential topics==
:''This list does nothing that categories don't do, as it's just a list of pages with membership in the semantic category. I can see an argument for keeping lists with a particular sort of organization, but if it's just a flat "on the list" or "not on the list" distinction, categories are equivalent and more maintainable. --User:Delirium 19:36, Nov 11, 2004 (UTC)''
This list ''now'' does something that categories cannot do. I have added invisible links so that edits to discussion pages will also appear when one clicks on "related changes". Even lists that cannot do what categories cannot do have the potential to do so with some editing. Not only what I just did, but also consider list of combinatorics topics or list of geometry topics, in which the lists are ''organized''. Categories cannot be organized -- only alphabetized. User:Michael Hardy 01:57, 14 Nov 2004 (UTC)
==New Gzornenplatz et al proposed temp order==
Please vote for, against, or abstain in [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Requests_for_arbitration/Gzornenplatz,_Kevin_Baas,_Shorne,_VeryVerily/Proposed_decision#Proposed_temporary_orders proposed temporary order #3 in the Gzornenplatz et al case]. --User:Maveric149 21:56, 15 Nov 2004 (UTC)
== Wikinews demo up and running ==
Hi!
I'm writing to let you know that the Wikimedia Board of Trustees has approved the first stage of the m:Wikinews project. There's now a fully operational English demo site at [http://demo.wikinews.org demo.wikinews.org]. This will be used for experimenting with various review models and basic policies before the site is launched officially in about a week. demo.wikinews.org will become the English version later.
You voted for the Wikinews project, so I'm asking for your participation now. Everything is open, nothing is final. What Wikinews will and can be depends in large part on you. There already is a [http://mail.wikipedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikinews-l global Wikinews mailing list] for discussing the project. If you are interested at all, please subscribe -- coordination is of key importance. There's also an Internet Relay Chat channel #wikinews on irc.freenode.net. Realtime discussion can help to polish up articles.
If you're looking for something to do, check out the [http://demo.wikinews.org/wiki/Category:Articles_in_development articles in development] and [http://demo.wikinews.org/wiki/Category:Articles_in_review articles in review]. Or start a new story in the Wikinews workspace, or ignore the proposed review system - it's up to you. I hope you'll join us soon in this exciting experiment.--User:EloquenceUser:Eloquence/CP 01:58, Nov 17, 2004 (UTC)
== Arb against Ta bu ==
Can I ask why you withdrew the request, and what specifically made you want to place it? -- User:NetoholicUser talk:Netoholic 22:57, 2004 Nov 17 (UTC)
== Lilypond ==
You're right. Lilypond as a markup language leaves a great deal to be desired. It is difficult to understand even for people with both a musical and a software background, and as you point out has a great deal of typographical cruft that has nothing to do with the musical idea being presented.
However, it is the best of the free solutions that we have today, and the situation is unlikely to change. There is a "music XML" project that is, at best, early stage, and that is encumbered by copyright. There are the widely used proprietary formats. And there are some "way out there" standards being proposed, that appear to me unlikely to come to fruition.
There are several barriers to a standardized music markup, chief among them being that proper music notation really can't be reduced to a simple grammar. There are so many instrument-specific, period-specific, and genre-specific things to portray that it's hard. I play organ, and organ notation uses heel and toe markings that, as far as I know, are not used for any other instrument (except maybe pedal piano). Accordion notation is another similar can of worms. This leaves aside more common instruments, like piano and strings and voice, that each have their own unique (albeit well understood) notational conventions.
Anyway, you probably already know most or all this, but the point is that with all the complexity, and the market fragmentation, and the small size of the classical music community, and the fact that music publishing is not particularly profitable, it is unlikely that any future standards effort will be more successful than the previous ones.
So we are left with Lilypond, which with all its shortcomings for what we want to do, is the best available and likely to remain so for quite some time.
User:UninvitedCompany Co., User_talk:UninvitedCompany 23:16, 17 Nov 2004 (UTC)
I noted in your abstain comment that you acknowledged that punishment for violating 3RR is somewhat "retroactive". I fully agree, and wonder why then you support the extremely harsh remedies for my past violation of this "rule" of hitherto uncertain status in the earlier proposed rulings. User:VeryVerilyUser talk:VeryVerily 11:13, 20 Nov 2004 (UTC)
== Your status on the Arbitration Committee ==
When I originally raised this question, you commented that "I would have resigned already if I was under the impression that there were suitable candidates interested in the position." [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/wiki.phtml?title=Wikipedia_talk:Arbitration_Committee&diff=7181525&oldid=7180602] I understand that the experience with the last election persuaded you that this was not the case.
However, discussions of the current election have continued with at least the possibility in mind that your position could be up for election. As the election approaches, I think it would be best to settle this question so that we know for sure how many positions are being elected, and I have brought the issue up again at Wikipedia talk:Arbitration Committee Elections December 2004#Time to make some decisions.
It seems clear that this election is rather different from the last one, and that more qualified candidates have come forward in response to the additional openings. But obviously everyone will have their own opinions on the current slate of candidates and whether there are actually enough good ones to fill all of the potential vacancies. Accordingly, with your earlier statement in mind, I wanted to ask you if you would simply comment on whether you believe resigning at this point would be suitable or not. I'm not trying to push your decision in either direction, just looking to get some closure on the issue, and I'll respect and support your choice either way. --User:Michael Snow 19:08, 23 Nov 2004 (UTC)
== Article Licensing ==
Hi, I've started the User:rambot which has the goals of getting users to Wikipedia:Multi-licensing all of their contributions that they've made to...
#...all U.S. state, county, and city articles...
#...all articles...
using the Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike (''CC-by-sa'') version 1.0 and 2.0 Creative Commons Licenses or into the public domain if they prefer. The ''CC-by-sa'' license is a true free documentation license that is similar to the GFDL (which every contribution made to Wikipedia is licensed under), but it allows other projects, such as WikiTravel, to use our articles (See the Wikipedia:Multi-licensing for more information). Since you are among the Wikipedia:List_of_Wikipedians_by_number_of_edits most active Wikipedians, I was wondering if you would be willing to multi-license all of your contributions or at ''minimum'' those on the geographic articles.
:Nutshell: Wikipedia articles can be shared with any other GFDL project but open/free projects using the incompatible Creative Commons Licenses (e.g. WikiTravel) can't use our stuff and we can't use theirs. It is important to us that other free projects can use our stuff. So we use their licenses too.
To allow us to track those users who muli-license their contributions, many users copy and paste the template (or for public domain) into their user page, but there are other templates for other options at Wikipedia:Template messages/User namespace#Licensing Templates. The following examples could also copied and pasted into your user page:
:Option 1
:I agree to Wikipedia:Multi-licensing all my contributions, with the exception of my user pages, as described below:
:OR
:Option 2
:I agree to Wikipedia:Multi-licensing all my contributions to any U.S. state, county, or city article as described below:
:
Or if you wanted to place your work into the public domain, you could replace with . If you only prefer using the GFDL, I would like to know that too. ''Please let me know'' at my User talk:Ram-Man what you think. -- User:Ram-Man 18:02, Nov 30, 2004 (UTC)
== Abusive behaviour ==
Could you take a look at this diff [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/wiki.phtml?title=Wikipedia%3ARequests_for_comment%2FCheeseDreams&diff=8149185&oldid=8145501]
Rienzo has forged a comment he alleges I made about him. I did not make it and it is demonstrably not present in my contributions list. Could you consider some sort of punishment for this please?User:CheeseDreams 15:21, 5 Dec 2004 (UTC)
== Hate Groups and NRMs ==
Care to comment on the dispute about Hate_group#Hate_groups_and_new_religious_movements?. That section is now in RfC. Thanks. --User:Zappaz 01:28, 6 Dec 2004 (UTC)
----
When Fennec asked me my opinion about what changes should occur on the Wikipedia, I honestly stated that I feel Jimbo should resign. What business is that of yours? What business is that of the arbitration committee? Has Fennec complained? What possible reasoning could you have to vote that I should be in any way censured for such a statement? User:Lir
Is it too much for you to answer my questions? Is it too much for you to state just what exactly I did that you consider "petty vandalism"? Surely, the accidental insertion of "da" into an article is not something you can honestly feel to be vandalism. Which raises the question, of where do you feel I committed vandalism? User:Lir
== Herschelkrustofsky ==
Hi Mark, I'm writing about a decision made by the Arbitration Committee regarding activism on behalf of Lyndon LaRouche in Wikipedia; see Wikipedia:Requests for arbitration/Lyndon LaRouche/Proposed decision.
If you have time, would you mind taking a look at Wikipedia talk:Requests for arbitration/Lyndon LaRouche/Proposed decision? User:Herschelkrustofsky, who is one of the LaRouche supporters the decision involved, has initiated a query of the Arbitration Committee for clarification of the ruling (under Regarding this Arbcom ruling, as it applies to the dispute between SlimVirgin and HerschelKrustofsky).
I agree that clarification is needed, because I feel the wording of the ruling has left loopholes that the LaRouche supporters are exploiting. I have therefore written up a long response to Herschelkrustofsky's query and have requested clarification from the Committee on three specific points, as I feel this is an opportunity to put the matter to rest. I wondered whether you'd be prepared to comment on the page. If you don't have the time or inclination, however, don't worry about it. Many thanks, User:SlimVirgin 05:25, Dec 9, 2004 (UTC)
==RFC pages on VfD==
Should RFC pages be placed on VfD to be deleted? I'm considering removing Wikipedia:Requests for comment/Slrubenstein, Wikipedia:Requests for comment/Jwrosenzweig and Wikipedia:Requests for comment/John Kenney from WP:VFD. Each of them was listed by User:CheeseDreams. Your comments on whether I should do this would be appreciated. - User:Ta bu shi da yu 03:33, 10 Dec 2004 (UTC)
== CheeseDreams arbitration ==
Hi, I was wondering if you might review the CheeseDreams request for arbitration and vote on whether to hear the case. User:John KenneyUser_talk:John Kenney 22:11, 10 Dec 2004 (UTC)
== One Question ==
In most legal situations, policemen whose conduct is undergoing criminal investigation tend to be temporarily suspended from duty.
Since Fred Bauder is currently undergoing arbitration himself as to his neutrality or accurate reportage, should he actually be allowed to take an active part in other cases?
User:CheeseDreams 18:37, 13 Dec 2004 (UTC)
== Fair play ==
According to the RfAr against me,
these are the arbitrators
* Accept User:Fred Bauder 18:48, Dec 5, 2004 (UTC)
* Accept. User:Raul654 19:32, Dec 5, 2004 (UTC)
* Accept. of_the_Cabal\">TINC">User:The Epopt|--the Epopt of_the_Cabal\">TINC 21:19, 5 Dec 2004 (UTC)
* Recuse. User:Jwrosenzweig 21:42, 5 Dec 2004 (UTC)
* Accept. User:Delirium 23:24, Dec 10, 2004 (UTC)
so why is User:Jdforrester voting on the proposed decision? User:Cheese Dreams 19:09, 14 Dec 2004 (UTC)
== Untegged image ==
I'm working on the untagged image project and you uploaded an image,
:Image:ChurchillTank.jpg that does not have a image copyright tag. Could you please add one? Thanks
User:Sortior 21:49, Dec 18, 2004 (UTC)
== Snowspinner vs. Lir/Proposed decision ==
A curiosity really, but why is the above only considering Lir, with no consideration, findings of fact, or decisions regarding the actions of Snowspinner, if it is "Snowspinner vs. Lir" ? User:CheeseDreams 21:15, 20 Dec 2004 (UTC)
== Housecleaning ==
To all those on the ArbCom: Man, you guys ''cleaned house!'' Great work. My number one hope for the 2005 ArbCom was that the backlog would shrink due to prompt decisions, and you all surpassed my hopes. My hat's off to you. – User:Quadell(User_talk:Quadell) (Wikipedia:Image sleuthing) 20:47, Feb 10, 2005 (UTC)
== Infoslurp on list of mirrors ==
The mailing list seems strangely quiet about this matter, so I decided to WP:BB and add it to Wikipedia:Mirrors and forks/Ghi. I'm not sure where to go from here or where to discuss it though. Thanks, User:AlphaxUser_talk:AlphaxSpecial:Contributions/AlphaxSpecial:Emailuser/Alphax 00:54, Feb 11, 2005 (UTC)
==Agia Sofia==
I find it hard to believe that an intelligent person could be making such asinine edits. Of course Agia Sofia ''could'' mean "Saint Sophia", but the fact is that it doesn't. Sophia is a very minor saint and I have never seen it suggested that the basilica was named for her. Its name is the Church of the Holy Wisdom and that's all that needs to be said. User:Adam Carr 06:25, 20 Feb 2005 (UTC)
Perhaps we should note that Saint Paul's Cathedral might have been named after Paul McCartney, but wasn't. User:Adam Carr 12:03, 20 Feb 2005 (UTC)
==Bring back quickpolls==
I think it's time that Wikipedia:quickpolls be re-evaluated as a solution to short term disputes between users. WP:BBQ --Ryan!">User:Merovingian | Talk">User talk:Merovingian 05:12, Mar 11, 2005 (UTC)
== For Atlanta newspaper article ==
Delirium,
I'd like to talk with you about being a Georgia-based Wikipedia contributor. Can you e-mail me? My deadline is Friday.
Thank you,
Kayakembe--User:Kayakembe 17:56, 4 Apr 2005 (UTC)
== issues about school articles ==
In November 2003, there was a VfD debate over Sunset High School (Portland). The debate was archived under Talk:Sunset High School (Portland). What to do with the article is still being contested and has been recently re-nominated for VfD at Wikipedia:Votes for deletion/Sunset High School (Portland).
I am writing to you because you have participated in such debates before. There still does not exist a wikipedia policy (as far as i can tell) over what to do in regards to articles about specific U.S. public school. My hope is that a real consensus can come out of the debate, and a real policy can take shape. Take part if you are so willing. User:Kingturtle 02:34, 12 Apr 2005 (UTC)
==DC trip==
Please list all your available dates in the table at Wikipedia:Meetup/Wikipedians of the East Coast field trip#Date. Thanks. --brian0918">User:Brian0918">User talk:Brian0918 18:34, 18 Apr 2005 (UTC)
== Walter Junghans ==
Hi, I'm always eager to learn, so I'd just like to ask you why you changed back "third choice" to "3rd choice", "four seasons" to "4 seasons" and "Schalke 04" to "Schalke". Is there any policy or other reason I have missed out on? Best wishes, User:KF 14:52, Apr 14, 2005 (UTC)
:Oh I see. Thanks a lot. Clearly a misunderstanding on my part. User:KF 21:56, Apr 14, 2005 (UTC)
==Wikipedia:Meetup/Wikipedians of the East Coast field trip will be May 7/8==
The DC Meetup date has been finalized to May 7/8. Even if you can only come one of the days, that's still fine. Please watch this page for new details, which will be posted in the next couple days: Wikipedia:Meetup/Wikipedians of the East Coast field trip --brian0918">User:Brian0918">User talk:Brian0918 16:12, 24 Apr 2005 (UTC)
==Defamation claim==
Mark, FYI, see Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents#Defamation complaint. User:SlimVirginUser_talk:SlimVirgin 21:02, May 5, 2005 (UTC)
== Queen Elizabeth II ==
Please note that I have disputed the neutrality of Elizabeth II of the United Kingdom. Jguk reverted my NPOV template, claiming that the NPOV dispute is just a personal campaign of one person. User:Whig 09:15, 15 May 2005 (UTC)
== Sexual compulsion ==
Hi, I noticed you redirected Sexual Compulsion to Hypersexuality. These are not the same things. It's too early for me to think about the difference, but it's something like: sexual compulsion or sexual addiction can be related to many, many things like drug use or, an unhappy childhood, etc., while hypersexuality is associated with manic disorder. However, sexual compulsion is often a ''symptom'' of hypersexuality, although is not necessarily an ''indicator'' of hypersexuality, as the physiological aspects of sexual desire are not always present in sexual compulsion.
== Vfd: Fictional websites in Doctor Who ==
Can you have a look at Wikipedia:Votes_for_deletion/Fictional_websites_in_Doctor_Who? It's been hanging around since May 18, and I think the proposer didn't put it on the VfD page and that's why no one's noticed the consensus. I don't want to do anything as I am an interested party. Thanks. --User:Khaosworks 21:51, May 29, 2005 (UTC)
==RfA on Argyrosargyrou==
I've started a Wikipedia:Requests for arbitration on User:Argyrosargyrou. Please take a look and add any evidence you feel is relevant to Wikipedia:Requests for arbitration/Argyrosargyrou/Evidence. -- User:ChrisO 22:23, 2 Jun 2005 (UTC)
==Hellenic Genocide==
I take issue with your arbitrary decision to re-instate this article. Please discussa the Talk:Hellenic Genocide. User:DJ Clayworth 17:46, 5 Jun 2005 (UTC)
Maybe Hellenic Genocide is a little too public to have this talk. I'll restate my case here.
1) Wikipedia:Deletion policy says that a 2/3 majority is considered consensus by some; in this case the votes were 3:1 in favour of deletion.
2) If you disagree with a deletion, there is a policy for dealing with it, at Wikipedia:Votes for undeletion. You should follow it.
Please don't second-guess other admins. Also please don't say that things were deleted 'improperly'; it carries the suggestion that the rules weren't followed. User:DJ Clayworth 17:57, 5 Jun 2005 (UTC)
Thanks for your reply. No hard feelings. Nobody can keep up with all policies here. I'm going to delete the page now, and since it's been the subject of repeated recreations I'm going to create a 'blank' page and protect it. That won't affect your recreation of a redirect, when you get to it. Happy editing. User:DJ Clayworth 18:53, 5 Jun 2005 (UTC)
== University of Edinburgh ==
Is there any particular reason for misplacing the photo and creating a meaningless space between the heading ("History") and the relevant text? -- User:EagleamnUser_talk:EagleamnUser_talk:EagleamnUser_talk:Eagleamn 20:36, Jun 6, 2005 (UTC)
Well, I'm using IE6.0. The place of the image itself has not changed, however there was some space between the heading "History" and the text, so I changed the position of the image link. -- User:EagleamnUser_talk:EagleamnUser_talk:EagleamnUser_talk:Eagleamn 05:32, Jun 7, 2005 (UTC)
== Xtian punk ==
Just to let you know that I replied there. In summary you're right and I made a dubious point poorly, but see Talk:Christian punk for detail. - User:PhilipR 15:34, 10 Jun 2005 (UTC)
== Poll (Macedonian Slav or Macedonian) ==
Just to inform you about an ongoing poll here:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:Macedonian_Slavs#The_poll
Some people are lobbying for changing the article's name to Macedonian without any qualifier. As it seems, a number of those people comes from the Macedonian/Macedonian Slav wikipedia project . I thought it was only fair to attract the attention of people that _possibly_ share or represent a different point of view. I hope that this message is of interest to you, if not please accept my apologies. User:Dstork 04:28, 18 Jun 2005 (UTC)
== slight vandal problem ==
Hi, I choose you mostly at random as an administrator to help deal with a problem. The user, User:Vorash, has been making some POV edits to the article on Italo Disco. He also re-writes or erases things right after I add them to the page. We have been having discussions but he seems quite immature and doesn't compromise. He also makes many small edits in a row, leaving the history page full of a long list. I, along with other users, have told him to use the "show preview" button in order to combine his edits into one update, but he insists that he can't. His English is not so good either and he constantly adds incoherent sentences to the article. He also recently deleted the external links I added (which have been in the article for a long period) and replaced them with cheap websites that are not of good quality, and I've told him that Wikipedia is not supposed to be a web-directory. Anyway, I could keep going on, but if you take a look at the article and look at different versions in it's history, you'll see what I'm talking about. I'd like you to block him from editing just this article if possible. Or at least give him a warning and remind him how to edit correctly, and follow the rules. I realize Italo Disco is an obscure genre, so maybe another administrator is more suited to deal with this issue. But let me know what can be done. Thank you. - User:Milk 05:33, 21 Jun 2005 (UTC)
*User:Milk doesn't tell the truth, i didn't rewrite or erase things right after he added them to the page. I always try to discuss disputed issues on talk page. User:Milk doesn't want to compromise at all. He deleted all links that i have added, even so these sites contain information about Italo disco genre and Italo-Disco artists. Only after his deletion of my links, i deleted his links. Not before !!User:Vorash 11:42, 21 Jun 2005 (UTC)
Hi there,
I've replaced the original initial sentence of this entry.
In the case of this entry the construction "In medicine, delirium is a mental state for which are several definitions exist" (sic) is (grammer aside) an incoherent definition.
Since there are several definitions, the word 'delirium' must be a term. Suggesting that 'delerium is a mental state' is fine in everyday language but in an encyclopedia it is important to describe the fact that it may be used in many different ways and that there are competing theories as to what it is actually refers to.
-- User:Vaughan
-----